Connect with us

National

Freedom to Marry launches campaign to bolster same-sex marriage support among conservatives

Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) attended campaign kick-off event

Published

on

Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) (Official U.S. Congressional Portrait)

Freedom to Marry on Tuesday formally launched a new campaign designed to bolster support of nuptials for same-sex couples among conservatives.

Members of Young Conservatives for the Freedom to Marry will work to pass state laws that allow same-sex marriage and lobby lawmakers on Capitol Hill to support a bill that would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act. The campaign also seeks to highlight conservatives who can effectively discuss marriage rights for gays and lesbians in the media.

“I am a conservative and as a conservative I believe in limited government and limited government isn’t something that takes rights away from our friends and family,” said Craig Stowell, Republican co-chair of Standing Up for New Hampshire Families, at the campaign’s kick-off event at the Capitol Hill Club in Southeast Washington. “The government shouldn’t be managing the personal lives of any decent law abiding citizen in any state.”

Tyler Deaton of the New Hampshire Young Republicans and New Hampshire Republicans for Freedom and Equality; Nicole Neily, vice president of Dezenhall Resources, former Republican National Convention staffer Madeline Koch, Sarah Longwell of the D.C. communications firm Berman and Company, Torrey Shearer and Will Rinehart were the members of the Young Conservatives for the Freedom to Marry Leadership Committee also attended the D.C. event. CNN commentator Margaret Hoover is also a member of the campaign’s leadership committee.

Stowell, a former Marine, became emotional as he discussed the struggles he said his gay brother Calvin experienced growing up.

“There were nights that I worried that he wouldn’t be around when I woke up in the morning, but you know what, he pulled through it and he has always been there for me,” he said. “When I got married, he was my best man. And when I had a daughter, he stepped up to be the godfather. And I want to be able to be there for him in those moments in life.”

Florida Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who is the only GOP sponsor of the DOMA repeal bill — the Respect for Marriage Act — also spoke.

“This is more than just about sexual orientation, it’s about the fundamental rights that we all share as Americans,” she said. “It’s bad enough we have to deal with the over-regulation of our economy. No one should have to deal with the government red tape when it comes to committing themselves to those whom they love. So with your help, our country will indeed continue on its path towards that most perfect union for each and every one of us.”

An NBC/Wall Street Journal poll in March showed that support for marriage rights for same-sex couples among Republicans has grown by 41 percent since 2009. A survey that ABC News and the Washington Post conducted shortly after President Obama publicly backed nuptials for gays and lesbians in May indicated that 46 percent of self-identified Republicans between 18-44 support same-sex marriage.

Stowell and others pointed to the 119 Republicans in the New Hampshire House who voted against a bill in March that would have struck down the state’s same-sex marriage law as further proof that support for this issue continues to grow. “We worked hard to preach our values of the state that freedom means freedom for everyone and that 2,000 loving and committed gay and lesbian couples that married in our state only makes it stronger,” Stowell told the Blade. “We made the case strongly. Our opponents invested millions of dollars, but you know what, we beat them overwhelmingly in a Republican super-majority by a 2-1 margin. It doesn’t get any better than that.”

Ros-Lehtinen, who has a transgender son, told the Blade that she remains optimistic that Young Conservatives for the Freedom to Marry and other efforts will spur more of her GOP colleagues to support the repeal of DOMA and back relationship recognition for same-sex couples.

“It’s a whole new image for Republicans and we’ve got to win the hearts and minds of the next generation,” she stressed. “The Republicans can’t be the party of middle age and beyond.”

R. Clarke Cooper, executive director of Log Cabin Republicans, shared a similar view.

“There’s now compelling data to prove that this is an issue that we’re going to win on,” he said, referring to polls that continue to indicate support for marriage rights for same-sex couples among younger Republicans in particular continues to grow. “If we don’t move forward on this particular issue within the conservative ranks within the Republican Party, it will have a diminishing effect on the party.”

Robert Kabel, chair of the D.C. Republican Committee, and Robert Turner, II, president of the D.C. Chapter of Log Cabin Republicans, were also among those who attended the campaign kick-off event.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

National

Advocacy groups issue US travel advisory ahead of World Cup

Renee Good’s death in Minneapolis among incidents cited

Published

on

(Photo by fifg/Bigstock)

More than 100 organizations have issued a travel advisory for the U.S. ahead of the 2026 World Cup.

The World Cup will take place in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico from June 11-July 19.

“In light of the deteriorating human rights situation in the United States and in the absence of meaningful action and concrete guarantees from FIFA, host cities, or the U.S. government, the undersigned organizations are issuing this travel advisory for fans, players, journalists, and other visitors traveling to and within the United States for the June 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup. World Cup games will be played in 11 different cities across the United States, which, like many localities, have already been the target of the Trump administration’s violent and abusive immigration crackdown,” reads the advisory that the Council for Global Equality and other groups that include the American Civil Liberties Union issued on April 23.  “The impacts of these policies vary by locality.”

