Health
Obama AIDS strategy targets gay, bi men
White House plan calls for shifting HIV prevention to high-risk groups

Michael Weinstein, president of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, called the proposed $30 million AIDS strategy and the $25 million proposed for ADAP grossly inadequate. Other AIDS activists disagreed with that assessment and praised President Obama’s plan. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)
A long-awaited National HIV/AIDS Strategy document the White House released this week calls for devoting more funds and attention to HIV prevention programs that target four high-risk population groups, especially gay and bisexual men.
In unusually blunt language, the 45-page strategy document that took 15 months to prepare says state and federal AIDS prevention programs have so far failed to adequately target gay and bisexual men and transgender people.
“Given the starkness and the enduring nature of the disparate impact on gay and bisexual men, it is important to significantly reprioritize resources and attention on this community,” says the document. “The United States cannot reduce the number of HIV infections nationally without better addressing HIV among gay and bisexual men.”
The document adds, “As with gay and bisexual men, transgender individuals are also at high risk for HIV infection. … Yet, historically, efforts targeting this specific population have been minimal.”
Other high-risk groups the strategy calls for targeting are blacks, Latinos and substance abusers.
The National HIV/AIDS Strategy and an accompanying 35-page Federal Implementation Plan call for reducing the overall number of new infections by at least 25 percent over the next five years; increasing access to medical care and “optimizing health outcomes” for people living with HIV; and reducing HIV-related health disparities.
“The United States will become a place where new HIV infections are rare and when they do occur, every person, regardless of age, gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, or socio-economic circumstance, will have unfettered access to high quality, life-extending care, free from stigma and discrimination,” the implementation plan declares as its goal.
The strategy and implementation document were released Tuesday amid a flurry of activity at the White House, which included a morning briefing on the document for the media and AIDS activists. Among those conducting the briefing were Melody Barnes, director of the White House Domestic Policy Council; Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services, and Jeff Crowley, the gay director of the White House Office of National AIDS Policy.
Later in the day, President Obama hosted a reception in the White House East Room for about 150 national and community activists working on HIV/AIDS issues.
“From activists, researchers, community leaders who’ve waged a battle against AIDS for so long, including many of you here in this room, we have learned what we can do to stop the spread of the disease,” Obama told the gathering.
“We’ve learned what we can do to extend the lives of people living with it. And we’ve been reminded of our obligations to one another — obligations that, like the virus itself, transcend barriers of race or station or sexual orientation or faith or nationality,” he said.
“So the question is not whether we know what to do, but whether we will do it, whether we will fulfill those obligations, whether we will marshal our resources and the political will to confront a tragedy that is preventable.”
The president was interrupted briefly during his remarks by a man in the audience who shouted, “Mr. President,” prompting Obama to promise to talk with him after finishing his speech at the reception.
“Let’s hold on, you can talk to me after — we’ll be able to talk after I speak,” Obama said. “That’s why I invited you here, right? So you don’t have to yell.”
The audience member was later identified as Charles King, president and CEO of Housing Works, a New York City-based AIDS group that sometimes organizes AIDS-related protests involving arrests spurred by civil disobedience.
After completing his remarks, the president walked to where King was standing and spoke with him as news photographers hovered over the two.
King could not be immediately reached and it was not clear what he and Obama said to each other. But his brief interruption of Obama’s speech drew attention to concerns raised by some AIDS activists that the National HIV/AIDS Strategy does not include a call for significant new funds to fight the AIDS epidemic.
At the White House briefing earlier in the day, Sebelius and Crowley announced that the Obama administration would allocate $30 million to implement the strategy from a disease prevention fund created by the Affordable Care Act. The act is one of two landmark bills that Congress passed earlier this year to put in place the president’s sweeping health insurance reform proposals.
Sebelius and Crowley also noted that the administration would arrange for a separate emergency supplemental appropriation of $25 million to fund the struggling AIDS Drug Assistance Program, which provides life-prolonging anti-retroviral drugs for low-income people with HIV/AIDS who lack health insurance.
