Opinions
The sexually stifled kingdom
America’s silence on LGBT rights abuses in Saudi Arabia

US Secretary of State John Kerry with the King of Saudi Arabia, Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Al Saud. (Photo public domain)
By OREN ADAKI & DAVID ANDREW WEINBERG
Middle Eastern media recently reported that the administrator of Saudi Arabia’s largest online network for lesbians was harassed and intimidated into closing up shop. The network, which reportedly had more than 4,000 participants, was described by some as a vice ring, but appears to have been just a networking site for consensual, same-sex relationships among Saudi women.
This incident is just the latest reminder of Saudi Arabia’s dismal record on LGBT rights, a topic that was regretfully absent from President Obama’s agenda during his recent trip to the sexually stifled kingdom.
The State Department advises LGBT travelers that consensual intercourse between same-sex individuals is “criminalized in Saudi Arabia” and that “potential penalties include fines, jail time or death.” The department also notes the possibility of “flogging” and documented that in 2012 the regime’s strident religious police declared that LGBT individuals would be banned from public schools or universities.
Our research has found that the Kingdom’s official curriculum continues to indoctrinate the next generation against LGBT rights. High school textbooks currently in use suggest that the most important debate about gay people is how best to murder them. When the State Department recently discovered as much from a taxpayer-funded study, it unfortunately chose to withhold its results.
Authorities in the region like to paint homosexuality as a foreign imposition. Saudi Arabia’s neighbor Kuwait made headlines recently for saying that all six monarchies in the Gulf would explore using intrusive medical testing to make it harder for LGBT individuals to visit the region. And yet, ironically, because the Gulf monarchies have such strict laws against the mixing of men and women, many believe that daily life in some ways encourages social and sexual relationships between same-sex partners.
Even before the recent dismantling of the Kingdom’s online lesbian network, more than 40 gay and transgender individuals were reported arrested in the Saudi city of Jeddah since President Obama’s visit in late March.
And when the president arrived in Saudi Arabia for his meeting with the king, that morning a widely republished Friday sermon at the Grand Mosque in Mecca specifically singled out the LGBT community for condemnation.
Imam Salah bin Humeid’s March 28 sermon at the Grand Mosque lashed out at homosexuality as an affliction that “seeks to strip man of his humanity” and inevitably “darkens and covers the soul.” He also claimed that homosexuality “violates the sanctity of Allah, kills chastity, and slaughters virtue.” He described organizations and legislation accepting this lifestyle as “frightening and terrifying,” insisting that being gay is at odds with common sense and “normal souls.”
Islamic scholars debate whether or not the Quran explicitly prohibits men having sex with men, but Bin Humeid clearly chose to emphasize the most homophobic possible theological view. He also made claims about contemporary society that were both offensive and factually erroneous. For instance, Bin Humeid claimed that homosexuality is outlawed by all religions (it’s not). In addition, he argued that 68 percent of all LGBT people suffer from public health maladies as a result of their behavior, including HIV/AIDS, herpes, hepatitis, gay bowel syndrome, and “feelings of inferiority that could lead to homicide or suicide.” He even declared that because homosexuality makes human beings “lower than a beast,” public health organizations should focus on preventing the “crimes” of gays and lesbians, not striving to address public health threats to the LGBT community.
This bigoted sermon was not delivered at any old house of worship — it was given by a longtime regime figure and adviser to the king from the pulpit of the Grand Mosque in Mecca, where the Saudi regime appoints the imams.
It is also reported that the Ministry of Islamic Affairs regularly vets sermons before they are delivered in important Saudi mosques.
The Obama administration broke new ground in 2011 by recognizing that “gay rights are human rights.” However, senior administration officials have ceded that the president did not raise human rights issues of any kind during his meeting in March with the king. And there apparently has been no high-level, public critique of Saudi Arabia’s intolerance toward gays since then from either the embassy in Riyadh or the executive branch.
America is not alone in downplaying its concerns about Saudi Arabia’s systematic human rights abuses, including against the LGBT community. On the same day as President Obama’s visit and Bin Humeid’s sermon, retired heads of state from Germany, Australia, Japan, Malaysia and Brazil were guests of honor at the Saudi King’s center for religious tolerance based in Vienna. Apparently none of them raised public concerns about this religious intolerance.
But as Saudi Arabia’s superpower patron, America has a special responsibility to help the royal family do better. As Martin Luther King Jr. famously said, “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” So, when a U.S. ally broadcasts state-sponsored hate on the day our president comes to visit, it deserves more than turning a blind eye.
Oren Adaki is a research associate at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. David Andrew Weinberg is a senior fellow at the Foundation.
Letter-to-the-Editor
Candidates should pledge to nominate LGBTQ judge to Supreme Court
Presidential, Senate hopefuls need to go on the record
As soon as the final votes are cast and counted and verified after the November 2026 elections are over, the 2028 presidential cycle will begin in earnest. Polls, financial aid requests, and volunteer opportunities ad infinitum will flood the public and personal media. There will be more issues than candidates in both parties. The rending of garments and mudslinging will be both interesting and maybe even amusing as citizens will watch how candidates react to each and every issue of the day.
There is one particular item that I am hoping each candidate will be asked whether in private or in public. If a Supreme Court vacancy occurs in your potential administration, will you nominate an open and qualified LGBTQ to join the remaining eight?
Other interest groups on both sides have made similar demands over the years and have had them honored. Is it not time that our voices are raised as well? There are several already sitting judges on both state and federal benches that have either been elected statewide or approved by the U.S. Senate.
Our communities are being utilized and abused on judicial menus. Enough already! Challenge each and every candidate, regardless of their party with our honest question and see if honest answers are given. By the way … no harm in asking the one-third of the U.S. Senate candidates too who will be on ballots. Looking forward to any candidate tap dancing!
Opinions
2026 elections will bring major changes to D.C. government
Mayor’s office, multiple Council seats up for grabs
Next year will be a banner year for elections in D.C. The mayor announced she will not run. Two Council members, Anita Bonds, At-large, and Brianne Nadeau, Ward 1, have announced they will not run. Waiting for Del. Norton to do the same, but even if she doesn’t, there will be a real race for that office.
So far, Robert White, Council member at-large, and Brooke Pinto, Council member Ward 2, are among a host of others, who have announced. If one of these Council members should win, there would be a special election for their seat. If Kenyon McDuffie, Council member at-large, announces for mayor as a Democrat, which he is expected to do, he will have to resign his seat on the Council as he fills one of the non-Democratic seats there. Janeese George, Ward 4 Council member, announced she is running for mayor. Should she win, there would be a special election for her seat. Another special election could happen if Trayon White, Ward 8, is convicted of his alleged crimes, when he is brought to trial in January. Both the Council chair, and attorney general, have announced they are seeking reelection, along with a host of other offices that will be on the ballot.
Many of the races could look like the one in Ward 1 where at least six people have already announced. They include three members of the LGBTQ community. It seems the current leader in that race is Jackie Reyes Yanes, a Latina activist, not a member of the LGBTQ community, who worked for Mayor Fenty as head of the Latino Affairs Office, and for Mayor Bowser as head of the Office of Community Affairs. About eight, including the two Council members, have already announced they are running for the delegate seat.
I am often asked by candidates for an endorsement. The reason being my years as a community, LGBTQ, and Democratic, activist; and my ability to endorse in my column in the Washington Blade. The only candidate I endorsed so far is Phil Mendelson, for Council chair. While he and I don’t always agree on everything, he’s a staunch supporter of the LGBTQ community, a rational person, and we need someone with a steady hand if there really are six new Council members, out of the 13.
When candidates call, they realize I am a policy wonk. My unsolicited advice to all candidates is: Do more than talk in generalities, be specific and honest as to what you think you can do, if elected. Candidates running for a legislative office, should talk about what bills they will support, and then what new ones they will introduce. What are the first three things you will focus on for your constituents, if elected. If you are running against an incumbent, what do you think you can do differently than the person you hope to replace? For any new policies and programs you propose, if there is a cost, let constituents know how you intend to pay for them. Take the time to learn the city budget, and how money is currently being spent. The more information you have at your fingertips, the smarter you sound, and voters respect that, at least many do. If you are running for mayor, you need to develop a full platform, covering all the issues the city will face, something I have helped a number of previous mayors do. The next mayor will continue to have to deal with the felon in the White House. He/she/they will have to ensure he doesn’t try to eliminate home rule. The next mayor will have to understand how to walk a similar tightrope Mayor Bowser has balanced so effectively.
Currently, the District provides lots of public money to candidates. If you decide to take it, know the details. The city makes it too easy to get. But while it is available, take advantage of it. One new variable in this election is the implementation of rank-choice voting. It will impact how you campaign. If you attack another candidate, you may not be the second, or even third, choice, of their strongest supporters.
Each candidate needs a website. Aside from asking for donations and volunteers, it should have a robust issues section, biography, endorsements, and news. One example I share with candidates is my friend Zach Wahls’s website. He is running for United States Senate from Iowa. It is a comprehensive site, easy to navigate, with concise language, and great pictures. One thing to remember is that D.C. is overwhelmingly Democratic. Chances are the winner of the Democratic primary will win the general election.
Potential candidates should read the DCBOE calendar. Petitions will be available at the Board of Elections on Jan. 23, with the primary on June 16th, and general election on Nov. 3. So, ready, set, go!
Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist.
Opinions
Lighting candles in a time of exhaustion
Gunmen killed 15 people at Sydney Hanukkah celebration
In the wake of the shooting at Bondi Beach that targeted Jews, many of us are sitting with a familiar feeling: exhaustion. Not shock or surprise, but the deep weariness that comes from knowing this violence continues. It is yet another reminder that antisemitism remains persistent.
Bondi Beach is far from Washington, D.C., but antisemitism does not respect geography. When Jews are attacked anywhere, Jews everywhere feel it. We check on family and friends, absorb the headlines, and brace ourselves for the quiet, numbing normalization that has followed acts of mass violence.
Many of us live at an intersection where threats can come from multiple directions. As a community, we have embraced the concept of intersectional identity, and yet in queer spaces, many LGBTQ+ Jews are being implicitly or explicitly asked to play down our Jewishness. Jews hesitate before wearing a Magen David or a kippah. Some of us have learned to compartmentalize our identities, deciding which part of ourselves feels safest to lead with. Are we welcome as queer people only if we mute our Jewishness? Are those around us able to acknowledge that our fear is not abstract, but rooted in a lived reality, one in which our friends and family are directly affected by the rise in antisemitic violence, globally and here at home?
As a result of these experiences, many LGBTQ+ Jews feel a growing fatigue. We are told, implicitly or explicitly, that our fear is inconvenient; that Jewish trauma must be contextualized, minimized, or deferred in favor of other injustices. Certainly, the world is full of horror. And yet, we long for a world in which all lives are cherished and safe, where solidarity is not conditional on political purity or on which parts of ourselves are deemed acceptable to love.
We are now in the season of Chanuka. The story of this holiday is not one of darkness vanishing overnight. It is the story of a fragile light that should not have lasted. Chanuka teaches us that hope does not require certainty; it requires persistence and the courage to kindle a flame even when the darkness feels overwhelming.
For LGBTQ+ Jews, this lesson resonates deeply. We have survived by refusing to disappear across multiple dimensions of our identities. We have built communities, created rituals, and embraced chosen families that affirm the fullness of who we are.
To our LGBTQ+ siblings who are not Jewish: this is a moment to listen, to stand with us, and to make space for our grief. Solidarity means showing up not only when it is easy or popular, but especially when it is uncomfortable.
To our fellow Jews: your exhaustion is valid. Your fear is understandable, and so is your hope. Every candle lit this Chanuka is an act of resilience. Every refusal to hide, every moment of joy, is a declaration that hatred will not have the final word.
Light does not deny darkness. It confronts it.
As we light our candles this Chanuka season, may we protect one another and bring light to one another, even as the world too often responds to difference with violence and hate.
Joshua Maxey is the executive director of Bet Mishpachah, D.C.’s LGBTQ synagogue.
