Connect with us

Opinions

D.C. a rare bright spot for Democrats

Bowser triumphs over Catania’s divisive tactics

Published

on

Democrats, gay news, Washington Blade
Democrats, gay news, Washington Blade

If the next two years are a continuing stalemate in Washington, the Democratic Party will become the party of the Clintons when Hillary announces in the beginning of 2015. (Washington Blade cartoon by Ranslem)

Across the nation, Republicans routed Democrats and won races by big margins that polls showed as close. They have taken over the Senate for the first time since 2007. Though that may not make much difference in the long run as their majority may only last for two short years and it isn’t large enough to override a presidential veto. In fact, many Democrats trying to put a good face on this have suggested it will make it easier for Hillary Rodham Clinton, should she run for president, to campaign against a Republican ultra-conservative Congress.

The District of Columbia is one of the few bright spots for Democrats. After a nearly 20-month campaign, Muriel Bowser won a decisive 19 percent win over independent David Catania. She won Wards 1, 4, 5, 7, 8 and split Ward 6 losing only in Wards 2 and 3. Schwartz made no difference in the outcome, polling only 7 percent.

Many believe that the undecided votes went to Bowser adding to her strong showing when Catania ended his campaign on the same nasty note he began it. He surprisingly used old political tactics sending different campaign literature to different Wards — bashing Bowser for her closeness to Fenty in Wards 7 and 8 and for her closeness to Barry in Ward 3. One would have thought he understood that in a small city with social media so prevalent you can’t do that anymore. Everyone sees everything and his divisive tactics just seemed to annoy. Bowser, on the other hand, ran a great campaign, sending a positive message across the city that it was time to make sure that everyone benefits from the progress we have made. She had a great campaign manager in Bo Shuff who put together a great team.

Other Democrats who won big in D.C. include Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton; Karl Racine as the District’s first independent attorney general; Phil Mendelson, Council chair; Anita Bonds, At-Large; Mary Cheh in Ward 3; Kenyan McDuffie in Ward 5; and newcomers Brianne Nadeau in Ward 1 and Charles Allen in Ward 6. Elissa Silverman who changed her registration from Democrat to independent to run won the At-large seat being vacated by Catania. All-in-all a great day for progressive Democrats in the District and when the special election is held for the Ward 4 seat that Mayor-elect Bowser will vacate on Jan. 1 there will be a majority of the Council there for less than four years.

Now is the time for everyone, no matter who they voted for, to join together to make sure that the District of Columbia continues to move forward. We need to hold our elected officials feet to the fire and make sure they do what they promised in the campaign. Bowser has shown herself to be intelligent, hardworking, knowledgeable and dedicated to making life better for all the people in the District. She promised to work to continue the upward arc that our city has been on. While there continue to be questions about Vincent Gray’s 2010 campaign, few would disagree that he has done a great job as mayor and is leaving Bowser a city in good shape financially and otherwise.

There were a few other bright spots for Democrats nationally. It appears that Mark Warner (D-Va.) will hold his Senate seat as will Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.). While Martha Coakley lost her race to be governor in Massachusetts voters there did elect Maura Healey who becomes the first openly gay elected attorney general in the country. Seth Moulton, who defeated John Tierney (D-MA) in the primary, won big over gay Republican Richard Tisei.

There will be recriminations and debates over what this election means. Thirty-three percent of the people said that part of their vote was a rebuke of President Obama. In my view that can be traced to the Democrats’ lack of a coherent message and not being willing to stand up for what they have accomplished and what they believe. There was scant mention to the drop in unemployment, the success of the Affordable Care Act, the rise in people’s 401k accounts or gas now being under $3 a gallon. But in the end Republicans may find it hard to accomplish anything while fighting their internal battles promised by the likes of the current reincarnation of Joseph McCarthy, Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

If that is the case and the next two years are a continuing stalemate in Washington, the Democratic Party will become the party of the Clintons when Hillary announces in the beginning of 2015. My prediction is that if she does become a candidate she will win and be sworn in as the nation’s 45th and first woman president on January 20, 2017.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Steve Clark

    November 11, 2014 at 8:43 pm

    "Catania ended his campaign on the same nasty note he began it…. Now is the time for everyone, no matter who they voted for, to join together to make sure that the District of Columbia continues to move forward."

    LMAO! Yes, Rosenstein is so clueless that he put those two themes—utterly at hypocritical cross-purposes—in the same column.

    What can we make of that? Well, maybe the juxtaposition means he thinks that a defeated candidate's supporters are supposed to be gracious and classy but that a victorious candidate's supporters are allowed to behave like him. Okay. But as the supporter of many defeated congressional candidates, is he now on Capitol Hill lying prostrate as he's imperiously ordering others to do here?