AIDS activists have criticized the administration and Congress for declining so far to appropriate $126 million in emergency funds for ADAP this year, an amount that state AIDS office directors believe is needed to provide drugs for 2,300 people who are on ADAP waiting lists in at least a dozen states.
The AIDS Healthcare Foundation, which bills itself as the largest global AIDS organization providing medical care to people with HIV/AIDS, held a separate news conference in Washington on Tuesday to criticize the AIDS strategy document.
Michael Weinstein, the group’s president, called the proposed $30 million allocation for the National HIV/AIDS Strategy and the $25 million proposed for ADAP grossly inadequate. He also said that the strategy document contained few if any new ideas and would likely “collect dust at the Library of Congress.”
But officials with other national AIDS organizations did not share Weinstein’s assessment of the strategy, calling it an important first step and a first-of-its-kind effort to prioritize federal AIDS programs.
“Today, the Obama administration took a significant step forward in the domestic battle against HIV/AIDS,” said AIDS Action, a national AIDS advocacy group, in a statement.
The statement said that, if properly implemented, the strategy would become “the first truly effective, comprehensive national plan in response to the U.S. HIV/AIDS epidemic, now in its 30th year.”
Michael Ruppal, executive director of the AIDS Institute, another national advocacy group, praised the strategy as an “ambitious” effort to curtail the domestic U.S. AIDS epidemic.
“The strategy will serve as a meaningful roadmap to reduce the number of HIV infections in the U.S., provide care to those who need it, and help reduce the stigma and disparities often associated with HIV/AIDS,” Ruppal said.
But he added, “Now we must turn our collective energies to implementing it with the necessary leadership and resources to achieve its goals and provide results for people who are currently living with HIV/AIDS or may be affected in the future.”
Cornelius Baker, former executive director of D.C.’s Whitman-Walker Clinic and a member of Obama’s Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS, issued a statement in his role as an official with the National Black Gay Men’s Advocacy Coalition.
He said the coalition considers the National HIV/AIDS Strategy and its accompanying implementation plan “significant steps forward in our nation’s effort to end the HIV epidemic.”
“Black gay men represent one of the most highly impacted populations and suffer the greatest disproportionate burden of the disease,” Baker said. “The National HIV/AIDS Strategy represents a major advance in its recognition that black gay men must be a focal point of attention if the United States is to make progress in reversing the trends of the HIV epidemic.”
In addition to the strategy and implementation documents, Obama issued a separate presidential memorandum to the heads of more than a dozen executive branch departments and agencies, establishing goals and timetables for carrying out the strategy.
The Obama memorandum designates six departments and agencies as “lead agencies” for implementing the strategy. They include the Department of Health & Human Services; Department of Justice; Department of Labor; Department of Housing & Urban Development; Department of Veterans Affairs; and the Social Security Administration.
The White House Office of National AIDS Policy, in consultation with the Office of Management & Budget, is assigned the task of monitoring the progress of the strategy’s implementation and setting the administration’s priorities for the project, the memo says.
At the White House briefing Tuesday, Crowley acknowledged that the National HIV/AIDS Strategy doesn’t initially call for providing significant new funds in the fight against AIDS, although he and Sebelius noted that the administration is committed to continue its existing proposals for increases in the federal AIDS budget in fiscal year 2011 and future years. The two also said the expansion of health insurance coverage for people who currently can’t afford it under the Obama health care legislation passed by Congress will greatly boost treatment and care for people with HIV/AIDS between now and 2014.
Crowley said the economic downturn and other competing spending needs made it important for the strategy to focus on ways to better use existing resources.
“Gay and bisexual men have comprised the largest proportion of the HIV epidemic in the United States since the first cases were reported in the 1980s, and that has not changed,” says the strategy document. “They still comprise the greatest proportion of infections nationally.”
