Connect with us


Mary Cheh’s ‘Scarlet Letter’

Proposed restaurant inspection ‘letter grade’ is wrong approach



Last week, local diners participated in the annual “Dining Out for Life” benefit for Food & Friends at more than 150 restaurants.

If D.C. Council member Mary Cheh (D-Ward 3) gets her way, next year’s event participants will be confronted by a “letter grade” posted in front windows of restaurants supposedly indicating the “cleanliness” and “food safety” of the establishment.

Cheh has re-introduced legislation – this time with the loss of both a co-introducer and a co-sponsor – requiring that the District implement a crude “A, B, C, or F” grading system based on a sporadic routine inspection by the D.C. Department of Health.

Her bill, bearing a title only a bureaucrat could love, is the “Restaurant Hygiene Transparency Act of 2011” and is part of an effort by the notorious Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) to impose a mandated grading system nationwide. (You might recall CSPI’s eye-roll-inducing effort attacking movie theater popcorn butter and summer ice cream consumption.)

Not one to pause before scheming new burdensome regulation of community businesses contributing mightily to the city’s tax revenues, Cheh has again proposed creating another layer of unnecessary and unproductive government operation in a city facing a financial crisis and a budget deficit in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

Just ask her about her proposed bill to “minimize light pollution” by restricting commercial and retail signage to prevent, among other things, “contributing to insomnia and interrupting the human body’s production of melatonin” and disrupting “animals’ breeding cycles and migration patterns by disorienting their sense of direction.” (Seriously, it’s in the bill.)

So what’s wrong with letting customers know how a food establishment scored on its last health inspection? Shouldn’t this information be made public?

Actually, it is. D.C. posts inspection reports online for easy search access on the District’s award-winning government website.

Problem is, the understaffed and already-overwhelmed inspection department has difficulty correctly posting and updating the information. A quick search of a few local restaurants resulted in mismatched reports and outdated information.

More important, a simple report card grade has little meaning, only represents a “snapshot” of one day, and is highly subjective based on the training and efficacy of the overworked inspector. Even CSPI admits that D.C. has fewer than 20 inspectors for more than 5,000 food service locations.

The front windows of local restaurants, delis, grocery stores, and other food service establishments would be marred by frayed and yellowing placards displaying only an uninformative letter grade originating with the department’s last inspection.

And what happens when a local restaurant gets a temporarily lower score based on “non-critical” demerits requiring a re-inspection within a few days? Jonathan ten Hoopen, general manager of popular Dupont Circle restaurants La Tomate and Mourayo, says that he has never experienced a follow-up visit by an inspector, although required by law.

Chair of the Dupont Circle Merchants and Professionals Association and a board member of Dupont Circle Main Streets, Jonathan is an outspoken critic of Cheh’s proposed legislation and says, “it’s like a ‘scarlet letter’ and is not fair to establishments.” Wondering how a restaurant could have its letter grade reviewed by a department already unable to conduct timely regular inspections or fulfill re-inspections, he suggests that the money would be best spent and provide better results for consumers “to hire more inspectors, provide better training for inspectors in the field and have inspectors do follow-ups.”

New York City is struggling to comply with a similar law passed last summer, completing letter grades for only half of the city’s food-serving locations. The New York Times reports that the data so far suggests that inspectors appear to be ‘bumping-up’ scores for restaurants on the cusp of the arbitrary letter grades to avoid the time-consuming burden of re-inspection required by a restaurant appeal of their rating.

Instead of proposing another “feel-good” law to appease a special interest group demanding more mandates on small business, Mary Cheh should smartly spend our tax dollars to improve the current inspection process and existing online report access. Rather than branding local restaurants with a meaningless and detrimental letter grade, she should be encouraging collaborative efforts with them to ensure effective implementation of existing public health standards to everyone’s benefit.

Continue Reading


  1. Realist

    March 17, 2011 at 5:18 pm

    Lee is right and Cheh is somewhere out in La-La Land.

    Anyone who has been paying attention recently knows that the DC Government has serious ethics problems. All this would be is another opportunity to DC government employees to shake down restauranteurs for a good rating. Pay to play is what it’s all about. And you can bet your fully loaded Lincoln Navigator and $110,000 city job on that!

