Connect with us

Africa

South Africa venue refuses same-sex weddings, stops hosting all marriages

Couple filed complaint with country’s Human Rights Commission

Published

on

Beloftebus farm (Photo via Facebook)

There have been mixed reactions from South Africa’s LGBTQ community after a popular wedding venue east of Cape Town announced it will no longer host weddings.

The Beloftebos farm, which Coia and Andreis de Villiers own, is 90 miles east of Cape Town and hosts a number of events.

It first came under the spotlight in 2017 when Alexandra Thorne and her partner Alex Lu approached Coia de Villiers in the hope of hosting a wedding, but was told the venue does not host same-sex marriages. Another same-sex couple, Megan Watling and Sasha-Lee Heekes, in January 2020 had a similar experience and approached the South Africa Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) which brought the de Villiers before the Equality Court for discrimination against the LGBTQ community.

The closure of the wedding venue has since seen Ruth Maseko, convener of the Triangle Project, an LGBTQ rights group, labeling the move as a total divergence from the LGBTQ community.

“Firstly, religious convections in the Bible have been used to appeal many forms of oppression including oppression of women, slavery amongst others,” said Maseko. “The sadness is that religion is still a point of exclusion and intolerance instead of being loving, affirming and inclusive. The case of the Beloftebos; owners to no longer host weddings at all than to allow people who do not identify exactly as they do is very repugnant. I wonder at what point do we become humans to know and understand the one who created you is the one who created us, members of the LGBTQIA+ (community)?”

“In this country, we have a constitution and as LGBTQIA+ people, we are protected by the constitution in that people may not discriminate against us on the grounds of our sexual orientation,” lamented Ruth. “If a wedding venue is open to the public, you cannot say we are open to the public except for LGBTQIA+ people or we are open to the public except black people, it is not constitutional.”

Michael Swain, director of Freedom of Religion South Africa, however, said the de Villiers had cited that they fully respect and recognize the constitutional rights of the LGBTQ community.

“The issue for the de Villiers family has always been about their sincere and deeply held convictions on the sacrament of marriage,” said Swain. “It has never been about the sexual orientation of any person and they have at every opportunity made it crystal clear that they fully respect and recognize the constitutional rights of the LGBTQIA+ community.” 

“They have therefore asked the SAHRC to accept, without having to agree with them, that their bona fide and intensely-held world view is that marriage is a sacrament between a man and a woman,” added Swain. “Further, that their views and beliefs regarding marriage are for considered and nuanced reasons which in turn are fundamental to their relationship with God. This relationship is central to how they live their lives and it guides all their activities, including their decisions to diversify the use of their farm.”

Swain said “the decision of the de Villiers family to no longer make the wedding venue on their property generally available to the public was not part of their proposal to the SAHRC to find a resolution to this matter.”

“Rather, it was the culmination of a process of prayer and consideration over a number of years. This decision was accelerated by the severe impact of the COVID-19 lockdown regulations that effectively shut down the wedding industry,” added Swain. “However, the Beloftebos farm will continue to be used for a variety of Christian ministry (sic) and other events. By way of example, and in line with their decision, they have recently hosted a conference covering the topic of Biblical engagement with secular society.”

Furthermore, Swain said the constitution is very clear on the issue of freedom.

“To date, there has been no legal precedent to force a wedding venue to host and celebrate a same sex marriage,” said Swain. “However, if someone can be forced to participate in and celebrate events that violate their conscience, religion and belief, then every supplier of goods and services in South Africa may be forced to perform work or to provide services that they fundamentally disagree with.”

“This case is therefore about freedom, freedom for all of us to live in an open and democratic society where people are free to live their lives as they choose, in mutual respect for the dignity and sincerely held beliefs of one another,” added Swain. “Our constitution does not require everyone to believe the same and it should not punish people for holding divergent beliefs and opinions.”

The de Villiers have since written this week to the SAHRC in an attempt to amicably resolve this matter, which has been ongoing for more than two years.

Daniel Itai is the Washington Blade’s Africa Correspondent.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Botswana

Botswana repeals colonial-era sodomy law

Country’s High Court struck down statute in 2019

Published

on

The first Palapye Pride took place in Palapye, Botswana, on Nov. 1, 2025. The country has repealed the provision of its colonial-era penal code that criminalized consensual same-sex sexual relations. (Photo courtesy of the AGANG Community Network)

Botswana’s government has repealed a provision of its colonial-era penal code that criminalized consensual same-sex sexual relations.