To further show why greater resources must immediately be shifted to HIV prevention programs aimed at gay and bisexual men, the strategy document lists these facts:
• gay and bisexual men of all races are the only group in the United States where the estimated number of new HIV infections is rising annually;
• they are 44 to 86 times more likely to become infected with HIV than other men, and 40 to 77 times more likely to become infected than women;
• approximately one-half of the 1.1 million persons living with HIV in the United States are gay and bisexual men, and they account for the majority (53 percent) of new HIV infections each year;
• and high rates of HIV among gay men are found not only in large urban areas. More than half of all AIDS cases diagnosed in the United States are among gay and bisexual men irrespective of town or city size.
Jose Zuniga, president of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care, praised the strategy document’s call for participation by non-government entities and individuals to help implement the strategy, saying more than 13,000 members of his group worldwide and more than 5,000 U.S. members “stand ready” join in the effort.
“[W]e have a ready army of seasoned advocates — public health experts, clinicians and allied healthcare and laypeople providers, AIDS service organizations, community and faith-based organizations, academic institutions, and professional associations — that can help to accelerate implementation and thus allow for more quickly achieving many of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy’s objectives,” he said.
Health
Housewives head to Capitol Hill to promote PrEP coverage
Bravo’s Real Housewives stars to lobby lawmakers for expanded PrEP access.
Stars from Bravo’s hit franchise “The Real Housewives” are heading to Capitol Hill next week to advocate for expanded access to HIV prevention and treatment.
On March 18, several well-known cast members — including NeNe Leakes, Phaedra Parks, Candiace Dillard Bassett, Erika Jayne, Luann de Lesseps, Melissa Gorga, and Marysol Patton — will travel to D.C. to participate in an advocacy event aimed at increasing awareness and coverage for pre-exposure prophylaxis, commonly known as PrEP.
The event, dubbed “Housewives on the Hill,” is being organized by MISTR, the nation’s largest telehealth platform focused on sexual health. The group’s founder and CEO, Tristan Schukraft, will join the reality television stars as they meet with lawmakers and legislative staff to discuss the importance of maintaining and expanding access to HIV prevention tools.
PrEP is a medication regimen that can, if taken properly, reduce the risk of contracting HIV through sex by up to 99 percent according to public health officials. Advocates say wider access to the medication — including through insurance coverage and telehealth services — is critical to reducing new HIV infections across the United States.
During their day on Capitol Hill, the Housewives are expected to meet with members of Congress and participate in conversations about federal policies affecting HIV prevention and treatment. Organizers say the reality stars will also share personal reflections about the continued impact of HIV on communities across the country and the importance of keeping prevention resources accessible.
The “Housewives on the Hill” event aims to use the cultural influence of the Bravo stars to spotlight HIV prevention efforts and encourage lawmakers to protect and expand access to lifesaving medication and treatment options. Organizers say the goal is simple: ensure that more Americans can access the tools they need to prevent HIV and maintain their sexual health.
Health
Too afraid to leave home: ICE’s toll on Latino HIV care
Heightened immigration enforcement in Minneapolis is disrupting treatment
Uncloseted Media published this article on March 3.
This story was produced in collaboration with Rewire News Group, a nonprofit publication reporting on reproductive and sexual health, rights and justice.
This story was produced with the support of MISTR, a telehealth platform offering free online access to PrEP, DoxyPEP, STI testing, Hepatitis C testing and treatment and long-term HIV care across the U.S. MISTR did not have any editorial input into the content of this story.
By SAM DONNDELINGER and CAMERON OAKES | For two weeks, Albé Sanchez didn’t leave their house in South Minneapolis.
“[I was] forced into survival mode,” Sanchez told Uncloseted Media and Rewire News Group (RNG). “I felt like there was an invisible wall [to the outside world] that I couldn’t cross unless I really wanted to put myself in a place where there was a chance that I might not be able to come back.”
Queer and Mexican American, Sanchez was afraid of being targeted by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement presence in their neighborhood, even though they are a U.S. citizen.
“Every day is a risk,” they say, adding that even if they have paperwork, if they fit the profile, they are a target, making it scary to go even to work or the grocery store.
