Connect with us

Commentary

Final thoughts from N.H.

High school student voted for the first time on Tuesday

Published

on

New Hampshire primary, gay news, Washington Blade

Katharine Demers, Bernie Sanders, New Hampshire primary, gay news, Washington Blade

Katharine Demers, a senior at Concord High School in Concord, N.H., on Feb. 9, 2016, after U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) defeated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the New Hampshire Democratic primary. (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Katharine Demers is a senior at Concord High School who voted for the first time on Tuesday in the New Hampshire Democratic primary.

The Concord resident’s happiness over her ability to fulfill her civic duty for the first time was palpable as she spoke inside her school’s gymnasium shortly after MSNBC and other media outlets projected the candidate for whom she voted, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), had defeated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Demers could not stop smiling as she explained that she cast her ballot for the self-described Democratic Socialist, in part, because of his support of LGBT rights.

“That was huge for me,” said Demers, while holding a Sanders campaign sign.

Demers is among the dozens of people from New Hampshire and across the country with whom I spoke over the past week while covering the state’s primary from my hometown of Manchester.

This uniquely American political exercise that takes place in my home state every four years is always an exciting thing to cover and observe. Demers’ experience on Tuesday, however, continues to resonate with me as I prepare to return home to D.C.

I, like Demers, was a senior in high school when I voted for the first time.

I will not identify the candidate for whom I voted in the 2000 primary, but there was a real sense of pride that I felt by the time I arrived at school. There was excitement throughout the day among my fellow classmates at Manchester Memorial High School who were able to vote. A friend and I even spent primary night at the Nashua campaign headquarters of the candidate for whom we both voted.

There are certainly things about New Hampshire that I strongly and openly dislike as my friends and loved ones know all too well. The primary, however, remains an immense source of pride for this native Granite Stater.

I have lived in D.C., New York City and Spain since I graduated from Manchester Memorial High School in 2000. I have also had the opportunity to travel to Cuba, Portugal and more than a dozen other countries over the last 16 years.

I readily acknowledge to those who feel New Hampshire should not hold the first-in-the-nation primary that the state’s 1.3 million residents do not reflect the country’s increasingly diverse electorate. I also concede New Hampshire’s role in the imperfect process through which the Democratic and Republican Parties choose their respective presidential nominees is disproportionate compared to that of New York, California and other larger states. I nevertheless remain exceptionally proud of the role that my home state plays in the process through which Americans choose their country’s next president.

New Hampshire primary, gay news, Washington Blade

Washington Blade International News Editor Michael K. Lavers at Concord High School in Concord, N.H., on Feb. 9, 2016, awaiting U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)’s speech after he won the New Hampshire Democratic primary. (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner last week projected that 62 percent of the state’s registered voters would vote in the primary. This record turnout includes my parents who exercised their civic duty in Manchester.

Elections, by their very nature, include winners and losers.

The jubilation among Sanders and Trump supporters over their respective candidate’s primary victory is certainly understandable. The disappointment among Clinton supporters and those of the other Republican candidates who did not receive as many votes as they had expected is also understandable.

Reaction to the primary results on social media was almost immediate, and a significant amount of it that I read throughout the night was downright ugly. This includes a series of tweets and Facebook posts from Clinton supporters who mocked Sanders voters.

A handful of Sanders supporters who were standing near me on the floor of the Concord High School gymnasium snickered aloud as Clinton gave her concession speech. One can also argue that the colorful language that Trump used during his pre-primary rally at the Verizon Wireless Arena in Manchester was less than becoming for a man who hopes to become president.

The debate over the New Hampshire primary and the role it should or should not have in the nomination process will undoubtedly continue after Tuesday. The one thing that will not change, however, is the sense of pride that I have to come from a state where people take full advantage of the unique role they have in U.S. politics.

I thank my parents for stressing the importance of voting to my sister and I as we grew up in New Hampshire. I am also exceptionally proud of Demers and other Granite Staters who exercised their right to vote for the first time on Tuesday.

New Hampshire primary, gay news, Washington Blade

Signs for presidential candidates line the road outside of a polling place in Manchester, N.H., on Feb. 9, 2016. (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Commentary

Protecting the trans community is not optional for elected allies and candidates

One of oldest political tactics is blaming vulnerable group for societal woes

Published

on

rotester stands outside Children's National Hospital in Northwest D.C. on Feb. 2, 2025. (Washington Blade photo by Linus Berggren)

Being an ally to the trans community is not a conditional position for me, nor should it be for any candidate. My allyship doesn’t hinge on polling, focus groups, or whether courage feels politically convenient. At a time when trans people, especially trans youth of color, are under coordinated attack, elected officials and candidates must do more than offer quiet support. We must take a public and solid stand.

History shows us how these moments begin. One of the oldest political tactics is to single out the most vulnerable and blame them for society’s anxieties — not because they are responsible, but because they are easier to blame than those with power and protection. In Nazi Germany, Jewish people were primarily targeted, but they were not the only demographic who suffered elimination. LGBTQ people, disabled people, Romani communities, political dissidents, and others were also rounded up, imprisoned, and killed. Among the earliest acts of fascistic repression was the destruction of Berlin’s Institute for Sexual Science, a pioneering center for gender-affirming care and LGBTQ research. These books and medical records were among the first to be confiscated and burned. It is not a coincidence that these same communities are now the first to suffer under this regime, they are our canaries in the coal mine signaling what’s to come. 

Congress, emboldened by the rhetoric of the Donald Trump campaign, recently passed HR 3492 to criminalize healthcare workers who provide gender-affirming healthcare with fines and imprisonment. This bill, sponsored by celebrity politicians like Marjorie Taylor Greene, puts politics and headlines over people and health outcomes. Healthcare that a number of cis-gendered people also benefit from byway of hair regeneration and surgery, male and female breast augmentation, hormone replacement therapy etc. Even when these bills targeting this care do not pass, they do real damage. They create fear among patients, legal uncertainty for providers, and instability for clinics that serve the most marginalized people in our communities.

Here in D.C., organizations like Planned Parenthood and Whitman-Walker Health are lifelines for many communities. They provide gender-affirming care alongside primary care, mental health services, HIV treatment, and preventative medicine. When healthcare is politicized or criminalized, people don’t wait for court rulings — they delay care, ration medication, or disappear from the system entirely.

As a pharmacist, I know exactly what that means. These are life-saving medications. Continuity of care matters. Criminalizing and politicizing healthcare does not protect children or families — it puts lives at risk.

Instead of centering these realities, political discourse has been deliberately diverted toward a manufactured panic about trans women in sports. Let me be clear: trans women deserve to be protected and allowed to compete just like anyone else. Athletics have always included people with different bodies, strengths, and abilities. Girls and women will always encounter competitors who are stronger or faster — that is not a gender or sports crisis, it is the nature of competition.

Sports are meant to teach fairness, mutual respect, and the shared spirit of competition — not suspicion or exclusion. We should not police young people’s bodies, and we should reject attempts to single out trans youth as a political distraction. Families and doctors should be the authority on sex and gender identity.

This narrative has been cynically amplified by the right, but too often Democrats have allowed it to take hold rather than forcefully rejecting it. It is imperative to pay attention to what is happening — and to push back against every attempt to dehumanize anyone for political gain.

Trans people have always been part of our communities and our democracy. Protecting the most vulnerable is not radical — it is the foundation of a just society. My work is grounded in that commitment, and I will not waver from it. I’m proud to have hired trans political team Down Ballot to lead my campaign for DC Council At Large. We need more ally leaders of all stages to stand up for the LGBTQ+ community. We must let elected detractors know that when they come for them, then they come for all of us. We cannot allow Fox News and social media trolls to create a narrative that scares us away from protecting marginalized populations. We must stand up and do what’s right.

Anything less is not leadership.

Rep. Oye Owolewa is running for an at-large seat on the D.C. Council.

Continue Reading

Commentary

America is going in the wrong direction for intersex children

Lawmakers are criminalizing care for trans youth, while permitting irreversible harm to intersex babies

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

I live with the consequences of what America is willing to condone in the name of “protecting children.”

When I was young, doctors and adults made irreversible decisions about my body without my informed consent. They weren’t responding to an emergency. They were responding to discomfort with innate physical differences and the social and medical pressure to make a child’s body conform to a rigid female-male binary. That’s the part people like to skip over when they talk about “child welfare”: the harm didn’t begin with my identity. It started with adults deciding my healthy body needed fixing.

That’s why the hypocrisy unfolding right now from statehouses to Capitol Hill feels so familiar, and so dangerous. 

While harmful medical practices on intersex children, the nearly 2 percent born with differences in one or more of their physical sex characteristics, have been ongoing in the U.S. for decades, until recently, there was no law specifically condoning it. 

This month, House Republicans passed one of the most extreme anti-trans bills in modern American history, advancing legislation that would criminalize gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth and threaten doctors with severe penalties for providing evidence-based treatment. The bill is framed as a measure to “protect children,” but in reality, it weaponizes the criminal legal system against families and providers who are trying to support young people in surviving adolescence.

At the same time, the administration has proposed hospital and insurance policies designed to choke off access to affirming care for trans youth nationwide by making providers fear loss of federal funding, regulatory retaliation, or prosecution. This is a familiar strategy: don’t just ban care outright; instead, make it so risky that hospitals stop providing it altogether. The result is the same everywhere. Young people lose access to care that major medical associations agree can be lifesaving.