  2. Pragmatist

    March 18, 2011 at 10:23 am

    Both Los Angeles and New York have laws requires restaurants to post sanitation grades. It hasn’t seemed to hurt their dining scenes. If anything, it is an incentive to the restaurants to strive for full compliance with the health code because they know a low score will be publicly advertised in their own window. The Cheh bill would be particularly helpful to tourists and other visitors to DC who have no other information about whether the restaurant they are about to enter is sanitary and up to code. If the DC inspection system is broken that is no reason to throw our hands up and allow the restaurants to do whatever they want. Bravo Mary Cheh.

  3. Tom

    March 18, 2011 at 1:05 pm

    This woman has also proposed heavily taxing some food/beverage products, too, right?

    Pretty soon she’ll have her fist all the way down our throats — but I’m gagging already!

  4. Rick Rosendall

    March 24, 2011 at 2:05 pm

    This sort of thing lends strength to the idea that D.C. should shorten its legislative period as so many states do, to limit the opportunities for mischief-making by councilmembers eager to invent more problems to solve.

    I wish to welcome Mark Lee to the ranks of ink-stained wretches. But I can’t believe, Mark, that you treat so lightly the disruption of migration patterns caused by light pollution. Why, my own migration was disrupted late one night when I saw the lights from Bob and Edith’s All-Night Diner.

  5. Bob Summersgill

    March 24, 2011 at 4:02 pm

    Mark Lee’s advocacy for businesses to poison their employees and customers would be amusing if not so dangerous. I’m sure most of us have experienced food poisoning at a restaurant at some point. It would be nice to have this incentive to restaurants to improve their safety and hygene; as well as the warning to customers of restaurants will less concern for health, such as any business operated by Mark Lee.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Study: One in ten LGBT workers experienced discrimination at work

LGBTQ employees of color were more likely to report being denied jobs and verbal harassment at work as opposed their white counterparts



bullying in the workforce, gay news, Washington Blade

LOS ANGELES – A new study by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law finds an estimated 46% of LGBT workers have experienced unfair treatment at work at some point in their lives, including being fired, not hired, or harassed because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.  

An estimated 9% of LGBT employees reported experiences of discrimination in the past year, despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, which extended employment non-discrimination protections to LGBT people nationwide. Approximately 11% of LGBT employees of color reported being fired or not hired because of their sexual orientation or gender identity in the last year.

Using survey data collected in May 2021 from 935 LGBT adults in the workforce, researchers examined lifetime, five-year, and past-year discrimination among LGBT employees.

Results show that over half (57%) of LGBT employees who experienced discrimination or harassment at work reported that the unfair treatment was motivated by religious beliefs, including 64% of LGBT employees of color and 49% of white LGBT employees.

“Employment discrimination and harassment against LGBT people remain persistent and pervasive in 2021,” said lead author Brad Sears, Founding Executive Director at the Williams Institute. “Passing the Equality Act would ensure that LGBT people—particularly transgender people and LGBT people of color—are allowed to participate fully in the workplace as well as other public settings.”



  • 30% of LGBT employees reported experiencing at least one form of employment discrimination (being fired or not hired) because of their sexual orientation or gender identity at some point in their lives.
  • 29% of LGBT employees of color reported not being hired compared to 18% of white LGBT employees.


  • 38% of LGBT employees reported experiencing at least one form of harassment (including verbal, physical, or sexual harassment) at work because of their sexual orientation or gender identity at some point in their lives.
  • LGBT employees of color were significantly more likely to experience verbal harassment than white employees.
    • 36% of LGBT employees of color reported experiencing verbal harassment compared to 26% of white LGBT employees.

Religious Motivation

  • Of employees who experienced discrimination or harassment at some point in their lives, 64% of LGBT employees of color said that religion was a motivating factor compared to 49% of white LGBT employees.

