Connect with us

Commentary

OPINION: Looking at Kamala Harris’ record on trans and progressive issues — the facts matter

Published

on

Upfront, I am a progressive. I am a transsexual and a visible trans activist.

I got into politics as the first transgender officer of the Stonewall Democratic Club and currently an elected official for the City of Los Angeles looking towards higher office.

At all times, I have voiced progressive values. This said because I would like you to understand where I am coming from and that I am not some shill for neo-libs.

I wanted Bernie or Warren. I did not get either. I, along with every other progressive, got Biden/Harris. Two people I am confident that were way down on most all progressives’ list of primary candidates.

But this is where we are at in this moment in time.

As a progressive, I hold sacred the fundamental values of inclusion, integrity, compassion, and truth. As part of that value system, and in particular when it comes to politics, it is fundamental to have open honest discussions/debates around issues and candidates without tearing people down. Instead, identify perceived strengths and weakness in others (we all have them), and then lift up the strengths and assist in resolving the weaknesses.

To me, the transgender movement is about acceptance and love. It is about second chances. It is about personal growth. It is about our journeys, not our destinations. This is what I have learned from the community and I thank you!

The truth matters. Not just the cherry-picked parts that attempt to make someone look bad because they were not one’s first choice, but the whole truth. A lie by omission is still a lie. This is what many folks in the transgender community seem to be trying to do at the moment. They say look at Sen. Harris’ record on trans issues and then they neglect to tell the whole story.

From a progressive standpoint, it should first be acknowledged Sen. Harris’ track record as a prosecutor is a bitter pill. Jamal Trulove’s wrongful conviction seems to be one of the most egregious examples of her “tough on crime” policies doing damage to folks in the black community in particular. These are certainly red flags for progressives in thinking about her as a VP pick.

Jamal Trulove attends The Last Black Man In San Francisco premiere during the 2019 Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah, in January 2019.

At the same time, if we are to have a discussion about her record, then in the spirit of telling the whole story, and not just the parts that make her look bad, her Senate record should also be considered as well, which in my view has been fairly progressive in general.

Based on that, has she seen the errors of her ways? No doubt the debate on this will continue.

As a transgender person who is a LA City elected official and community leader, I feel the need to set the record straight in the court of public opinion as to her record with respect to transgender issues. My progressive values demand I do. It is injurious to the trans movement if we do not ourselves live up to the ideals of the movement. So for today, I would like to focus on her record on trans rights, and LGBTQ issues in general.

From what I am seeing, there are 2 main instances where she is being perceived to have purposefully done injury to the trans community. One is a brief she wrote as CA Attorney General on behalf of the CA Department of Corrections (DOC) and the other was her votes as US Senator on two anti-human trafficking bills.

Michelle Lael-Norsworhy and Shiloh Quine were transgender inmates who sought gender reassignment surgery. (Norsworthy photo courtesy Transgender Law Center; Quine photo courtesy SFINX Publishing: Women of San Quentin)

Brief Defending A CA Department Of Corrections Policy Disallowing Medical Transition Services To Transgender Inmates

It is true she wrote the brief. This is what some trans people are using to discredit her. But this is not the entire story. The people using this to discredit her are lying by omission. Let’s be clear. She did not deny trans inmates services, DOC did, a judge did.

The DOC was her client while she was CA Attorney General. She did not write the policy. It was her job, it was her sworn duty, to represent her client to the best of her ability in court. As AG, her personal feelings had no bearing on her obligations.

What folks are omitting is the part where she went back to DOC and convinced them to change their policy so that trans people can now get the medical transition services they need. She didn’t have to do that. Technically her job as AG was done the moment she submitted the brief. But clearly after having to write it, this did not sit well with her. It looks like she saw the harm such a policy was inflicting, and on her own, she fixed it.

SESTA/FOSTA

It is true she was in support of these 2 bills and voted in favor. But again, this is not the whole story. For those who may not know, these 2 bills, which did become law, sought to make it more difficult for pimps and sex traffickers to further exploit willing and unwilling sex workers by holding online platforms accountable if such persons were using them. Unfortunately, there were unintended consequences for trans survival sex workers.

