- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
Biden: ‘Wait and see’ on gay couples in immigration reform
Vice President Joe Biden said the Obama administration will “wait and see” what the Senate comes up with on immigration reform before determining whether to insist a provision for same-sex couples be included in the package, according to a report from Bloomberg News.
“We’re going to wait and see what the Senate bill and the bipartisan group presents, and we’ll make our judgments,” Biden reportedly said during an interview on Capitol Hill. “We made it clear what we think should be done, and we’ll see.”
Biden’s remarks suggest the Obama administration is closely monitoring whether language will be included in immigration reform to ensure bi-national same-sex couples can remain together in the United States — a provision Obama included in his proposal for a change in U.S. immigration law.
An official in Biden’s office clarified for the Washington Blade that Biden “was simply stating that he wanted to see specific legislation” and the White House looks forward to working with Congress as it develops a bill.
Steve Ralls, a spokesperson for the LGBT group Immigration Equality, said he interpreted Biden’s remarks to mean if language isn’t included in the initial legislation, the administration will try to find other opportunities to include gay couples in the final package.
“I take the vice president’s remarks to mean that, if Congress crafts a bill without LGBT families in it, the administration will look at opportunities, as a bill moves forward in the legislative process, to work with our allies on putting our families in,” Ralls said.
Ralls added the administration has been clear it wants bi-national same-sex couples included as part of immigration reform and expects Congress to take an active approach on the issue.
“President Obama spent considerable political capital to see ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ repealed, and he has been an integral part of ensuring [the Defense of Marriage Act's] defeat,” Ralls said. “Every recent action he has taken, and the plan he has outlined, indicates to me that we should expect the same for immigration reform.”
Obama included a provision for bi-national same-sex couples as part of the plan that he unveiled for immigration reform. The Senate framework doesn’t include such language. Although Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has said the issue hasn’t come up yet in discussions, Republicans have been dismissive of the idea.
During a forum hosted by Buzzfeed on Feb. 5, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said when asked about including language for bi-national same-sex couples in immigration reform, ”If that issue becomes a central issue in the debate, it’s just going to make it harder to get it done.”
Tagged with bi-national couples, Homepage Headlines, immigration, Immigration Equality, Joseph Biden, Marco Rubio, Steve Ralls
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.


view print edition
In the congressional house pending on the state the republican comes from they're been fairly decent with trying to be bi-partisan for once and having talks about bi-national same -sex couples instead of not doing anything at all. Usually, if they don't like something they never want to talk about it it's been surprising as of late to see some republican's talk on it or at least the ones who are capable of chewing gum and talking at the same time something most of them don't know how to do.
[Translate]
”If that issue becomes a central issue in the debate, it’s just going to make it harder to get it done.”.
It's nice to know we're reduced to just being 'issues'. Last time I checked, we're people, not ideas or abstract 'things'.
[Translate]