Connect with us

Opinions

Join Mayor Gray and the Blade on June 2

Published

on

On Thursday, June 2 at 5:30 p.m. join the Washington Blade for a “Conversation with the Mayor” at City Hall. We will have the chance to hear Mayor Gray talk about his commitment to the LGBT community and how he sees us as a part of his “One City” vision. Blade editor Kevin Naff will pose questions to the mayor to solicit his views and proposed policies as he implements that vision for the people of the District.

Despite some early missteps it appears the mayor is moving the city forward. I think it is important to look at what the mayor talked about during his campaign and then judge for yourself what is actually happening within the administration. It may not be fast enough for some and there is the lingering distrust over the mistakes made and who is actually advising him, but no one can deny that the mayor is keeping an absolutely grueling schedule of work and appearances and dealing with many of the critical issues facing our city. He presented an on-time and balanced budget to the Council. He is being well received across the city at every meeting and discussion whether it is was the Ward by Ward budget town halls or at the myriad of events he has attended and spoken at in the nearly five months he has been mayor.

While some skeptics, including the Washington Post, wondered how he would be received on Capitol Hill after being arrested and leading some demonstrations against the Congress, the mayor came away from the first hearing on his budget with a surprise commitment from Republican Chairman Issa (R-Calif.) to look at providing some form of limited budget autonomy and ensuring that the city will not be caught up in another federal government shut-down. The Washington Post felt that only merited a page three Metro story, but most others agree that it has the potential to be a big step forward.

The most visible difference between Vince Gray and our last two mayors is that he actually enjoys spending time with and talking to people. He is well informed about so many issues that he consistently impresses with his ability to discuss in detail the most arcane subjects and how they impact government and various constituencies. The general consensus is that he is the most knowledgeable person in the Wilson Building. Following is an example of the grueling schedule he keeps:

April 8, 2011, was the day Congress threatened to close the federal government and shut down the District government as well. The mayor was up early as usual. His public schedule began at 10:30 a.m. with remarks at a groundbreaking for new townhomes in Southeast. Among some of the other listed events on his calendar were desk time, emergency meetings with agency heads and a meeting with his Education Transition team at 3 p.m. to present and discuss their final transition report. I was part of that team and as the day wore on was sure the mayor would cancel the meeting due to the threatened shutdown. But the meeting began at 3:15 with the mayor there in mind and body despite everything else that was happening.

Issues including general school reform, special education, charter schools, and the IMPACT teacher evaluation system were discussed and the mayor was clearly up to speed on each. He knew in detail how much money other cities were allocating to charter schools for facilities, the number of children in special education programs now and how many were anticipated to enter in coming years and issues involving parental involvement in the schools. His knowledge base was impressive and he wasn’t averse to disagreeing with members of the transition team but did so in a way that left everyone with the feeling that he understood their point of view and respected it.

He left the meeting at 4:15 to lead a cabinet meeting finalizing plans for shutting down the government. As he left he asked if I was going to the Capital Area Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (CAGLCC) dinner that evening. I said I was and he said he would see me there. I was sure that he wouldn’t manage that if the government really was going to shut down.

How wrong I was. He directed his cabinet on final preparations for shutting down the government and responded to numerous media requests speaking eloquently about how outrageous it was that the city was being treated like another federal agency in this shutdown. He then kept to his evening pubic schedule along with various emergency meetings and calls.

I left the dinner at 10:15 p.m. as they were just beginning to present their awards. Someone needs to come up with a way to shorten these types of dinners so that events that begin at 6:30 p.m. don’t end up with dinner being served close to 10 p.m. As I walked into my apartment I received a text from someone at the dinner. The mayor had arrived close to 10:45 p.m. and made a great and well-received speech. As he was speaking the news broke that an agreement had been reached by Congress and the president to keep the government open. At 11:15 the mayor began a round of press calls dealing with the rumors, which turned out to be true, that part of that deal to keep the government open foisted education vouchers on the District and prohibited the District from spending its own funds on legal abortions for poor women — something 17 other states do without any interference from Congress.