Sanchez, a 30-year-old sexual health care educator, has been taking oral PrEP, the daily preventive medication for HIV, for over a decade. But the mounting stress of ICE raids has made it harder to keep up with dosing.
“A missed dose here and there pushed me to make the appointment [for something more sustainable],” they say.
Sanchez says they felt like somebody would have their back at their local clinic. It was only a 10-minute drive from where they worked, they knew its staff from previous visits and community outreach, and they could count on finding Spanish-speaking staff and providers of Latino heritage. But not everybody has had that same experience accessing care.
Since ICE’s Operation Metro Surge began in early December, an increasing number of Latino patients in Minnesota are delaying or canceling what can be lifesaving care for the prevention and treatment of HIV.
These findings are particularly alarming for Latino communities, who, as of 2023, are 72 percent more likely than the general U.S. population to be diagnosed with HIV. And while overall infections have decreased, cases among Latinos increased by 24 percent between 2010 and 2022.
“I’m very concerned that there is going to be a sharp uptick in transmission,” says Alex Palacios, a community health specialist in the Minneapolis area.
In a January 2026 declaration as part of a lawsuit seeking to end Operation Metro Surge in the days following Renee Nicole Good’s killing, the commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Health said HIV testing among Latino populations has “dropped dramatically” and that “although grantee staff continue to go into the community to promote and provide testing, people are not showing up.”
Local clinics are reporting the same thing. The Aliveness Project, a community wellness center in Minneapolis specializing in HIV care, told Uncloseted Media and RNG they have seen more than a 50 percent decrease in new clients. The clinic serves a large number of Latino and undocumented clients, and while it usually sees 750 people walk through their door each week, according to providers, it reported seeing 100 fewer people each week since December.
Red Door, Minnesota’s largest STI and HIV clinic, has had a “modest uptick” in no-shows and missed appointments since December.
What happens when treatment stops
Today, there are multiple medications available that work to prevent HIV and dozens that treat it once a person tests positive. Many people who consistently take their medication have such low levels of the virus that they can’t transmit it through sex. But becoming undetectable requires patients to stay on their medication; otherwise, the virus replicates and mutates, weakening the immune system and increasing the risk of life-threatening infections.
“If patients aren’t on their medicines consistently, HIV can learn about the medication and become resistant to them. When this happens, the medicine will not work for the patient, and the new resistant virus could potentially be passed on to others,” says George Froehle, a physician assistant and provider at Aliveness Project. “Medication adherence is one of the most important aspects of HIV care.”
To maintain care and prevent dangerous, untreatable strains from spreading in Minnesota, providers at Aliveness Project have begun delivering medication to patients when possible, offering telehealth when they can, and pausing routine lab work to limit in-person appointments.
“The most important thing we can do from a public health perspective is to keep people undetectable so they don’t transmit HIV,” Froehle says, adding that providers in other cities targeted by ICE will need to make plans for missed injection visits, pivot to telehealth and prepare their teams for the “trauma that can occur.”
Sanchez understands the risks of inconsistent treatment, which is why they opted for the injectable preventative medication.
“I have a lot of risk [to HIV in my community],” Sanchez says. “With so much uncertainty about the future and whether HIV care will remain stable, I realized I couldn’t let this opportunity pass.”
But injectable HIV treatments are commonly dosed at two weeks to six months apart, and the medication must be administered in a clinic — a setting many patients are avoiding, according to providers.
“They have a two-week window” to get their shots, according to Froehle, who added that because patients are afraid to come in person, they have had to transition people off of their injectable HIV treatments. This has caused patients to return to oral HIV treatments without the testing they would normally receive had ICE not been in Minneapolis. “[Oral treatments] weren’t super successful [for these patients] to begin with and that’s why they were on injectables.”
Oral HIV medications, too, must be taken consistently to work. In response, providers have urged patients to have their pills with them at all times in case they get deported or detained.
