Connect with us

News

Una ciudad cubana que no quiere ser gueto

Santa Clara se debate espacios exclusivos para la comunidad LGBT

Published

on

Una noche de sábado en el Cabaret Cubanacán, de Santa Clara. (Foto por Yariel Valdés González/Tremenda Nota)

Nota del editor: Tremenda Nota es una revista electrónica independiente que documenta la comunidad LGBTI del país y otros grupos minoritarios. Tremenda Nota es una pareja de contenido del Washington Blade.

Esa nota salió originalmente en el sitio web de Tremenda Nota.

SANTA CLARA, Cuba — Una de las ciudades cubanas más hospitalarias con las personas LGBTI+ también se debate entre la demanda de espacios exclusivos para las minorías sexuales y las desigualdades económicas que crecen en la Isla.

Cada sábado Miguel Antonio Castillo viaja cerca de dos kilómetros para encontrar una discoteca.

En San Diego del Valle, su primer destino, hay pocos lugares para bailar o simplemente disfrutar de espectáculos culturales. Por eso, desde que supo que existía una “noche para las personas LGBTI+” en Santa Clara, la capital de la provincia, Miguel Antonio decidió alargar su travesía por más de 30 kilómetros hasta el Cabaret Cubanacán.

“Las actividades que hacen allá [en San Diego del Valle] son muy generales,” se queja. “Y tampoco hay un día específico para los homosexuales.”

Al joven le seduce que “en las fiestas gais todos son gais.” Además, allí puede “encontrar amigos e intercambiar con personas que tienen gustos sexuales, estéticos o musicales similares, sin riesgo de sufrir homofobia.”

Más allá de las cabeceras municipales cubanas la recreación se reduce a una discoteca improvisada y a un parque central donde la gente se reúne a “cotillear.” Las fiestas concebidas para personas LGBTI+ tampoco son comunes más allá de La Habana y de algunas capitales provinciales.

En la pequeña ciudad de Camajuaní, a 20 kilómetros de Santa Clara, nunca ha prosperado una “fiesta diversa,” aseguran varias personas LGBTI+ entrevistadas por Tremenda Nota.

Según Leonel Jacomino Jiménez, promotor del proyecto Hombres que tienen sexo con otros hombres (HSH), las gestiones para crear un espacio inclusivo “tienen que hacerse sobre la base de cartas y tocando puertas para molestar a algunos funcionarios del gobierno.”

En otros casos, como ocurrió el pasado año en Sagua la Grande, una de las principales ciudades de la provincia, las fiestas LGBTI+ fracasan por falta de público o de buenas estrategias de promoción.

Solo el proyecto itinerante “Me incluyo,” organizado por el promotor cultural Ramón Silverio, creador y director de El Mejunje, ha presentado espectáculos de transformismo y otras actividades inclusivas en poblados y zonas apartadas.

Santa Clara, por su parte, cuenta con tres espacios que celebran las llamadas “fiestas gais,” y que incluyen shows de transformismo. El Centro Recreativo El Bosque, el Cabaret Cubanacán y El Mejunje de Silverio son los únicos lugares que introducen en su cartelera semanal una “noche diversa.”

En la última década las “fiestas diversas” han alcanzado varias ciudades cubanas, aunque todavía La Habana y Santa Clara son las que ofrecen más opciones recreativas “exclusivas” para las personas LGBTI+. (Foto por Yariel Valdés González/Tremenda Nota)

¿Gueto homosexual?

Junto al Cabaret Cubanacán funciona otro espacio recreativo nombrado Disco Isla. Los públicos se muestran segregados cada sábado. De un lado hacen fila las personas gais, trans y lesbianas; del otro aparecen jóvenes heterosexuales que evitan mezclarse con “sus vecinos.” Las personas LGBTI+ permanecen en el gueto “asignado” socialmente.

“La creación de espacios exclusivos genera también una especie de exclusión,” cree Félix Izaguirre, un joven que hace fila para entrar a otra de las “fiestas diversas” de la ciudad.

“Mucha gente no va al Cabaret los sábados ni vienen a El Mejunje, precisamente porque saben que es noche gay,” dice. “Siempre existen heterosexuales que tienen amigos gais y los acompañan sin prejuicios, pero son los menos.”
 
Ramón Silverio creó hace más de tres décadas el centro cultural El Mejunje, acusado en sus primeros años de ser un “club exclusivo para personas gais.” Sin embargo, la institución sobrevivió el paso del tiempo y, en vez de apartar en un gueto a las personas LGBTI+, abrió las puertas al resto de la sociedad.  

