Africa
LGBTQ people omitted from South Africa Census
Advocacy groups have urged the government to change course
Advocacy groups are up in arms with Statistics South Africa (StatsSA) over the exclusion of LGBTQ people in the ongoing national Census which will end on Feb. 28.
Although South Africa is deemed to be among the most liberal countries when it comes to LGBTQ rights on the African continent and globally, this time, it seems as if the government made a costly error by including only male and female boxes on the questionnaire.
Reacting to the exclusion of LGBTQ people on the 2022 national Census questionnaire, Nolwazi Tusini, communications and media manager at Iranti, a Johannesburg-based media advocacy organization that advocates for the rights of LGBTQ people, said the data will be used to make conclusions about gender in ways that completely exclude transgender and non-binary people.
“According to StatsSA, the Census 2022 questionnaire includes a question relating to sex which provides only two options, male or female, and this refers to a biological make-up of the person or the sex that is assigned at birth. This effectually means that transgender and intersex persons will not be counted in the upcoming Census,” said Tusini. “The Census solely relies on counting a society that is cisgender and excludes a significant part of South Africa’s population.”
“Furthermore, history has taught us that the data captured from the responses to the question on sex is often used to make conclusions about gender in ways that completely exclude transgender and non-binary persons,” added Tusini. “For example, using this data to tell us about the number of cisgender women and cisgender men residing in South Africa and their employment status.”
The current questionnaire also does not include questions relating to sexual orientation and will therefore, not yield any data relating to lesbian, gay and bisexual people in South Africa. This is contrary to South Africa’s Constitution, which recognizes South Africans by their diverse sexual orientations.
“By StatsSA’s own admission, the current structure of the Census 2022 does not actively enumerate LGBTQIA+ persons. This effectively renders LGBTQIA+ persons invisible and is not in line with the South African Constitution which enshrines the rights to equality and self-determination,” said Tusini. “This urges a greater conversation around legal gender recognition in this country, where it permeates and how it’s understood and then accepted across government departments.”
Iranti Executive Director Jabu Pereira said StatsSA was encouraging the state to erase the existence of the LGBTQ community,
“We regard this Census as unconstitutional because its very design is premised on exclusion and if a census excludes a significant population such as the LGBTQIA+ community, then by its very nature it encourages the state to erase our very existence,” said Pereira.
Bruce Walker of Pretoria LGBTQIA+ Gay Pride concurred with Pereira, saying the omission of the LGBTQ community in the ongoing Census was a move aimed at “erasing their existence.” Walker said their organization has already launched campaigns against the count.
“Considering the news of the exclusion of the LGBTQIA+ identities in the Census we felt it necessary to voice our outrage on this. We feel this is a direct attack on the community,” said Walker.
“There are a few points that we feel should be addressed before this Census is held,” added Walker. “Why are there only two options relating to sex? Male or female. Why is there no intersex or transgender here? Why are people who do not identify with either excluded? Why are there no questions about sexual orientation? This is a missed opportunity for the government to better understand the LGBTQIA+ community.”
Pretoria LGBTQIA+ Gay Pride’s directed the following questions to StatsSA:
– Why have you excluded a large portion of South Africa in this Census? Do you feel that the LGBTQIA+ community is not part of the population?
– If you think the LGBTQIA+ is not part of the community then why should we participate in the Census? Is this not against our constitutional rights? Why did you not engage with LGBTQIA+ organizations when compiling the questions? Is this not the first step to excluding the LGBTQIA+ rights in the constitution? Is the government now going to stop LGBTQIA+ rights in the workplace?
– Will the LGBTQIA+ community rights that we have fought for now be revoked? Will gay marriage now be revoked? What would the people say if you had only black or white under race?
– We as a Pride organization are outraged at this and we are extremely disappointed at the silence from political parties. We are putting out petitions out in the community and online. Why must we wait 10 years for the next Census? If we do not get a satisfactory response from Census 22 and the government then we will be asking our community not to participate in this Census at all. After all they do not think we are part of the population.
“An attack on one party of the LGBTQIA+ community is an attack on the whole community,” said Walker.
Uganda
LGBTQ Ugandans targeted ahead of country’s elections
President Yoweri Museveni won 7th term in disputed Jan. 15 vote
Barely a week after Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni secured a 7th term in an election marred by state violence, intimidation, and allegations of fraud, the country’s queer community spoke about how the election environment impacted it.
