Financial
A striking new ‘View’ on 14th Street

David Franco, a longtime local entrepreneur who co-owns Level 2 Development, opened View 14, a 185-unit apartment building in the bustling 14th and U corridor. (DC Agenda photo by Michael Key)
David Franco laughs as he recalls his foray into the entrepreneurial arena. It was 1989 and his good friend, John Guggenmos, was pulling together a group of investors to buy the nightclub Tracks. Franco, a fresh-faced 24-year-old, could not have known that Tracks would shortly experience its heyday and become the focal point of D.C.’s gay nightlife scene, making it a hugely profitable venture, but he smelled opportunity. Or at the very least a really good time. He was ready to jump at the chance.
There was just one snag: “I was not out at the time.”
Franco wasn’t among the legions of gay men and lesbians who came to D.C. to explore and embrace life outside the closet. The recent University of Maryland graduate was a native Washingtonian who had never lived anywhere else. He and his four brothers worked for the family business, a chain of discount department stores run by their father, and they all lived within a mile of each other in the Maryland suburbs. How would his family, especially his Orthodox Jewish father, react to having a family member who was not only gay but owned a gay nightclub?
“I went to my father and said, ‘Dad, I have this opportunity and the opportunity requires me to leave the family business.’” When his father asked what the opportunity was, Franco forced the words out. “I said, ‘I have the opportunity to go in with a group of guys to buy a [gay] nightclub.’ I thought my father was going to hit the roof. But instead he said, ‘If this is going to make you happy, you have my blessing.’”
The Tracks venture was the first step along a career path that would see Franco launch with his Tracks associates a new gay establishment in D.C., Trumpets restaurant, and with business partner Keith Clark start Universal Gear, a chain of clothing stores popular with gay men. Those accomplishments, however, were dwarfed with the opening last month of View 14, a $90 million 185-unit apartment building that he and business partner Jeff Blum developed and built through their real estate firm, Level 2 Development.
The building’s interior was designed in collaboration with local furniture store owners Jason Claire and Eric Kole of Vastu and has the feel of a boutique hotel: funky but modern, stylish with some flashes of whimsy. It boasts the usual upscale finishes like granite countertops and stainless steel appliances and an enviable array of amenities, some the kind you would expect in a new luxury building – roof decks with Weber grills, a party room, 24-hour concierge service, fitness center, underground parking – but some you might not have seen elsewhere, including a sculpture garden, yoga studio, fully loaded theater, and a screen in the cavernous lobby that tells you when the next green and yellow line trains will be arriving at the U Street Metro Station.
Franco likens View 14 itself to a “giant ship coming down 14th Street.” It’s a very fitting image, with the sleek and majestic glass, steel and stone structure seeming to glide down the hill from Columbia Heights to the U Street area. How View 14 came to be is a harrowing voyage in itself, fraught with the squalls and swells of a tanking real estate market and the ensuing lending crisis.
It was 2005, and Franco and Blum were finishing their first venture together, the development of a 12-unit apartment building on the 1400 block of Chapin Street, N.W., called the Mercury at Meridian Hill Park. The real estate market was moving from high gear into overdrive, Franco said, and the building sold out very quickly. Flush with excitement, the two decided that for their second project together they would go big in order to capitalize on the red hot market.
After losing a bid on a property in the NoMa neighborhood, they set their sights on the Petrovich Auto Repair garage at the corner of 14th Street and Florida Avenue, around the corner from the Mercury. The property was perfectly situated on a hill that would afford stunning views of the city, and was within a stone’s throw of the popular U Street corridor.
Unfortunately, owners Paolo and Pedro Petrovich weren’t exactly jumping at the opportunity.
“They weren’t prepared [to sell] at that time,” said Franco. “They wanted to reinvest [whatever profit they would make from the sale] but didn’t know what to do.”
