Connect with us

Washington

Federal court upholds Wash. conversion therapy ban

State lawmakers in 2018 prohibited debunked practice for minors

Published

on

The William Kenzo Nakamura U.S. Courthouse for the 9th Circuit in Seattle. (Photo by Joe Mabel)

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit on MondayĀ rejected a therapistā€™s requestĀ for the court to reconsider its previous decision upholding Washington Stateā€™s law protecting minors from so-called conversion therapy by licensed health professionals.

Conversion therapy is a dangerous and discredited practice that attempts to change a minorā€™s sexual orientation or gender identity.

Washington prohibited licensed mental health professionals from subjecting minors to conversion therapy in 2018, as more than 20 other states have also done.

Last September, the 9th Circuit wrote: ā€œIn relying on the body of evidence before it as well as the medical recommendations of expert organizations, the Washington Legislature rationally acted by amending its regulatory scheme for licensed health care providers to add ā€˜performing conversion therapy on a patient under age eighteenā€™ to the list of unprofessional conduct for the health professions.ā€

ā€œThe 9th Circuit has affirmed that states can require licensed mental health providers to comply with ethical and professional standards prohibiting the use of unnecessary, ineffective, and harmful treatments on their minor patients,ā€ said National Center for Lesbian Rights Legal Director Shannon Minter. ā€œThese are common sense protections that unfortunately are necessary to prevent unethical therapists from defrauding parents and causing severe harm to LGBTQ youth. Every major medical and mental health organization in the country supports these laws, which are supported by decades of research and clear standards of care.ā€

ā€œWe applaud the 9th Circuit for permitting states to protect survivors like myself from the unethical practice of so-called ā€˜conversion therapy,’ which has wreaked havoc on thousands of LGBTQ youth and their families,ā€ saidĀ Mathew Shurka, a conversion therapy survivor and co-founder ofĀ Born Perfect.Ā 

In 2018, Washington passed a law prohibiting state-licensed therapists from engaging in conversion therapy with a patient under 18-years-old. Every leading medical and mental health organization in the country has warned that these practices do not work and put young people at risk of serious harm, including depression, substance abuse and suicide. Twenty-five states and more than 100 localities have laws or administrative policies protecting youth from these practices or preventing the expenditure of state funds on conversion therapy.

In 2021, an anti-LGBTQ legal group filed a federal lawsuit challenging the new law on behalf of Brian Tingley, a therapist and advocate of conversion therapy.

Tingley, who is represented by the Scottsdale, Ariz.,-based anti-LGBTQ Alliance Defending Freedom, identifies himself as a ā€œChristian licensed marriage and family therapistā€Ā and alleges in the court filings that the provided definition of ā€œconversion therapyā€ is ā€œvague, content-biased and biased against one perspective or point of view.ā€

NCLR successfully moved to intervene in the lawsuit on behalf of Equal Rights Washington, the stateā€™s largest LGBTQ civil rights organization and a primary supporter of the law during the legislative process. ERW and Washington State urged the court to uphold the law in light of the overwhelming consensus of medical and mental health professionals that conversion therapy poses a serious risk to the health and well-being of Washingtonā€™s youth. In August 2021, the federal district court for the Western District of Washington upheld the law and rejected Tingleyā€™s challenge.

In September 2022, a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit affirmed the district courtā€™s decision, ruling that state laws protecting minors from conversion therapy by licensed health professionals are constitutional. Tingley then asked the full 9th Circuit to order the September decision to be reconsidered by a larger panel of 9th Circuit judges. Today, the court rejected that request. 

The courtā€™s order means that the September 2022 panel decision upholding the Washington law will be the 9th Circuitā€™s final decision in the case.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Washington

Wis. governor vetoes ban on transgender student athletes

Tony Evers blocked measure to bar gender affirming medical care for minors

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

BY BAYLOR SPEARS | Democratic Gov. Tony Evers vetoed a Republican bill Tuesday that would have barred transgender girls from participating on girlsā€™ sports teams. 

The expected veto of AB 377 is Eversā€™ latest rejection of bills passed by Republicans that targeted LGBTQ people. Evers, who also recently vetoed a bill that would ban gender affirming medical care for minors, had repeatedly said that he wouldnā€™t sign bills that could negatively impact LGBTQ Wisconsinites.   