El público asiste a un show de transformismo en El Mejunje. (Foto por Yariel Valdés González)

Aun así, muchas personas homosexuales y transgéneros prefieren acudir a “espacios exclusivos para gais.” Javier Olivera, transformista que se presenta en el escenario de El Mejunje como Cinthia, aseguró que en sitios “aparentemente para heterosexuales” suele encontrarse conflictos entre la clientela homofóbica y los gais.

Por eso, Denet Oliva Triana, colega de Javier conocida como Blacuchini, respalda la existencia de lugares dedicados a la comunidad LGBTI+, aunque siente que está “en un círculo” que le lleva siempre al mismo sitio con la misma gente.

Si es caro no es incluyente

A pesar del éxito del Cabaret Cubanacán y del Centro Recreativo El Bosque ― actualmente en reparación ―, el sitio más popular para la comunidad LGBTI+ de Santa Clara sigue siendo El Mejunje, por sus razonables precios y su cercanía al centro de la ciudad.

“Cada uno se divierte donde le permiten sus ingresos,” aseguran varios entrevistados. Las incipientes clases sociales que se consolidan en Cuba hace más de una década también dividen a las minorías sexuales.

Al Cubanacán, al Bosque, van quienes cuentan con mejor economía, pues solo la entrada cuesta como mínimo 25 pesos (1 CUC, equivalente a un dólar). Ese precio, por ejemplo, quintuplica el valor del boleto de entrada a El Mejunje.

En un país donde el salario medio es 767 pesos mensuales (poco más de 30 dólares estadounidenses), “no se puede decir que un lugar sea inclusivo si cobra cuarenta pesos por la entrada,” advierte Ramón Silverio.

Reinaldo Gil, un joven artista plástico, confirma que “al Cubanacán va la gente que tiene un poco más de dinero.” Al principio, cuando acababan de abrir la “noche diversa” en el cabaret, “los mismos trabajadores de allí te discriminaban un poco, existía homofobia.”

“En el Carishow — una céntrica discoteca de la cadena de servicios extrahoteleros Palmares — a veces no aceptan que entren los homosexuales,” denuncia Gil.

Sin embargo, uno de los agentes de seguridad del Carishow aseguró a Tremenda Nota que allí nunca han existido manifestaciones de homofobia y que “se trata a todos los clientes por igual,” en tanto se comporten de acuerdo a “las normas generales establecidas” en el centro recreativo.

Hace algunos meses dos jóvenes fueron expulsados de Efe Bar, en La Habana, supuestamente por besarse dentro del establecimiento privado. También el KingBar, otro centro nocturno bastante frecuentado de la capital, invocó el derecho de admisión para negar la entrada al poeta Norge Espinosa y un grupo de activistas LGBTI+ en 2015.

La transformista Blancuchini (a la izquierda) durante una de sus presentaciones en el Cabaret Cubanacán de Santa Clara (Foto por Yariel Valdés González)

Orlando Reinoso Castillo, barman del bar Tacones Lejanos de El Mejunje, se atreve a asegurar que este resulta el único sitio en la ciudad frecuentado a diario por personas gais que se mezclan sin dificultad con la población heterosexual, o con las chicas trans, o con los “pepillos.”

“A este lugar le llaman el bar de los escachados,” comenta, en alusión a los bajos ingresos de muchos clientes. “Además, aquí vienen las parejas, se besan y no pasa nada. La diversidad es tan natural en El Mejunje como sus ladrillos.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Federal Government

Protesters say SAVE Act targets voters, transgender youth

Bill described as ‘Jim Crow 2.0’

Published

on

Protesters show their opposition to the SAVE Act outside the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Members of Congress, advocates, and people from across the country gathered outside the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday to protest proposed federal legislation that voting rights activists have deemed “Jim Crow 2.0.”

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act would amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require in-person proof of citizenship for anyone seeking to vote in U.S. elections.

President Donald Trump has also pushed for the proposed legislation to include a section that would ban gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, even with parental consent, and prohibit trans people from participating in school or professional sports consistent with their gender identity rather than their sex assigned at birth.

In addition to changing voter registration requirements, the bill would limit acceptable forms of identification to documents such as a birth certificate or passport — records that the Brennan Center for Justice estimates more than 21 million Americans do not have — effectively restricting access to the ballot. It would also ban online voter registration, DMV voter registration efforts, and mail-in voter registration.