All of this is happening under the banner of preventing “irreversible harm.”

But if America were genuinely concerned about irreversible harm to minors, the first thing lawmakers would address is the medically unnecessary, nonconsensual surgeries still performed on intersex infants and young children, procedures that permanently alter healthy tissue, often without urgent medical need, and long before a child can meaningfully participate in the decision. Human rights organizations have documented for years how these interventions are justified not by medical necessity, but by social pressure to make bodies appear more typically “female” or “male.” 

Here is the uncomfortable truth: all of the state laws now banning gender-affirming care for transgender youth explicitly include exceptions that allow nonconsensual and harmful intersex surgeries to continue.

A recent JAMA Health Forum analysis found that 28 states have enacted bans on gender-affirming care for minors that carve out intersex exceptions, preserving doctors’ ability to perform irreversible “normalizing” procedures on intersex children even while prohibiting affirming care for trans adolescents.

This contradiction is not accidental. It reveals the real priority behind these laws.

If the goal were truly to protect children from irreversible medical interventions, intersex kids would be protected first. Instead, these policies target one group of children, transgender youth, while continuing to permit permanent interventions on another group whose bodies challenge the same rigid sex and gender binary that lawmakers are trying to enforce.

Intersex people are routinely erased from American policy debates, except when our bodies are invoked to justify harmful laws, warning that intersex children are being used as legal loopholes rather than protected as human beings. This “protect the children” rhetoric is routinely deployed to justify state control over bodies, while preserving medical practices that stripped intersex children like me of autonomy, good health, and choice. Those harms are not theoretical. They are lifelong.

What makes this moment even more jarring is that the federal government had finally begun to recognize intersex people and attempt to address the harms suffered.

In 2024, at the very end of his term, the Biden administration released the first-ever intersex health equity report — a landmark admission that intersex people have been harmed by the U.S. health care system. Issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, the report documents medically unnecessary interventions, lack of informed consent, and systemic erasure and recommends delaying irreversible procedures until individuals can meaningfully participate in decisions about their own bodies.

This should have been a turning point. Instead, America is moving in the opposite direction.

On day one, President Trump issued an executive order defining “sex” in a way attempting to delegitimize the existence of transgender Americans that also erased the existence of many intersex people. 

When medicine is used to erase difference, it is called protection, while care that supports self-understanding is treated as a threat. This is not about medicine. It is about control.

You cannot claim to oppose irreversible harm to children while legally permitting surgeries that intersex adults and human rights experts have condemned for decades. You cannot claim to respect bodily autonomy while denying it selectively, based on whose bodies make lawmakers uncomfortable.

Protecting children means protecting all children, transgender, intersex, and cisgender alike. It means delaying irreversible interventions when they are not medically necessary. It means trusting and supporting young people and families over politicians chasing culture-war victories.

America can continue down the path of criminalizing care for some children while sanctioning harm to others, or it can finally listen to the people who have lived the consequences.

Intersex children deserve laws that protect their bodies, not politics that hurt and erase them.

Kimberly Zieselman is a human rights advocate and the author of “XOXY: A Memoir”. The author is a co-author of the JAMA Health Forum article cited, which examined state laws restricting gender-affirming care.

Continue Reading

Commentary

Stand with displaced queer people living with HIV

Dec. 1 is World AIDS Day

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

Today, on World AIDS Day, we honor the resilience, courage, and dignity of people living with HIV everywhere especially refugees, asylum seekers, and queer displaced communities across East Africa and the world.

For many, living with HIV is not just a health journey it is a journey of navigating stigma, borders, laws, discrimination, and survival.

Yet even in the face of displacement, uncertainty, and exclusion, queer people living with HIV continue to rise, thrive, advocate, and build community against all odds.

To every displaced person living with HIV:

• Your strength inspires us.

• Your story matters.

• You are worthy of safety, compassion, and the full right to health.

• You deserve a world where borders do not determine access to treatment, where identity does not determine dignity, and where your existence is celebrated not criminalized.

Let today be a reminder that:

• HIV is not a crime.

• Queer identity is not a crime.

• Seeking safety is not a crime.

• Stigma has no place in our communities.

• Access to treatment, care, and protection is a human right.

As we reflect, we must recommit ourselves to building systems that protect not punish displaced queer people living with HIV. We must amplify their voices, invest in inclusive healthcare, and fight the inequalities that fuel vulnerability.

Hope is stronger when we build it together.

Let’s continue to uplift, empower, and walk alongside those whose journeys are too often unheard.

Today we remember.

Today we stand together.

Today we renew hope.

Abraham Junior lives in the Gorom Refugee Settlement in South Sudan.

Continue Reading

Popular