Connect with us

National

3 gay nominees held up in Senate

Trio among 74 Obama appointees still awaiting a vote

Published

on

Three openly gay nominees are among the 74 presidential appointees whose confirmations are being held up by the U.S. Senate, although observers don’t suspect anti-gay bias as a factor preventing a vote.

The lack of a Senate vote on these nominees is blocking them from assuming the jobs to which President Obama nominated them. The three nominees are:

• Michael Camunez, nominated to become assistant secretary of commerce for market access and compliance;

• Richard Sorian, nominated to become assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Health & Human Services;

• and Beatrice Hanson, nominated to become director of the Justice Department’s Office of Victims of Crime.

The White House announced the nomination of Camunez in March. Obama announced the nominations of the other two nominees late last year.

Shin Inouye, a White House spokesperson, expressed disappointment that the Senate has been unable to confirm the nominees as well as the 71 other appointments that are pending.

“It’s unfortunate that at a time when our nation is facing enormous challenges, some senators have decided to delay critical nominations — often for political purposes,” he said. “With 74 nominees still pending before the Senate, the president hopes that the Senate will move forward and consider all of these well-qualified candidates.”

The Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund has pushed for the appointment of LGBT people through the federal government as the coalition leader in the Presidential Appointments Project.

Denis Dison, a Victory Fund spokesperson, said he had no knowledge of anti-gay bias holding up the confirmation process.

“My understanding is there are tons of nominees that are still being held,” Dison said. “I think that if the president is nominating a number of LGBT people, they’re just as likely to get caught up in the politics as straight nominees.”

Of the three pending LGBT nominees, the Senate has most recently taken steps to put Camunez on track to receive his appointment. The Senate Finance Committee last week favorably reported his nomination to the floor, just before lawmakers broke for the August recess.

Jim Manley, a spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), said the full Senate had yet to schedule a confirmation vote for Camunez.

“Last Thursday is a millisecond in the Senate, so it’s not like he’s been hanging out there for six months,” Manley said. “We rarely, if ever, confirm anyone on the day they [are] reported out.”

On June 30, the Senate Finance Committee unanimously reported out the nomination of Sorian, but his nomination hasn’t yet come before the full Senate.

Manley cited general Republican opposition to presidential nominees as the reason why the Senate has not confirmed Sorian.

“I have no idea what the deal is, but I think if you Google up the words ‘Donald Berwick’ and ‘Republicans,’ you will find Republicans vowing jihad in the light of the recess appointment for Burwick, so that’s all I know about that,” Manley said.

Manley was referring to Obama’s recess appointment in July of Donald Berwick as head of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which invoked the ire of Republicans ranging from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

The other appointee, Hanson, is pending before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Erica Chabot, spokesperson for the Judiciary Committee, said consideration of the nomination of Elena Kagan to become associate justice for the U.S. Supreme Court prevented the panel from holding other confirmation hearings.

“That often times slows up the scheduling of the nominations hearings, when we have a Supreme Court nominee,” Chabot said.

Time for a hearing or committee vote of Hanson’s nomination has not been scheduled, Chabot said. She denied that Hanson’s sexual orientation played any role in what was preventing the Judiciary Committee from taking up her nomination.

“It’s certainly not from Sen. Leahy’s perspective,” Chabot said. “I don’t think that anybody has raised that — certainly not with me.”

Another nominee, Chai Feldblum, a lesbian with a long history of LGBT activism, never received Senate confirmation. Still, she was able to assume her position as a commissioner for the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission through a recess appointment March 27.

But because Feldblum never received confirmation from the Senate, her tenure is shorter than it would have been if she had received consent from the chamber. She will only retain her EEOC position until the end of this year, while if she had received confirmation she would have been able to stay on until 2013.

An unknown senator placed a secret hold on Feldblum’s appointment, as well as other EEOC nominations, preventing the Senate from taking action. It’s still possible for the Senate to vote on her nomination to enable her to take her position for full tenure.

Dison said the extent to which Feldblum’s sexual orientation played a role in the mystery senator’s hold is unknown, but he noted it would be “appalling” if any senator thought being a lesbian would disqualify them from any job.

“I know that she has been quite active in LGBT issues,” Dison said. “If that’s the problem for those who don’t want her confirmed, then it’s not far from saying that her sexual orientation is the issue. She fought for those issues on principle, but she also fought for them because she’s part of that community.”

Sean Theriault, a gay government professor at the University of Texas, Austin, said the hold up of the nominations reflects “how truly paralyzed the Senate is” as opposed to any anti-gay bias.

“The system of holds, filibusters, electioneering, legislative games, and party polarization has brought the Senate to a screeching halt,” he said. “Now, if these were the only four nominees who hadn’t yet been confirmed, I would speculate that the reason might be their orientations. But hundreds of nominees are stalled.”

Theriault said he doesn’t expect the Senate to take up the nominations until after the November elections.

“Then, quite frankly, who knows what will happen to them, especially if the Republicans take over,” Theriault said.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Federal Government

RFK Jr.’s HHS report pushes therapy, not medical interventions, for trans youth

‘Discredited junk science’ — GLAAD

Published

on

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

A 409-page report released Thursday by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services challenges the ethics of medical interventions for youth experiencing gender dysphoria, the treatments that are often collectively called gender-affirming care, instead advocating for psychotherapy alone.

The document comes in response to President Donald Trump’s executive order barring the federal government from supporting gender transitions for anyone younger than 19.

“Our duty is to protect our nation’s children — not expose them to unproven and irreversible medical interventions,” National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya said in a statement. “We must follow the gold standard of science, not activist agendas.”

While the report does not constitute clinical guidance, its findings nevertheless conflict with not just the recommendations of LGBTQ advocacy groups but also those issued by organizations with relevant expertise in science and medicine.

The American Medical Association, for instance, notes that “empirical evidence has demonstrated that trans and non-binary gender identities are normal variations of human identity and expression.”

Gender-affirming care for transgender youth under standards widely used in the U.S. includes supportive talk therapy along with — in some but not all cases — puberty blockers or hormone treatment.

“The suggestion that someone’s authentic self and who they are can be ‘changed’ is discredited junk science,” GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said in a statement. “This so-called guidance is grossly misleading and in direct contrast to the recommendation of every leading health authority in the world. This report amounts to nothing more than forcing the same discredited idea of conversion therapy that ripped families apart and harmed gay, lesbian, and bisexual young people for decades.”

GLAAD further notes that the “government has not released the names of those involved in consulting or authoring this report.”

Janelle Perez, executive director of LPAC, said, “For decades, every major medical association–including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics–have affirmed that medical care is the only safe and effective treatment for transgender youth experiencing gender dysphoria.

“This report is simply promoting conversion therapy by a different name – and the American people know better. We know that conversion therapy isn’t actually therapy – it isolates and harms kids, scapegoats parents, and divides families through blame and rejection. These tactics have been used against gay kids for decades, and now the same people want to use them against transgender youth and their families.

“The end result here will be a devastating denial of essential health care for transgender youth, replaced by a dangerous practice that every major U.S. medical and mental health association agree promotes anxiety, depression, and increased risk of suicidal thoughts and attempts.

“Like being gay or lesbian, being transgender is not a choice, and no amount of pressure can force someone to change who they are. We also know that 98% of people who receive transition-related health care continue to receive that health care throughout their lifetime. Trans health care is health care.”

“Today’s report seeks to erase decades of research and learning, replacing it with propaganda. The claims in today’s report would rip health care away from kids and take decision-making out of the hands of parents,” said Shannon Minter, legal director of NCLR. “It promotes the same kind of conversion therapy long used to shame LGBTQ+ people into hating themselves for being unable to change something they can’t change.”

“Like being gay or lesbian, being transgender is not a choice—it’s rooted in biology and genetics,” Minter said. “No amount or talk or pressure will change that.” 

Human Rights Campaign Chief of Staff Jay Brown released a statement: “Trans people are who we are. We’re born this way. And we deserve to live our best lives and have a fair shot and equal opportunity at living a good life.

“This report misrepresents the science that has led all mainstream American medical and mental health professionals to declare healthcare for transgender youth to be best practice and instead follows a script predetermined not by experts but by Sec. Kennedy and anti-equality politicians.”




Continue Reading

The White House

Trump nominates Mike Waltz to become next UN ambassador

Former Fla. congressman had been national security advisor

Published

on

U.N. headquarters in New York (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

President Donald Trump on Thursday announced he will nominate Mike Waltz to become the next U.S. ambassador to the U.N.

Waltz, a former Florida congressman, had been the national security advisor.

Trump announced the nomination amid reports that Waltz and his deputy, Alex Wong, were going to leave the administration after Waltz in March added a journalist to a Signal chat in which he, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and other officials discussed plans to attack Houthi rebels in Yemen.

“I am pleased to announce that I will be nominating Mike Waltz to be the next United States ambassador to the United Nations,” said Trump in a Truth Social post that announced Waltz’s nomination. “From his time in uniform on the battlefield, in Congress and, as my National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz has worked hard to put our nation’s Interests first. I know he will do the same in his new role.”

Trump said Secretary of State Marco Rubio will serve as interim national security advisor, “while continuing his strong leadership at the State Department.”

“Together, we will continue to fight tirelessly to make America, and the world, safe again,” said Trump.

Trump shortly after his election nominated U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) to become the next U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Trump in March withdrew her nomination in order to ensure Republicans maintained their narrow majority in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Continue Reading

U.S. Federal Courts

Second federal lawsuit filed against White House passport policy

Two of seven plaintiffs live in Md.

Published

on

Lambda Legal on April 25 filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of seven transgender and nonbinary people who are challenging the Trump-Vance administration’s passport policy.

The lawsuit, which Lambda Legal filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in Baltimore, alleges the policy that bans the State Department from issuing passports with “X” gender markers “has caused and is causing grave and immediate harm to transgender people like plaintiffs, in violation of their constitutional rights to equal protection.”

Two of the seven plaintiffs — Jill Tran and Peter Poe — live in Maryland. The State Department, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and the federal government are defendants.

“The discriminatory passport policy exposes transgender U.S. citizens to harassment, abuse, and discrimination, in some cases endangering them abroad or preventing them from traveling, by forcing them to use identification documents that share private information against their wishes,” said Lambda Legal in a press release.

Zander Schlacter, a New York-based textile artist and designer, is the lead plaintiff.

The lawsuit notes he legally changed his name and gender in New York.

Schlacter less than a week before President Donald Trump’s inauguration “sent an expedited application to update his legal name on his passport, using form DS-5504.”

Trump once he took office signed an executive order that banned the State Department from issuing passports with “X” gender markers. The lawsuit notes Schlacter received his new passport in February.

“The passport has his correct legal name, but now has an incorrect sex marker of ‘F’ or ‘female,'” notes the lawsuit. “Mr. Schlacter also received a letter from the State Department notifying him that ‘the date of birth, place of birth, name, or sex was corrected on your passport application,’ with ‘sex’ circled in red. The stated reason was ‘to correct your information to show your biological sex at birth.'”

“I, like many transgender people, experience fear of harassment or violence when moving through public spaces, especially where a photo ID is required,” said Schlacter in the press release that announced the lawsuit. “My safety is further at risk because of my inaccurate passport. I am unwilling to subject myself and my family to the threat of harassment and discrimination at the hands of border officials or anyone who views my passport.”

Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken in June 2021 announced the State Department would begin to issue gender-neutral passports and documents for American citizens who were born overseas.

Dana Zzyym, an intersex U.S. Navy veteran who identifies as nonbinary, in 2015 filed a federal lawsuit against the State Department after it denied their application for a passport with an “X” gender marker. Zzyym in October 2021 received the first gender-neutral American passport.

Lambda Legal represented Zzyym.

The State Department policy took effect on April 11, 2022.

Trump signed his executive order shortly after he took office in January. Germany, Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlands are among the countries that have issued travel advisories for trans and nonbinary people who plan to visit the U.S.

A federal judge in Boston earlier this month issued a preliminary injunction against the executive order.  The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of seven trans and nonbinary people.

Continue Reading

Popular