    Oh, I seriously doubt it. His shoe doesn't fit on the other foot. Longtime Blade readers may note the amusing contrast between his self-serving call for unity here and his own reaction six years ago when his personal savior Hillary Clinton lost the Democratic nomination. OMG, now that was a petulant tantrum that even toddlers found cringe-worthy! :-)

    Oh, Peter, maybe the only thing worse than being a hack is being a bad one. Pick your message, man: pissy Catania-basher or unifying statesman. They're not exactly compatible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinions

The future of lesbian bars

Resolve to support our queer spaces in 2022

Published

on

lockdown zone, gay news, Washington Blade

This New Year, I hope you wish for more lesbian bars across the country. The story of lesbian bars in the U.S. has been slightly tragic of late: as of January 2021, there were only 15 clubs or bars dedicated to queer women across the country. 

That’s right—only 15. Across all 50 states. 

In Washington, D.C., my hometown, A League of Her Own stands out as the only lesbian bar in the city, dedicated to queer women. Located in Adams Morgan, A League of Her Own, also known as ALOHO, is a small mecca for queer ladies to pass through, socialize, and flirt. ALOHO is a chic gathering point for all queer folk, with posters of softball players dotting the walls and gender neutral signs lying about. 

Several years ago, another lesbian bar called Phase 1 existed in Southeast, where queer women could slam eight balls in pool games and engage in raunchy yet ever-so-hot jello wrestling competitions. 

Unfortunately, Phase 1 shut its doors in 2016. 

So what explains the closure of so many lesbian bars, while bars for gay men continue to flourish? Perhaps many queer women view gay bars as a space for their own as well, whereas gay men view lesbian bars as less of a place for them to socialize. 

Either way, we need to give support to lesbian bars now more than ever. Tokens of support can take many forms. 

For one, make sure to socialize in spaces dedicated to queer ladies. There are three lesbian bars in New York City: Cubbyhole (281 W. 12th St.), Gingers in Brooklyn (363 5th Ave.), and Henrietta Hudson (438 Hudson St.). Next time you visit the Big Apple, make sure to give these three spots some love. Maybe drag your experimenting bi friend to these locations. Or your pansexual roommate. 

Back in D.C., you can buy unisex shirts in A League of Her Own’s merchandise store, available online. 

Proceeds will go toward funding the bar, and making sure it stays afloat, especially during this COVID economy. 

Most of all, I hope you encourage your queer lady friends to keep on frequenting queer lady destinations. After all, there is only one thing that will keep lesbian bars afloat—and that is attendance. 

I, for one, will be frequenting many lesbian destinations this new year.  

Isaac Amend is a Yale graduate and participated in National Geographic’s ‘Gender Revolution’ documentary. He also is a member of the LGBT Democrats of Virginia, and contributes regularly to the Blade. Follow him on Twitter and Instagram at @isaacamend.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Breaking barriers as an out trans ‘Jeopardy’ champion

Amy Schneider’s run inspires us all

Published

on

Amy Schneider (Photo courtesy of Sony Pictures Television)

“When was the last time anybody said ‘wow!’” a friend asked me.

I couldn’t remember the last time anyone I know (including me) had any “Wow!” moments. Until I heard about trans woman and software engineering manager Amy Schneider’s 29-game winning streak on “Jeopardy.”

You wouldn’t think anything could dispel our COVID exhaustion and political divisiveness. Yet, news about a champion on “Jeopardy,” a quiz show that has been on TV since 1964, has broken through our gloom.

In our culture, there are few things that everyone loves. But, “Jeopardy” is beloved by many, from theater geeks to 80-year-old sports nuts. A progressive friend was over the moon when his brother was a “Jeopardy” contestant. A buddy, a hetero (non-Trump) Republican, is a “Jeopardy” fanatic and a gay librarian pal is a “Jeopardy” freak.

Many of us daydream about being on “Jeopardy.” But we know that we wouldn’t have a chance on this legendary quiz show with its deceptively simple format: You give the answer to the (often incredibly hard) clues in the form of a question. You have to have a strategic military commander’s and a world-class athlete’s coordination: so you can press the buzzer to answer the clue.

The game’s categories run the gamut from opera to mountain ranges. Most of us, mere mortals, would be lucky to know even one category in the first round of the game. Let alone in the “Double Jeopardy” round or the “Final Jeopardy” clue. I might jump on clues about Katharine Hepburn movies or M&Ms. But that would be it for me.

It’s exciting to watch a “Jeopardy” contestant become a long-running champion. You marvel at the player’s intelligence, endurance, and nerve. It’s thrilling when the contestant on a winning-streak is part of your community.

Many of us LGBTQ “Jeopardy” fans are thrilled by Schneider’s record-setting winning streak. As I write this, Schneider has won more than $1 million in 29 games of “Jeopardy.” She is the fifth millionaire in “Jeopardy” history, and only the fourth player to reach this milestone in the regular season. She has won more than any other female “Jeopardy” contestant.

Schneider, like so many of us, doesn’t want to be defined by her gender identity or sexuality. Schneider’s life is multi-faceted; she has many interests. Schneider lives with her girlfriend Genevieve. They have a cat named Meep.