Avoiding Discrimination

  • Half (50%) of LGBT employees said that they are not open about being LGBT to their current supervisor and one-quarter (26%) are not out to any of their co-workers. 
  • Many LGBT employees reported engaging in “covering” behaviors to avoid harassment or discrimination at work, such as changing their physical appearance and avoiding talking about their families or social lives at work.
    • For example, 36% of transgender employees said that they changed their physical appearance and 28% said they changed their bathroom use at work to avoid discrimination and harassment.

Read the report

Continue Reading


Time to dust off your pre-pandemic budget

We can no longer rely on closures to restrict us from spending money



With pandemic restrictions lifting, we’ll all be spending more on going out in 2021 than we did last year.

D.C.’s first ‘mostly open’ weekend shows there is a year’s worth of socializing built up. It was amazing to feel the energy of the District roar back to life. From long lines outside bars to literal dancing in the streets – this is the city we all came to love. Now that the physical hangover may have subsided, you should prepare for the financial hangover. If you were lucky to keep your full pay and position through the pandemic, data tells us most of you were paying down debt.

The first thing everyone needs to do is dust off that old pre-pandemic budget. Sadly (or really luckily), we can no longer rely on health restrictions to naturally restrict us from spending. If you need a refresher, start with your post-tax income. From there, subtract ‘fixed’ or required expenses, like rent, and the balance is what you get to play with. Some may ask why I don’t use gross income (aka the before tax income) like many financial institutions do for credit applications. Frankly, it’s because net income (aka the money you actually receive) is the most practical number to budget daily life with. It’s what you can tangibly use to live.

Now as you develop your budget, return to using an app like Mint to take some of the work out of it. If you prefer to retain some level of privacy, many banks offer their own version of ‘spending trends’ that you can use to put together a more simple budget. This time the challenge is a bit different – we are all ‘restarting’ our social lives. So instead of having to ‘cut’ things, we can better prioritize what we actually want to do. Still – it is not easy or fun to have to choose, but every dollar you don’t spend today, will be there for the next rainy day.

Finally, so many of our friends and family lost their jobs or had their wages cut during the pandemic. Expanded unemployment benefits helped, but anyone trying to budget for life in D.C. knows that choices had to be made and often rent/utilities took a back seat to eating. Luckily, a state-run, but federal program will help people pay back rent and utilities, so they can focus on getting back to work. In D.C., this is called StayDC, but each jurisdiction offers a similar program.

Be prepared to do a little homework, you will need proof of income (or lack thereof) and documentation of the late payments. Finally, your landlord will need to complete separate forms, but it is in their best interest to receive those funds, so don’t let them drag their feet. The program will cover back rent to April 2021, three months of future rent, and past utilities. Do not delay, nor feel any shame by participating – this is the key to your long term success and, frankly, is a drop in the bucket compared to other spending priorities.

I hope this helps and I wish everyone a much more fun and prosperous 2021.

Information contained herein is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or recommendations. Advice may only be provided after entering into an advisory agreement with an advisor.

Alex Graham is a Principal at Graham Capital Wealth Management, a registered Investment Advisor located on K Street.

Continue Reading


Gay D.C. business owner to run 100-mile ultramarathon

Brandt Ricca to raise money for Capital Pride, LGBTQ businesses



Brandt Ricca (Photo by Jonathan Thorpe/jthorpephoto)

Brandt Ricca will begin a non-stop 100-mile ultramarathon at 6 a.m. on Oct. 7 while most D.C. residents will still be sipping their morning coffee.

In a year of isolation and economic downturn, Ricca decided to run 100 miles in two days to benefit local, LGBTQ-owned businesses affected by the coronavirus pandemic. Ricca, who’s lived in D.C. for 10 years, is donating the money he raises to the Capital Pride Alliance and Equality Chamber of Commerce, where he has been a member since 2018.

The gay entrepreneur and owner of the D.C.-based business Nora Lee by Brandt Ricca understands first-hand how the ongoing pandemic affects small businesses, particularly LGBTQ-owned companies.

“I definitely want to give back to the community and local colleagues, especially because Capitol Pride has been now canceled two years in a row,” Ricca said.

Out of the funds raised, 90 percent will go towards funding 20 small business grants through the Equality Chamber of Commerce and the remaining 10 percent will go towards supporting Capital Pride Alliance.  