In discussions with staff before he got home around midnight he was already thinking about and planning the next phase of what has been a strong response from District residents and officials, with leadership from DC Vote, to fight this Congress’ efforts to whittle away at home rule for the District’s 600,000 residents.

While investigations will continue, as they should, to make sure nothing illegal happened concerning the hiring of Sulaimon Brown, Mayor Gray is moving the city forward and doing what we elected him to do. Along with a balanced budget we have seen major expansion of the bike sharing program, continued movement on improving government operations, qualified people being recommended and placed on boards and commissions and continued forward momentum on Education Reform. There is much more to do and the mayor needs to make a decision on a permanent Chief of Staff and other agency personnel but despite some naysayers the government is moving forward.

To hear directly from the mayor, make plans to join him and the Blade on June, 2 at City Hall to find out what his plans for the future are and how he sees the LGBT community being a part of that future.

If you require accommodations to participate in this event, please inform The District of Columbia Office of Disability Rights at 202-724-5055.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Opinions

Happy Thanksgiving to all

Dreaming of a brighter future for America

Published

on

(Photo by lilkar/Bigstock)

I hope you have a great Thanksgiving and can enjoy it with family and friends and that you have things you can be thankful for this past year. That you have your health. Now here is the column I would have liked to share with you this Thanksgiving: 

To all my friends and family. This year I am thankful the felon has left the White House. It feels we can all finally breath again. I am so happy his idea of a ballroom at the White House was a joke, and we can once again walk in Jackie Kennedy’s rose garden, and visit the beautiful East Wing. I am thankful the felon’s personal Goebbels, Stephen Miller, lost his job when the reality that he was a fascist was too much to take. It was wonderful to see the Supreme Court wake up and do their job once again. They stopped drinking the MAGA Kool-Aid and voided all the executive orders calling on museums to hide the history of Black Americans, women, and the LGBTQ community. They told the president he didn’t have the right to place tariffs, and that he couldn’t fire legally appointed members of commissions under the rubric of Congress’s control.

Then I am thankful the Congress began to do its job. That so many Republicans grew a set of balls and decided to challenge Speaker Mike ‘sycophant’ Johnson, reminding him they were an independent part of government, and didn’t need to rubber stamp everything the felon wanted. I was thankful to see them extend the SNAP program indefinitely, and the same with the tax credits for the ACA, agreeing to include these important programs in next year’s budget. Then they went further, and paid for the programs, by rescinding all the tax benefits they had given to the wealthy, and corporations, in the felon’s big ugly bill. Finally realizing it is the poor and middle class who they had to help if the country was to move forward. Then I can’t thank them enough for finally passing the Equality Act, and doing it with a veto proof majority, so the felon had to sign it, before he left office. They did the same for the Choice Act, and the Voting Rights Act. It was a glorious year with so much to be thankful for. 

Then I am so thankful Congress finally stood up to the felon and said he couldn’t start wars without their approval, and the Supreme Court ruled they were right. That attacking Venezuela was not something he had the right to do. Then the final thing the court did this year I am thankful for, is they actually modified their ruling on presidential immunity, and said the felon’s grifting was not covered, as under their decision that was private, and not done in his role as president. Again, can’t thank them enough for waking up and doing that. 

Then there is even more I am thankful for this year. It was so nice to see Tesla collapse, and Musk lose his trillion-dollar salary. The people finally woke up to him and insisted Congress mandate the satellite system he built, basically with money from the government, was actually owned by the government, and he could no longer control who can use it. It was determined he alone would not be able to tell Ukraine whether or not they can use it in their war defending against the Russian invasion. Then I am so thankful Congress went even further, and approved the funds needed by the Ukrainians for long-range missiles, and a missile defense system, accepting Ukraine was actually fighting a proxy war for the West, and Ukraine winning that war would help keep our own men and women off the battlefield. 

