September 23, 2015 at 7:19 pm EDT | by Chris Johnson
Judge denies request from Kim Davis to limit order against her

Kim Davis, gay news, Washington Blade

A federal judge has denied the latest request from Rowan County (Ky.) Clerk Kim Davis. (Photo courtesy Twitter)

A federal judge has denied the latest request from Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis in litigation that remains pending against her after she was jailed for withholding marriage licenses to all couples, gay or straight, despite multiple court orders.

In a five-page decision, U.S. District Judge David Bunning, the George W. Bush-appointed judge who was responsible for finding Davis in contempt of court, denied on Wednesday her request to keep the injunction against her limited only to the couples who sued her and not other seeking marriage licenses in her Kentucky office.

“Although Plaintiffs have obtained their marriage licenses, other eligible couples have and will most certainly continue to seek licenses in Rowan County going forward,” Bunning writes. “If the Court granted Davis’ Motion to Stay at this juncture, it would essentially allow her to reinstate her ‘no marriage licenses’ policy during the pendency of the appeal and likely violate the constitutional rights of eligible couples.”

Davis, an Apostolic Christian with religious objections to same-sex marriage, filed the request after Bunning issued on Sept. 3 a clarification on his preliminary injunction ordering her to stop enforcement of the “no licenses” policy in her office. Davis maintained the clarifying the ruling applies to all couples more or less was an attempt to skirt legal analysis on plaintiffs’ pending request to expand the case into a class-action lawsuit to ensure it applies to all couples.

“Had the Court declined to clarify that its ruling applied to all eligible couples seeking a marriage license in Rowan County, it would have effectively granted Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief and left other eligible couples at the mercy of Davis’ ‘no marriage licenses’ policy, which the Court found to be in violation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, ” Bunning writes. “Such an approach would not only create piecemeal litigation, it would be inconsistent with basic principles of justice and fairness. Thus, when the need arose, the Court clarified that its ruling applied with equal force to all marriage license applicants in Rowan County, regardless of their involvement in this litigation.”

Charla Bansley, a spokesperson for social conservative Liberty Counsel, said Davis would appeal to the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The issue was one of several remaining questions pending before Bunning. After a lawyer for Deputy County Clerk Brian Mason raised questions about whether Davis continues to defy courts by altering marriage forms now being issued to couples in her office, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a brief with the court echoing that concern and calling for change the licenses to their original form. Bunning has yet to rule on that question.

h/t New Civil RIghts Movement

Chris Johnson is Chief Political & White House Reporter for the Washington Blade. Johnson attends the daily White House press briefings and is a member of the White House Correspondents' Association. Follow Chris

  • Bob Conti

    The next motion filed by Liberty Counsel and their merry band of half-wits should give rise to FRCP Rule 11 sanctions. It’s time for Mat Staver et al to get judicially roughed up a bit.

  • I have been unsuccessfully trying to find the original link to the court ruling, could someone from Washington Blade post that here. Thanks.

  • newtosf921

    and, for the 1000th time from appeals, courts, judges, judge’s orders, US Supreme Court, Davis has been given the same answer and for the next 1000 appeals, court orders, judge’s orders, etc, Ms. Davis will get the same answer. Her defiance of the law has remnants of prisoners suing over the peanut butter in prison. I just wish someone with adult powers would end this farce.

  • Mark Cichewicz

    As my husband and I watched the make believe band of legales defend the right of court clearks to discriminate in Florida as the Marriage ban crumbled, we never thought we would see it happen again as with Davis. This is old news I am sick to death of. Here is one republican who dosen’n understand the term frivolous law suit.

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2017. All rights reserved.
Blade Blast

Get the latest LGBTQ news to your inbox every Thursday!