Connect with us

Commentary

OPINION: Looking at Kamala Harris’ record on trans and progressive issues — the facts matter

Published

on

Upfront, I am a progressive. I am a transsexual and a visible trans activist.

I got into politics as the first transgender officer of the Stonewall Democratic Club and currently an elected official for the City of Los Angeles looking towards higher office.

At all times, I have voiced progressive values. This said because I would like you to understand where I am coming from and that I am not some shill for neo-libs.

I wanted Bernie or Warren. I did not get either. I, along with every other progressive, got Biden/Harris. Two people I am confident that were way down on most all progressives’ list of primary candidates.

But this is where we are at in this moment in time.

As a progressive, I hold sacred the fundamental values of inclusion, integrity, compassion, and truth. As part of that value system, and in particular when it comes to politics, it is fundamental to have open honest discussions/debates around issues and candidates without tearing people down. Instead, identify perceived strengths and weakness in others (we all have them), and then lift up the strengths and assist in resolving the weaknesses.

To me, the transgender movement is about acceptance and love. It is about second chances. It is about personal growth. It is about our journeys, not our destinations. This is what I have learned from the community and I thank you!

The truth matters. Not just the cherry-picked parts that attempt to make someone look bad because they were not one’s first choice, but the whole truth. A lie by omission is still a lie. This is what many folks in the transgender community seem to be trying to do at the moment. They say look at Sen. Harris’ record on trans issues and then they neglect to tell the whole story.

From a progressive standpoint, it should first be acknowledged Sen. Harris’ track record as a prosecutor is a bitter pill. Jamal Trulove’s wrongful conviction seems to be one of the most egregious examples of her “tough on crime” policies doing damage to folks in the black community in particular. These are certainly red flags for progressives in thinking about her as a VP pick.

Jamal Trulove attends The Last Black Man In San Francisco premiere during the 2019 Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah, in January 2019.

At the same time, if we are to have a discussion about her record, then in the spirit of telling the whole story, and not just the parts that make her look bad, her Senate record should also be considered as well, which in my view has been fairly progressive in general.

Based on that, has she seen the errors of her ways? No doubt the debate on this will continue.

As a transgender person who is a LA City elected official and community leader, I feel the need to set the record straight in the court of public opinion as to her record with respect to transgender issues. My progressive values demand I do. It is injurious to the trans movement if we do not ourselves live up to the ideals of the movement. So for today, I would like to focus on her record on trans rights, and LGBTQ issues in general.

From what I am seeing, there are 2 main instances where she is being perceived to have purposefully done injury to the trans community. One is a brief she wrote as CA Attorney General on behalf of the CA Department of Corrections (DOC) and the other was her votes as US Senator on two anti-human trafficking bills.

Michelle Lael-Norsworhy and Shiloh Quine were transgender inmates who sought gender reassignment surgery. (Norsworthy photo courtesy Transgender Law Center; Quine photo courtesy SFINX Publishing: Women of San Quentin)

Brief Defending A CA Department Of Corrections Policy Disallowing Medical Transition Services To Transgender Inmates

It is true she wrote the brief. This is what some trans people are using to discredit her. But this is not the entire story. The people using this to discredit her are lying by omission. Let’s be clear. She did not deny trans inmates services, DOC did, a judge did.

The DOC was her client while she was CA Attorney General. She did not write the policy. It was her job, it was her sworn duty, to represent her client to the best of her ability in court. As AG, her personal feelings had no bearing on her obligations.

What folks are omitting is the part where she went back to DOC and convinced them to change their policy so that trans people can now get the medical transition services they need. She didn’t have to do that. Technically her job as AG was done the moment she submitted the brief. But clearly after having to write it, this did not sit well with her. It looks like she saw the harm such a policy was inflicting, and on her own, she fixed it.

SESTA/FOSTA

It is true she was in support of these 2 bills and voted in favor. But again, this is not the whole story. For those who may not know, these 2 bills, which did become law, sought to make it more difficult for pimps and sex traffickers to further exploit willing and unwilling sex workers by holding online platforms accountable if such persons were using them. Unfortunately, there were unintended consequences for trans survival sex workers.

As many of us in the trans community are aware, survival sex work for some of us is just that, a means of survival. Due to an unemployment rate for trans people of 3 times the national average because of discrimination in the workplace, some people have little choice. What these 2 laws did was to take away platforms that were used to vet clients making it safer for those workers. With the threat of prosecution, online platforms such as Craigslist took no chances and illuminated their personal pages.

The one thing I hope we can all agree on is human trafficking is horrid. It is estimated there are 50,000 people trafficked each year in the US and 20 – 40 million globally. I am not saying these bills were even close to the right approach to the problem but did she vote for these bills as a way of harming the transgender community? It does not appear so.

