Arts & Entertainment
Husband caught with gay lover on ‘What Would You Do?’
diners were faced with decisions beyond the menu

(Screenshot via YouTube)
Customers in an Atlanta barbecue restaurant had to choose whether to destroy a four-year marriage because of a cheating husband’s secret affair with a gay lover on the latest episode of “What Would You Do?” on ABC.
Actors depicting a husband and wife were seated near unsuspecting diners to pretend that it was their anniversary. After appearing like a happy couple, the wife gets up and leaves the table. While she’s gone another man enters the restaurant and kisses the husband making it clear that they are in a relationship. The husband tells the man he needs to go because his wife is there and when the wife returns she has no idea that her husband is having a secret affair.
Reactions to the situation were varied. No one appeared homophobic about the affair but were more interested that there was an affair at all.
One woman decides to approach the husband and convince him to tell his wife he’s cheating. Another man keeps quiet, but can’t help laughing to himself. A husband and wife are shocked by the situation, but decide to not get involved.
One woman tries to get the husband to reveal his secret saying he owes it to his wife and to his boyfriend if he really loves him. When the husband still won’t share, the woman tells the wife he is having an affair with a man.
Watch how it plays out below.
Television
Repression, toxic masculinity fuel intense queer drama āHalf Manā
A solidly crafted, well-acted, fascinating binge watch
In 2024, when Richard Gaddās āBaby Reindeerā became a stock-boosting hit for Netflix, there were few Americans who knew his name.
In the UK, however, the Scottish writer/comedian/actor had already emerged as a talent to be reckoned with, blending autobiographical stand-up comedy with theater to create a reputation as an edgy and provocative creator whose shows tended to be equal parts divisive and successful. One of these, his fictionalized true-life story of being stalked and sexually harassed by a female fan, became an Olivier Award-winning hit in the London theater; that was āBaby Reindeer,ā and ā in the form of a seven-episode miniseries adaptation ā it became the vehicle that carried him to wider fame.
Two years later, Gadd has returned with another high-profile miniseries, this time for HBO Max, and like its predecessor, itās a story that deals with queer sexual repression, unhealthy attachments, and a central relationship that can safely be described without exaggeration as ātoxicā ā and itās an even darker (and more twisted) ride that stretches across decades.
āHalf Man,ā which debuted on April 23 and continues with one episode per week through May 14, is the story of two ābrothersā ā Niall (Jamie Bell) and Ruben (Gadd) ā whose mothers (Neve McIntosh and Marianne McIvor) have become a lesbian couple after leaving their relationships with the boysā respective fathers. They are seeming opposites in personality; Niall is quiet, sensitive, and secretly unsure about his sexuality, while Ruben is tough, rebellious, and prone to violence ā and unsurprisingly, itās a match made in hell.
We meet them at the top of the first episode as adults, on the day of Niallās wedding, when Ruben shows up without warning; his appearance triggers what looks like fear in his ābrother from another lover,ā and a private meeting between them in a barn at the wedding site turns ugly, launching a flashback format that takes us back to their schooldays, when young Ruben (Stuart Campbell) ā already in trouble with the law and trying for a new start ā comes home from juvenile detention to become roommate, protector, and bully to young Niall (Mitchell Robertson), all in one.
Itās the dawn of a new and epic relationship, despite a history that has made Niall terrified of the older boy; their seemingly opposite qualities somehow mesh into a kind of symbiotic bubble, in which a tense equilibrium turns them into unlikely allies. Ruben makes sure Niall has nothing to fear from the sniggering schoolyard homophobes who target him, and Niall helps Ruben pass the tests he needs to pass in order to stay in school, Nevertheless, their dynamic is equal parts surprisingly tender and alarmingly lopsided. Though they form a bond, itās a volatile one, and by the end of episode one ā after an uncomfortable-to-watch late night incident that amounts to a sexual assault ā there is little doubt that Ruben is a psychopath. By then, however, itās too late; Niall has become hopelessly ensnared by his manipulations, and their dangerous attachment has taken permanent root.
In episode two, the timeline moves the past forward several years (while rolling the wedding-day story back a few hours as well), bringing Niall forward to his college years. Ruben is once again absent from his life, but the bond is still deep. He struggles to make connections in his new setting ā including with another student, the openly gay Alby (Bilal Hasna), who recognizes a side of him that he has still yet to accept for himself. Though he gradually begins to adapt to his new social circle, his insecurities get the better of him ā and despite warnings from his mother not to do so, he calls Ruben to come and visit. His arrival triggers another escalating series of incidents, this time entangling Niallās new friends and culminating in a shocking, jealous-fueled explosion of violence.
Without going on with the story ā after all, the two remaining episodes have yet to be released, so we wouldnāt want to spoil anything ā itās safe to say thereās a pattern here, and itās intentional.
Gadd has already been public about his own struggles with repression, which were directly explored (albeit fictionally) in āBaby Reindeer,ā and itās clear that he had more to say about the effects they had on his life and identity.
As he put it himself, in an interview with the Hollywood Reporter, āThemes of, I guess, masculinity, or what it means to be a man, or āIāve gone through a masculinity crisisā come into [the show] probably because Iāve been through that in my life, and I feel I can write to it and speak to it.
