National
Gay bishop gives update on acceptance in his denomination
Anglican leader Gene Robinson says U.S. church showing increasing signs of acceptance
In 2003, Gene Robinson became the world’s first openly gay person to be ordained as a bishop in a major Christian denomination.
His elevation to the post of Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New
Hampshire created an international furor within the Episcopal Church
and prompted thousands of clergy and lay people to leave the church in
the U.S.
Robinson, 63, spoke to the Blade following an appearance before D.C.’s
St. Thomas’s Parish, an Episcopal congregation in Dupont Circle in the
process of rebuilding its church destroyed by arson in 1970.
He noted that lesbian Canon Mary Douglas Glasspool’s election as
bishop earlier this year in the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles
resulted in far less controversy than his election seven years
earlier, indicating a gradual acceptance of gays in church leadership
positions.
Blade: You spoke tonight about the importance of the community
getting involved in the effort to build a new church building for St.
Thomas Parish. Do you have any message for the broader LGBT community
here in Washington about the benefit of this church and what
they might do to help?
Robinson: You know, asking an LGBT person to go back to the church
that has been the source of so much pain and abuse is a little like
asking an abused spouse to go back to her husband. The fact of the
matter is in many places the church is changing. And the church
realizes that for years it got it wrong about LGBT people. And what I
love about St. Thomas’ Parish is that it is really leading the way in
that kind of radically inclusive message. And it doesn’t stop with
LGBT people. It reaches out to really all of God’s children. And so I
would say to the gay community, take another look. The church you left
may be different now. And certainly St. Thomas is modeling I think the
kind of inclusive love that God is all about. And those who would use
the church or use scripture, be it the Hebrew scriptures or the
Christian scriptures, to beat us over the head, they’ve gotten it
wrong and it’s time that we rediscover God’s love in the middle of all
that.
Blade: While you’re here in D.C. can you give a brief update on
where things stand with the Episcopal Church, including your
situation?
Robinson: Well, there’s never been any question about my situation. I
was duly elected and consented to and consecrated. So there’s never
been any question about whether I would continue. What I can say is
over the last seven years I think you have seen the Episcopal Church
make dramatic steps forward. I think they consented to my election in
2003. In 2006 at our national gathering we sort of put things on hold
to figure out if what the rest of the world was saying us us — that we
were crazy and unfaithful in consecrating an openly gay person. We
stopped to consider and listen. But last summer, in 2009, when we
gathered, it was very clear that the Episcopal Church had made up its
mind that, in fact, it was being the church that God was calling it to
be and that we’re going to move forward. And of course in the ensuing
year we’ve seen the election and consecration of another openly
lesbian person at this point in time in Los Angeles. And my sense from
– even the bishops and people who might have liked to see it go a
different way have realized that this is who the Episcopal Church is
going to be and they’re ready to get on with it. And you haven’t seen
near the controversy over the consecration of the second openly gay
bishop as you saw with mine. And I think it just shows how far we’ve
come in seven years.
Blade: Is there some sort of schism taking place?
Robinson: Well you know, if you just read the headlines you would
think that it was virtually a 50-50 split in our church. The fact of
the matter is out of a little better than two million members, only
about a hundred thousand have left. And that’s their count, that’s how
many they claim have left the Episcopal Church.
Blade: Is it the U.S. Episcopal Church you’re talking about?
Robinson: Yeah, the U.S. church. And so we’ve seen the departure of
some 100,000 people who just can’t believe this is God’s will. But for
the most part the U.S. Episcopal Church is alive and well and moving
forward. And as I think you’ll see the same thing worldwide in the
Anglican community. There are many African and Asian Episcopal
dioceses who still don’t understand what we did. But more and more of
them are saying to us, “We don’t understand this. We don’t agree with
it. But you know we have people dropping dead of malaria and AIDS and
of severe abject poverty. We have women and children being abused.
This is so far down our priority list. We’re just going get on with
being the church.” And so I think at the end of the day we’re going to
be just fine, both internally in the Episcopal Church and the
worldwide community. That doesn’t mean there won’t still be
controversy. People will still be uncomfortable. But that’s O.K. It’s
going to take a little while to get used to it.