A 2021 investigation by the Associated Press found that fewer than 475 people voted illegally or improperly, a tiny fraction of the estimated 160 million Americans who voted in the 2020 election.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) spoke at the event.

“It will kick millions of American citizens off the rolls. And they don’t even require you to be told,” the highest-ranking Democrat in the Senate told protesters and reporters outside the Capitol. “If this law passes — and it won’t — you’re gonna show up in November … and they’ll say… sorry, you’re no longer on the voting rolls.”

U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks at a rally and press conference opposing the SAVE Act held outside of the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

He, like many other speakers, emphasized the bill in the context of American history, pointing to what he described as its racist roots and its impact on Black and brown Americans.

“I have called this act, over and over again, Jim Crow 2.0 … because they know it’s the truth.”

U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was one of the lawmakers leading opposition to the legislation and spoke at the rally.

“It’s not just voting rights that are on the line — our democracy is on the line,” the California lawmaker said. “It’s not a voter I.D. bill. It’s a bait and switch bill.”

He added historical context, noting the significance of voting rights legislation passed more than 60 years ago. In 1965, Alabama civil rights activists marched to protest barriers to voter registration. Alabama state troopers violently attacked peaceful demonstrators at the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, using tear gas, clubs, and whips against more than 500 — mostly Black — protesters.

U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) speaks at a rally and press conference opposing the SAVE Act held outside of the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

“61 years ago — not to the day — but this week, President Lyndon Johnson came to the Capitol and addressed a joint session of Congress in the wake of Bloody Sunday and pushed Congress to pass the Voting Rights Act,” Padilla said. “61 years later, Donald Trump and this Republican majority wants to take us backwards. We’re not gonna let that happen.”

U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) also spoke, emphasizing that he views the effort as a Republican-led and Trump-backed attempt to restrict voting access, particularly among Black, brown, and predominantly Democratic communities.

“President Trump told Republicans when they were meeting behind closed doors that ‘The SAVE Act will guarantee Republicans win the midterms and ensure they do not lose an election for 50 years,’” Luján said. “The first time I think Donald Trump’s been honest … This voter suppression bill is only that. Taking away vote by mail? I hope my Republican colleagues from states that voted for Donald Trump or where vote by mail is popular have the courage and the backbone to stand up and say no to this nonsense, because their constituents are going to push back.”

U.S. Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) also spoke.

“Our Republican colleagues have already cut Medicaid, Medicare, people don’t know how they’re gonna be able to afford energy,” she said, providing context for the broader political moment. “We’re in the middle of a war that they can’t even get straight while we’re in it and don’t have a way to get out of it. And we are now faced with defending our democracy?”

She then showed the crowd something that she said has been with her throughout her political journey in Washington. 

“I brought with me something that I carried on the day that I was sworn into the House of Representatives when I was elected in 2016, and I carried it with me on the day that I was sworn in as United States senator. And I also carried it with me when I was trapped up in the gallery on Jan. 6 and all I could think to do was pray … This document allowed my great great great grandfather, who had been enslaved in Georgia, to have the right to vote. We took this and turned it into a scarf. It is the returns of qualified voters and reconstruction code from 1867. This is my proof of what we’ve been through. This is also our inspiration.”

U.S. Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) speaks at a rally and press conference opposing the SAVE Act held outside of the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

“I got to travel between the Edmund Pettus Bridge two times. And even as I thought about this moment, I recognized that while we wish we weren’t in it, while we don’t know why we’re in it, I do know we were made for it … So I came today to tell you that, um, just like the leader said, that he calls it Jim Crow 2.0. I call it Jim Crow 2.NO.”

Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the largest LGBTQ advocacy organization in the U.S., also spoke, highlighting the impact of the bill’s proposed provisions affecting trans people.

“This bill is not about saving America. This bill is about stealing an election. This bill is about suppressing voters,” Robinson said. “This bill not only tries to disenfranchise voters that deserve their right to vote, it also tries to criminalize trans kids and their families … It tries to criminalize doctors providing medically necessary care for our trans youth.”

Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, speaks at a rally and press conference opposing the SAVE Act held outside of the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

The SAVE Act passed the U.S. House of Representatives on Feb. 11 but has not yet been considered in the U.S. Senate.

Continue Reading

Obituary

Thomas A. Decker of Arlington dies at 73

Active in visiting AIDS patients, urging Congress to fight HIV

Published

on

Thomas A. Decker Jr.

Thomas A. Decker Jr, of Arlington, Va., died March 3, 2026 following an extended illness, according to a statement released by his family. He was 73.