Brandt, already an avid runner and self-described “fitness explorer,” decided after crowdsourcing ideas to pursue the 100-mile project. Ricca has been a frequent visitor at the Equinox Anthem Row in D.C. to prepare for the run.

“I was looking to do my next fitness endeavor, at the same time wanting to do something to get back to the fellow business owners in D.C.,” he said.

Applications for the 20 grants of various sizes for LGBTQ businesses are projected to open this summer through the Equality Chamber of Commerce, Ricca said. His goal is to raise $100,000 from individuals and companies. The grants will be distributed in October following the completion of the run.

Equality Chamber of Commerce Vice President Riah Gonzales-King is in the process of developing grants and additional summer educational programming to help young LGBTQ entrepreneurs and students start their businesses.

“So much of the culture centers around these businesses, many of which have been around for decades,” Gonzales-King said. “They’re pillars of the community — their owners are pillars in the community. And I think it’s time that we gave back.”

Helping LGBTQ entrepreneurs specifically at this time is essential, Ricca said, especially entrepreneurs in the creative and hospitality industry.

Ricca began training in February with the help of several exercise experts like Brian Mazza, a New York City fitness entrepreneur who ran 50 miles last December to raise awareness for male infertility stigma. The former Men’s Health headliner is guiding Ricca’s physical training, which has been a near-daily routine. Ricca was inspired by Mazza’s run in the first place.

Ricca reached out to Mazza over Instagram to get his assistance and training.

Mazza said Ricca reaching out over Instagram “meant the world.”

“I believe what he’s doing for his cause is remarkable,” Mazza said. “It’s important. I’m happy that he’s standing up for what he believes in and helping these businesses and helping individuals in general.”

Jacob Zemer, a coach and nutritionist, has designed a daily nutrition program for Ricca to prepare him for the run. Zemer and Mazza have been working together throughout the process to track Ricca’s health and progress.

The two fitness experts work with Ricca multiple times a day to monitor his diet, mileage, heart rate and pace monitoring. Both Mazza and Zemer said Ricca’a training has been successful.

“Brandt’s an excellent individual,” Zemer said. “He’s very easy to work with. He’s highly coachable, he’s a pleasure to talk to every day.”

Pacers Running will be sponsoring and designing Ricca’s 100-mile route throughout the D.C. region. The company is also working with Ricca to design specific shoes for the ultramarathon.

Pacers Running CEO Kathy Dalby won “Best Straight Ally” in the Washington Blade’s 2019 Best of Gay D.C.

“I really wanted someone local who could really guide me on a route,” Ricca said.

Elyse Braner, a community lead at Pacers Running and longtime friend to Ricca, said the local business was excited to collaborate with Brandt because of an alignment of values.

“As a community, inclusivity and diversity is extremely important to Pacers Running,” Braner said. “As a small business, we really appreciated that Brandt wanted to do an event that supported small businesses — specifically LGBTQ businesses.”

Originally an event-planning business, Nora Lee debuted in 2018 on the second annual Allison Gala, a fundraising event benefiting the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Foundation, which Brandt created in memory of a family friend. He’s worked with a range of clients, including the Dupont Circle Hotel and Sotheby’s Real Estate.

Looking back at events on his website, he said he found himself bored with the photography. This led him to focus on creative marketing and decided to pivot his business model at the beginning of the pandemic. Now, Ricca provides photography and video shoots for clients.

“When COVID hit I decided to, like every business owner, I revisited my plan,” he said. “I really enjoyed the creative branding more in the photo shoot. So I decided to pivot strictly to just a full-on creative branding agency.”

The training for the 100-mile run has provided a stable routine for Ricca, which has helped him get through the pandemic, he said. Ricca is planning to create a campaign this summer inviting LGBTQ entrepreneurs to do their version of 100 miles, with the hope it will provide positive stability in their lives as it does in his.

“Obviously, people think I’m crazy for doing this,” Ricca said. “All the uncertainty out there right now – with business, with clients, with whatever; I needed an anchor. Something that was going to be a routine for me that I can control.”

Continue Reading

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts