Connect with us


Season’s bleedings

Calls for justice in Michael Brown case affirm that all lives matter



Ferguson, gay news, Washington Blade
Ferguson, gay news, Washington Blade

Protests erupted around the country last week after a grand jury failed to indict Michael Brown’s killer.

The “Season’s Greetings” banner hung across South Florissant Road in Ferguson, Missouri is a far smaller piece of incongruity than the Christmas truce on the Western Front in World War I a century ago. But it provides a contemporary reminder of the contrast between our ideals and our treatment of one another.

The failure last week of a Ferguson grand jury to indict Officer Darren Wilson in the August shooting death of Michael Brown was criticized by several LGBT groups, including the National Black Justice Coalition, National LGBTQ Task Force, Human Rights Campaign, National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, Metropolitan Community Churches, Gay-Straight Alliance Network, National Center for Transgender Equality and PROMO, the statewide LGBT group in Missouri.

If gay advocacy for you is a joyful progression from understanding to understanding, you might think the story would end with these groups deploring another black son being missing from another Thanksgiving table. You would be wrong. Here is a sampling from Twitter. @HRC: “HRC expresses disappointment after grand jury fails to bring Michael Brown shooting case to trial.” @nyctrojan69: “@HRC you just lost my donations. Stick to what you know! I will never donate to you again.” @jowierey: “@nyctrojan69 @HRC bye bitch! They don’t need yo money!” (This last comment may be true, but don’t expect to see it as a new HRC slogan.)

What is the fuss about? Succinctly: A police officer who was more an occupier than a protector used deadly force to subdue a jaywalker, then prosecutors presented the case for his defense.

As protests sprang up across the nation and overseas last week, Wilson resigned from the force. St. Louis County police shut down a vigilante operation by the Oath Keepers militia. Twenty-year-old Deandre Joshua was murdered during the unrest on the night of Nov. 24. When President Obama said after the grand jury announcement, “[T]here are still problems and communities of color aren’t just making these problems up,” reactions from the right would make you think he had torched a storefront.

Carlton Lee, Michael Brown Sr.’s pastor, received dozens of racist death threats in recent weeks, and his church, far from the riots, was burned down as he was off trying to keep the peace. Vowing to rebuild at a Sunday service beside the ruins, he urged love in response to the haters.

It is an old struggle. Frederick Douglass, speaking in 1852 on the meaning of the Fourth of July to a slave, accused America of “crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages.” The catalog runs from slavery to the ethnic cleansing of Native Americans to the rapacity of robber barons. Extrajudicial killings of young black men by police are ongoing. The desire for payback is perfectly natural; but we must choose between seeking revenge and building our country.

Any building, however, must be done on a foundation of truth. Here are some disturbing details that we must confront: Wilson describing Brown as a demon, as if he could bounce bullets off his body. Police leaking falsified evidence, including a convenience store security video edited to delete the part where Michael Brown paid for his cigarillos. Fox News falsely reporting that Wilson suffered a fractured eye socket. An assistant DA giving the Grand Jury a law on police use of force that was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1985.

The haters portray the protesters as all looters and rioters despite extensive efforts by community leaders and ministers to keep the peace. Echoing their peers in Ferguson, the Council of Elders of Metropolitan Community Churches wrote, “Humanity has the power to do great good. Systemic racism can be dismantled. The Berlin wall was toppled. Apartheid was overthrown. Nazi Germany was defeated. Slavery was stopped. Systems of oppression are constructed by human beings and can be deconstructed by human beings. Will it be easy? No, but like every good thing we work for, it will be worth the effort. Our only regret will be that we did not act more quickly.”

The LGBT groups do not have to speak for everyone. All lives matter, and so do our voices.


Richard J. Rosendall is a writer and activist. He can be reached at [email protected].

Copyright © 2014 by Richard J. Rosendall. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading


  1. Anonymous

    December 4, 2014 at 12:25 am

    What is the fuss about? Succinctly: A police officer who was more an occupier than a protector used deadly force to subdue a jaywalker, then prosecutors presented the case for his defense."


