- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
U.S. Senate may vote on D.C. marriage
The U.S. Senate will consider Republican amendments to the health care reconciliation package this week. One such amendment would force a referendum on same-sex marriage in Washington, D.C.
Sen. Bob Bennett (R-Utah) is expected to introduce the amendment sometime Wednesday or Thursday. The amendment is widely expected to fail, but supporters said they would pursue it in order to put all U.S. senators on the record regarding their views on same-sex marriage.
The National Organization for Marriage, which opposes same-sex marriage, issued an “emergency alert” to supporters on Wednesday asking them to e-mail their senators and urge a vote in favor of the Bennett amendment.
Bennett filed amendment No. 3568 early Wednesday morning, titled, “To protect the democratic process and the right of the people of the District of Columbia to define marriage.”
Bennett has yet to formerly introduce the amendment. He must do so by about 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, when the debate period ends on the underlying bill, the Healthcare and Education Reconciliation Act.
One knowledgeable source familiar with the healthcare bill said Bennett’s amendment was expected to be ruled non-germane, preventing it from being brought up for a vote. Sixty senators would have to vote to overturn the non-germaneness ruling, something nearly all observers feel will not happen.
DC Agenda will have more on this story as it develops.
Staff writer Lou Chibbaro Jr. contributed to this article.
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.

view print edition
I’ve contacted my Senators.
[Translate]
“Formerly” means “at an earlier time.”
“Formally” means “in a formal way.” Get it write, ok? ;)
[Translate]