āI always think that the best kind of art is kept close to your chest, kept close to your heart, kept close to your experiences, and I guess with āHalf Man,ā thereās a lot in it that I relate to. Itās not an autobiographical piece by any stretch, itās purely fiction, but it certainly borrows from themes and struggles and issues that I understand.ā
That understanding translates to the series through its focus on tracing the roots of Niall and Rubenās relationship by methodically tracking the cause-and-effect chain that links the major events of their lives together. It explores the contradictory combination of worship and terror, the transgressive eroticism that intertwines danger and desire, the power of the forbidden to make us want it more, and the self-loathing that punishes itself through violence toward others. The inverted framework of the storytelling, which works both forward and back to meet at (we assume) some definitive point, makes following it a bit like putting together a puzzle, which also has the effect of building suspense as we wait to see the āmoment of truth.ā
Of course, those who prefer a more straightforward narrative might not appreciate the additional challenge, especially when the subject matter ā which revolves around experiences, feelings, and behavior that might be entirely unfamiliar to many audiences ā is challenging enough by itself, in its own way. Likewise, and for much the same reason, there will be viewers who are unable to relate to its characters, as some of the showās less-favorable reviews have pointed out.
But it would be naive to assume that the themes in āHalf Manā ā of fragile masculinity, internalized homophobia, misdirected rage, nihilistic rebellion, conflicted desires, projected shame, and the other ingredients that infuse this shadow-boxing psychodrama with such a distinctive musky odor ā do not apply to more men in todayās culture of incels, ālooksmaxxers,ā and āthe Man-o-sphereā than any of them would like to admit. Weād wager that its portrait of a same-sex, sub/Dom, borderline incestuous relationship might resonate more urgently there than within a queer community that has been grappling with those issues for generations already and are just waiting for everybody else to catch up.
In any case, Gaddās newest variation on a theme is a solidly crafted, well-acted, and hypnotically fascinating (if sometimes uncomfortable) exercise in the kind of ācanāt look awayā drama that makes for a perfect binge watch. Or, at least, it will once all the episodes drop.
The Miss Gay Western Maryland pageant was held at The Lodge in Boonsboro, Md. on Friday, May 1. Maria R. Posa was crowned the winner withĀ Aura Fixation named first alternate. Both winners are qualified to compete in the 2026 Miss Gay Maryland America pageant.
(Washington Blade photos by Michael Key)














Arts & Entertainment
A reign defined by commitment and human impact
Nicole Murray Ramirez defined era in International Imperial Court System
Writing about the reign of Nicole Murray Ramirez and the close leadership of King Father Terry Sidie requires far more than listing achievements, because what has been built over these years cannot be reduced to titles, ceremonies, or public recognition. It must be understood as the result of a sustained vision rooted in service, memory, solidarity, and the real ability to build bridges within and beyond the LGBTQ community.
At this point, looking back and assessing this period means acknowledging that this was not just another chapter in the history of the International Imperial Court System. It was a time shaped by far-reaching initiatives, a clear commitment to concrete causes, and a style of leadership that moved confidently between symbolic representation and public action. In that context, Nicole Murray Ramirezās announcement that her reign will conclude in February 2027, along with the coronation of the person who will assume the throne as the new Queen Mother of the Americas, should not be read simply as the end of an era, but as a moment to fully recognize what has been built while also understanding that a new chapter is about to begin.
One of the most defining aspects of this reign has been its understanding that visibility alone is not enough. Visibility matters, but it only becomes meaningful when it leads to action, support, and measurable change. That has been a consistent strength of the work led by Nicole Murray Ramirez alongside key figures such as Terry Sidie.
The Jose Nicole Terry Scholarship and Educational Fund reflects that commitment. Reaching $400,000 is significant, but what matters most is what that represents in terms of opportunity and access.
This leadership also prioritized historical memory through initiatives like the National LGBTQ Wall of Honor at the Stonewall Inn and the recognition of Jose Julio Sarria.
Efforts such as the Harvey Milk postage stamp, the USNS Harvey Milk, and multiple recognitions for Sarria reflect a sustained commitment to public recognition and justice.
International outreach, financial support to global causes, advocacy for transgender communities, and engagement with organizations beyond national borders further define this period.
The expansion into Canada and the opening of a new chapter that includes Puerto Rico highlight the evolving nature of this leadership. The upcoming June coronation marks an important step in that direction.
Acknowledging that the reign was not perfect does not weaken its legacy. It reinforces its authenticity.
This was not an individual effort. It was collective work supported by a broad network.
As the transition toward Feb. 5, 2027, continues, what remains is a legacy built on action, commitment, and responsibility.
-
Theater4 days agoDiverse cast tackles āAguardienteā at GALA Hispanic Theatre
-
Russia4 days agoUnder new extremism laws, LGBTQ Russians must fight to survive
-
Books4 days agoNew books reveal style trends for a more enlightened century
-
Commentary3 days agoHow do you vote a child out of their future?