Tennessee
Tenn. lawmakers pass transgender “watch list” bill
State Senate to consider measure on Wednesday
The Tennessee House of Representatives passed a bill last week to create a transgender “watch list” that also pushes detransition medical treatment. The state Senate will consider it on Wednesday.
House Bill 754/State Bill 676 has been deemed “ugly” by LGBTQ advocates and criticized by healthcare information litigators as a major privacy concern.
The bill would require “gender clinics accepting funds from this state to perform gender transition procedures to also perform detransition procedures; requires insurance entities providing coverage of gender transition procedures to also cover detransition procedures; requires certain gender clinics and insurance entities to report information regarding detransition procedures to the department of health.”
It would require that any gender-affirming care-providing clinics share the date, age, and sex of patients; any drugs prescribed (dosage, frequency, duration, and method administered); the state and county; the name, contact information, and medical specialty of the healthcare professional who prescribed the treatment; and any past medical history related to “neurological, behavioral, or mental health conditions.” It would also mandate additional information if surgical intervention is prescribed, including details on which healthcare professional made a referral and when.
HB 0754 would also require the state to produce a “comprehensive annual statistical report,” with all collected data shared with the heads of the legislature and the legislative librarian, and eventually published online for public access.
The bill also reframes detransitioning as a major focus of gender-affirming healthcare — despite studies showing that the number of trans people who detransition is statistically quite low, around 13 percent, and is often the result of external pressures (such as discrimination or family) rather than an issue with their gender identity.
This legislation stands in sharp contrast to federal protections restricting what healthcare information can be shared. In 1996, Congress passed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, requiring protections for all “individually identifiable health information,” including medical records, conversations, billing information, and other patient data.
Margaret Riley, professor of law, public health sciences, and public policy at the University of Virginia, has written about similar efforts at the federal level, noting the Trump-Vance administration’s push to subpoena multiple hospitals’ records of gender-affirming care for trans patients despite no claims — or proof — that a crime was committed.
It has “sown fear and concern, both among people whose information is sought and among the doctors and other providers who offer such care. Some health providers have reportedly decided to no longer provide gender-affirming care to minors as a result of the inquiries, even in states where that care is legal.” She wrote in an article on the Conversation, where she goes further, pointing out that the push, mostly from conservative members of the government, are pushing extracting this private information “while giving no inkling of any alleged crimes that may have been committed.”
State Rep. Jeremy Faison (R-Cosby), the bill’s sponsor, said in a press conference two weeks ago that he has met dozens of individuals who sought to transition genders and ultimately detransitioned. In committee, an individual testified in support of the bill, claiming that while insurance paid for gender-affirming care, detransition care was not covered.
“I believe that we as a society are going to look back on this time that really burst out in 2014 and think, ‘Dear God, What were we thinking? This was as dumb as frontal lobotomies,’” Faison said of gender-affirming care. “I think we’re going to look back on society one day and think that.”
Jennifer Levi, GLAD Law’s senior director of Transgender and Queer Rights, shared with PBS last year that legislation like this changes the entire concept of HIPAA rights for trans Americans in ways that are invasive and unnecessary.
“It turns doctor-patient confidentiality into government surveillance,” Levi said, later emphasizing this will cause fewer people to seek out the care that they need. “It’s chilling.”
The Washington Blade reached out to the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee, which shared this statement from Executive Director Miriam Nemeth:
“HB 754/SB 676 continues the ugly legacy of Tennessee legislators’ attacks on the lives of transgender Tennesseans. Most Tennesseans, regardless of political views, oppose government databases tracking medical decisions made between patients and their doctors. The same should be true here. The state does not threaten to end the livelihood of doctors and fine them $150,000 for safeguarding the sensitive information of people with diabetes, depression, cancer, or other conditions. Trans people and intersex people deserve the same safety, privacy, and equal treatment under the law as everyone else.”
