<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans argue DOJ can&#8217;t litigate against DOMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/house-gop-argues-doj-cant-litigate-against-doma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/house-gop-argues-doj-cant-litigate-against-doma/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: guy</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/house-gop-argues-doj-cant-litigate-against-doma/#comment-95375</link>
		<dc:creator>guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=59982#comment-95375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason is separation of power. The Presidents job is to enforce laws and Congress creates laws. If you don&#039;t like a law the Executive branch that being the President can&#039;t just ignore enforcing it because it was passed by the House, Senate, and Previous President. DOMA was signed into law by Clinton who is a Democrat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason is separation of power. The Presidents job is to enforce laws and Congress creates laws. If you don&#8217;t like a law the Executive branch that being the President can&#8217;t just ignore enforcing it because it was passed by the House, Senate, and Previous President. DOMA was signed into law by Clinton who is a Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael David Barber Moghul</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/house-gop-argues-doj-cant-litigate-against-doma/#comment-94235</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael David Barber Moghul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=59982#comment-94235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a reason for the separation of powers at the federal level.  Neither the BLAG nor the DOJ should have standing since one legislated the law and the other is charged with defending that legislation.  Only the courts and private parties injured by the Unconstiutional law should be involved in this dispute.  The legislature and it&#039;s members are charged with making laws that are Constitutional, when they fail to do this, the Courts must intervene to make whole any injuries caused by their incompetence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a reason for the separation of powers at the federal level.  Neither the BLAG nor the DOJ should have standing since one legislated the law and the other is charged with defending that legislation.  Only the courts and private parties injured by the Unconstiutional law should be involved in this dispute.  The legislature and it&#039;s members are charged with making laws that are Constitutional, when they fail to do this, the Courts must intervene to make whole any injuries caused by their incompetence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Ann Avancena</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/house-gop-argues-doj-cant-litigate-against-doma/#comment-94096</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Ann Avancena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=59982#comment-94096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For God&#039;s sake, The GOP can defend DOMA but the Executive branch can&#039;t? Gimme a break! I&#039;m no attorney, but something stinks about the conservative&#039;s logic. If the shoe were on the other foot I&#039;m sure they&#039;d see it differently, ay? 

Those wrinkly old white guys need to take a look in the mirror and remember those precious moments in church last weekend. Ask yourself old white guys, what would Jesus do?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For God&#039;s sake, The GOP can defend DOMA but the Executive branch can&#039;t? Gimme a break! I&#039;m no attorney, but something stinks about the conservative&#039;s logic. If the shoe were on the other foot I&#039;m sure they&#039;d see it differently, ay? </p>
<p>Those wrinkly old white guys need to take a look in the mirror and remember those precious moments in church last weekend. Ask yourself old white guys, what would Jesus do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USA: DOMA Update &#8211; Obama Files Brief; Republicans Argue Against Department of Justice Involvement</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/house-gop-argues-doj-cant-litigate-against-doma/#comment-94076</link>
		<dc:creator>USA: DOMA Update &#8211; Obama Files Brief; Republicans Argue Against Department of Justice Involvement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=59982#comment-94076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] On the other side, Attorney Paul Clement is claiming the DoJ doesn&#8217;t have standing to argue in this case. The Washington Blade reports: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the other side, Attorney Paul Clement is claiming the DoJ doesn&#8217;t have standing to argue in this case. The Washington Blade reports: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/house-gop-argues-doj-cant-litigate-against-doma/feed/ ) in 0.27449 seconds, on May 20th, 2013 at 1:35 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 20th, 2013 at 2:35 am UTC -->