As many of us in the trans community are aware, survival sex work for some of us is just that, a means of survival. Due to an unemployment rate for trans people of 3 times the national average because of discrimination in the workplace, some people have little choice. What these 2 laws did was to take away platforms that were used to vet clients making it safer for those workers. With the threat of prosecution, online platforms such as Craigslist took no chances and illuminated their personal pages.

The one thing I hope we can all agree on is human trafficking is horrid. It is estimated there are 50,000 people trafficked each year in the US and 20 – 40 million globally. I am not saying these bills were even close to the right approach to the problem but did she vote for these bills as a way of harming the transgender community? It does not appear so.

Her Record On LGBTQ Rights In General

• A co-sponsor of the Equality Act (S.788).
• Helped make California the first state to outlaw the gay/trans panic defense.
• As State AG, she refused to defend Prop 8 on the grounds it was unconstitutional.
• Declined to certify a measure that obtained enough signatures to get on the state ballot to institute the death penalty for homosexual acts.
• Introduced legislation in the Senate that would require the Census Bureau to include questions on the Census after Trump denied its inclusion on the form
• As a presidential candidate, she pledged to have a west wing office for a chief advocate for LGBT affairs. As VP, I have little doubt that won’t be made to happen.
• More

At the end of the day, one can certainly find fault with just about anyone. Some may find fault with me for even writing this op-ed and that is ok.

But don’t you think in this age of memes and 240 character quips that pass for civil discourse, and unless there is something I am missing here, isn’t it nice for a change to actually get the whole picture?

The truth is the Trump Fascist Regime must be removed on November 3rd. On November 4th, progressives will continue to do what we do best.

Keep pushing forward for workers, healthcare for all, housing as a human right, racial justice, protection of LGBTQ+ rights, reimagining of criminal justice and the for-profit prison systems, community policing, etc.

And if Biden/Harris do not listen, we will most certainly continue taking to the streets!

— Rachael Rose Luckey is a progressive political activist living in Los Angeles. As President of the Rampart Village Neighborhood Council, she is one of only a couple of dozen openly Transgender elected Government Officials in the nation. f: @RachaelRose4LA | Email List: tinyurl.com/RachaelRoseEmailSignUp

(The views expressed are solely her own and do not represent the views of any political party, organization, government entity or candidate/elected official.)

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Commentary

Protecting the trans community is not optional for elected allies and candidates

One of oldest political tactics is blaming vulnerable group for societal woes

Published

on

rotester stands outside Children's National Hospital in Northwest D.C. on Feb. 2, 2025. (Washington Blade photo by Linus Berggren)

Being an ally to the trans community is not a conditional position for me, nor should it be for any candidate. My allyship doesn’t hinge on polling, focus groups, or whether courage feels politically convenient. At a time when trans people, especially trans youth of color, are under coordinated attack, elected officials and candidates must do more than offer quiet support. We must take a public and solid stand.

History shows us how these moments begin. One of the oldest political tactics is to single out the most vulnerable and blame them for society’s anxieties — not because they are responsible, but because they are easier to blame than those with power and protection. In Nazi Germany, Jewish people were primarily targeted, but they were not the only demographic who suffered elimination. LGBTQ people, disabled people, Romani communities, political dissidents, and others were also rounded up, imprisoned, and killed. Among the earliest acts of fascistic repression was the destruction of Berlin’s Institute for Sexual Science, a pioneering center for gender-affirming care and LGBTQ research. These books and medical records were among the first to be confiscated and burned. It is not a coincidence that these same communities are now the first to suffer under this regime, they are our canaries in the coal mine signaling what’s to come. 

Congress, emboldened by the rhetoric of the Donald Trump campaign, recently passed HR 3492 to criminalize healthcare workers who provide gender-affirming healthcare with fines and imprisonment. This bill, sponsored by celebrity politicians like Marjorie Taylor Greene, puts politics and headlines over people and health outcomes. Healthcare that a number of cis-gendered people also benefit from byway of hair regeneration and surgery, male and female breast augmentation, hormone replacement therapy etc. Even when these bills targeting this care do not pass, they do real damage. They create fear among patients, legal uncertainty for providers, and instability for clinics that serve the most marginalized people in our communities.

