<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge rejects Graham request for order against ethics ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/judge-rejects-graham-request-for-order-against-ethics-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/judge-rejects-graham-request-for-order-against-ethics-ruling/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Council reprimands Graham, strips duties &#124; Gay News &#124; Washington Blade - America&#039;s Leading Gay News Source</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/judge-rejects-graham-request-for-order-against-ethics-ruling/#comment-94243</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Council reprimands Graham, strips duties &#124; Gay News &#124; Washington Blade - America&#039;s Leading Gay News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=59994#comment-94243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Through his attorneys, Graham last week filed a lawsuit against the ethics board on grounds that it ... that created it by issuing an opinion on Graham’s case without holding a hearing in which Graham had the opportunity to contest the allegations and evidence used against him. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Through his attorneys, Graham last week filed a lawsuit against the ethics board on grounds that it &#8230; that created it by issuing an opinion on Graham’s case without holding a hearing in which Graham had the opportunity to contest the allegations and evidence used against him. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/judge-rejects-graham-request-for-order-against-ethics-ruling/#comment-94083</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=59994#comment-94083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Graham, as anyone who has spent 5 minutes in his presence can sense, is an imperious little snit with an outsize ego and a Helmsian attitude of superiority and exceptionalism that would make even Leona blush.  

Jim Graham has harmed everyone with whom he has ever had any contact whatsoever.

You come away from being around him feeling dirtied, as though some of the taint of him may have gotten on you.

It comes as no surprise, then, that, finally, Graham&#039;s behavior has caught up with him.  I&#039;d say it&#039;s way too late.  Think of all the money he&#039;s been paid over the years to be the awful creature that he is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Graham, as anyone who has spent 5 minutes in his presence can sense, is an imperious little snit with an outsize ego and a Helmsian attitude of superiority and exceptionalism that would make even Leona blush.  </p>
<p>Jim Graham has harmed everyone with whom he has ever had any contact whatsoever.</p>
<p>You come away from being around him feeling dirtied, as though some of the taint of him may have gotten on you.</p>
<p>It comes as no surprise, then, that, finally, Graham&#8217;s behavior has caught up with him.  I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s way too late.  Think of all the money he&#8217;s been paid over the years to be the awful creature that he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/judge-rejects-graham-request-for-order-against-ethics-ruling/#comment-94010</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=59994#comment-94010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be impossible to damage Jim Graham&#039;s reputation. 30+ years of criminal behavior leaves little reputation to damage and none of it good. To say Graham took gratuities for services rendered actually flatters his reputation of stealing from the sick and dying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be impossible to damage Jim Graham&#8217;s reputation. 30+ years of criminal behavior leaves little reputation to damage and none of it good. To say Graham took gratuities for services rendered actually flatters his reputation of stealing from the sick and dying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2013/02/22/judge-rejects-graham-request-for-order-against-ethics-ruling/feed/ ) in 0.24921 seconds, on May 23rd, 2013 at 3:55 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2013 at 4:55 am UTC -->