<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White House still says marriage not a federal issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/#comment-91370</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=57207#comment-91370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOMA was a smart move for President Clinton in 1996.  Back then, there was likely enough support nationally to pass it as an amendment, and quickly ratify it, ending the marriage debate forever.  As long as DOMA is only statute, then the states can continue their experiments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOMA was a smart move for President Clinton in 1996.  Back then, there was likely enough support nationally to pass it as an amendment, and quickly ratify it, ending the marriage debate forever.  As long as DOMA is only statute, then the states can continue their experiments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truelive</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/#comment-90878</link>
		<dc:creator>Truelive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 06:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=57207#comment-90878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the issues that require a greater need of attention and importance,  i do not see a need to put this adgenda on the front burner nor should the White House.  Its not like the world is going to come to an end for same sex seekers. Lets get real!  If you want to wear a dress today, wear that dress.  If you want to wear pants tomorrow, wear pants.  There are far more policies requiring immediate attention that affect more lives than just gay people and their world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the issues that require a greater need of attention and importance,  i do not see a need to put this adgenda on the front burner nor should the White House.  Its not like the world is going to come to an end for same sex seekers. Lets get real!  If you want to wear a dress today, wear that dress.  If you want to wear pants tomorrow, wear pants.  There are far more policies requiring immediate attention that affect more lives than just gay people and their world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/#comment-90781</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=57207#comment-90781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... states not permitting all citizens to marry, violates the Equal Protection clause of the federal constitution, denying same-sex couples the same benefits, rights and privileges given to heterosexual married couples. I believe this is what the President means.
**********
Hawaiian or not, even a president has to wear credible footwear.

If that&#039;s the case-- given the WH&#039;s dance moves around Prop 8&#039;s Equal Protection argument-- President Obama&#039;s position, as stated by Carney, is not tenable-- and WAAY NOT credible. 

Worse still, the president is all but inviting SCOTUS to vote against Prop 8&#039;s Equal Protection argument with this shameful WH Press-parsing. 

Romney and his flip-flops were rejected by the voters. The WH valet should provide the president credible footwear. 

(PDQ please, as oral arguments are just about 60 days hence.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; states not permitting all citizens to marry, violates the Equal Protection clause of the federal constitution, denying same-sex couples the same benefits, rights and privileges given to heterosexual married couples. I believe this is what the President means.<br />
**********<br />
Hawaiian or not, even a president has to wear credible footwear.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case&#8211; given the WH&#8217;s dance moves around Prop 8&#8242;s Equal Protection argument&#8211; President Obama&#8217;s position, as stated by Carney, is not tenable&#8211; and WAAY NOT credible. </p>
<p>Worse still, the president is all but inviting SCOTUS to vote against Prop 8&#8242;s Equal Protection argument with this shameful WH Press-parsing. </p>
<p>Romney and his flip-flops were rejected by the voters. The WH valet should provide the president credible footwear. </p>
<p>(PDQ please, as oral arguments are just about 60 days hence.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willie Millard</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/#comment-90752</link>
		<dc:creator>Willie Millard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=57207#comment-90752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are no &quot;Federal Marriages&quot;. Each state decides on which two people can enter into marriage. The Government would have no choice but to recognize same-sex marriage if it wasn&#039;t for DOMA. DOMA was passed before any state legalized same-sex marriage. 

DOMA will fall this year and people in marriage equality states will enjoy Federal benefits only in those states. People in the military will have their same-sex marriage recognized in any state they reside.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no &#8220;Federal Marriages&#8221;. Each state decides on which two people can enter into marriage. The Government would have no choice but to recognize same-sex marriage if it wasn&#8217;t for DOMA. DOMA was passed before any state legalized same-sex marriage. </p>
<p>DOMA will fall this year and people in marriage equality states will enjoy Federal benefits only in those states. People in the military will have their same-sex marriage recognized in any state they reside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie Yildirim</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/#comment-90733</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Yildirim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=57207#comment-90733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They better not back away from this now especially after getting re-elected. It&#039;s time for DOMA to be struck down end of story!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They better not back away from this now especially after getting re-elected. It&#039;s time for DOMA to be struck down end of story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Mitton</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/#comment-90731</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Mitton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=57207#comment-90731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...And I believe you are only making excuses for him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;And I believe you are only making excuses for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madison Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/#comment-90728</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=57207#comment-90728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know, and any reasonable person knows that marriage is a civil right (Loving vs Virginia) that should apply to gays as well as straights.  But unfortunately, as has always been the case with every new kind of civil right, we have a disagreement on this one. This is why our Supreme Court needs to make clarification.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know, and any reasonable person knows that marriage is a civil right (Loving vs Virginia) that should apply to gays as well as straights.  But unfortunately, as has always been the case with every new kind of civil right, we have a disagreement on this one. This is why our Supreme Court needs to make clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madison Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/#comment-90727</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=57207#comment-90727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But that was a mistake - actually a huge scam jammed through Congress with the intent to harm gay couples; especially bi-national couples.  It should never have been a federal issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that was a mistake &#8211; actually a huge scam jammed through Congress with the intent to harm gay couples; especially bi-national couples.  It should never have been a federal issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robyn Jane Sheppard</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/#comment-90725</link>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Jane Sheppard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=57207#comment-90725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the FEDERAL congress passed DOMA, that made it a FEDERAL issue. He can&#039;t have it both ways.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the FEDERAL congress passed DOMA, that made it a FEDERAL issue. He can&#039;t have it both ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robyn Jane Sheppard</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/#comment-90726</link>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Jane Sheppard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=57207#comment-90726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the FEDERAL congress passed DOMA, that made it a FEDERAL issue. He can&#039;t have it both ways.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the FEDERAL congress passed DOMA, that made it a FEDERAL issue. He can&#039;t have it both ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/22/white-house-still-says-marriage-not-a-federal-issue/feed/ ) in 0.31108 seconds, on May 22nd, 2013 at 9:52 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2013 at 10:52 pm UTC -->