Evers said in his veto message that the bill and ā€œthe harmful rhetoricā€ that produced it ā€œharmsĀ  LGBTQ Wisconsinitesā€™ and kidsā€™ mental health, emboldens anti-LGBTQ harassment, bullying, and violence and threatens the safety and dignity of LGBTQ Wisconsinites, especially our LGBTQ kids.ā€Ā 

ā€œI will veto any bill that makes Wisconsin a less safe, less inclusive and less welcoming place for LGBTQ people and kids and I will continue to keep my promise of using every power available to me to defend them, protect their rights and keep them safe,ā€ Evers said.Ā 

The bill would have required schools to create three categories of teams ā€” ā€œmales,ā€ ā€œfemales,ā€ and ā€œmales and females,ā€ ā€” based on studentsā€™ sex assigned at birth. It would have specifically prohibited a ā€œmale pupilā€ from participating on a team designated for ā€œfemales.ā€

Ā The bill passed the Assembly withĀ only Republican support. When itĀ passed the Senate, state Sen. Joan Ballweg (R-Markesan) was the only Republican to join Democrats against the bill.Ā 

Evers said in his message that he was vetoing the bill because it ignored the current policy regarding trans student athletes set by the Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association, because it could conflict with current federal law and because it ā€œfails to comport with our Wisconsin values.ā€ 

ā€œI am vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to codifying discrimination into state statutes and the Wisconsin State Legislatureā€™s ongoing efforts to perpetuate hateful and discriminatory rhetoric and policies targeting LGBTQ Wisconsinites, including our transgender and gender nonconforming kids,ā€ Evers said. 

The Transgender and Non-Binary Advocacy caucus applauded Eversā€™ veto in a statement. 

Caucus co-chair state Rep. Melissa Ratcliff (D-Cottage Grove) said the ā€œharmful proposal targeted trans and nonbinary students and would have prevented them from participating in sports teams that align with their gender identity.”

ā€œIt is a sad day when discrimination and prejudice receive the overwhelming support of Republicans in the State Legislature,ā€ she continued.

******************************************************************************************

Baylor Spears

Baylor Spears is a staff reporter for the Wisconsin Examiner. Sheā€™s previously written for the Minnesota Reformer and Washingtonian Magazine. A Tennessee native, she graduated with a degree in journalism from Northwestern University in June 2022.

The preceding piece was previously published by the Wisconsin Examiner and is republished with permission.

Wisconsin Examiner is part of States Newsroom, the nationā€™s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

In Wisconsinā€™s great progressive tradition, we aim to hold the powerful accountable to the people, follow the money, and dig out the truth. Although we give you the inside scoop, we are not a publication for ā€œinsiders.ā€ Instead, we cover the way politics and government affect citizens of the state.

Continue Reading

Washington

Events roundup: Federal gov’t celebrates Pride month

Bidens to host White House Pride reception on Thursday

Published

on

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas (Photo courtesy DHS)

The White House, U.S. federal agencies, and Congress are honoring Pride month with a slate of official and unofficial events this year, many taking place this week.

Details for some events have not yet been announced, so this article will be updated when new information becomes available ā€“ such as details about the U.S. State Departmentā€™s Pride reception, which is expected to happen later this month.

  • The U.S. Department of the Interior kicked off Pride month with a celebration on June 1, where DoI Secretary Deb Haaland raised the Progress Pride Flag alongside members of Interiorā€™s LGBTQ community.
  • Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowserā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs hosted a flag raising ceremony on June 1 at the John A. Wilson Building. The Mayorā€™s Office is also sponsoring a District of Pride Showcase at the Lincoln Theatre on June 29.
  • On June 2, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security held a flag raising ceremony at the agencyā€™s headquarters with DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
  • Speaker Emerita U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) will throw out the ceremonial first pitch during the Washington Nationals Night OUT game on Tuesday, Major League Baseballā€™s longest-running annual Pride event. The Speaker will be honored this year for her advancement of LGBTQ civil rights throughout her career in Congress.
  • The U.S. Department of Defenseā€™s DoD Pride, an LGBTQ employee resource group for service members and DoD civilian employees, will hold its annual Pride month event on June 7 at the Pentagon.
  • President Joe Biden and First Lady Dr. Jill Biden are hosting a Pride month celebration on the South Lawn of the White House on June 8, which will feature a performance by singer-songwriter Betty Who.
  • The LGBTQ Victory Fundā€™s June 22 Federal PAC Reception will feature LGBTQ members of Congress: U.S. Reps. Chris Pappas (D-N.H.), Eric Sorensen (D-Ill.), Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), Mark Takano (D-Calif.), Robert Garcia (D-Calf.), and Sharice Davids (D-Kan.).
  • On June 28, Vice President Kamala Harris and Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff are hosting a reception in celebration of Pride at the Vice Presidentā€™s residence, in collaboration with GLAAD.
Continue Reading