Here in D.C., organizations like Planned Parenthood and Whitman-Walker Health are lifelines for many communities. They provide gender-affirming care alongside primary care, mental health services, HIV treatment, and preventative medicine. When healthcare is politicized or criminalized, people don’t wait for court rulings — they delay care, ration medication, or disappear from the system entirely.

As a pharmacist, I know exactly what that means. These are life-saving medications. Continuity of care matters. Criminalizing and politicizing healthcare does not protect children or families — it puts lives at risk.

Instead of centering these realities, political discourse has been deliberately diverted toward a manufactured panic about trans women in sports. Let me be clear: trans women deserve to be protected and allowed to compete just like anyone else. Athletics have always included people with different bodies, strengths, and abilities. Girls and women will always encounter competitors who are stronger or faster — that is not a gender or sports crisis, it is the nature of competition.

Sports are meant to teach fairness, mutual respect, and the shared spirit of competition — not suspicion or exclusion. We should not police young people’s bodies, and we should reject attempts to single out trans youth as a political distraction. Families and doctors should be the authority on sex and gender identity.

This narrative has been cynically amplified by the right, but too often Democrats have allowed it to take hold rather than forcefully rejecting it. It is imperative to pay attention to what is happening — and to push back against every attempt to dehumanize anyone for political gain.

Trans people have always been part of our communities and our democracy. Protecting the most vulnerable is not radical — it is the foundation of a just society. My work is grounded in that commitment, and I will not waver from it. I’m proud to have hired trans political team Down Ballot to lead my campaign for DC Council At Large. We need more ally leaders of all stages to stand up for the LGBTQ+ community. We must let elected detractors know that when they come for them, then they come for all of us. We cannot allow Fox News and social media trolls to create a narrative that scares us away from protecting marginalized populations. We must stand up and do what’s right.

Anything less is not leadership.

Rep. Oye Owolewa is running for an at-large seat on the D.C. Council.

Continue Reading

Commentary

America is going in the wrong direction for intersex children

Lawmakers are criminalizing care for trans youth, while permitting irreversible harm to intersex babies

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

I live with the consequences of what America is willing to condone in the name of “protecting children.”

When I was young, doctors and adults made irreversible decisions about my body without my informed consent. They weren’t responding to an emergency. They were responding to discomfort with innate physical differences and the social and medical pressure to make a child’s body conform to a rigid female-male binary. That’s the part people like to skip over when they talk about “child welfare”: the harm didn’t begin with my identity. It started with adults deciding my healthy body needed fixing.

That’s why the hypocrisy unfolding right now from statehouses to Capitol Hill feels so familiar, and so dangerous. 

While harmful medical practices on intersex children, the nearly 2 percent born with differences in one or more of their physical sex characteristics, have been ongoing in the U.S. for decades, until recently, there was no law specifically condoning it. 

This month, House Republicans passed one of the most extreme anti-trans bills in modern American history, advancing legislation that would criminalize gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth and threaten doctors with severe penalties for providing evidence-based treatment. The bill is framed as a measure to “protect children,” but in reality, it weaponizes the criminal legal system against families and providers who are trying to support young people in surviving adolescence.

At the same time, the administration has proposed hospital and insurance policies designed to choke off access to affirming care for trans youth nationwide by making providers fear loss of federal funding, regulatory retaliation, or prosecution. This is a familiar strategy: don’t just ban care outright; instead, make it so risky that hospitals stop providing it altogether. The result is the same everywhere. Young people lose access to care that major medical associations agree can be lifesaving.

All of this is happening under the banner of preventing “irreversible harm.”

But if America were genuinely concerned about irreversible harm to minors, the first thing lawmakers would address is the medically unnecessary, nonconsensual surgeries still performed on intersex infants and young children, procedures that permanently alter healthy tissue, often without urgent medical need, and long before a child can meaningfully participate in the decision. Human rights organizations have documented for years how these interventions are justified not by medical necessity, but by social pressure to make bodies appear more typically “female” or “male.” 