The caution is not unfounded. Federal immigration facilities have a history of denying adequate medical care to people living with HIV, despite internal standards that require them to comply. Since 2025, at least two men living with HIV have been denied access to their medication in a Brooklyn jail, according to lawsuits obtained by THE CITY. One man said he was only given his medication after his lips broke open and he developed an open pustule on his leg. And in January 2025, another man died of HIV complications while in ICE custody in Arizona.
Beyond being detained without proper medication, patients are at risk of being deported to countries with limited access to HIV care, like Honduras and Venezuela, experts say.
“A lot of men [from Venezuela] told me they left because it wasn’t safe to be gay there and because they struggled to access HIV care,” says Froehle. “It’s a little heartbreaking to see new folks not only face the threat of deportation, but to places where they didn’t feel safe medically or identity-wise.”
“Some of these patients will die in their home country,” says Anna Person, the chair of the HIV Medicine Association. “It’s a death sentence.”
A ‘cascading disaster’
While ICE’s presence is threatening the infrastructure of HIV care that Minneapolis has built over decades, experts say there has always been a blind spot in HIV care for the city’s Latino community.
Vincent Guilamo-Ramos, executive director of the Institute for Policy Solutions at the Johns Hopkins University of Nursing, describes HIV in Latino communities as a “cascading disaster,” the result of years of compounding inequities.
“There’s been an invisible crisis among Latinos that hasn’t gotten traction,” he says. “The numbers have consistently gone up in terms of new infections, while nationally they’ve gone down. … That should be a big alarm.”
Numbers are rising because structural barriers and stigma are preventing Latinos from receiving care. A 2022 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that between 2018 and 2020, nearly 1 in 4 Hispanic people living with HIV reported experiencing discrimination in health care settings. Lack of representation among providers, language barriers and deep-rooted medical mistrust further complicate access to care, according to Guilamo-Ramos.
Beyond the medical system, stigma within Latino communities can be equally damaging. According to Human Rights Campaign data, more than 78 percent of Latino LGBTQ youth reported experiencing homophobia or transphobia within the Latino community in 2024.
Sanchez agrees that stigma and bias are already massive barriers to care, citing the strict gender norms and Catholic beliefs many Latino communities hold. They say ICE’s presence is threatening already delicate access to HIV care.
“This has caused so much damage to people,” Sanchez says. “Not being able to access your health care appointments is such a stab in the side. … Being able to navigate any of these things in normal circumstances already has so much difficulty to it.”
Palacios, who is Afro-Latine and living with HIV, says the heightened ICE presence is worsening barriers that have long undermined the Latino community’s access to HIV care.
“The horizon has always been stark and dim,” they say. “And this just feels like one more thing to address and to fight back against.”
Sliding backwards
Navigating HIV care is becoming more difficult across the board, as the federal government has decimated HIV funding, compromising decades of progress made in the fight against the virus since Donald Trump retook office just over a year ago.
In February 2026, three months into Operation Metro Surge, the Trump-Vance administration proposed slashing $600 million in HIV-related grants, targeting four blue states, including $42 million for Minnesota programs. A federal judge has temporarily blocked the cuts.
“This would completely decimate and gut all of our HIV prevention,” says Dylan Boyer, director of development at Aliveness Project. “That’s the reality that we live in.”
“We have all the tools, and yet we are staring down this rollback of infrastructure and research dollars, prevention efforts, treatment efforts, that are going to put us squarely back in the 1980s,” says Person, a national HIV expert who grew up in Minnesota. “[There] seems to be no other rationale for that besides cruelty, to be quite frank, since there’s no scientific reason for it.”
Repair and representation
Jenny Harding, director of advancement at a Minneapolis-area supportive housing program for people living with HIV, says that while ICE’s presence is lessening in the Twin Cities, the “damage is done.”
Person says that this mending will take time, especially between the medical community and patients, since HIV providers can have a “very fragile” relationship with their clients.