Undeterred, Franco and Blum made themselves a fixture at the Petroviches’ garage. “One of us would be in there at least once a week, seeing how things were,” often over lunch. “We really cultivated a relationship.” Franco, meanwhile, diligently researched opportunities for the Petroviches to reinvest their money. When the brothers took him up on a suggestion to tour some CVS stores in the Baltimore area, Franco began to feel guardedly optimistic.
Several months later, after a delicate dance with the Petroviches that could only be described as a wooing, complete with the appearance of a rival suitor, Franco and Blum won the sale.
Once that first major hurdle was cleared other challenges followed – finding a suitable architect and investment partner, navigating city bureaucracy to get the requisite permits to build a large scale condo building where an auto repair shop used to be, making expensive arrangements for the grounds to be cleansed of several decades worth of oil and gasoline seepage – but those were overcome with hard work and perseverance.
Franco and Blum quickly found strong support for their project among D.C. politicians, with Mayor Adrian Fenty attending the groundbreaking and Ward 1 Council member Jim Graham stepping in to facilitate communication with Comcast, which had been unresponsive to Franco and Blum’s appeals to discuss with them the relocation of Comcast-owned satellite dish equipment and a signal receiver tower from the View 14 site. Graham would later champion legislation that gave the View 14 project $5.7 million in tax abatement.
The View 14 developers also won kudos from local community leaders and the city government by donating $1 million to the residents of Cresthill Apartments toward the purchase of their building and the formation of a cooperative. This was done as part of their deal with the city, which requires developers to provide affordable housing if they are building a high-density project. Rather than set aside units in the new building for that purpose, as is normally done, the View 14 developers, seeing need in their community, chose instead to donate needed funds to the Cresthill residents, whose building was less than a block away and was soon to be sold on the open market.
“I never will forget the first day I met David,” said Sankofa Cooperative president Sheila Royster, who has lived in the Cresthill Apartments building for 40 years. “He came to my unit and he brought me a plant. I thought that was wonderful. It was a genuine gesture and to me it just demonstrated his respect for us and what we were doing.”
Dark clouds began to loom though as speculation that the housing market was cresting gave way to fears of a housing bubble that could burst at any moment and send property values tumbling. Still, Franco and Blum were confident. More than 1,000 people attended the lavish launch party in September of 2006. Rival developers nervously dubbed View 14 “The Death Star” because it was expected to “suck up all the other condo purchasers in the market,” Franco said. “We were excited.”
Contracts trickled in, a dozen and a half in the first two months, and the cold reality set in: they weren’t selling enough units to finance the start of construction on time. It might be months, or even a year, before they reached that point. If they were able to reach that point.
The two men sat down with their project partners and made the difficult decision to re-engineer View 14 as a rental project. “It was literally the million dollar decision for us,” said Franco. “We had spent a million dollars in marketing and building a sales center.”
Franco said that he and Blum have accepted a letter of intent from a “well-known retail and services establishment in the area” that will use 8,000 square feet of space to expand their facilities.
“The neighborhood is going to be ecstatic when they learn who’s going to be there,” he promises. A signed lease and announcement is expected soon.
Franco is just as ebullient when he talks about the 14th and U Street neighborhood and its future. He points out that the Solea, a condo building directly across 14th Street from View 14, has nearly sold out. And there is just one unit left for sale at Union Row, the massive, 216-unit condo building that also houses Yes! Market, a CVS, and the restaurant Eatonville.
“That speaks volumes to the desirability of this neighborhood,” said Franco.
About 25 leases have been signed so far and the first View 14 residents moved in over Thanksgiving weekend, among them Galan Panger, a 24-year-old gay man who is leasing a studio. Panger, who works in Google’s downtown D.C. office, said he was impressed by the quality of the building’s construction and with the finishes. The amenities solidified the decision to trade in his digs at nearby Union Row for View 14.