The country’s High Court in 2019 struck down the provision. The Batswana government in 2022 said it would abide by the ruling after country’s Court of Appeals upheld it.

The government on March 26 announced the repeal of the penal code’s “unnatural offenses” section that specifically referenced any person who “has carnal knowledge of any person against the order of nature” and “permits any other person to have carnal knowledge of him or her against the order of nature.”

Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals of Botswana, a Batswana advocacy group known by the acronym LEGABIBO, challenged the criminalization law with the support of the Southern Africa Litigation Center. LEGABIBO in a statement it posted to its Facebook on April 25 welcomed the repeal.

“For many, these provisions were not just words on paper — they were lived realities,” said LEGABIBO. “They affected access to healthcare, safety, employment, and the freedom to love and exist openly.”

“LEGABIBO believes that the deletion of these sections is a necessary and long-overdue step toward restoring dignity and aligning our legal framework with constitutional values of equality and human rights,” it added. “It is a clear message that LGBTIQ+ persons are not criminals, and that their lives and relationships deserve protection, not punishment.”

LEGABIBO further stressed that “while this does not erase the harm of the past, it creates space for healing, inclusion, and continued progress toward full equality.”

Continue Reading

Senegal

Senegalese court issues first conviction under new anti-LGBTQ law

Man sentenced to six years in prison on April 10

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

A Senegalese court has issued the first conviction under a new law that further criminalizes consensual same-sex sexual relations.

The Associated Press notes the court in Pikine-Guédiawaye, a suburb of Dakar, the Senegalese capital, on April 10 convicted a 24-year-old man of committing “acts against nature and public indecency” and sentenced him to six years in prison.

Authorities arrested the man, who Senegalese media reports identified as Mbaye Diouf, earlier this month. The court also fined him 2 million CFA ($3,591.04).

Lawmakers in the African country on March 11 nearly unanimously passed the measure that increases the penalty for anyone convicted of engaging in consensual same-sex sexual relations from one to five years in prison to five to 10 years. The bill that Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko introduced also prohibits the “promotion” or “financing” of homosexuality in Senegal.

MassResistance, an anti-LGBTQ group based in the U.S., reportedly worked with Senegalese groups to advance the bill that President Bassirou Diomaye Faye signed on March 31.

“This prison sentence is unlawful under international law,” said Human Rights Watch on Wednesday. “Senegal is bound by treaty obligations that protect every person’s right to dignity, privacy, and equality.”

Continue Reading

Eswatini

The emperor has no clothes: how rhetoric fuels repression in Eswatini

King Mswati III’s anti-LGBTQ comments can have deadly consequences

Published

on

King Mswati III (Screen capture via Eswatini TV/YouTube)

In an absolute monarchy, the words spoken by the sovereign can swiftly become a baton striking a citizen. When King Mswati III speaks, his words do not simply drift into the air as political “opinion”; they often quickly turn into, sometimes violently, state policy. This reflects the reality of Eswatini, where the right to freedom of expression, including the right to hold dissenting political views, is increasingly being systematically eroded by the very voice that claims to uphold “traditional values.”

To understand the current crisis facing the LGBTIQ+ community in Eswatini, one must view it through the lens of a broader strategy: the weaponization of culture to justify the erosion of democratic institutions, the rule of law, and human rights protections. As observed across Africa, from the streets of Harare and Dar es Salaam to the parliamentary courtrooms of Dakar and Kampala, African leaders are increasingly using the marginalised as an entry point to dismantle civil society. In Eswatini, this strategy has manifest its most brutal expression in the king’s recent harmful rhetoric concerning sexual orientation and gender identity.

The danger of the king’s words lies in how the state apparatus interprets them as a divine mandate for persecution. Recently, we have seen this “Rhetoric-to-Policy Pipeline” operate with chilling efficiency. Shortly after the Minister of Education made public vitriol against the existence of LGBTIQ+ students, reports emerged of children being expelled from schools. In a country where the king is culturally and traditionally called the “ingwenyama” (the lion), the bureaucracy acts as his pride; when leadership suggests that a particular group is “un-African” or “deviant,” the machinery of the state, along with the emboldened segments of the public, moves to purge that group from society.