Her Record On LGBTQ Rights In General

• A co-sponsor of the Equality Act (S.788).
• Helped make California the first state to outlaw the gay/trans panic defense.
• As State AG, she refused to defend Prop 8 on the grounds it was unconstitutional.
• Declined to certify a measure that obtained enough signatures to get on the state ballot to institute the death penalty for homosexual acts.
• Introduced legislation in the Senate that would require the Census Bureau to include questions on the Census after Trump denied its inclusion on the form
• As a presidential candidate, she pledged to have a west wing office for a chief advocate for LGBT affairs. As VP, I have little doubt that won’t be made to happen.
• More

At the end of the day, one can certainly find fault with just about anyone. Some may find fault with me for even writing this op-ed and that is ok.

But don’t you think in this age of memes and 240 character quips that pass for civil discourse, and unless there is something I am missing here, isn’t it nice for a change to actually get the whole picture?

The truth is the Trump Fascist Regime must be removed on November 3rd. On November 4th, progressives will continue to do what we do best.

Keep pushing forward for workers, healthcare for all, housing as a human right, racial justice, protection of LGBTQ+ rights, reimagining of criminal justice and the for-profit prison systems, community policing, etc.

And if Biden/Harris do not listen, we will most certainly continue taking to the streets!

— Rachael Rose Luckey is a progressive political activist living in Los Angeles. As President of the Rampart Village Neighborhood Council, she is one of only a couple of dozen openly Transgender elected Government Officials in the nation. f: @RachaelRose4LA | Email List: tinyurl.com/RachaelRoseEmailSignUp

(The views expressed are solely her own and do not represent the views of any political party, organization, government entity or candidate/elected official.)

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Commentary

When a church fears the rainbow

Puerto Rico pastor objected to Pride symbols outside congregation

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

There are moments when an incident stops being merely a local story and begins to reveal something much deeper. What happened on June 28 outside One Church, in Comerío, Puerto Rico, belongs in that category.

I do not know who painted the rainbow colors on the asphalt and on a roadside guardrail. I do not know what motivated them, and it is not my place to justify their actions. If someone believes a law was broken, there are authorities and legal mechanisms to address that. That is not the point of this reflection.

The point is the words that followed.

Hours after those colors appeared, Pastor Jorge J. Santiago Reyes went live on social media. He said he felt threatened. He described what happened as a physical attack against his church. He appeared angry and disappointed. He called those who painted the rainbow “cowards” and “charlatans.” He expressed frustration with the support that, according to him, the municipal government of Comerío has shown toward the LGBTQ community, and with those who support posts related to that community. He repeated several times that the people responsible had “crossed the line.” He ended his message by saying, “These charlatans have to be stopped.”

As I listened to his words, I stopped thinking about the paint.

I began thinking about fear.

There is one phrase the pastor repeated again and again: “They crossed the line.” Yet he never explained what that line was. If he was referring to a possible violation of the law, that is for the authorities to determine. If he meant respect for property, there are also procedures to deal with that. But when that line remains undefined and the message begins to associate a rainbow with a threat, the question changes. It is no longer only about a guardrail or a road. It becomes a question about what boundary, in the pastor’s view, was actually crossed.

Paint can be erased.

A brush can cover the asphalt and return a guardrail to its original color.

What does not disappear so easily is the meaning of those colors.

And perhaps that is where the real conflict begins.

It is significant that this happened precisely on June 28, the day when the LGBTQ community remembers a history marked by exclusion, violence, and the struggle for dignity. What represents memory, hope, and the possibility of living without hiding for millions of people was presented by others as a threat.

I do not know why someone painted that rainbow. I do not need to know in order to ask whether those were the words society should expect from a pastor.

A religious leader may feel hurt, frustrated, or angry. What he cannot forget is the responsibility that comes with every public expression. His words do not end when a livestream ends. They move beyond the space of his church, reach people who may never share his faith, and help shape the way others see those who think differently. When a pastor calls other people “charlatans” and “cowards,” says they “have to be stopped,” and turns a rainbow into evidence of an attack, he is no longer speaking only from frustration. He begins to build a discourse that can feed rejection toward a community far larger than the people responsible for that act.

There was another moment in the livestream that caught my attention. The pastor reminded viewers how much he has served Comerío, how much he has accompanied his community, and how much he has worked for it. I have no reason to question that service. I am sure many people can testify to the good he has done.

That is precisely why it was difficult to hear.

Pastoral vocation is not about reminding a town of everything one has done for it when conflict appears. Service does not lose its value when it goes unrecognized; it loses something when it becomes an argument to claim a moral position from which to speak down to others. A person who serves does so because that is the nature of the calling, not because that service grants authority to discredit those who think differently.