“It was nice of them to create these community spaces,” Panger said. “My boyfriend and I have been grilling even though it’s been cold.” They have been sticking to the east roof deck after Franco joked during a tour of the building that it was the gayer of the two rooftop spaces since it has “the more fabulous view.”
Franco himself is one of View 14’s newest tenants, along with his dog; last week he sold his home near Meridian Hill Park and they moved into one of the penthouse units.
Franco sees a wide mix of people coming to View 14, from single young professionals to retired couples. There is also a fair bit of traffic from gay and lesbian renters like Panger, which Franco attributes to a variety of factors, including the fact that the building bears the strong imprint of two openly gay men, he and Blum, as well as the influence of other gay men they know like Claire and Kole of Vastu and Chris Cahill, a good friend of Franco’s who works for Botanical Decorators and came up with the idea for using the courtyard space as a sculpture garden and helped select the sculptures and interior plants.
People, gay and straight alike, Franco observed, appreciate quality and, “not to rely too heavily on stereotypes, but gay men have a natural attention to detail. We as gay men are [attuned] to high style, high design and convenience. This building delivers that.”
Real Estate
New year, new housing landscape for D.C. landlords
Several developments expected to influence how rental housing operates
As 2026 begins, Washington, D.C.’s rental housing landscape continues to evolve in ways that matter to small landlords, tenants, and the communities they serve. At the center of many of these conversations is the Small Multifamily & Rental Owners Association (SMOA), a D.C.–based organization that advocates for small property owners and the preservation of the city’s naturally occurring affordable housing.
At their December “DC Housing Policy Summit,” city officials, housing researchers, lenders, attorneys, and housing providers gathered to discuss the policies and proposals shaping the future of rental housing in the District. The topics ranged from recent legislative changes to emerging ballot initiatives and understanding how today’s policy decisions will affect housing stability tomorrow.
Why Housing Policy Matters in 2026
If you are a landlord or a tenant, several developments now underway in D.C., are expected to influence how rental housing operates in the years ahead.
One of the most significant developments is the Rebalancing Expectations for Neighbors, Tenants and Landlords (RENTAL) Act of 2025, a sweeping piece of legislation passed last fall and effective December 31, 2025, which updates a range of housing laws. This broad housing reform law will modernize housing regulations and address long-standing court backlogs, and in a practical manner, assist landlords with shortened notice and filing requirements for lawsuits. The Act introduces changes to eviction procedures, adjusts pre-filing notice timelines, and modifies certain tenant protections under previous legislation, the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act.
At the same time, the District has expanded its Rent Registry, to have a better overview of licensed rental units in the city with updated technology that tracks rental units subject to and exempt from rent control and other related housing information. Designed to improve transparency and enforcement, Rent Registry makes it easier for all parties to verify rent control status and compliance.
Looking ahead to the 2026 election cycle, a proposed ballot initiative for a two-year rent freeze is generating significant conversation. If it qualifies for the ballot and is approved by voters, the measure would pause rent increases across the District for two years. While still in the proposal phase, it reflects the broader focus on tenant affordability that continues to shape housing policy debates.
What This Means for Rental Owners
Taken together, these changes underscore how closely policy and day-to-day operations are connected for small landlords. Staying informed about notice requirements, registration obligations, and evolving regulations isn’t just a legal necessity. It’s a key part of maintaining stable, compliant rental properties.
With discussions underway about rent stabilization, voucher policies, and potential rent freezes, long-term revenue projections will be influenced by regulatory shifts just as much as market conditions alone. Financial and strategic planning becomes even more important to protect your interests.
Preparing for the Changes
As the owner of a property management company here in the District, I’ve spent much of the past year thinking about how these changes translate from legislation into real-world operations.
The first priority has been updating our eviction and compliance workflows to align with the RENTAL Act of 2025. That means revising how delinquent rent cases are handled, adjusting notice procedures, and helping owners understand how revised timelines and court processes may affect the cost, timing, and strategy behind enforcement decisions.
