May 27, 2010 at 4:02 pm EST | by Kevin Naff
Holding wealthy gay donors accountable

When the LGBT rights movement encounters setbacks — something that happens regularly — fingers inevitably point at the Human Rights Campaign.

As the most prominent and visible organization working for LGBT equality, that’s to be expected. But there’s another group that doesn’t get nearly the amount of media attention as HRC that also deserves scrutiny: Gill Action Fund and its separate entity, Political OutGiving.

Gill Action Fund, founded by wealthy gay entrepreneur Tim Gill in Colorado, “provides resources to individuals and organizations working to advance equality,” according to its web site. Gill himself is notoriously press shy and the organization works behind the scenes to elect pro-LGBT political candidates across the country and to defeat anti-gay figures.

It’s important, effective work for the movement but sometimes a little sunshine can be a good thing. For that, read Lou Chibbaro’s story in this week’s Blade about a recent meeting of Political OutGiving, Gill’s 527 group that works to elect politicians committed to LGBT equality. The story offers a peek at a facet of the national movement that most of us never see: the world of prominent LGBT donors.

About 200 such donors met at the Peninsula Hotel in Chicago earlier this month to hear a sales pitch from a few politicians who desperately want their money.

The donors assembled at the hotel for a small panel discussion with the politicians, moderated by the Washington Post’s Jonathan Capehart, who, like all others in the room, agreed to keep the meeting off the record. Among those hoping to impress the wealthy gays was Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, who flew halfway across the country for the secret weekend confab. Of course, keeping a meeting of 200 people off the record in this era is next to impossible and so the Blade began getting reports of what happened behind those gilded closed doors.

O’Malley spoke to the donors and, during his remarks, advocated for civil unions over marriage for same-sex couples because he thinks voters aren’t ready for it. It’s a cowardly and ill-informed viewpoint, considering the Washington Post just released a poll showing that more Marylanders now support marriage equality than oppose it. If O’Malley had done his homework he would have known that key, relevant fact.

According to multiple sources who were in the room, Julie Goodridge, a plaintiff in the Massachusetts case that legalized same-sex marriage there, was in the audience and vocally objected to O’Malley’s position, informing him that his view of civil unions sounds more 2001 than 2010. Indeed, O’Malley isn’t just on the wrong side of history, he’s on the wrong side of the present and his dim view of marriage doesn’t jibe with his own state’s blue demographics and voters’ growing support for marriage rights.

When Goodridge criticized O’Malley, the audience reportedly broke into applause. Let’s hope this means they will resist supporting O’Malley in his re-election bid this year.

And here’s where OutGiving’s secrecy does a disservice to the movement at large: Real progress won’t come as long as politicians, particularly Democrats, can rely on big gay money even after doing nothing to earn it. O’Malley has been criticized in Maryland for his failures on our issues. He did not spend an ounce of political capital to help boost the marriage or trans bias bills this year, both of which died in committee. Again. What’s worse: In 2007, after privately telling the plaintiffs in Maryland’s marriage lawsuit that he backed them, O’Malley expressed support for the high court ruling against marriage rights and invoked the Catholic sacraments to explain his position.

Worse still is that O’Malley has a gay brother, Paul O’Malley, a D.C.-area attorney. D.C. has legalized marriage and so Martin O’Malley is advocating against a right for his own brother that neighboring D.C. says he is entitled to.

Why would any gay donor give this man a cent? He betrayed the plaintiffs in the marriage case and all the LGBT voters who helped elect him. He’s even willing to throw his brother under the bus out of cynical political expediency. O’Malley does not deserve Political OutGiving’s support. But if a handful of sources hadn’t told the Blade about the meeting, he might have benefitted from a flood of gay money and no one would know about it or be able to hold O’Malley accountable for receiving such support.

Gill Action Fund has done tremendous work on behalf of LGBT rights, most of which goes deliberately unrecognized. But sometimes Tim Gill’s quest for secrecy threatens to undermine his cause.

The LGBT movement needs more transparency, especially now that Democrats are facing re-election after two years of wide majorities in both houses that yielded decidedly mixed results for our community. Showering traitorous Democrats like O’Malley with more gay money won’t advance marriage or trans rights in Maryland. Gill and his Political OutGiving group should reject O’Malley as a recipient of national gay money — and they should tell him why.

Maybe when politicians pay a financial price for their inaction and duplicity, they will change their behavior.

Kevin Naff is editor of the Washington Blade. Reach him at

Kevin Naff is the editor and a co-owner of the Washington Blade, the nation’s oldest and most acclaimed LGBT news publication, founded in 1969.

  • Oh, I’m sure O’Malley DID do his homework alright… He was well aware of the BACKLASH voiced at Attorney General Gansler, who deemed that same-sex marriages (as “civil-only” as any “civil unions”) performed in other states would be recognized in Maryland. O’Malley is obviously differentiating his very malleable “beliefs” from that of Gansler. What a great guy, O’Malley, protect those rotting, cheating heterosexual “marriages” (if they can be called that).

    Or, O’Malley could really, actually protect marriage, and protect ours as well. Of course, since he says that he is doing this because of his Catholic beliefs, then he is only following the commands of el papa, his Pope. And THAT man (ex-nazi-youth member) says that we are out to destroy civilization! Really… So O’Malley really IS only following orders. Uh… like a GOOD nazi??? I dunno, you decide…

    • Outing people who are themselves NOT elected officials is reprehensible. Shame on you, Kevin Naff. You have no right. Moreover, you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. The Governor had nothing to do with the gay marriage case and did not *betray* the plaintiffs.

      Governor O’Malley supports the Attorney General’s opinion that the State must recognize out-of-state gay marriages. He has stated that he would sign a gay marriage bill when it is passed by the Legislature. He implemented domestic partner benefits for State employees. He is a good and decent person who does not deserve your ill-informed vitriol. Save it for the man who vetoed every gay rights bill that crossed his desk. Save it for the man who is against gay partner hospital visition.

  • Really, Blade, my favorite paper for LGBT news? GLBTQ Marylanders would rather have Bob Ehrlich? Really? Would backward Bob even speak to gay donors? Gov. O’Malley is open to hearing from us. He’s not perfect, but there are very few elected officials anywhere who are. At least Gov. O’Malley’s administration has shown support for LGBTQ constituents.

    There is a race in Maryland, and bizarre commentary like this has no chance of helping the GLBTQ community. Has-been Bob should be defeated by Gov. O’malley, who has shown more support for equality than any Maryland governor before him.

  • Brian is correct that a trip back to Ehrlich’s Maryland would be a disaster for the LGBT community and will set us back at least another 4 years.

    But the governor who showed the most support for equality was not O’Malley but Gov. Parris Glendening. He used his dwindling political capital to lead(that’s right lead)the effort to get an anti-discrimination law passed in 2001. He is the true champion.

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2020. All rights reserved.