As a pastor, that part of the message left me deeply uneasy. Not because I expect ministers of God to be perfect. We are not. But because our words carry weight, we are called to speak with greater responsibility. Some expressions build bridges. Others raise walls. Some words invite encounter. Others end up justifying rejection.

The paint will disappear. A brush will be enough to cover the asphalt and return the guardrail to its original color.

The words will not disappear as easily.

They will remain recorded in a video, shared again and again on social media, and remembered by those who heard them. They will remain long after the last trace of paint has been erased.

When this episode is remembered, it probably will not be because of the rainbow that appeared outside One Church, in Comerío, Puerto Rico.

It will be because of the words a pastor chose to use when speaking about it.

And that difference changes everything.

Continue Reading

Commentary

The boy they refused to forget

Jonathan David Muir Burgos released from Cuban prison after participating in protest

Published

on

Jonathan David Muir Burgos (Graphic by Ignacio Estrada Cepero)

When the Washington Blade first reported the story of Jonathan David Muir Burgos, the news centered on a 16-year-old Cuban teenager who had been sent to prison after taking part in a public protest in Morón, Ciego de Ávila. At the time, the facts were straightforward. A minor had lost his freedom, and his case was beginning to attract attention beyond Cuba’s borders.

Today there is another fact that deserves to be recorded with the same rigor.

Jonathan is no longer in prison.

His release, confirmed by multiple news organizations, closes one chapter of a story that, for months, was followed by journalists, human rights organizations, religious communities, and countless individuals who refused to let his name disappear from public view. Each of them became part of a much larger effort to ensure that the imprisonment of a Cuban teenager would not fade into silence as the news cycle moved on.

That collective attention does not explain every decision that ultimately led to Jonathan’s release, and it would be irresponsible to suggest otherwise. Judicial processes are rarely shaped by a single factor. What can be said with certainty is that Jonathan’s story never disappeared. It continued to be documented, discussed and followed long after the initial headlines were published.

Behind every widely reported case there is a family living a reality that rarely appears in the news. In Jonathan’s case, there was a father who also serves as a Protestant pastor and who spent months speaking publicly about his son while asking others not to forget him. There was a mother enduring the uncertainty familiar to any parent separated from a child. There were classmates, friends, and neighbors waiting for the day when Jonathan would no longer be known as the teenager behind bars, but simply as the young man returning home.

The image of a prison gate opening often marks the end of a news story. In reality, it marks the beginning of something far more difficult. A teenager must resume an interrupted education, reconnect with friends, rebuild ordinary routines, and recover a sense of normalcy after months in confinement. Those experiences seldom become headlines, yet they are part of the true cost of imprisonment.

Jonathan’s release is therefore more than an update to a story previously reported. It is a reminder that public attention has value. Journalism matters because it documents. Human rights organizations matter because they investigate. Communities matter because they refuse indifference. Families matter because they continue to wait, even when the waiting becomes unbearable. None of these efforts should be viewed in isolation. Together they ensure that a person’s story does not disappear simply because time has passed.

Many people leave prison after being forgotten.

Jonathan David Muir Burgos walked out of prison knowing that, throughout those months, thousands of people had continued to speak his name, follow his case and hope for the day when this story could be told differently.

Today, that day has arrived.

Continue Reading

Commentary

Religion, spirituality, and humanity: finding meaning in a complex world

LGBTQ refugees find hope in faith, common humanity

Published

on

By

A UNHCR-affiliated community center for refugees in Kraków, Poland, on April 5, 2024. LGBTQ refugees around the world often find hope in religion and their shared humanity. (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

Religion and spirituality continue to shape the lives of billions of people around the world. Whether expressed through organized faith traditions, personal beliefs, cultural practices, or philosophical reflection, they remain powerful influences on how people understand themselves, others, and the world around them.

As a displaced person, I have seen firsthand how religion and spirituality affect people’s lives during times of uncertainty, hardship, and hope. In communities facing displacement, poverty, illness, conflict, and long waits for resettlement opportunities, questions about meaning, purpose, resilience, and belonging are not abstract concepts. They are part of everyday survival.

Religion and spirituality are often discussed together, yet they are not identical. Religion generally involves organized systems of belief, sacred texts, rituals, and communities. Spirituality is often more personal and may involve an individual’s search for meaning, connection, and inner peace without necessarily belonging to a specific faith tradition.

Despite their differences, both seek to answer some of humanity’s oldest questions: Why are we here? How should we live? How do we cope with suffering? What gives life meaning?

A search shared across cultures

Human beings have always searched for answers to the mysteries of existence. Across continents and throughout history, people have developed different ways of understanding life, death, nature, and the universe.