Just as important, we’re shifting toward earlier, more proactive communication around compliance and regulatory risk. Rather than reacting after policies take effect, we’re working to flag potential exposure in advance, so owners can make informed decisions before small issues become costly problems.
A Bigger Picture for 2026
Housing policy in Washington, D.C., has always reflected the city’s values from protecting tenants to preserving affordability in rapidly changing neighborhoods. As those policies continue to evolve, the challenge will be finding the right balance between stability for renters and sustainability for the small property owners who provide much of the city’s housing.
The conversations happening now at policy summits, in Council chambers, and across neighborhood communities will shape how rental housing is regulated. For landlords, tenants, and legislators alike, 2026 represents an opportunity to engage thoughtfully, to ask hard questions, and to create a future where compliance, fairness, and long-term stability go hand-in-hand.
Real Estate
Unconventional homes becoming more popular
HGTV show shines spotlight on alternatives to cookie cutter
While stuck in the house surrounded by snow and ice, I developed a new guilty pleasure: watching “Ugliest House in America” on HGTV. For several hours a day, I looked at other people’s unfortunate houses. Some were victims of multiple additions, some took on the worst décor of the ‘70s, and one was even built in the shape of a boat.
In today’s world, the idea of what a house should look like has shifted dramatically. Gone are the days of cookie-cutter suburban homes with white picket fences. Instead, a new wave of architects, designers, and homeowners are pushing the boundaries of traditional housing to create unconventional and innovative spaces that challenge our perceptions of what a home can be.
One of the most popular forms of alternative housing is the tiny house. These pint-sized dwellings are typically fewer than 500 square feet and often are set on trailers to allow for mobility. Vans and buses can also be reconfigured as tiny homes for the vagabonds among us.
These small wonders offer an affordable and sustainable living option for those wishing to downsize and minimize their environmental footprint. With clever storage solutions, multipurpose furniture, and innovative design features, tiny homes have become a creative and functional housing solution for many, although my dogs draw the line at climbing Jacob’s Ladder-type steps.
Another unusual type of housing gaining popularity is the shipping container home. Made from repurposed shipping containers, these homes offer a cost-effective and environmentally friendly way to create modern and sleek living spaces. With their industrial aesthetic and modular design, shipping container homes are a versatile option for those contemplating building a unique and often multi-level home.
For those looking to connect with nature, treehouses are a whimsical and eccentric housing option. Nestled high up in the trees, these homes offer a sense of seclusion and tranquility that is hard to find in traditional housing. With their distinctive architecture and stunning views, treehouses can be a magical retreat for those seeking a closer connection to the natural world.
For a truly off-the-grid living experience, consider an Earthship home. These self-sustaining homes use recycled construction materials and rely on renewable energy sources like solar power and rainwater harvesting. With their passive solar design and natural ventilation systems, Earthship homes are a model of environmentally friendly living.
For those with a taste for the bizarre, consider a converted silo home. These cylindrical structures provide an atypical canvas for architects and designers to create modern and minimalist living spaces. With curved walls and soaring ceilings, silo homes offer a one-of-a-kind living experience that is sure to leave an impression.
Barn homes have gained popularity in recent years. These dwellings take the rustic charm of a traditional barn and transform it into a modern and stylish living space. With their open, flexible floor plans, lofty ceilings, and exposed wooden beams, barn homes offer a blend of traditional and contemporary design elements that create a warm and inviting atmosphere, while being tailored to the needs and preferences of the homeowner.
In addition to their unique character, barn homes also offer a sense of history and charm that is hard to find in traditional housing. Many of them have a rich and storied past, with some dating back decades or even centuries.
If you relish life on the high seas (or at a marina on the bay), consider a floating home. These aquatic abodes differ from houseboats in that they remain on the dock rather than traverse the waterways. While most popular on the West Coast (remember “Sleepless in Seattle”?), you sometimes see them in Florida, with a few rentals available in Baltimore’s Inner Harbor and infrequent sales at our own D.C. Wharf. Along with the sense of community found in marinas, floating homes offer a peaceful retreat from the hustle and bustle of city life.