    Demagoguery and spreading a criminal accomplice's big lie regarding the justified shooting of a violent, raving common criminal — who tried to kill said cop, btw — isn't surprising, however disappointing.
    Stopping and arresting violent criminals and would-be cop killers are among the things civilized societies hire police officers to do. And well they should, in a nation with almost as many guns as people.
    But such demonizing and racist bigotry, and outright, intentional lies directed at a cop for the color of his 'white' skin is just as wrongful as racism directed at people of color.
    It is also hypocrisy of a high order coming from members of the LGBT minority, often subjected to demonizing bigotry and hate violence as well.
    Had that outrageously belligerent, common criminal not violently assaulted his community's duly authorized police officer, grabbing his gun and trying to kill him — and had that perpetrator followed orderers to stop and get down on the ground, he'd be alive today.
    The overwhelming majority of Americans understand that, and agree with lethal force applied in necessary situations. They reject racism and bigotry masquerading as progressive liberalism, just as they reject racism and bigotry masquerading as legitimate conservative thought.
    A body cam would have more fully exonerated Officer Wilson for doing the right thing under the extreme, criminal circumstances Brown created — hard evidence which the GJ reviewed thoroughly. Rick, of course, did not review that evidence.

  2. Chris Chocolatebearcub Capers

    December 4, 2014 at 11:20 am

    You're a fucking idiot! But I like how you tried to cover up subliminal thinly veiled supremacist feelings with statements about demonizing. Most whites think just like you that Michael Brown was a 'common criminal'. Did you see the FULL VIDEO from the store? If you did you will see he didn't steal nothing. Sometimes I find myself wondering why does this community considers itself a 'minority'? We are hardly that if you take away the only thing we have in common is that we are lovers of the same sex! Outside out of that everybody see things very differently. But I'd bet if that was a white gay male shot down by police you wouldn't feel like that. As sad as it is to see these instances occur. They definitely let folks know what people really feel about different groups. Especially within this community.

    But I find this Strange James Eagan Holmes walks into a theatre with multiple firearms with tear gas. Kills 12 and injures 70 and was taken into custody MIND YOU without being shot and is considered a college kid with 'issues'? Then we have Eric Frein who purposely kills a state trooper and badly injures another one goes on the lam for 48 days and finally gets caught with a loaded rifle and wasn't shot by police and cost the state of Pennsylvania 60 MILLION DOLLARS?

    And this Darren Wilson who is the same height as Michael Brown claims he was scared so he shot him to death in self defense and Michael Brown had NO GUN and shot dead like dog? I guess it is a blessing to be born white in America! Maybe Peter need not write these articles because obviously it's offensive to many in this community. No wonder Blacks are still to this day are 'Leary' about their involvement within this community.

    UGH just UGH!!!!

  3. Anonymous

    December 4, 2014 at 12:27 pm

    Chris Chocolatebearcub Capers —

    Thanks. Racial profiling against people of color — by police, by vigilante predators, employers of all types, etc. — is a completely legitimate and incredibly important issue for every government level to solve.
    This is just a poor, illegitimate case to pursue as an example of racial profiling by police.
    For example, as soon as Brown assaulted Officer Wilson, Wilson's job was to arrest and pursue him for a felony by an obviously dangerous young man — no ifs, ands or buts.
    And that's completely irrespective of the shoplifting/ shopkeeper assault report, which Wilson didn't associate until he got out of his vehicle and saw Brown's khaki shorts and yellow socks. That just added to the fact that he was dealing with a dangerous criminal.
    Lying about a case and making racist assertions against a cop for his skin color only weakens the credibility of civil rights activists making the larger point against racial profiling/ civil rights violations under color of authority. Likewise trying to turn common, violent street criminals into heroes. It's nutty. Few commonsense Americans will ever believe it, and most think it's reflective of racial bias.
    The Ohio, NY and other cases are entirely different and are easily more on point to that larger issue you make as well.
    Quickly getting body cams on every cop in the nation is going to solve a lot of the problems. Fed bucks can help with that.

  4. Efrem Capers

    December 4, 2014 at 2:25 pm

    Brian he didn't steal anything and there is no PROOF that he hit Officer Wilson! But no use in trying to prove that to you your mind is made up.

  5. Anonymous

    December 4, 2014 at 3:06 pm

    Efrem Capers
    Hey, thanks for that link– i had heard about that full version video but hadn't seen it.
    Still, it shows a simple assault of the shopkeeper by Brown — whatever the cause, it's highly belligerent behavior, under any circumstances.