And speaking of our military, I thank Congress for lifting the ban on transgender persons in the military, and honoring their service, along with the service of women, Black service members, all members of the LGBTQ community, and all minorities. It was fun to see Pete Hegseth being led out of the Pentagon, and being reminded he wasn’t the Secretary of War. There is no Department of War, it is still the Department of Defense, with congressional oversight. Again, so many things to be thankful for this past year. It seemed like my heart runneth over. 

Then my alarm went off and I woke up from my big beautiful dream, only to realize I was still living in the Trumpian nightmare. 


Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist.

Continue Reading

Commentary

Elusive safety: what new global data reveals about gender, violence, and erasure

Movements against gender equality, lack of human rights data contributing factors.

Published

on

Activists who participated in a 2024 Pride march in San Salvador, El Salvador, carry a banner that calls for a country where “being a woman is not a danger.” (Photo courtesy of Colectivo Alejandría)

“My identity could be revealed, people can say whatever they want [online] without consequences. [Hormone replacement therapy] is illegal here so I’m just waiting to find a way to get out of here.”

-Anonymous respondent to the 2024 F&M Global Barometers LGBTQI+ Perception Index from Iraq, self-identified as a transgender woman and lesbian

As the campaign for 16 Days Against Gender-Based Violence begins, it is a reminder that gender-based violence (GBV) — both on– and offline — not only impacts women and girls but everyone who has been harmed or abused because of their gender or perceived gender. New research from the Franklin & Marshall (F&M) Global Barometers and its report A Growing Backlash: Quantifying the Experiences of LGBTQI+ People, 2022-2024 starkly show trends of declining safety among LGBTQI+ persons around the world.

This erosion of safety is accelerated by movements against gender equality and the disappearance of credible human rights data and reporting. The fight against GBV means understanding all people’s lived realities, including those of LGBTQI+ people, alongside the rights we continue to fight for.

We partnered together while at USAID and Franklin & Marshall College to expand the research and evidence base to better understand GBV against LGBTQI+ persons through the F&M Global Barometers. The collection of barometers tracks the legal rights and lived experiences of LGBTQI+ persons from 204 countries and territories from 2011 to the present. With more than a decade of data, it allows us to see how rights have progressed and receded as well as the gaps between legal protections and lived experiences of discrimination and violence. 

This year’s data reveals alarming trends that highlight how fear and violence are, at its root, gendered phenomena that affect anyone who transgresses traditional gender norms.

LGBTQI+ people feel less safe

Nearly two-thirds of countries experienced a decline in their score on the F&M Global Barometers LGBTQI+ Perception Index (GBPI) from 2022-2024. This represents a five percent drop in global safety scores in just two years. With almost 70 percent of countries receiving an “F” grade on the GBPI, this suggests a global crisis in actual human rights protections for LGBTQI+ people. 

Backsliding on LGBTQI+ human rights is happening everywhere, even in politically stable, established democracies with human rights protections for LGBTQI+ people. Countries in Western Europe and the Americas experienced the greatest negative GBPI score changes globally, 74 and 67 percent, respectively. Transgender people globally reported the highest likelihood of violence, while trans women and intersex people reported the highest levels of feeling very unsafe or unsafe simply because of who they are. 

Taboo of gender equality

Before this current administration dismantled USAID, I helped create an LGBTQI+ inclusive whole-of-government strategy to prevent and respond to GBV that highlighted the unique forms of GBV against LGBTQI+ persons. This included so-called ‘corrective’ rape related to actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, or expression” and so-called ‘conversion’ therapy practices that seek to change or suppress a person’s gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, or sex characteristics. These efforts helped connect the dots in understanding that LGBTQI+ violence is rooted in the same systems of inequality and power imbalances as the broader spectrum of GBV against women and girls. 

Losing data and accountability

Data that helps better understand GBV against LGBTQI+ persons is also disappearing. Again, the dismantling of USAID meant a treasure trove of research and reports on LGBTQI+ rights have been lost. Earlier this year, the US Department of State removed LGBTQI+ reporting from its annual Human Rights Reports. These played a critical role in providing credible sources for civil society, researchers, and policymakers to track abuses and advocate for change. 

If violence isn’t documented, it’s easier for governments to deny it even exists and harder for us to hold governments accountable. Yet when systems of accountability work, governments and civil society can utilize data in international forums like the UN Universal Periodic Review, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Sustainable Development Goals to assess progress and compliance and call for governments to improve protections. 

All may not be lost if other countries and donors fill the void by supporting independent data collection and reporting efforts like the F&M Global Barometers and other academic and civil society monitoring. Such efforts are essential to the fight against GBV: The data helps show that the path toward safety, equality, and justice is within our reach if we’re unafraid of truth and visibility of those most marginalized and impacted.

Jay Gilliam (he/him/his) was the Senior LGBTQI+ Coordinator at USAID and is a member of the Global Outreach Advisory Council of the F&M Global Barometers.

Susan Dicklitch-Nelson (she/her/hers) is the founder of the F&M Global Barometers and Professor of Government at Franklin & Marshall College.

Continue Reading

Commentary

Second ‘lavender scare’ is harming our veterans. We know how to fix it

Out in National Security has built Trans Veterans State and Local Policy Toolkit

Published

on

(Photo by Cheryl Casey via Bigstock)

Seventy years after the first “lavender scare” drove LGBTQ Americans from public service, a second version is taking shape. Executive directives and administrative reviews have targeted transgender servicemembers and veterans, producing a new wave of quiet separations and lost benefits.

The policy language is technical, but the result is personal. Veterans who served honorably now face disrupted healthcare, delayed credentials, or housing barriers that no act of Congress ever required. Once again, Americans who met every standard of service are being told that their identity disqualifies them from stability.

Out in National Security built the Trans Veterans State and Local Policy Toolkit to change that. The toolkit gives state and local governments a practical path to repair harm through three measurable actions.

First, continuity of care. States can keep veterans covered by adopting presumptive Medicaid eligibility, aligning timelines with VA enrollment, and training providers in evidence-based gender-affirming care following the World Professional Association for Transgender Health Standards of Care Version 8.

Second, employment, and licensing. Governors and boards can recognize Department of Defense credentials, expedite licensing under existing reciprocity compacts, and ensure nondiscrimination in state veterans’ employment statutes.

Third, housing stability. States can designate transgender-veteran housing liaisons, expand voucher access, and enforce fair-housing protections that already exist in law.

Each step can be taken administratively within 90 days and requires no new federal legislation. The goal is straightforward: small, state-level reforms that yield rapid, measurable improvement in veterans’ daily lives.

The toolkit was introduced during a Veterans Week event hosted by the Center for American Progress, where federal and state leaders joined Out in National Security to highlight the first wave of state agencies adopting its recommendations. The discussion underscored how targeted, administrative reforms can strengthen veterans’ healthcare, employment, and housing outcomes without new legislation. Full materials and implementation resources are now available at outinnationalsecurity.org/public-policy/toolkit, developed in partnership with Minority Veterans of America, the Modern Military Association of America, SPARTA Pride, and the Human Rights Campaign.

These are technical fixes, but they carry moral weight. They reaffirm a basic democratic promise: service earns respect, not suspicion.

As a policy professional who has worked with veterans across the country, I see this moment as a test of civic integrity. The measure of a democracy is not only who it allows to serve but how it treats them afterward.

The second “lavender scare” will end when institutions at every level decide that inclusion is an obligation, not an exception. The toolkit offers a way to begin.

For more information or to access the toolkit once it is public, visit outinnationalsecurity.org/toolkit.

Lucas F. Schleusener is the CEO of Out in National Security.

Continue Reading

Popular