“While the Trump administration’s rising authoritarianism and increasing violence pose serious risks to all, those from immigrant communities, racial and ethnic minority groups, and LGBTQ+ individuals have been and continue to be disproportionately targeted and affected by the administration’s policies and, as such, are most vulnerable to serious harm when traveling to and/or within the United States,” it adds. “This travel advisory calls on fans, players, journalists, and other visitors to exercise caution.”

The advisory specifically mentions Renee Good.

A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent on Jan. 7 shot and killed her in Minneapolis. Good, 37, left behind her wife and three children.

The full advisory can be read here.

Continue Reading

State Department

Democracy Forward files FOIA request for State Department bathroom policy records

April 20 memo outlined anti-transgender rule

Published

on

(Photo courtesy of the Library of Congress)

Democracy Forward on Tuesday filed a Freedom of Information Act request for records on the State Department’s new bathroom policy.

A memo titled “Updates Regarding Biological Sex and Intimate Spaces, Including Restrooms” that the State Department issued on April 20 notes employees can no longer use bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity.

“The administration affirms that there are two sexes — male and female — and that federal facilities should operate on this objective and longstanding basis to ensure consistency, privacy, and safety in shared spaces,” State Department spokesperson Tommy Piggot told the Daily Signal, a conservative news website that first reported on the memo. “In line with President Trump’s executive order this provides clear, uniform guidance to the department by grounding policy in biological sex as determined at birth.”

President Donald Trump shortly after he took office in January 2025 issued an executive order that directed the federal government to only recognize two genders: male and female. The sweeping directive also ordered federal government agencies to “effectuate this policy by taking appropriate action to ensure that intimate spaces designated for women, girls, or females (or for men, boys, or males) are designated by sex and not identity.”

Democracy Forward’s FOIA request that the Washington Blade exclusively obtained on Tuesday is specifically seeking a copy of the memo that details the State Department’s new bathroom policy. Democracy Forward has also requested “all” memo-specific communications between the State Department’s Bureau of Global Public Affairs and the Daily Signal from April 1-21.

Continue Reading

Federal Government

House Republicans push nationwide ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill

Measures would restrict federal funding for LGBTQ-affirming schools

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Republicans have been gaining ground in reshaping education policy to be less inclusive toward LGBTQ students at the state level, and now they are turning their focus to Capitol Hill.

Some GOP lawmakers are pushing for a nationwide “Don’t Say Gay” bill, doubling down on their commitment to being the party of “traditional family values” by excluding anyone who does not identify with their sex at birth.

The largest anti-LGBTQ education legislation to reach the House chamber is House Bill 2616 — the Parental Rights Over the Education and Care of Their Kids Act, or the PROTECT Kids Act. The PROTECT Kids Act, proposed by U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), and co-sponsored by U.S. Reps. Burgess Owens (R-Utah), Mary Miller (R-Ill.), Robert Onder (R-Mo.), and Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.), would require any public elementary and middle schools that receive federal funding to require parental consent to change a child’s gender expression in school.

The bill, which was discussed during Tuesday’s House Rules Committee hearing, would specifically require any schools that get federal money from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 — which was created to minimize financial discrepancies in education for low-income students — to get parental approval before identifying any child’s gender identity as anything other than what was provided to the school initially. This includes getting approval before allowing children to use their preferred locker room or bathroom.

It reads that any school receiving this funding “shall obtain parental consent before changing a covered student’s (1) gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on any school form; or (2) sex-based accommodations, including locker rooms or bathrooms.”

LGBTQ rights advocates have criticized both national and state efforts to require parental permission to use a child’s preferred gender identity, as it raises issues of at-home safety — especially if the home is not LGBTQ-affirming — and could lead to the outing of transgender or gender-curious students.

A follow-up bill, HB 2617, proposed by Owens, one of the bill’s co-sponsors, prevents the use of federal funding to “advance concepts related to gender ideology,” using the definition from President Donald Trump’s 2025 Executive Order 14168, making that an enshrined definition in law of sex rather than just by executive order. There is also a bill making its way through the senate with the same text— Senate Bill 2251.

Advocates have also criticized this follow-up legislation, as it would restrict school staff — including teachers and counselors — from acknowledging trans students’ identities or providing any support. They have said that this kind of isolation can worsen mental health outcomes for LGBTQ youth and allows for education to be politicized rather than being based in reality.

David Stacy, the Human Rights Campaign’s vice president of government affairs, called this legislation out for using LGBTQ children as political pawns in an ideology fight — one that could greatly harm the safety of these children if passed.

“Trans kids are not a political agenda — they are students who deserve safety and affirmation at school like anyone else,” Stacy said in a statement. “Despite the many pressing issues facing our nation, House Republicans continue their bizarre obsession with trans people. H.R. 2616 does not protect children. It targets them. This bill is cruel, and we’re prepared to fight it.”

This is similar to Florida House Bills 1557 and 1069, referred to as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill and “Don’t Say They” bill, respectively, restricting classroom discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity, prohibiting the use of pronouns consistent with one’s gender identity, expanding book banning procedures, and censoring health curriculum.

The American Civil Liberties Union is tracking 233 bills related to restricting student and educator rights in the U.S.

Continue Reading

Popular