The LGBTQ lobby groups who spoke with the Washington Blade noted that, besides government institutions’ failure to create a safe and inclusive environment for civic participation by all Ugandans, authorities weaponized the Anti-Homosexuality Act to silence dissent and discourage queer voter engagement.
The rights groups note that candidates aligned with Museveni’s ruling National Resistance Movement — including Parliament Speaker Anita Among — during the campaigns accused their rivals of “promoting homosexuality” to discredit them while wooing conservative voters.
Queer people and LGBTQ rights organizations as a result were largely excluded from the formal political processes for the election as voters, mobilizers, or civic actors due to fear of exposure, stigma, violence, and legal reprisals.
“This homophobic rhetoric fueled public hostility and emboldened vigilante violence, forcing many queer Ugandans into deeper hiding during the election period,” Uganda Minority Shelters Consortium Coordinator John Grace stated.
Some queer people had expressed an interest in running for local council seats, but none of them formally registered as candidates or campaigned openly because of safety concerns and local electoral bodies’ discriminatory vetting of candidates.
“UMSC documented at least three incidents of election-related violence or intimidation targeting LGBTQ+ individuals and activists,” Grace noted. “These included harassment, arbitrary detentions, extortions by state and non-state actors, digital cat-fishing, and threats of outing.”
Amid such a militarized and repressive election environment, Let’s Walk Uganda Executive Director Edward Mutebi noted queer-led and allied organizations engaged in the election process through restricted informal voter education, community discussions, and documenting human rights violations.
“Fear of backlash limited visibility and direct participation throughout the election cycle,” Mutebi said. “But despite the hostile environment of work, Let’s Walk Uganda was able to organize a successful transgender and gender diverse youth training on electoral security and safety.”
Museveni’s government escalated its repressive actions during the Jan. 15 elections by shutting down the internet and suspending nine civil society organizations, including Chapter Four Uganda and the National Coalition of Human Rights Defenders, for allegedly engaging in activities that are prejudicial to the security and laws of the country.
The suspension of the rights organizations remains in force, an action both Mutebi and Grace condemn. They say it prevents queer Ugandans from accessing urgent services from the affected groups.
“For the LGBTQ community, the impact has been immediate and deeply harmful. Many of the suspended organizations, like Chapter Four Uganda, were critical partners in providing legal representation, emergency response, and documentation of rights violations,” Grace said.
This has compelled UMSC and its other partners to handle increased caseloads with limited resources, while navigating heightened scrutiny and operational risk.
“The suspension has disrupted referral pathways, delayed urgent interventions, and weakened collective advocacy for marginalized groups and minority rights defenders, which calls for urgent international solidarity, flexible funding, and protection mechanisms to safeguard the work of grassroots organizations operating under threat,” Grace stated.
Mutebi warned that such repressive actions are tyrannical and are indicative of shrinking civic space, which undermines democratic accountability as the promotion and protection of human rights is ignored.
With Museveni, 81, extending his tenure at State House from a landslide win of 72 percent, UMSC and LWU consider a bleak future in the protection of rights for queer Ugandans and other minority groups.
“Without significant political and legal shifts, LGBTQ persons will face continued criminalization, reduced civic space, and heightened insecurity, making sustained advocacy and international solidarity more critical than ever,” Mutebi said. “ It is unimaginable how it feels to live in a country with no hope.”
Grace, however, affirmed the resistance by local queer lobby groups will continue through underground networks, regional solidarity, and digital organizing.
The duo noted that a win by Museveni’s main challenger and rapper, Bobi Wine, who only managed 24 percent of the total votes cast, could have enabled the opening up of civil space and human rights protections in Uganda.
Wine, for his part, spoke in favor of the respect for the rule of law and human rights during his campaign.
“While Bobi Wine’s past stance on LGBTQ rights was inconsistent, his recent shift toward more inclusive rhetoric and international engagement suggested a potential opening for dialogue,” Grace said. “A win might have created space for policy reform or at least reduced state-sponsored homophobia, though structural change would still require sustained pressure and coalition-building.”
Mutebi stated that a change in Uganda’s leadership to a youthful leader like Wine could have offered an opening, but not a guarantee for progress on inclusion and human rights. Mutebi added existing institutionalized and societal homophobia remain in place.
Egypt
Iran, Egypt object to playing in Seattle World Cup ‘Pride Match’
Game to take place on June 26
Iran and Egypt have objected to playing in a “Pride Match” that will take place in Seattle during the 2026 World Cup.