Born and raised in Canton, Ohio, Decker attended the University of Akron and earned his bachelor’s degree in political science. He then moved to the Washington, D.C. area and accepted a position with Beaver Press where he worked for 32 years, according to the statement. 

He later worked in the Inova Juniper Program working with HIV/AIDS clients to assist them with support services and was active as a volunteer visiting AIDS patients in the hospital or advocating on Capitol Hill for HIV funding.

Tommy, as he was called by family, is survived by three sisters, a sister-in-law and two brothers-in-law: Carol Decker and Kathryn Kramer of West Newbury, MA, Margaret and Thomas Williams of Bluffton, SC, Mary Sue and Timothy Desiato of New Philadelphia, Ohio, Niece’s Trina and Chad Wedekind of Jacksonville Fl and great niece Isabella, Lindsay and Will Burgette of Dublin, Ohio and great nephews Colin and Luke and Nephews David Williams of Jacksonville, Florida, and Michael and Lucy Desiato of Dublin, Ohio and great nieces Lena and Stella. In accordance with Tom’s wishes, he will be buried at Calvary Cemetery in Massillon, Ohio.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Gay candidate running for D.C. congressional delegate seat

Robert Matthews among 19 hoping to replace Eleanor Holmes Norton

Published

on

Robert Matthews (Photo courtesy of Matthews’s campaign website)

Robert Matthews, a former director of the D.C. Child and Family Services Agency, is running in the city’s June 16 Democratic primary for the D.C. Congressional Delegate seat as an openly gay candidate, according to a statement released by his campaign to the Washington Blade.

Matthews is one of at least 19 candidates running to replace longtime D.C. Congressional Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D), who announced earlier this year that she is not running for re-election.  

Information about the candidates’ campaign financing compiled by the Federal Elections Commission, which oversees elections for federal candidates, shows that Matthews is one of only six of the candidates who have raised any money for their campaigns as of March 17.  

Among those six, who political observers say have a shot at winning compared to the remaining 13, are D.C. Council members Brooke Pinto (D-Ward 2) and Robert White (D-At-Large). Both have longstanding  records of support for LGBTQ rights and the community.

The FEC campaign finance records show Matthews was in fourth place regarding the money raised for his campaign, which was $49,078 as of March 17. The FEC records show Pinto’s campaign in first place with $843,496 raised, and White in third place with $230,399 raised.

The Matthews campaign statement released to the Blade says Matthews’s “commitment to the LGBTQ community is not a campaign position. It is the foundation of his life and his life’s work.”

The statement adds, “As the former director of D.C.’s Child and Family Services Agency, Robert led the District’s child welfare system with an explicit commitment to LGBTQ-affirming care.” It goes on to say, “He ensured that LGBTQ, trans, and nonbinary youth in foster care — among the most vulnerable young people in our city — were served with dignity, cultural humility, and genuine support.”

Among his priorities if elected as Congressional delegate, the statement says, would be “fighting to end homelessness among queer and trans seniors and youth,” opposing “federal roadblocks” to LGBTQ related health services, and defending D.C.’s budget and civil rights laws “from federal interference that directly threatens LGBTQ  residents.”

 The other three candidates who the FEC records show have raised campaign funds and observers say have a shot at winning are:

 • Kinney Zalesne, former deputy national finance chair at the Democratic National Committee and an official at the U.S. Justice Department during the Clinton administration, whose campaign is in second place in fundraising with $593,885 raised.  

 • Gordon Chaffin, a former congressional staffer whose campaign has raised $17,950.

 • Kelly Mikel Williams, a podcast host and candidate for the Congressional Delegate seat in 2022 and 2024, whose 2026 campaign has raised  $3,094 as of March 17.

The Blade reached out to the Zalesne, Chaffin, and Williams campaigns to determine their position on LGBTQ issues. As of late Wednesday, the Zalesne campaign was the only one that responded.    

“Kinney believes LGBTQ  rights are fundamental civil rights and central to what makes Washington, D.C. a strong and vibrant community,” a statement sent by her campaign says. “At a time when LGBTQ people (especially transgender and nonbinary neighbors) are facing escalating political attacks across the country, she believes the District must continue to lead in protecting dignity, safety, and freedom for all,” it says.

The statement adds, “Throughout her career in government, business, and nonprofit leadership, Kinney has worked alongside LGBTQ and queer advocates and leaders. She is committed to maintaining an active partnership with the community to make sure LGBTQ voices remain central to the District’s future.” 

Continue Reading

Popular