    The store assault was really a distraction, however, to the *REPEATED* acts of assault Brown perpetrated against Officer Wilson. Brown's criminal actions at the scene of his death, and Wilson's account is reliably corroborated by BOTH the physical evidence and eyewitness accounts.
    Repeatedly physically assaulting a police officer is outrageous, common criminal behavior. It can never be tolerated in any civilized society.
    It's too bad this young man was taught to have such a blind hatred for white police officers. Given the parents comments, actions and behavior, it's not hard to speculate where all that belligerence and hate came from.

  6. Chris Chocolatebearcub Capers

    December 4, 2014 at 4:17 pm

    brians.ions SERIOUSLY?For you say "It's too bad this young man was taught to have such a blind hatred for white police officers" How do you know this? No criminal history, Was on his way to college. Here goes that good word that is called PERCEPTION it's everything! But I'm glad you think those white police officers love Blacks LOL! Anyway it also shows how divided gays are on this again just like the recent Mayoral election. It all came down to RACE in the end!!!!! Oh wells he's dead and gone. Eric Garner is dead and gone and the cops got off. Oh well! Good Ol' AMURICA'

  7. Anonymous

    December 4, 2014 at 6:28 pm

    Chris Chocolatebearcub Capers
    "It's too bad this young man was taught to have such a blind hatred for white police officers" How do you know this?
    Chris, for sure it's speculation — but it's rooted in some common sense, too. People don't generally physically assault police officers unless they have a profound dislike or hatred for them.
    What bothers me most about this, is the credibility that all progressives/ Democrats (and civil rights activists of all stripes) are losing as a result of what most Americans recognize as an outrageous lie to further narrow special interests — and maybe celebrity journalists' special interests..
    When riots and protest demonstrations disrupting innocent bystanders result from such a lie, Americans, left, right and center, are likely to react to what they see as an unfair assault on their freedom, their institutions and their public safety.
    We've seen that kind of voter reaction/rebellion in broad, middle class democratic nations all over the world– whether the protests were regarding racial bias, labor/management issues, students's free speech, social safety net cutbacks, etc. Conservative, 'law and order' governments are typically swept into power — and for substantial blocks of time. A freeze on political and social reforms usually results.
    The last time it occurred in the United States was after the King assassination riots and the Democratic Convention/ anti-war protest ('police riot') in 1968. It resulted in Republican 'law and order' presidents being elected for 20 of the next 24 years– a whole generation's block of time. Civil rights advances for all groups were generally downplayed and put on back burners.
    The depth and breadth of the Republican sweep last month is pretty shocking. Progressives and civil rights activists can not afford to be angering independent and crossover voters. Our 'political capital' has clearly been spent — for a nation still waiting for an economic recovery and weary of boots-on-the-ground wars.

  8. Anonymous

    December 5, 2014 at 10:37 am

    The huge difference between Ferguson and the murder in New York…
    And PBA's/ New York's Police union's bossy bullying of minorities…
    The New York police union ('PBA') is a disgrace to every police department in the country. It is time for federal and state legislation to limit the power of police union bosses. They can not be permitted to intentionally bully minorities and the public they are sworn to serve and protect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Blogging my first overseas vacation since COVID

Chronicling life aboard Celebrity APEX



I will be blogging a number of times during my two-week transatlantic cruise and sharing my thoughts and experiences. 

The first thing I found is boarding during a pandemic is a little different. People were given specific boarding times yet most arrived at the port when it was convenient for them as many had early check-out times from their hotel or Airbnb in Barcelona. Celebrity didn’t turn anyone away. There was no Wi-fi at the entrance to the terminal so things got a little complicated as many had the information needed on their iPhone Celebrity app. It worked out and when you got inside to the counter they shared a Wi-fi connection. 

I knew in advance from a Facebook connection, some childhood friends whom I hadn’t seen in 21 years were going to be onboard. We ended up arriving at the terminal at the same time and caught up for the next hour and a half as we progressed through the boarding process. We all had to take a Covid test and only those with negative results could board. Of the approximately 1,300 people boarding, less than half the possible number for a full ship, I didn’t hear of anyone getting a positive result. 

When my negative result came back I was allowed to board and went to find my stateroom on deck 11. The key was at the door with all my information on it. Celebrity was doing everything to limit crew-to-passenger contact. We were asked to keep masks on in all indoor spaces except when eating or drinking, which on a cruise is often, and the crew are all wearing masks. Luggage was delivered to the door. 

Shortly after entering my beautiful stateroom there was a knock at the door and my stateroom attendant, Lenie, had come to introduce herself. She didn’t come in but explained how I could reach her anytime and for safety she would only come into the room when I was out. We chatted for a few minutes and I found out she was from the Philippines, had three children, and had worked for Celebrity for 20 years. She was both charming and efficient. 