National

Seattle Pride drops Amazon over donations to anti-LGBTQ+ politicos

ā€œThis Pride Parade is for our community to celebrate, to remember Stonewall in 1969, to continue the fight for our rights”

Published

on

Screenshot via KING 5 NBC News Seattle

The organizers and board of Seattle Pride has cut sponsorship ties with internet retail behemoth Amazon citing more than $450,000 to lawmakers who voted against the Equality Act and a demand by the Seattle-based company for naming rights to the annual LGBTQ+ Pride parade.

Seattle Pride Executive Director Krystal Marx told local media that donations to anti-LGBTQ+ Washington state politicians and the participation of anti-LGBTQ+ organizations in the company’s AmazonSmile program also factored into the decision.

Marx noted that while Amazon offered a $100,000 sponsorship buy in, which was significantly higher than past donations the company has made in previous years, there were strings attached that included a request to call the annual celebration “Seattle Pride Parade Presented by Amazon.” It felt as if Amazon was trying to buy the event and the nonprofit itself, Marx told media outlet The Seattle Times.

ā€œIt was important for us to really take a hard look at how do these values align with us,ā€ she said. ā€œThis Pride Parade is for our community to celebrate, to remember Stonewall in 1969, to continue the fight for our rights, and we donā€™t feel it was possible to accept this money.ā€

Seattle Pride also cited $11,000 in contributions Amazon made to Washington legislators who sponsored anti-LGBTQ+ and anti-transgender bills during the 2022 session, NBC News affiliate KING-TV 5 reported.

“We simply cannot partner with any organization actively harming our community through the support of discriminatory laws and politics,” Seattle Pride said in a statement

An Amazon spokesperson told KING 5 that the company works with lawmakers on a broad array of topics that impact their business, but that did not mean they agreed with “any individual or political organization 100 percent of the time on every issue.”

“This includes legislation that discriminates or encourages discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community,” a spokesperson said.  

The company went on to cite their support for Seattle Pride and LGBTQ+ issues on a national scale. 

ā€œAmazon has long supported Seattle Pride because we believe that the rights of LGBTQ+ people must be protected. We stand together with the LGBTQ+ community, were early and strong supporters of marriage equality, and are working at the U.S. federal and state level on legislation, including supporting passage of the Equality Act,” a spokesperson said. “We also work hard to offer an inclusive environment for employees and for five consecutive years weā€™ve received a perfect score on the Human Rights Campaignā€™s annual Corporate Equality Index.ā€

Seattle Pride said organizers are also “deeply concerned” about the company’s AmazonSmile program, which allows customers to donate to charities as they shop. Seattle Pride cited an investigation revealing more than 40 anti-LGBTQ+ organizations were signed up to receive funds through the program.

Amazon said an organization’s participation in the AmazonSmile program does not mean the company endorses their views.

“Itā€™s critical Amazon and other corporate partners of Seattle Pride ā€“ and for other Pride events nationally ā€“ do not allow their platforms to be used by organizations which are actively working against the rights of LGBTQIA+ people,” Seattle Pride said in their statement

When evaluating corporate sponsors, Marx says the group started from the top, with the companies that offered the largest donations and stood to benefit the most from exposure and involvement with the parade, she told the Seattle Times.

“Amazon has been a sponsor for the parade on and off since 2009. It has donated roughly $42,000 since then,” Marx said.

ā€œWe simply cannot partner with any organization actively harming our community through the support of discriminatory laws and politics. Making the decision to cut Amazon as a sponsor wasnā€™t an easy one,” Marx said, and it will affect the nonprofitā€™s finances.

********************

Seattle Pride cuts ties with Amazon, alleging company donates to anti-LGBTQ+ politicians:

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular