<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mixed views on &#8216;conscience&#8217; language in defense bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/12/19/mixed-views-on-conscience-language-in-defense-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/12/19/mixed-views-on-conscience-language-in-defense-bill/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/12/19/mixed-views-on-conscience-language-in-defense-bill/#comment-87159</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=54880#comment-87159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember the many clients of the MRFF (Military Religious Freedom Foundation).  Remember, about 75% of military Chaplains are radical evangelicals.  Don&#039;t be so naive.  The original DADT legislation, according to Pres. Clinton, was to have no witch hunts.  Look how well that turned out.  If something happens, and you are surrounded by Homophobes, you will be dead in the water.  An evangelical pay any attention to the Uniform Code of Military Justice?  Possibly, but probably not.
If Tony Perkins is happy, we should be very worried.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the many clients of the MRFF (Military Religious Freedom Foundation).  Remember, about 75% of military Chaplains are radical evangelicals.  Don&#8217;t be so naive.  The original DADT legislation, according to Pres. Clinton, was to have no witch hunts.  Look how well that turned out.  If something happens, and you are surrounded by Homophobes, you will be dead in the water.  An evangelical pay any attention to the Uniform Code of Military Justice?  Possibly, but probably not.<br />
If Tony Perkins is happy, we should be very worried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Orlando</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/12/19/mixed-views-on-conscience-language-in-defense-bill/#comment-87060</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=54880#comment-87060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This language, I thought, was already part of DoD policy. As a gay SM, I really don&#039;t see any adverse consequences for gays. Actions and speech are key: those are how Christian morals manifest themselves, and those with homophobic tones will be dealt with in accordance with EO policy and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This language, I thought, was already part of DoD policy. As a gay SM, I really don&#039;t see any adverse consequences for gays. Actions and speech are key: those are how Christian morals manifest themselves, and those with homophobic tones will be dealt with in accordance with EO policy and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/12/19/mixed-views-on-conscience-language-in-defense-bill/feed/ ) in 0.25117 seconds, on May 23rd, 2013 at 7:18 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2013 at 8:18 am UTC -->