Yet, Schneider doesn’t want to hide that she’s trans. On “Jeopardy,” Schneider brilliantly dealt with this dilemma. She didn’t make a big deal about being out. She just wore the trans Pride flag pin.

“It was something that I wanted to get out there and to show my pride in while not making it the focus of what I was doing there,” Schneider told the New York Times. “Because I was just there to answer trivia questions and win money.”

As a cisgender lesbian, I can’t speak to how Schneider’s record-setting “Jeopardy” streak feels to transgender people.

But, as a trans ally, I’m cheering for Schneider. Kudos for her bravery! At a time when many states are passing anti-trans laws, it takes guts to be out on TV and the Internet.

Few things are as mainstream as “Jeopardy.” I bet that many “Jeopardy” viewers who are frightened at the idea of trans people, will become more comfortable with transgender people after watching Schneider on the popular quiz show. Because folks on TV come into our living and bedrooms and we feel as if we know them after watching them for a while.

“Amy looks like everybody else,” my neighbor said when I told her Schneider was trans. “She doesn’t act odd. She’s not strange.”

Transgender people encounter violence and discrimination in everything from housing to health care to employment.

I know Schneider’s “Jeopardy” triumph won’t end transphobia. But her winning streak will go a long way toward jumpstarting a change in hearts and minds.

Kathi Wolfe, a writer and a poet, is a regular contributor to the Blade.

Continue Reading

Opinions

SCARY: Tucker Carlson now the conscience of GOP

Cruz bows down, kisses ring of Fox host

Published

on

Tucker Carlson (Screen capture via Fox on YouTube)

The Republican Party has sunk to a new low, hard to do, when a sleazebag like Tucker Carlson is now their conscience. Seeing Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) groveling before him is laughable, disgusting, and frightening all at the same time. 

As reported in Rolling Stone, Cruz said, “We are approaching a solemn anniversary this week. It is an anniversary of a violent terrorist attack on the Capitol where we saw the men and women of law enforcement demonstrate incredible courage, incredible bravery, risk their lives to defend the men and women who serve in this Capitol.” Then “Cruz was lambasted by Tucker Carlson that night, prompting him to hop on Carlson’s show Thursday and beg for forgiveness. “The way I phrased things yesterday, it was sloppy and it was frankly dumb,” Cruz said before Carlson cut him off and said he didn’t believe him. Cruz took it up a notch, stammering through an absurd bit about how he wasn’t talking about the “patriots across the country supporting President Trump,” only those who assaulted police officers, and that he’s always described anyone who assaults a cop as a terrorist.

Carlson has made a career of being a pompous commentator. Interestingly he worked at CNN, PBS, and MSNBC, before finally landing at Fox in 2009. According to his Wikipedia page he went to Trinity College where he earned a bachelor’s degree and Carlson’s Trinity yearbook describes him as a member of the “Dan White Society,” an apparent reference to the American political assassin who murdered San Francisco Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk. After college, Carlson tried to join the CIA, but his application was denied, after which he decided to pursue a career in journalism with the encouragement of his father, who advised him that “they’ll take anybody.” Reading this clearly raised my opinion of the CIA and based on what we see in some media today I agree with Carlson’s father on his view of journalism. 

When you have a moment of silence in the House of Representatives to honor those who lost their lives on Jan. 6 and only two Republicans show up, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and her father Dick Cheney, the former vice president, one understands the influence Carlson has on the GOP. The rest were afraid of being criticized on-air by him or lambasted by Trump. 

Dick Cheney remarked on the GOP, “It’s not a leadership that resembles any of the folks I knew when I was here for 10 years.” He spoke to ABC News saying, “I’m deeply disappointed we don’t have better leadership in the Republican Party to restore the Constitution.” 

There is a leadership void in the Republican Party today. Their so-called leaders are afraid to say what they think if it differs in any way from Trumpism or Carlson’s view of the world, which requires total fealty to Trump. He found a home on Fox where he can lie with impunity and have millions believe his lies. 

President Biden said, in what many think was the best speech of his presidency so far, these people are “holding a dagger to the neck of democracy.” He went on to say, “For the first time in our history, a president not just lost an election, he tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power as a violent mob breached the Capitol.” 

Tucker Carlson and his ilk have never bothered to answer a question the president threw at them, which is how they can accept all their down ballot victories, governors, and members of Congress, which occurred on the same ballots, cast by the same people, on the same day, as those for president. Of course, Carlson has no need to make sense, tell the truth, or speak rationally because of his platform on Fox, which doesn’t require that.

My question is whether Carlson is as dumb as he makes himself sound or is he brilliant and this is all a big act? Either way the acolytes that follow Trump don’t seem to care and are bowing down to Carlson’s big audience. It’s as if he can tell any Republican senator or congressperson, or Republican candidate for those jobs, to just ‘bend over and take it’ and they do. All we can do is mourn for the GOP of Lincoln and Eisenhower. Non-Trumpers will have to work hard and speak out if they ever want to resurrect a GOP that can be respected.

Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist. He writes regularly for the Blade.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts

Popular