Here is the uncomfortable truth: all of the state laws now banning gender-affirming care for transgender youth explicitly include exceptions that allow nonconsensual and harmful intersex surgeries to continue.

A recent JAMA Health Forum analysis found that 28 states have enacted bans on gender-affirming care for minors that carve out intersex exceptions, preserving doctors’ ability to perform irreversible “normalizing” procedures on intersex children even while prohibiting affirming care for trans adolescents.

This contradiction is not accidental. It reveals the real priority behind these laws.

If the goal were truly to protect children from irreversible medical interventions, intersex kids would be protected first. Instead, these policies target one group of children, transgender youth, while continuing to permit permanent interventions on another group whose bodies challenge the same rigid sex and gender binary that lawmakers are trying to enforce.

Intersex people are routinely erased from American policy debates, except when our bodies are invoked to justify harmful laws, warning that intersex children are being used as legal loopholes rather than protected as human beings. This “protect the children” rhetoric is routinely deployed to justify state control over bodies, while preserving medical practices that stripped intersex children like me of autonomy, good health, and choice. Those harms are not theoretical. They are lifelong.

What makes this moment even more jarring is that the federal government had finally begun to recognize intersex people and attempt to address the harms suffered.

In 2024, at the very end of his term, the Biden administration released the first-ever intersex health equity report — a landmark admission that intersex people have been harmed by the U.S. health care system. Issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, the report documents medically unnecessary interventions, lack of informed consent, and systemic erasure and recommends delaying irreversible procedures until individuals can meaningfully participate in decisions about their own bodies.

This should have been a turning point. Instead, America is moving in the opposite direction.

On day one, President Trump issued an executive order defining “sex” in a way attempting to delegitimize the existence of transgender Americans that also erased the existence of many intersex people. 

When medicine is used to erase difference, it is called protection, while care that supports self-understanding is treated as a threat. This is not about medicine. It is about control.

You cannot claim to oppose irreversible harm to children while legally permitting surgeries that intersex adults and human rights experts have condemned for decades. You cannot claim to respect bodily autonomy while denying it selectively, based on whose bodies make lawmakers uncomfortable.

Protecting children means protecting all children, transgender, intersex, and cisgender alike. It means delaying irreversible interventions when they are not medically necessary. It means trusting and supporting young people and families over politicians chasing culture-war victories.

America can continue down the path of criminalizing care for some children while sanctioning harm to others, or it can finally listen to the people who have lived the consequences.

Intersex children deserve laws that protect their bodies, not politics that hurt and erase them.

Kimberly Zieselman is a human rights advocate and the author of “XOXY: A Memoir”. The author is a co-author of the JAMA Health Forum article cited, which examined state laws restricting gender-affirming care.

Continue Reading

Commentary

Stand with displaced queer people living with HIV

Dec. 1 is World AIDS Day

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

Today, on World AIDS Day, we honor the resilience, courage, and dignity of people living with HIV everywhere especially refugees, asylum seekers, and queer displaced communities across East Africa and the world.

For many, living with HIV is not just a health journey it is a journey of navigating stigma, borders, laws, discrimination, and survival.

Yet even in the face of displacement, uncertainty, and exclusion, queer people living with HIV continue to rise, thrive, advocate, and build community against all odds.

To every displaced person living with HIV:

• Your strength inspires us.

• Your story matters.

• You are worthy of safety, compassion, and the full right to health.

• You deserve a world where borders do not determine access to treatment, where identity does not determine dignity, and where your existence is celebrated not criminalized.

Let today be a reminder that:

• HIV is not a crime.

• Queer identity is not a crime.

• Seeking safety is not a crime.

• Stigma has no place in our communities.

• Access to treatment, care, and protection is a human right.

As we reflect, we must recommit ourselves to building systems that protect not punish displaced queer people living with HIV. We must amplify their voices, invest in inclusive healthcare, and fight the inequalities that fuel vulnerability.

Hope is stronger when we build it together.

Let’s continue to uplift, empower, and walk alongside those whose journeys are too often unheard.

Today we remember.

Today we stand together.

Today we renew hope.

Abraham Junior lives in the Gorom Refugee Settlement in South Sudan.

Continue Reading

Popular