I then took a walk around the ship and was duly impressed. It is beautiful. I walked through the huge buffet where people were happily eating lunch and saw instead of serving yourself there were servers behind each station filling people’s plates. All passengers had on their masks when getting food, as did the crew serving them. It made for a very safe feeling. 

Instead of a group muster each passenger was asked to go to their assigned muster station where you were met by staff who explained emergency procedures. You also had to look at a video on the Celebrity app and were then logged in and confirmed you had done so. All efficiently and safely done. 

Then I headed to the sail-away party my travel agent, and friends, Scott Moster and his husband Dustin, were hosting in the Iconic suite. The suite has everything from a peloton cycle to a hot tub for eight. It is incredible. I had the chance to catch up with old friends I had sailed with before the pandemic. Then it was a quick tour of the spa and gym open twenty-four hours a day. A way to assuage guilt over all the food and drink. Then back to the stateroom to finish unpacking and change for dinner with good friends in one of the specialty restaurants, EDEN. That meant long pants and a shirt with a collar. That’s as formal as required on this cruise. 

The food was superb and we got to meet the chef, Nicholas. An interesting guy who I will interview during the cruise. The menu was a combination of fresh fish, lobster, to filet mignon, all interestingly prepared. 

After dinner it was a stop at the Martini bar where a large group of LGBTQ friends had gathered along with some who would become friends. I was surprised when a guy came over and gave me a hug. I didn’t recognize him with his mask on but turned out he was another friend from my past I hadn’t seen in years. It is clearly a small world and the gay world seems even smaller. 

Finally headed to my stateroom around midnight, where turndown service had been done, to get some sleep and prepare for day two, and our first stop, Alicante.  

Day two and three on the Celebrity APEX

Time flies when on a cruise; maybe it’s the endless food and drink. All passengers received a letter in their room telling us we would need to report for a Covid test on day 5 the first at-sea day before we get to the Canary Islands. I pre-scheduled mine just before what I planned as my first hour at the gym. I expect to go to the gym on all sea days and there will be eight of those.

Each morning I have had coffee, a bagel and orange juice delivered to the stateroom.  I always miss that knock on the door each morning when I am home but then I would miss my daily coffee at Java House so I guess it’s OK. 

On day two we stopped at our first port, Alicante, on Spain’s Costa Blanca. I was truly surprised at how beautiful the city is. I joined friends for what turned out to be a three and a half hour walk as we were allowed off the ship on our own without booking a tour. We visited churches and the main market in town. We strolled along the beach and the harbor with great walking and bicycle paths. Alicante is a wonderful mix of old-world charm and modern amenities. One friend ventured up to the castle, Castillo de Santa Barbara, but since the elevator (the easy way up) wasn’t working and it’s a very long, steep climb up the mountain I passed. We arrived back at the ship around 1 p.m. and headed to the Mast bar on deck 14 for burgers and fries. Then some time back in the stateroom before heading to the martini bar for a drink and then to the beautiful APEX theater to see the Shamrock Tenors, four Irish performers who are not only talented but cute to boot. 

We decided to try one of the regular restaurants, those not needing reservations and chose Normandy. The food was good and I had shrimp cocktail, rigatoni, and cherries jubilee for dessert. 

After dinner it was up to the Rooftop Garden for ‘Silent Disco’. That is where you get a set of headphones with a few channels of disco music, and you dance to the music only you can hear. It’s really fun but by 11:30 my knees gave out and it was off to bed. 

Day three dawned nice and sunny and we were docked in Cartagena, located in the autonomous of the region of Murcia. I had an 8:45 excursion and again had breakfast delivered to the room. We were instructed to head to the theater to meet the tour group and sign in for our ‘Journey to Murcia’. Murcia is a city in south-eastern Spain, the capital and most populous city of the Autonomous Community of the Region of Murcia, and the seventh largest city in the country, with a population of 447,182. It is about a forty-minute drive from the port. It is a fascinating city with an incredible history from the Romans to and Moorish influence. There is a beautiful cathedral, isn’t there one in every Spanish city? This being a national holiday in Spain most of the shops were closed saving some on the tour a lot of money. We strolled around the city with our guide giving us a running commentary on its history for about an hour and a half. She was a little hard to understand because not only did she have a heavy accent but she spoke really fast. But it was still fun and we did learn a lot. We made a second stop outside the city at another church where a wedding was being officiated. The bride was beautiful. Then we headed back to the ship for an early departure. Our tour was the last onboard and we sailed not more than thirty minutes after we got there. 