For an openly gay man who has dedicated most of his adulthood to advancing equality and dignity for all, especially marginalized communities, these are not merely policy changes; they pose existential threats. When a powerful leader speaks, they offer a moral shield for the dogmatist and a legal roadmap for the policeman. In Eswatini, where political parties are banned, and the “tinkhundla” system (constituency-based system) — a system that systematically silences dissent and favors those aligned with the sovereign — is celebrated as the sole “authentic” form of governance, any identity that falls outside the narrow, state-defined “tradition” is seen as treason. By branding LGBTIQ+ rights as “ungodly” and essentially unwelcome in Eswatini, the monarchy effectively views the mere existence of queer Swazis as a subversive act against the crown.

The most harrowing example of this pattern is the assassination of human rights lawyer Thulani Maseko in January 2023. Maseko’s murder did not happen in isolation. It followed a period of heated rhetoric directed at those calling for democratic reforms. The king had publicly warned those demanding change that they would face consequences. On the evening after the king had said, “[t]hese people started the violence first, but when the state institutes a crackdown on them for their actions, they make a lot of noise blaming King Mswati for bringing in mercenaries,” Maseko was shot dead at his home in front of his family.

The parallel here is unmistakable. When the king targets the LGBTIQ+ community with his words, he is aiming at the most vulnerable. If a world-renowned human rights lawyer can be silenced following royal condemnation, what chance does a queer youth in a rural area stand when the king’s words reach the local chief or school head? This is what I call “Chaos as Governance”: a state where the law is replaced by the monarch’s whims, leaving the population in a constant cycle of managed chaos that renders collective opposition nearly impossible. Despite strong condemnation from the organization I founded, Eswatini Sexual and Gender Minorities (ESGM), recent reports already suggest growing support for the rhetoric shared by the king, indicating treacherous weeks and months ahead for ordinary queer people in Eswatini.  

The monarchy’s defense of these actions is almost always based on “African tradition.” As Mswati has shown, the ban on political parties and the suppression of minority rights are framed as a return to indigenous governance, the “tinkhundla” system. But we must ask: whose culture is being defended? Is it a culture that historically valued communal care and diverse social roles, or is it a modern, imported authoritarianism cloaked in the robes of the ancestors?

When he uses his platform at the “sibaya” (traditional gathering) to alienate a segment of his own people, he is not engaging in dialogue; he is delivering a monologue of exclusion. This weaponized version of culture serves a dual purpose. First, it offers a “neocolonial” defense against international criticism, portraying human rights as a foreign threat. Second, it creates an internal enemy, the “terrorist” political dissident or the “immoral” LGBTIQ+ person, to distract from the fact that nearly two-thirds of the population live below the poverty line. In contrast, the royal family resides in obscene luxury, acquiring fleets of expensive vehicles.

The silence of Eswatini’s neighbors worsens its situation. The Southern African Development Community (SADC), a regional organization ostensibly committed to democracy and human rights, has repeatedly allowed Mswati to evade accountability. By agreeing to remove Eswatini from the Organ Troika agenda at the king’s request in 2024, SADC sent a message to every authoritarian in the region. If you conceal your repression behind the guise of tradition, we will not intervene.

The call for freedom of expression, including LGBTIQ+ rights, is a fundamental human right vital for safety and dignity. It demands that a child should not be expelled from school because of who they are. It insists that a lawyer should not be murdered for expressing their beliefs. It states that a king’s word should not be a death sentence. We must resist the “politics of distraction” that portrays the fight for minority rights as separate from the fight for democratic reform. The dissolution of political parties in Burkina Faso, the attack on lawyers in Zimbabwe, and the criminalization of advocacy in Senegal, Tanzania, and Uganda are all parts of the same pattern. They reflect a leadership class that fears its own people.

It is time for the African Union and SADC to decide whether to uphold the ideals of their lofty charters or to prioritize political convenience across Africa. For the people of Eswatini, improving livelihoods and human development can only occur when the king’s words are limited by a constitution that protects every citizen, regardless of whom they love or how they pray. Until then, the chaos is not a failure; it is the purpose. The monarch’s word may be law today, but the universal right to dignity is the only law that will endure. We must demand an Eswatini, and by extension, an Africa that seeks to improve the lives of its people, and where the “lion” protects all his people, rather than hunting those he deems “unworthy” of the shade.

Melusi Simelane is the founder and board chair of Eswatini Sexual and Gender Minorities. He is also the Civic Rights Program Manager for the Southern Africa Litigation Center.

Continue Reading

Popular