Local
Protester accuses Charles Village officials of homophobia
Demonstration follows Eagle liquor license flap
Brian Gaither protested outside the Charles Village Festival. (Blade photo by Steve Charing)
Brian Gaither of the Baltimore Homophobia Opposition Network (HON) stood on the island on Charles Street just outside the Charles Village Festival’s footprint on May 30 donning a rainbow boa and pink-framed sunglasses, playing Erasure on his boom box and handing out fliers to festival goers.
The flier that was titled “WANTED FOR HOMOPHOBIA” included the photographs of five key individuals who went on record opposing the liquor license transfer requested by the new owners of the Baltimore Eagle—a leather bar located on the corner of Charles and 21st streets—at a key liquor board hearing in March. In April, the board denied the license transfer request. HON is not affiliated with the Baltimore Eagle and was acting independently.
Gaither also carried a bullhorn, which he used to bellow to all within earshot the following:
“The Charles Village Civic Association, despite the excuses they offer, used procedural tools to oppose the opening of a gay business in Charles Village. In so doing the Charles Village Civic Association has made it clear that businesses catering to the LGBT community are not welcome here. Opposing businesses which cater to the LGBT community makes me, a Baltimore citizen, feel less welcome and less safe in Charles Village. Expressing a personal dislike of LGBT people, whether you say it or you use the neighborhood association to do it, is the essence of homophobia. Spending your money at the festival today directly supports the homophobia of the Charles Village Civic Association.”
The protest lasted two hours though it had been scheduled for five hours each of the two days of the festival. Brendan Coyne, a board member of CVCA, approached Gaither and told him that it was not the official position of the association to oppose the bar, Gaither told the Blade. Gaither later aborted the protest.
Gaither told the Blade, “If Sandy Sparks, the president of the CVCA, (one of the five pictured on the flier) was not acting in accordance with the desires of the rest of the board when she appeared before the Liquor Board to oppose the transfer of the license, then CVCA should take corrective actions to remedy the situation and make public their official position on the re-opening of the Eagle.”
He added, “I think of Charles Village as a diverse and inclusive part of Baltimore. So it was disappointing to watch video of the president of the neighborhood association go before the Liquor Board and oppose a gay business.”
Coyne disputed that assessment.
“I know of no one on the CVCA board who is opposed to the Baltimore Eagle on the grounds of it being a gay bar,” Coyne told the Blade in an email. “While there may be opposition in Charles Village and among other organizations on liquor license and land-use grounds, ours is an inclusive neighborhood that has long welcomed members of the LGBTQ community and continues to do so.”
He continued, “Happily, American society at large is finally catching up to where we’ve been for decades and I fervently hope that Mr. Gaither and others fighting the good fight against homophobia will choose better targets in the future.”
Efforts by the Baltimore Eagle’s ownership and supporters are underway to attempt to overturn the liquor board’s decision. More than 1,000 signatures have been gathered from an online petition at TheBaltimoreEagle.com.
CLARIFICATION: This story was updated to add attribution, reflecting that Gaither told the Blade about Coyne’s comments. The Blade has invited Coyne to contribute a quote explaining his position on the Eagle liquor license dispute and has offered op-ed space to CVCA to better explain its position.
District of Columbia
Norton reintroduces bill to ban discrimination against LGBTQ jurors in D.C. Superior Court
Congresswoman notes Congress controls local court system
D.C. Congressional Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) on Friday, June 20, reintroduced her bill to ban discrimination against LGBTQ D.C. residents in the process for selecting people to serve as jurors in D.C. Superior Court.
“The bill would clarify that D.C. residents may not be excluded or disqualified from jury service in the local D.C. trial court, the D.C. Superior Court, based on sexual orientation or gender identity,” Norton said in a statement.
“Specifically, this bill would clarify that the term ‘sex,’ which is a protected class under the nondiscrimination law that applies to jurors in the D.C. Superior Court includes sexual orientation and gender identity,” Norton said.
She points out in her statement that under the D.C. Home Rule Act approved by Congress that created D.C.’s local government, including an elected mayor and City Council, the federal government retained control over the local court system.
“Therefore, until D.C. is given authority to amend Title 11 of the D.C. Code, which one of my bills would do, an act of Congress is required to clarify that LGBTQ+ jurors in the D.C. Superior Court are protected from discrimination,” according to her statement.
A spokesperson for Norton couldn’t immediately be reached to determine whether Norton is aware of specific instances where residents were denied jury service because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Online records of congressional action on Norton’s juror nondiscrimination bill show she had introduced it in 2019, 2021, and 2023, when it died in committee each year, except for the 117th Congress in 2022, when it was approved by a committee but died in the full House.
“During Pride month we are reminded of the many contributions of the LGBTQ+ community,” Norton said in her June 20 statement. “Nobody, including D.C. jurors, should be discriminated against based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, and D.C. juries should not be deprived of the service of LGBTQ residents,” she added.
The Washington Blade’s second day of Pride on the Pier at The Wharf DC ended with a fireworks show on Saturday, June 7. The fireworks show was presented by the Leonard-Litz LGBTQ Foundation.
(Washington Blade photos by Michael Key)
State Sen. Ghazala Hashmi (D-Chesterfield) will face John Reid in the race to become Virginia’s next lieutenant governor.
Hashmi won the Democratic primary with 27.49 percent of the vote. She defeated former Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney, state Sen. Aaron Rouse (D-Virginia Beach), Babur Lateef, Victor Salgado and Alexander Bastani.
“Tonight, Virginians made history,” said Hashmi in a statement. “We didn’t just win a primary, we sent a clear message that we won’t be bullied, broken, or dragged backward by the chaos in Washington.”
Reid, a gay conservative talk show host, in April won the Republican nomination to succeed Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, who is running to succeed Gov. Glenn Youngkin.
The incumbent governor days after Reid secured the nomination called for him to withdraw his candidacy amid reports that a social media account with his username included “pornographic content.” Reid, who would become the first openly gay person elected to statewide office in Virginia if he wins in November, has strongly denied the reports.
Former state Del. Jay Jones defeated Henrico County Commonwealth’s Attorney Shannon Taylor in Democratic attorney general primary. Jones will face Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares in November.
Youngkin cannot run for a second, consecutive term.
Former Congresswoman Abigail Spanberger will face off against Earle-Sears in November. The winner will make history as the first woman elected governor in the state’s history.
Nine trans activists arrested outside Supreme Court
Norton reintroduces bill to ban discrimination against LGBTQ jurors in D.C. Superior Court
PHOTOS: Goodwin Living Pride Parade
More books for Pride month
Baltimore Orioles Pride Night set for June 25
Supreme Court upholds ban on transgender care for minors
Juvenile arrested for anti-gay assault in D.C.
‘Lou’s Legacy’ to make TV debut next week
More than 15K people attend Baltimore Trans Pride