From tiny homes on wheels to treehouses in the sky or homes that float, these distinctive dwellings offer a fresh perspective on how we live and modify traditional thoughts on what a house should be. Sadly, most of these homes rely on appropriate zoning for building and placement, which can limit their use in urban or suburban areas.
Nonetheless, whether you’re looking for a sustainable and eco-friendly living option or a whimsical retreat, there is sure to be an unconventional housing option that speaks to your sense of adventure and creativity. So, why settle for a run-of-the-mill ranch or a typical townhouse when you can live in a unique and intriguing space that reflects your personality and lifestyle?
Valerie M. Blake is a licensed Associate Broker in D.C., Maryland, and Virginia with RLAH @properties. Call or text her at 202-246-8602, email her at [email protected] or follow her on Facebook at TheRealst8ofAffairs.
Real Estate
Convert rent check into an automatic investment, Marjorie!
Basic math shows benefits of owning vs. renting
Suppose people go out for dinner and everyone is talking about how they are investing their money. Some are having fun with a few new apps they downloaded – where one can round up purchases and then bundle that money into a weekly or monthly investment that grows over time, which is a smart thing to do. The more automatic one can make the investments, the less is required to “think about it” and the more it just happens. It becomes a habit and a habit becomes a reward over time.
Another habit one can get into is just making that rent check an investment. One must live somewhere, correct? And in many larger U.S. cities like New York, Chicago, D.C., Los Angeles, Miami, Charlotte, Atlanta, Dallas, Nashville, Austin, or even most mid-market cities, rents can creep up towards $2,000 a month (or more) with ease.
Well, do the math. At $2,000 per month over one year, that’s $24,000. If someone stays in that apartment (with no rent increases) for even three years, that amount triples to $72,000. According to Rentcafe.com, the average rent in the United States at the end of 2025 was around $1,700 a month. Even that amount of rent can total between $60,000 and $80,000 over 3-4 years.
What if that money was going into an investment each month? Now, yes, the argument is that most mortgage payments, in the early years, are more toward the interest than the principal. However, at least a portion of each payment is going toward the principal.
What about closing costs and then selling costs? If a home is owned for three years, and then one pays out of pocket to close on that home (usually around 2-3% of the sales price), does owning it for even three years make it worth it? It could be argued that owning that home for only three years is not enough time to recoup the costs of mostly paying the interest plus paying the closing costs.
Let’s look at some math:
A $300,000 condo – at 3% is $9,000 for closing costs.
One can also put as little as 3 or 3.5% down on a home – so that is also around $9,000.
If a buyer uses D.C. Opens Doors or a similar program – a down payment can be provided and paid back later when the property is sold so that takes care of some of the upfront costs. Knowledgeable lenders can often discuss other useful down payment assistance programs to help a buyer “find the money.”
Another useful tactic many agents use is to ask for a credit from the seller. If a property has sat on the market for weeks, the seller may be willing to give a closing cost credit. That amount can vary. New construction sellers may also offer these closing cost credits as well.
And that, Marjorie, just so you will know, and your children will someday know, is THE NIGHT THE RENT CHECK WENT INTO AN INVESTMENT ACCOUNT ON GEORGIA AVENUE!
Joseph Hudson is a referral agent with Metro Referrals. Reach him at 703-587-0597 or [email protected].
-
a&e features5 days agoMarc Shaiman reflects on musical success stories
-
Television5 days agoNetflix’s ‘The Boyfriend’ is more than a dating show
-
Movies5 days ago50 years later, it’s still worth a return trip to ‘Grey Gardens’
-
Opinions5 days agoSnow, ice, and politics: what is (and isn’t) happening