Then it was off to the captain’s reception. I had the chance to chat a few moments with the Captain Panagiotis Skylogiannis, who is as charming as are most Greek men. We also met the rest of the senior crew who run the ship. Many said they would be more than happy to sit and get a cup of coffee with me during our at-sea days so I can interview and write about them.

Then it was back to my stateroom again to prepare for another tough night of food and drinking. We went to see Andrew Derbyshire in the theater for the 7:30 show and then to dinner at Cyprus.   After dinner Celebrity hosted the first LGBTQ+ event of the cruise at the EDEN bar. A large crowd showed up, not all gay but they all knew where the fun people would be. The entertainers all showed up there as including the Shamrock Tenors, four talented Irish guys and Andrew Derbyshire, a British actor and singer. We chatted and I will meet him for coffee to do a column on him. 

Then about midnight it was back to the stateroom for what some of my friends on board called an early night. Morning would have us docking in Cadiz and we had a private tour planned for over 20 of the people who had booked the trip with Scott Moster, travel agent extraordinaire, taking us to the city of Seville.  

Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist. He writes regularly for the Blade.

Continue Reading


‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ clouds Powell’s legacy

A final act of redemption



Former Secretary of State Colin Powell (Photo by Susan Montgomery via Bigstock)

The legacy of General Colin Powell is complicated for those in the LGBTQ community. On the one hand, we celebrate that Powell was the first African-American chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Secretary of State. On the other, he is also the person who disobeyed the strategic choice of his Commander in Chief, Bill Clinton, on gays in the military. 

Powell stood on the steps of the Pentagon reporting how many calls had been received opposing lifting the ban. He testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee that the service of openly gay troops would harm unit cohesion. He argued that race was a “benign characteristic” and being gay was not. Congress codified into statute what had been a regulatory ban on gays in the military, making the law that much harder to change. Almost 14,000 lesbian, gay and bisexual service members were dismissed under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” a rate of two-four service members every day. Some were subjects of witch hunts. Others faced criminal charges. Many endured harassment, assault and threats. Private First Class Barry Winchell was murdered.

Michelle Benecke and I knew when we founded Servicemembers Legal Defense Network that for “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” to be repealed, we would have to either win the support or neutralize the opposition of Powell, one of the previously undisclosed strategies described in my new book, “Mission Possible.” Michelle and I first met him at the Arlington, Va., headquarters of America’s Promise. We offered to brief him on the ban’s implementation as he was being asked on the Sunday shows about the law’s efficacy. He agreed to see us.

The question was whether we could find common ground on which to build a new consensus. My theory was that Powell genuinely believed that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” was a better policy than the one before it. After all, he had testified before the Senate, “We will not ask, we will not witch-hunt, we will not seek to learn orientation.” 

“General Powell,” I said, “we have received nearly a thousand calls from service members who have been impacted by ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’ We have documented that most are being asked point blank about their sexual orientation in contravention of ‘Don’t Ask.’” 

“That’s not supposed to happen,” he said.

That was our first conversation. We might have been able to better enforce some of the meager gains under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” if we had been able to prevail upon Powell to help us, but he wasn’t ready. 

In 2003, he told Teen Ink magazine that while discrimination is wrong, “I think it’s a different matter with respect to the military, because you’re essentially told who you’re going to live with, who you’re going to sleep next to.”

Four years later, he called me, prompted by an opinion essay in The New York Times that I had sent him. “Second Thoughts on Gays in the Military”—written by retired Army General John Shalikashvili, Powell’s successor as chairman of the Joint Chiefs—called for repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” Powell and I spoke for 45 minutes. “I agree with General Shalikashvili that America has changed and is ready for gays to serve openly,” he said. My heart leapt. “I am not convinced, however, that military commanders are ready for that change.” My heart sunk.

It was clear to me, though, that he was moving in the right direction.  I put it on the line. “Sir, you will be a critical voice on ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ when it comes up for debate again. I need you to support repeal if we are going to win. Do you know that?”

“Yes,” he said.