Iran
LGBTQ groups condemn Trump’s threat to destroy Iranian civilization
Ceasefire announced less than two hours before Tuesday deadline
The Council for Global Equality is among the groups that condemned President Donald Trump on Tuesday over his latest threats against Iran.
Trump in a Truth Social post said “a whole civilization will die tonight” if Tehran did not reach an agreement with the U.S. by 8 p.m. ET. on Tuesday.
Iran is among the handful of countries in which consensual same-sex sexual relations remain punishable by death.
Israel and the U.S. on Feb. 28 launched airstrikes against Iran.
One of them killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iran in response launched missiles and drones against Israel and other countries that include Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Azerbaijan, and Cyprus.
Gas prices in the U.S. and around the world continue to increase because the war has essentially closed the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway that connects the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman through which roughly 20 percent of the world’s crude oil passes.
Trump less than 90 minutes before his deadline announced a two-week ceasefire with Iran that Pakistan helped broker.
“We the undersigned human rights, humanitarian, civil liberties, faith-based and environmental organizations, think tanks and experts are deeply alarmed by President Trump’s threat regarding Iran that ‘a whole civilization will die tonight’ if his demands are not met. Such language describes a grave atrocity if carried out,” reads the statement that the Council for Global Equality more than 200 other organizations and human rights experts signed. “A threat to wipe out ‘a whole civilization’ may amount to a threat of genocide. Genocide is a crime defined by the Genocide Convention and by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court as committing one or more of several acts ‘with intent to destroy in whole or in part a national, racial or religious groups as such.'”
The statement states “the law is clear that civilians must not be targeted, and they must also be protected from indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks.”
“Strikes on civilian infrastructure — such as the recent attack on a bridge and the attacks President Trump is repeatedly threatening to carry out to destroy power plants — have devastating consequences for the civilian population and environment,” it reads.
“We urge all parties to respect international law,” adds the statement. “Those responsible for atrocities, including crimes against humanity and war crimes, can and must be held accountable.”
The Alliance for Diplomacy and Justice, Amnesty International USA, Human Rights Watch, the American Civil Liberties Union, the NAACP, MADRE, and the Robert and Ethel Kennedy Human Rights Center are among the other groups that signed the letter.
National
Glisten’s 30th annual Day of Silence to take place April 10
Campaign began as student-led protests against anti-LGBTQ bullying, discrimination
Glisten’s 30th annual Day of Silence will take place on April 10.
The annual Day of Silence began as a student-led protest in response to bullying and discrimination that LGBTQ students face. It is now a national campaign for the LGBTQ community and their allies to come together for LGBTQ youth.
It takes place annually and has multiple ways for supporters to get involved in the movement.
Glisten, originally GLSEN, champions LGBTQ issues in schools, grades K-12. Glisten’s mission is to create more inclusive and accepting environments for LGBTQ students through curriculum, supportive measures, education campaigns, and engagement, such as the Day of Silence.
There are three main ways for the community to get involved in the Day of Silence.
Glisten has a Day of Silence frame, a series of pictures used as profile photos across social media that feature individuals holding signs. The signs allow for personalization, by providing a space to put the individual’s name, followed by filling in the prompt “ … and I am ENDING the silence by…”
Participants are encouraged to post the photo on social media and use it as a profile picture. The templates can be found on Google Drive through this link.
Using #DayOfSilence and #NSCS, as well as tagging Glisten’s official Page @glistencommunity, is another way to participate in the Day of Silence.
Glisten also encourages participants to tag creators, friends, family and use a call to action in their caption, to call attention to the facts and stories behind the Day of Silence.
“Today’s administration in the U.S. wants us to stay silent, submit to their biased and hurtful conformity, and stop fighting for our right to be authentically ourselves,” said Glisten CEO Melanie Willingham-Jaggers. “We urge supporters to use their social platforms and check in with local chapters to be boots on the ground to help LGBTQ+ students feel seen, heard, supported, and less alone. By participating in the ‘Day of Silence,’ you are showing solidarity with young people as they navigate identity, safety, and belonging. Our voices matter.”
