<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gray measures up on halting a regulatory folly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/20/gray-measures-up-on-halting-a-regulatory-folly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/20/gray-measures-up-on-halting-a-regulatory-folly/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mabel</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/20/gray-measures-up-on-halting-a-regulatory-folly/#comment-93966</link>
		<dc:creator>Mabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=59749#comment-93966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, Where&#039;s your boy Pete Rosenstein this week? Guess things are a little too hot in the ol&#039; Jimmy Graham kitchen this week after Pete&#039;s passionate, well I&#039;m kind of not sure what it was, apologia perhaps, piece on Jimmy and how well things were doing in the District in spite of him. 

Sure looks like Graham is going down.

As everybody knows you are the principal reason anyone even reads The Blade at all anymore. I would assume therefore you have influence with the powers that be. I mean where would CNN be without Anderson? At any rate, do you think you could relay a message for me to Pete and Ms. Brown and perhaps nab a carrier pigeon en-route to Baltimore? Peter Rosenstein is irrelevant and it is past time to move him off the opinion pages of this paper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, Where&#8217;s your boy Pete Rosenstein this week? Guess things are a little too hot in the ol&#8217; Jimmy Graham kitchen this week after Pete&#8217;s passionate, well I&#8217;m kind of not sure what it was, apologia perhaps, piece on Jimmy and how well things were doing in the District in spite of him. </p>
<p>Sure looks like Graham is going down.</p>
<p>As everybody knows you are the principal reason anyone even reads The Blade at all anymore. I would assume therefore you have influence with the powers that be. I mean where would CNN be without Anderson? At any rate, do you think you could relay a message for me to Pete and Ms. Brown and perhaps nab a carrier pigeon en-route to Baltimore? Peter Rosenstein is irrelevant and it is past time to move him off the opinion pages of this paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/20/gray-measures-up-on-halting-a-regulatory-folly/feed/ ) in 0.28955 seconds, on May 22nd, 2013 at 2:11 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2013 at 3:11 pm UTC -->