Christians may turn to the Bible. Muslims may seek guidance from the Quran. Jews may draw wisdom from the Torah. Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Indigenous peoples, and many others have their own spiritual traditions and teachings.

Recently, an Australian reader, Eveline Goy, shared a thoughtful reflection after reading one of my earlier articles. She noted that while some people may speak of “false prophets” based on their religious beliefs, others may find truth and wisdom in entirely different traditions. She also highlighted the rich spiritual heritage of Australia’s First Nations peoples, whose stories of the Rainbow Serpent continue to shape cultural identity and understanding of creation.

Her reflection reminded me that while beliefs vary widely, the desire to understand our place in the universe appears to be deeply human.

Religion, love, and LGBTQ people

For many LGBTQI+ people, religion can be both a source of comfort and a source of pain.

Throughout history, faith communities have offered people hope, belonging, and moral guidance. Yet many LGBTQI+ individuals have also experienced rejection, exclusion, or condemnation from religious institutions because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

As a queer refugee, I know how deeply these experiences can affect a person’s sense of self-worth and belonging. Many LGBTQI+ refugees I work with were not only rejected by society but also by families and faith communities they once trusted. Some were told they were sinful, broken, or unworthy of love. Others were forced to hide their identities in order to remain accepted.

Yet this is not the whole story.

Across the world, there are also religious leaders, churches, mosques, synagogues, temples, and faith communities that embrace LGBTQI+ people and affirm their dignity. Many believers interpret their faith through the values of compassion, justice, mercy, and love rather than exclusion.

At its heart, love is one of the most universal values found across spiritual traditions. Whether expressed through faith, friendship, family, or community, love has the power to heal wounds, build bridges, and restore dignity.

For many LGBTQI+ people, the challenge is not choosing between faith and identity but finding spaces where both can coexist.

Religion and spirituality in difficult times

We live in a world facing numerous challenges. Wars continue across several regions. Climate change affects communities through droughts, floods, and extreme weather events. Economic uncertainty impacts millions of families. Refugees and displaced people face uncertain futures.

In such circumstances, many people turn to religion or spirituality for comfort and guidance.

Here in Gorom Refugee Settlement Camp, I see this every day. Some gather for prayer. Others find strength in sacred texts. Some find comfort in collective worship, while others seek peace through personal reflection and meditation.

For many, faith provides hope when circumstances seem hopeless.

Yet I have also observed something equally important. Not everyone draws strength from religion. Some find resilience through friendship, mutual support, activism, creativity, and the determination to keep moving forward despite adversity.

This reminds us that while religion and spirituality can be sources of strength, so too can our shared humanity.

The human values that unite us

One of the most remarkable aspects of religion and spirituality is that despite their differences, many traditions promote similar values: Compassion, kindness, forgiveness, generosity, honesty, and respect for others.

These values are not exclusive to any single religion or philosophy. They appear across cultures, faiths, and secular worldviews.

Living in a refugee community has reinforced this lesson. Some of the most generous people I have met are deeply religious. Others are not religious at all. What matters most is not necessarily what people believe, but how they treat one another.

When someone shares food with a hungry neighbor, that is compassion.

When a person comforts a frightened child, that is humanity.

When communities stand together despite differences, that is solidarity.

These actions often speak louder than doctrine.

Building bridges in a diverse world

Religion and spirituality have inspired extraordinary acts of kindness throughout history. Yet they have also contributed to division when people become convinced that only their own beliefs are valid.

In today’s interconnected world, we encounter a greater diversity of perspectives than ever before. This diversity can enrich societies, but it also requires humility, curiosity, and respect.

No individual, community, or tradition possesses all the answers to life’s mysteries.

The challenge is not to eliminate differences but to learn how to coexist peacefully despite them.

For LGBTQI+ people, refugees, people of faith, and those without religious beliefs, dialogue and mutual respect remain essential. We all benefit when societies create space for people to live authentically while respecting the dignity of others.

Religion and spirituality continue to play important roles in human life. They help many people find meaning, resilience, comfort, and community during difficult times.

At the same time, the values that often matter most compassion, dignity, kindness, justice, and love are not confined to any single religion or belief system.

My experiences as a queer refugee have shown me that hope can emerge from many places. Some find it in prayer. Some find it in philosophy. Some find it in activism. Some find it in human connection.

Perhaps what ultimately matters is not which path we follow, but whether that path encourages us to become more compassionate, understanding, and caring human beings.

In an uncertain world marked by division and conflict, our shared humanity may be the strongest foundation upon which we can build a more peaceful, inclusive, and loving future for LGBTQI+ people, for people of faith, and for all humanity.

Aby lives in the Gorom Refugee Settlement Camp in South Sudan.

Continue Reading

Popular