The Egyptian Football Association on Tuesday said it told FIFA Secretary General Mattias Grafström in a letter that “it categorically rejects holding any activities related to supporting (homosexuality) during the match between the Egyptian national team and Iran, scheduled to be held in Seattle, USA, on June 26, 2026, in the third round of the group stage of the 2026 World Cup.” Football Federation Islamic Republic of Iran President Mehdi Taj told ISNA, a semi-official Iranian news agency that both his country and Egypt “protested this issue.”
The 2026 World Cup will take place in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. The draw took place at the Kennedy Center on Dec. 5.
Iran is among the handful of countries in which consensual same-sex sexual relations remain punishable by death.
The State Department’s 2023 human rights report notes that while Egyptian law “did not explicitly criminalize consensual same-sex sexual activity, authorities regularly arrested and prosecuted LGBTQI+ persons on charges including ‘debauchery,’ prostitution, and ‘violating family values.’” Egyptian authorities “also reportedly prosecuted LGBTQI+ individuals for ‘misuse of social media.’”
“This resulted in de facto criminalization of same-sex conduct and identity,” notes the report.
The 2024 human rights report the State Department released earlier this year did not include LGBTQ-specific references.
Soccer has ‘unique power to unite people across borders, cultures, and beliefs’
The June 26 match between Iran and Egypt coincides with Seattle Pride. The Washington Post reported the Seattle FIFA World Cup 2026 Local Organizing Committee decided to hold the “Pride Match” before last week’s draw.
“As the Local Organizing Committee, SeattleFWC26’s role is to prepare our city to host the matches and manage the city experience outside of Seattle Stadium,” said SeattleFWC26 Vice President of Communications Hana Tadesse in a statement the committee sent to the Washington Blade on Wednesday. “SeattleFWC26 is moving forward as planned with our community programming outside the stadium during Pride weekend and throughout the tournament, partnering with LGBTQ+ leaders, artists, and business owners to elevate existing Pride celebrations across Washington.”
“Football has a unique power to unite people across borders, cultures, and beliefs,” added Tadeese. “The Pacific Northwest is home to one of the nation’s largest Iranian-American communities, a thriving Egyptian diaspora, and rich communities representing all nations we’re hosting in Seattle. We’re committed to ensuring all residents and visitors experience the warmth, respect, and dignity that defines our region.”
The 2034 World Cup will take place in Saudi Arabia.
Consensual same-sex sexual relations remain punishable by death in the country. The 2022 World Cup took place in neighboring Qatar, despite concerns over the country’s anti-LGBTQ rights record.
Eswatini
PEPFAR delivers first doses of groundbreaking HIV prevention drug to two African countries
Lenacapavir now available in Eswatini and Zambia.
The State Department on Tuesday announced PEPFAR has delivered the first doses of a groundbreaking HIV prevention drug to two African countries.
The lenacapavir doses arrived in Eswatini and Zambia.
The State Department in September unveiled an initiative with Gilead Sciences to bring lenacapavir “to market in high-burden HIV countries.”
Lenacapavir users inject the drug twice a year.
The State Department in its September announcement noted everyone who participated in Gilead’s clinical trials remained HIV negative. It also said lenacapavir “has the potential to be particularly helpful for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers, as it safely protects them during and after pregnancy to prevent mother-to-child transmission.”
“In our new America First Global Health Strategy, the Department of State is establishing a first-of-its-kind innovation fund to support American-led research, market-shaping, and other dynamic advancements in global health,” said PEPFAR on Tuesday in a press release.
“The arrivals of the first doses of lenacapavir in Eswatini and Zambia mark an important milestone in HIV prevention and reflect our commitment to supporting communities with the greatest need,” added Gilead CEO Daniel O’Day. “For the first time, a new HIV medicine is reaching communities in sub-Saharan Africa in the same year as its U.S. approval.”
The September announcement came against the backdrop of widespread criticism over the Trump-Vance administration’s reported plans to not fully fund PEPFAR and to cut domestic HIV/AIDS funding. The Washington Blade has previously reported PEPFAR-funded programs in Kenya and other African countries have been forced to curtail services or even close because of U.S. funding cuts.
-
National5 days agoFederal authorities arrest Don Lemon
-
a&e features5 days agoD.C. LGBTQ sports bar Pitchers listed for sale
-
Florida4 days agoAIDS Healthcare Foundation sues Fla. over ‘illegal’ HIV drug program cuts
-
China5 days agoTwo Chinese men detained over AI-generated picture of pandas engaging in same-sex behavior
