Connect with us

News

GOP congressional hopeful says ENDA is ‘segregation’

Democrats demand apology for ‘disgusting remarks’

Published

on

Nevada, Republican Party, Cresent Hardy, gay news, Washington Blade, Cresent Hardy
Nevada, Republican Party, Cresent Hardy, gay news, Washington Blade, Cresent Hardy

Nevada Assemblyman Cresent Hardy says ENDA is “segregation” (Photo public domain).

A Republican candidate running for Congress in Nevada said he opposes the Employment Non-Discrimination Act because the pro-LGBT measure would amount to “segregation” under the law.

Cresent Hardy, a Nevada Assembly member, expressed opposition to ENDA in an interview with the Las Vegas Sun on Tuesday — the same day he launched his congressional bid.

“When we create classes, we create that same separation that we’re trying to unfold somehow,” Hardy was quoted as saying. “By continuing to create these laws that are what I call segregation laws, it puts one class of a person over another. We are creating classes of people through these laws.”

The long-sought measure, passed by the U.S. Senate and pending in the U.S. House, would prohibit employers from discriminating against or firing someone because of their sexual orientation and gender identity.

As an Assembly member, Hardy voted against a state law extending job protections to transgender workers before it was signed in 2011 by Gov. Brian Sandoval, a Republican.

Meanwhile, Rep. Steve Horsford (D-Nev.), the Democratic incumbent Hardy is challenging, is among the 201 sponsors of ENDA in the U.S. House. Both U.S. senators from Nevada, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Sen. Dean Heller (R-Nev.), voted for ENDA on the Senate floor late last year, where it passed on a bipartisan basis.

In addition to expressing opposition to ENDA, Hardy, a Mormon, also reportedly expressed opposition to same-sex marriage based on his religious beliefs, saying the issue should be left to the states.

I will always vote against same sex marriage because of my religious beliefs, the way I was raised,” Hardy was quoted as saying. “For me to vote for it would be to deny the same God that I believe in.”

Hardy is the middle of a primary fight for the Republican nomination to represent Nevada’s 4th congressional district in the U.S. House. He’s facing a challenge from Tea Party activist Niger Innis. The primary is set for June 10.

Zach Hudson, communications director for the Nevada State Democratic Party, criticized Hardy for expressing opposition to ENDA despite widespread public support for the measure, calling on the candidate to apologize for the remarks.

“Only months after Nevada Republicans cheered at the prospect of minorities not voting and said they would vote to legalize slavery if their constituents wanted it, Cresent Hardy piled on yesterday and compared the Employment Non-Discrimination Act to ‘segregation,’” Hudson said. “The Employment Non-Discrimination Act would end employment discrimination based off sexual orientation, yet somehow Cresent Hardy thinks it is comparable to a discriminatory practice that the Supreme Court rightly ruled unconstitutional decades ago. Cresent Hardy clearly needs a history lesson, and, more importantly, Nevadans deserve an apology for his disgusting remarks.”

UPDATE: Following the publication of this posting, Hardy issued a statement via his campaign to the Washington Blade to clarify his position on ENDA.

“I believe in advancement through performance,” Hardy said. “There is no room for discrimination in the workplace at any level and I strongly oppose laws to hold back, or advance, a person strictly based upon a label or grouping. Political spin doctors will twist that comment in ways that benefit those that fund their activities. The truth is, I support workplace laws that reward those who do the best job regardless of who they are. Any suggestion otherwise is simply not true.”

The campaign also pointed to a subsequent article published by the Las Vegas Sun with the full transcript of the interview. Although Hardy did suggest ENDA amounts to “segregation” under the law, he also said “you shouldn’t discriminate against anybody.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Federal Government

HHS reverses Trump-era anti-LGBTQ rule

Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act now protects LGBTQ people

Published

on

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra (Public domain photo)

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights has issued a final rule on Friday under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act advancing protections against discrimination in health care prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, or sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics), in covered health programs or activities. 

The updated rule does not force medical professionals to provide certain types of health care, but rather ensures nondiscrimination protections so that providers cannot turn away patients based on individual characteristics such as being lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, or pregnant.

“This rule ensures that people nationwide can access health care free from discrimination,” said HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra. “Standing with communities in need is critical, particularly given increased attacks on women, trans youth, and health care providers. Health care should be a right not dependent on looks, location, love, language, or the type of care someone needs.”

The new rule restores and clarifies important regulatory protections for LGBTQ people and other vulnerable populations under Section 1557, also known as the health care nondiscrimination law, that were previously rescinded by the Trump administration.

“Healthcare is a fundamental human right. The rule released today restores critical regulatory nondiscrimination protections for those who need them most and ensures a legally proper reading of the Affordable Care Act’s healthcare nondiscrimination law,” said Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, counsel and health care strategist for Lambda Legal.

“The Biden administration today reversed the harmful, discriminatory, and unlawful effort by the previous administration to eliminate critical regulatory protections for LGBTQ+ people and other vulnerable populations, such as people with limited English proficiency, by carving them out from the rule and limiting the scope of entities to which the rule applied,” Gonzalez-Pagan added. “The rule released today has reinstated many of these important protections, as well as clarifying the broad, intended scope of the rule to cover all health programs and activities and health insurers receiving federal funds. While we evaluate the new rule in detail, it is important to highlight that this rule will help members of the LGBTQ+ community — especially transgender people, non-English speakers, immigrants, people of color, and people living with disabilities — to access the care they need and deserve, saving lives and making sure healthcare professionals serve patients with essential care no matter who they are.”

In addition to rescinding critical regulatory protections for LGBTQ people, the Trump administration’s rule also limited the remedies available to people who face health disparities, limited access to health care for people with Limited English Proficiency, and dramatically reduced the number of healthcare entities and health plans subject to the rule.

Lambda Legal, along with a broad coalition of LGBTQ advocacy groups, filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration rule, Whitman-Walker Clinic v. HHS, and secured a preliminary injunction preventing key aspects of the Trump rule from taking effect.

These included the elimination of regulatory protections for LGBTQ people and the unlawful expansion of religious exemptions, which the new rule corrects. The preliminary injunction in Whitman-Walker Clinic v. HHS remains in place. Any next steps in the case will be determined at a later time, after a fulsome review of the new rule.

GLAAD President Sarah Kate Ellis released the following statement in response to the news:

“The Biden administration’s updates to rules regarding Section 1557 of the ACA will ensure that no one who is LGBTQI or pregnant can face discrimination in accessing essential health care. This reversal of Trump-era discriminatory rules that sought to single out Americans based on who they are and make it difficult or impossible for them to access necessary medical care will have a direct, positive impact on the day to day lives of millions of people. Today’s move marks the 334th action from the Biden-Harris White House in support of LGBTQ people. Health care is a human right that should be accessible to all Americans equally without unfair and discriminatory restrictions. LGBTQ Americans are grateful for this step forward to combat discrimination in health care so no one is barred from lifesaving treatment.”

Continue Reading

Maryland

Md. governor signs Freedom to Read Act

Law seeks to combat book bans

Published

on

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (Public domain photo/Twitter)

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore on Thursday signed a bill that seeks to combat efforts to ban books from state libraries.

House Bill 785, also known as the Freedom to Read Act, would establish a state policy “that local school systems operate their school library media programs consistent with certain standards; requiring each local school system to develop a policy and procedures to review objections to materials in a school library media program; prohibiting a county board of education from dismissing, demoting, suspending, disciplining, reassigning, transferring, or otherwise retaliating against certain school library media program personnel for performing their job duties consistent with certain standards.”

Moore on Thursday also signed House Bill 1386, which GLSEN notes will “develop guidelines for an anti-bias training program for school employees.”

Continue Reading

Mexico

Mexican Senate approves bill to ban conversion therapy

Measure passed by 77-4 vote margin

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

The Mexican Senate on Thursday approved a bill that would ban so-called conversion therapy in the country.

Yaaj México, a Mexican LGBTQ rights group, on X noted the measure passed by a 77-4 vote margin with 15 abstentions.  The Chamber of Deputies, the lower house of Mexico’s congress, approved the bill last month that, among other things, would subject conversion therapy practitioners to between two and six years in prison and fines.

The Senate on its X account described conversion therapy as “practices that have incentivized the violation of human rights of the LGBTTTIQ+ community.”

“The Senate moved (to) sanction therapies that impede or annul a person’s orientation or gender identity,” it said. “There are aggravating factors when the practices are done to minors, older adults and people with disabilities.”

Mexico City and the states of Oaxaca, Quintana Roo, Jalisco and Sonora are among the Mexican jurisdictions that have banned the discredited practice. 

The Senate in 2022 passed a conversion therapy ban bill, but the House of Deputies did not approve it. It is not immediately clear whether President Andrés Manuel López Obrador supports the ban.

Canada, Brazil, Belgium, Germany, France, and New Zealand are among the countries that ban conversion therapy. Virginia, California, and D.C. are among the U.S. jurisdictions that prohibit the practice for minors.  

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular