Opinions
Beware the sex police in Trump’s America
Stigmatizing our community with outdated criminal statutes
As much as the LGBT community has successfully won favorable laws to secure and protect our rights to marriage and fair employment, we did so at a time when the president and the cultural tide supported us. In the coming Age of Trump, we know we can’t rely on the same level of political and public support. Already, we see reported acts of targeted homophobia carried out in Trump’s name, and in the coming years we must be wary of tepid support from our remaining political allies. Most importantly, we must be vigilant of the dangers lingering in many states’ outdated criminal statutes.
For generations, laws have been deliberately designed for use against members of the LGBT community. Criminal codes applicable only to us – and prosecutions for violating them – have been a reliable tool for conflating homosexuality and gender identity with criminality. No matter how unjust the basis for a law targeting us, a conviction permanently marks us. There is no worse stigma than “Pervert by Order of the Court.”
When police raids of gay bars were common, those arrested could expect to have their names printed in local newspapers. The “public interest” justification for this destruction of privacy was to “notify the public of criminal behavior.” However, the true purpose was to terrorize gay men through a campaign of shame that resulted in job loss and worse. Today in North Carolina, it’s hard to imagine the horror of applying for a job with a criminal record based solely on a violation of HB2.
In Maryland, I can have a marriage recognized by the state, but if my husband and I were to celebrate our honeymoon here, any county’s State’s Attorney could charge us with felony sodomy. Under Maryland Criminal Code Sec. 3-321, it’s punishable by up to 10 years in prison. Most insultingly, the marriage certificate itself would offer our zealous persecutor [sic] probable cause for a surveillance warrant. Whether or not a local judge would recognize the federal decision in Lawrence v. Texas isn’t something I want to learn in that moment. And if one of us were HIV+, he could be charged under Maryland Code Sec. 18-601 with a misdemeanor carrying a maximum penalty of three years and a $2,500 fine.
Even the selective enforcement of general “decency” laws offers the government a frighteningly effective means of social control. In 2015, officers in Rehoboth Beach stepped up citations for public urination on Poodle Beach, and at Cape Henlopen they used a rookie park ranger as bait in a cruising sting. The purpose of these actions could only be one thing – to make it clear to LGBT people that our presence always requires special scrutiny. “Lewdness” is a presumption of our characters; all that’s needed is a conviction or a plea bargain to prove it. Kelly Cross learned that in April of 2016. While a candidate for Baltimore City Council, anonymous opponents papered the doorways of Cross’s neighbors with the titillating news that seven years ago, in Washington D.C., he had accepted a plea bargain on a charge of “voyeurism.” His political foes slanderously inflated a misdemeanor offense (and $50 fine) into claims that he was a “convicted sex offender.” When the Baltimore Sun recently published an opinion piece by Cross, a local dissenter simply dismissed him with a weblink to old reports of the scandal. The message was clear – there’s no need to engage a member of the LGBT community who has something to say once he’s been branded “Pervert by Order of the Court.”
To beat back this common mistreatment, we have to recognize that existing statutes are regularly used to minimize the LGBT community even as new ones are drafted to control our lives and outlaw our families. We need to shore up local organizations that may have atrophied in the past few years, especially those focused on LGBT legal services. We need to tell our friends in state legislatures that laws criminalizing LGBT people have to go. And most importantly, we need to halt the propagation of stigmas attached to violations of “decency” crimes.
In this new Age of Trump, we know they’re coming for us with their “religious freedom” laws. We know they want to roll back our civil protections where they can. But let’s not forget that the most lethal – and accessible – weapon in their political arsenal is to have us all named sex criminals who don’t deserve a place in “decent” society.
Brian Gaither is an LGBT activist living in Baltimore. He is co-founder of the Pride Foundation of Maryland.
Letter-to-the-Editor
Candidates should pledge to nominate LGBTQ judge to Supreme Court
Presidential, Senate hopefuls need to go on the record
As soon as the final votes are cast and counted and verified after the November 2026 elections are over, the 2028 presidential cycle will begin in earnest. Polls, financial aid requests, and volunteer opportunities ad infinitum will flood the public and personal media. There will be more issues than candidates in both parties. The rending of garments and mudslinging will be both interesting and maybe even amusing as citizens will watch how candidates react to each and every issue of the day.
There is one particular item that I am hoping each candidate will be asked whether in private or in public. If a Supreme Court vacancy occurs in your potential administration, will you nominate an open and qualified LGBTQ to join the remaining eight?
Other interest groups on both sides have made similar demands over the years and have had them honored. Is it not time that our voices are raised as well? There are several already sitting judges on both state and federal benches that have either been elected statewide or approved by the U.S. Senate.
Our communities are being utilized and abused on judicial menus. Enough already! Challenge each and every candidate, regardless of their party with our honest question and see if honest answers are given. By the way … no harm in asking the one-third of the U.S. Senate candidates too who will be on ballots. Looking forward to any candidate tap dancing!
Opinions
2026 elections will bring major changes to D.C. government
Mayor’s office, multiple Council seats up for grabs
Next year will be a banner year for elections in D.C. The mayor announced she will not run. Two Council members, Anita Bonds, At-large, and Brianne Nadeau, Ward 1, have announced they will not run. Waiting for Del. Norton to do the same, but even if she doesn’t, there will be a real race for that office.
So far, Robert White, Council member at-large, and Brooke Pinto, Council member Ward 2, are among a host of others, who have announced. If one of these Council members should win, there would be a special election for their seat. If Kenyon McDuffie, Council member at-large, announces for mayor as a Democrat, which he is expected to do, he will have to resign his seat on the Council as he fills one of the non-Democratic seats there. Janeese George, Ward 4 Council member, announced she is running for mayor. Should she win, there would be a special election for her seat. Another special election could happen if Trayon White, Ward 8, is convicted of his alleged crimes, when he is brought to trial in January. Both the Council chair, and attorney general, have announced they are seeking reelection, along with a host of other offices that will be on the ballot.
Many of the races could look like the one in Ward 1 where at least six people have already announced. They include three members of the LGBTQ community. It seems the current leader in that race is Jackie Reyes Yanes, a Latina activist, not a member of the LGBTQ community, who worked for Mayor Fenty as head of the Latino Affairs Office, and for Mayor Bowser as head of the Office of Community Affairs. About eight, including the two Council members, have already announced they are running for the delegate seat.
I am often asked by candidates for an endorsement. The reason being my years as a community, LGBTQ, and Democratic, activist; and my ability to endorse in my column in the Washington Blade. The only candidate I endorsed so far is Phil Mendelson, for Council chair. While he and I don’t always agree on everything, he’s a staunch supporter of the LGBTQ community, a rational person, and we need someone with a steady hand if there really are six new Council members, out of the 13.
When candidates call, they realize I am a policy wonk. My unsolicited advice to all candidates is: Do more than talk in generalities, be specific and honest as to what you think you can do, if elected. Candidates running for a legislative office, should talk about what bills they will support, and then what new ones they will introduce. What are the first three things you will focus on for your constituents, if elected. If you are running against an incumbent, what do you think you can do differently than the person you hope to replace? For any new policies and programs you propose, if there is a cost, let constituents know how you intend to pay for them. Take the time to learn the city budget, and how money is currently being spent. The more information you have at your fingertips, the smarter you sound, and voters respect that, at least many do. If you are running for mayor, you need to develop a full platform, covering all the issues the city will face, something I have helped a number of previous mayors do. The next mayor will continue to have to deal with the felon in the White House. He/she/they will have to ensure he doesn’t try to eliminate home rule. The next mayor will have to understand how to walk a similar tightrope Mayor Bowser has balanced so effectively.
Currently, the District provides lots of public money to candidates. If you decide to take it, know the details. The city makes it too easy to get. But while it is available, take advantage of it. One new variable in this election is the implementation of rank-choice voting. It will impact how you campaign. If you attack another candidate, you may not be the second, or even third, choice, of their strongest supporters.
Each candidate needs a website. Aside from asking for donations and volunteers, it should have a robust issues section, biography, endorsements, and news. One example I share with candidates is my friend Zach Wahls’s website. He is running for United States Senate from Iowa. It is a comprehensive site, easy to navigate, with concise language, and great pictures. One thing to remember is that D.C. is overwhelmingly Democratic. Chances are the winner of the Democratic primary will win the general election.
Potential candidates should read the DCBOE calendar. Petitions will be available at the Board of Elections on Jan. 23, with the primary on June 16th, and general election on Nov. 3. So, ready, set, go!
Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist.
Opinions
Lighting candles in a time of exhaustion
Gunmen killed 15 people at Sydney Hanukkah celebration
In the wake of the shooting at Bondi Beach that targeted Jews, many of us are sitting with a familiar feeling: exhaustion. Not shock or surprise, but the deep weariness that comes from knowing this violence continues. It is yet another reminder that antisemitism remains persistent.
Bondi Beach is far from Washington, D.C., but antisemitism does not respect geography. When Jews are attacked anywhere, Jews everywhere feel it. We check on family and friends, absorb the headlines, and brace ourselves for the quiet, numbing normalization that has followed acts of mass violence.
Many of us live at an intersection where threats can come from multiple directions. As a community, we have embraced the concept of intersectional identity, and yet in queer spaces, many LGBTQ+ Jews are being implicitly or explicitly asked to play down our Jewishness. Jews hesitate before wearing a Magen David or a kippah. Some of us have learned to compartmentalize our identities, deciding which part of ourselves feels safest to lead with. Are we welcome as queer people only if we mute our Jewishness? Are those around us able to acknowledge that our fear is not abstract, but rooted in a lived reality, one in which our friends and family are directly affected by the rise in antisemitic violence, globally and here at home?
As a result of these experiences, many LGBTQ+ Jews feel a growing fatigue. We are told, implicitly or explicitly, that our fear is inconvenient; that Jewish trauma must be contextualized, minimized, or deferred in favor of other injustices. Certainly, the world is full of horror. And yet, we long for a world in which all lives are cherished and safe, where solidarity is not conditional on political purity or on which parts of ourselves are deemed acceptable to love.
We are now in the season of Chanuka. The story of this holiday is not one of darkness vanishing overnight. It is the story of a fragile light that should not have lasted. Chanuka teaches us that hope does not require certainty; it requires persistence and the courage to kindle a flame even when the darkness feels overwhelming.
For LGBTQ+ Jews, this lesson resonates deeply. We have survived by refusing to disappear across multiple dimensions of our identities. We have built communities, created rituals, and embraced chosen families that affirm the fullness of who we are.
To our LGBTQ+ siblings who are not Jewish: this is a moment to listen, to stand with us, and to make space for our grief. Solidarity means showing up not only when it is easy or popular, but especially when it is uncomfortable.
To our fellow Jews: your exhaustion is valid. Your fear is understandable, and so is your hope. Every candle lit this Chanuka is an act of resilience. Every refusal to hide, every moment of joy, is a declaration that hatred will not have the final word.
Light does not deny darkness. It confronts it.
As we light our candles this Chanuka season, may we protect one another and bring light to one another, even as the world too often responds to difference with violence and hate.
Joshua Maxey is the executive director of Bet Mishpachah, D.C.’s LGBTQ synagogue.