Finally, on Feb. 5, 2010, 10 months before final repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” and days after Admiral Mike Mullen had testified before the Senate that he supported repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” Powell released a statement. “If the chiefs and commanders are comfortable with moving to change the policy, then I support it. Attitudes and circumstances have changed. Society is reflected in the military. It’s where we get our soldiers from.” The stage was set for final repeal.

We too often look for heroes and villains when the record can be complicated. Powell deserves opprobrium for defying Clinton, rallying opposition, and allowing 60,000 troops under his command to suffer the indignity of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” He deserves credit, though, for changing his mind. I admired his willingness to speak with me over nearly two decades. I find that the best leaders engage in a lifelong process of learning and challenging assumptions. Powell will receive deserved accolades for his service to our nation, but for us, his legacy includes a profound betrayal with a final act of redemption.

C. Dixon Osburn is author of ‘Mission Possible: The Story of Repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’’

Continue Reading


‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ repeal serves as a guide for enacting equality legislation

Equality Act supporters should take cues from Senate moderates



Equality legislation is close to passing in Congress, but close isn’t good enough. “Close” won’t change anything for the LGBTQ Americans who face discrimination every day. Senate Democrats and Republicans must make a push to negotiate. With a reach on both sides to find common ground, we can move equality legislation from “close” to “done deal.”

Some Democrats are waiting for the filibuster to end—despite clear evidence that they lack the votes to end it. Some Republicans are practicing a tried-and-true brand of obstructionism. To break this deadlock, we should look to the successful, bipartisan repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) as a guide.

The DADT repeal is the single reference point for LGBTQ advocates for overcoming the Senate filibuster. Other victories have been in the courts; notably, the Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell decision that made gay marriage legal nationwide.

Before Obergefell, advocates had success in the state legislatures. I worked on campaigns for the freedom to marry in Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York and elsewhere, finding common ground between Democrats and Republicans who thought it was impossible to negotiate on marriage. Eventually, enough people from both parties came together to pass marriage laws in a majority of states.

Working together at the state level is one thing. Congress is another.

Despite Democrats’ control of the White House, Senate and House, negotiations are failing at the federal level. So, we lets look to ancient history—the 2010 repeal of DADT—for guidance on reaching 60 votes in the Senate.

The most important lesson from the DADT repeal is that Senate moderates must champion the cause and lead negotiations. The more partisan figures on both sides need to step back. Overcoming the filibuster is a job for moderates, not ideologues.

As it happens, the hero of the DADT repeal is still a senator and can help. Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine led the negotiations on DADT repeal.

Senator Collins supports the Equality Act in principle and even sponsored a version of the bill in past. However, the current version is too extreme for Sen. Collins, as a result, she has withdrawn as a co-sponsor. The current bill has also foundered with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, another important figure in the repeal of DADT.

The fact that moderate, pro-LGBTQ senators are unable to back the current version of the Equality Act should send a clear message to Democrats that we need to make reasonable changes to the bill. So far, the message is being ignored.

On the Democratic side, independent Sen. Joe Lieberman was essential to the repeal of DADT. There certainly were passionate, liberal Democrats who could have asserted themselves during the debate. But then, the bill would have taken longer to pass, or even might have failed.

The lesson is clear. Listen to the moderates. Let them lead this charge.

Another important lesson from the repeal of DADT is to be flexible in the legislative strategy. DADT repeal was originally an amendment to a large defense authorization bill. Rather than give up, Collins and Lieberman fought and saved DADT repeal from defeat by pulling out key provisions they knew could pass on their own and making them a standalone measure. Repeal passed with bipartisan support.

The current version of the Equality Act tries to do too much. That’s why it can’t win support from moderate Republicans who have legitimate concerns the bill might suppress free speech or shut down religious charities.  

Over 60 senators can agree on the basic premise of the Equality Act. They would gladly vote to prohibit discrimination against LGBTQ Americans in employment, housing, and public accommodations, so long as the law didn’t intrude on the First Amendment.

If the far left believes that our country has too much religious liberty, they can deal with that in future legislation. But so long as we have a filibuster—and, there’s no indication it will end any time soon—the Equality Act needs to reflect our society’s current views on religious liberty.  

The DADT repeal passed with 65 votes in the Senate, overcoming the filibuster. Let’s replicate that victory by using the same playbook. Moderates: Take the lead.

Tyler Deaton is the senior advisor to the American Unity Fund, a conservative nonprofit organization working to advance LGBTQ freedom and religious freedom

Continue Reading

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts