<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton comes out for marriage equality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/03/18/hillary-clinton-comes-out-for-marriage-equality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/03/18/hillary-clinton-comes-out-for-marriage-equality/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Robben Wainer</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/03/18/hillary-clinton-comes-out-for-marriage-equality/#comment-99266</link>
		<dc:creator>Robben Wainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=62023#comment-99266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to know how others feel about common law relationships, will they be tolerated? or will marriage be expected for gay couples to have sex?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know how others feel about common law relationships, will they be tolerated? or will marriage be expected for gay couples to have sex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Just Hillary Clinton: Why More and More Republicans Embrace Marriage &#8230; &#8211; The Nation. (blog) &#124; Feedster</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/03/18/hillary-clinton-comes-out-for-marriage-equality/#comment-98800</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Just Hillary Clinton: Why More and More Republicans Embrace Marriage &#8230; &#8211; The Nation. (blog) &#124; Feedster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=62023#comment-98800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Marriage Republican Presidential Candidate Only A Matter Of Time &#8230;Huffington PostWashington Blade&#160;-Death and Taxes&#160;-On Top Magazineall 222 news [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marriage Republican Presidential Candidate Only A Matter Of Time &#8230;Huffington PostWashington Blade&nbsp;-Death and Taxes&nbsp;-On Top Magazineall 222 news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/03/18/hillary-clinton-comes-out-for-marriage-equality/#comment-98614</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=62023#comment-98614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This deserves a &quot;better late than never&quot; plug.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This deserves a &#8220;better late than never&#8221; plug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poll: 58 percent back gay marriage &#124; Supreme Court &#124; LGBT News : Washington Blade &#8211; America&#039;s Leading Gay News Source</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/03/18/hillary-clinton-comes-out-for-marriage-equality/#comment-98584</link>
		<dc:creator>Poll: 58 percent back gay marriage &#124; Supreme Court &#124; LGBT News : Washington Blade &#8211; America&#039;s Leading Gay News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=62023#comment-98584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Hillary Clinton comes out for marriage equality [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hillary Clinton comes out for marriage equality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/03/18/hillary-clinton-comes-out-for-marriage-equality/#comment-98558</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=62023#comment-98558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the statement was well crafted -- and put the issue of equality in a broad policy context both domestically and internationally -- it strikes me as too much, too little, too late.  She starts the video extolling all the venues and events at which she stood up for &quot;gay rights&quot; -- but takes no responsibility either directly, or indirectly, for having been one of the people who impeded progress on &quot;gay rights&quot; because of her views and roll as a national and international thought leader.  She is so proud of her  &quot;Gay rights are human rights; and human rights are gay rights.&quot; statement, but thinks we forgot about the &quot;except if you want to be married&quot; part that she held onto for years.  Longer than her husband, Obama, Joe Biden, Arne Duncan, Dick Cheney, and Laura Bush for heavens sake !

Like her husband&#039;s earlier public statement that also seems to have historical amnesia -- where is the apology for having held a view, and contributed to policy, that actively perpetuated the disenfranchisement they now deplore.  It also seems like a self-serving attempt to clear the decks on her equality bona fides, prior to determining if she will run in 2016.  Really Hillary -- with all the gay love that has come your way all these years -- just NOW you are getting around to making a public statement affirming the right of gay and lesbian people to decide who they want to marry ?  Kind of late to the party, don&#039;t you think ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the statement was well crafted &#8212; and put the issue of equality in a broad policy context both domestically and internationally &#8212; it strikes me as too much, too little, too late.  She starts the video extolling all the venues and events at which she stood up for &#8220;gay rights&#8221; &#8212; but takes no responsibility either directly, or indirectly, for having been one of the people who impeded progress on &#8220;gay rights&#8221; because of her views and roll as a national and international thought leader.  She is so proud of her  &#8220;Gay rights are human rights; and human rights are gay rights.&#8221; statement, but thinks we forgot about the &#8220;except if you want to be married&#8221; part that she held onto for years.  Longer than her husband, Obama, Joe Biden, Arne Duncan, Dick Cheney, and Laura Bush for heavens sake !</p>
<p>Like her husband&#8217;s earlier public statement that also seems to have historical amnesia &#8212; where is the apology for having held a view, and contributed to policy, that actively perpetuated the disenfranchisement they now deplore.  It also seems like a self-serving attempt to clear the decks on her equality bona fides, prior to determining if she will run in 2016.  Really Hillary &#8212; with all the gay love that has come your way all these years &#8212; just NOW you are getting around to making a public statement affirming the right of gay and lesbian people to decide who they want to marry ?  Kind of late to the party, don&#8217;t you think ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2013/03/18/hillary-clinton-comes-out-for-marriage-equality/feed/ ) in 0.24373 seconds, on May 19th, 2013 at 6:12 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2013 at 7:12 am UTC -->