“It takes, sometimes, years to build that level of trust. And I do worry that folks are just going to say, ‘I don’t feel safe here anymore. The system does not have my best interest at heart, and I’m not coming back,’” she says. “This is not something that you can flip a switch and everything will go back to normal.”
“We need to hold our federal government accountable, particularly HHS, [and] we need to ensure that HIV funding remains intact,” Guilamo-Ramos says, adding that in order to lower rates of HIV in the Latino community, there should be more specialized efforts: such as bilingual and culturally aligned health care providers, community-based outreach programs co-located where risk is highest, trust-building initiatives to address medical mistrust, mobile clinics, and targeted programs to re-engage patients who have fallen out of care.
Aliveness Project’s patient numbers have increased in the last few weeks as the ICE operation has waned, but the clinic staff is keeping “a watchful eye” and is having “difficulty reaching folks who are understandably scared.”
“Our biggest focus right now is reconnecting with people through our outreach so no one has a lapse in their HIV medications or prevention care,” Boyer, of Aliveness Project, says.
For Sanchez, seeing providers who speak Spanish and are of Latin heritage at Aliveness Project built enough trust for them to reach out and make an appointment despite the risks. Sanchez feels optimistic about their new injectable prevention strategy with the support of their clinic.
“There’s many places where you can receive care here in the Twin Cities where you might not see your skin tone. … There’s still a lot of health care professionals that unfortunately carry bias. … Aliveness is the opposite of that,” they say. “Seeing that representation and knowing someone has that cultural context of how to meet you in moments of sensitivity, it’s crucial.”
District of Columbia
Trans activists arrested outside HHS headquarters in D.C.
Protesters demonstrated directive against gender-affirming care
Authorities on Tuesday arrested 24 activists outside the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services headquarters in D.C.
The Gender Liberation Movement, a national organization that uses direct action, media engagement, and policy advocacy to defend bodily autonomy and self-determination, organized the protest in which more than 50 activists participated. Organizers said the action was a response to changes in federal policy mandated by Executive Order 14187, titled “Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation.”
The order directs federal agencies and programs to work toward “significantly limiting youth access to gender-affirming care nationwide,” according to KFF, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that provides independent, fact-based information on national health issues. The executive order also includes claims about gender-affirming care and transgender youth that critics have described as misinformation.
Members of ACT UP NY and ACT UP Pittsburgh also participated in the demonstration, which took place on the final day of the public comment period for proposed federal rules that would restrict access to gender-affirming care.
Demonstrators blocked the building’s main entrance, holding a banner reading “HANDS OFF OUR ‘MONES,” while chanting, “HHS—RFK—TRANS YOUTH ARE NO DEBATE” and “NO HATE—NO FEAR—TRANS YOUTH ARE WELCOME HERE.”
“We want trans youth and their loving families to know that we see them, we cherish them, and we won’t let these attacks go on without a fight,” said GLM co-founder Raquel Willis. “We also want all Americans to understand that Trump, RFK, and their HHS won’t stop at trying to block care for trans youth — they’re coming for trans adults, for those who need treatment from insulin to SSRIs, and all those already failed by a broken health insurance system.”
“It is shameful and intentional that this administration is pitting communities against one another by weaponizing Medicaid funding to strip care from trans youth. This has nothing to do with protecting health and everything to do with political distraction,” added GLM co-founder Eliel Cruz. “They are targeting young people to deflect from their failure to deliver for working families across the country. Instead of restricting care, we should be expanding it. Healthcare is a human right, and it must be accessible to every person — without cost or exception.”

Despite HHS’s efforts to restrict gender-affirming care for trans youth, major medical associations — including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Endocrine Society — continue to regard such care as evidence-based treatment. Gender-affirming care can include psychotherapy, social support, and, when clinically appropriate, puberty blockers and hormone therapy.
The protest comes amid broader shifts in access to care nationwide.
NYU Langone Health recently announced it will stop providing transition-related medical care to minors and will no longer accept new patients into its Transgender Youth Health Program following President Donald Trump’s January 2025 executive order targeting trans healthcare.
