- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-

Affleck mocks ‘ex-gay’ camps on SNL skit
-

Rehoboth Summer Kickoff Party
-

Thousands attend Puerto Rico LGBT rights march
-

Dems seeking to delay gay-inclusive immigration reform?
-

Puerto Rico Senate committee holds adoption bill hearing
-

GLAAD leaderless again with Graddick resignation
-

U.S. ambassador to U.N. observes IDAHO
McCain: UAFA ‘not of paramount importance’ for immigration deal

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said including gay couples in immigration reform is ‘not of paramount importance’ (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)
A top Republican involved in the talks for a Senate deal on immigration reform said Tuesday the inclusion of gay couples in the final agreement is “not of paramount importance at this time.”
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) seemed disinclined to accept a provision for gay couples as part of the immigration deal headed through Congress — calling such a provision a “red flag” — during an interview on “CBS This Morning.”
“We’ll have to look at it,” McCain said. “We’ll have to gauge how the majority of Congress feels, but that, to me, is a red flag that frankly, we will address in time.”
LGBT advocates are seeking a provision as part of comprehensive immigration reform that would enable gay Americans to sponsor a foreign same-sex partner for residency in the United States. Standalone legislation along these lines is known as the Uniting American Families Act.
The Senate blueprint unveiled on Monday by the “Gang of Eight” — a group of which McCain is a member — doesn’t mention any such provision. An aide for Sen. Charles Schumer, a leading Democrat involved in the talks, told the Washington Blade that language for gay couples “is among the many unresolved aspects of the negotiations, which is why it isn’t reflected either way in the outline.”
Jimmy LaSalvia, executive director of GOProud, blasted McCain in a statement for his reluctance to accept a provision for bi-national same-sex couples as part of an immigration deal while accepting a path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States.
“It defies logic that Sen. McCain would craft an immigration proposal that would reward gay people who came to this country illegally with a path to citizenship, but deny legal gay couples the opportunity to access the same immigration rights as opposite-sex couples,” LaSalvia said. “Under Sen. McCain’s vision for America, a gay American would be better off urging his or her partner to break the law, sneak across the border and come here illegally, and be granted amnesty by the senator.”
President Obama is expected to include a measure for same-sex couples as part of his own immigration reform plan that he’ll unveil in Las Vegas later on Tuesday.
During a press gaggle aboard Air Force One on the way to Nevada, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney hinted that Obama’s proposal would include UAFA.
“The president believes that it should be included and that should come as no surprise,” Carney said. “As we’ve said all along, this is consistent with the principles he has laid out over the last four years. And the president has long believed that Americans with same-sex partners from other countries should not be faced with the painful choice between staying with the person they love or staying in the country they love. And the president’s position on this is consistent with how we’ve approached prosecutorial discretion at [the Department of Homeland Security] and others.”
LGBT advocates, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said they were involved in a call put together by Schumer on the issue in which Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) also participated. In the call, Schumer reportedly told advocates UAFA wouldn’t be in the Senate principles because Republicans were opposed to it.
Advocates said they were told UAFA might be put in the legislation at a later point and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) may offer an amendment in committee to include the provision as part of the package. Schumer also asked LGBT advocates to cooperate because the intention of the process was to bring along as many folks as possible.
Watch the video of McCain here (courtesy ThinkProgress):
UPDATE: This article has been updated to include a comment from Jay Carney.
Tagged with GOProud, Homepage Headlines, Jimmy LaSalvia, John McCain, Uniting American Families Act
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.
-
[...] have to look at it,” McCain said during an interview on CBS. “We’ll have to gauge how the majority of Congress feels, but that, to me, is a red flag that [...]
-
[...] have to look at it,” McCain said during an interview on CBS. “We’ll have to gauge how the majority of Congress feels, but that, to me, is a red flag that [...]
-
[...] in immigration rights as too politicizing, and–according to Senator McCain–a “red flag.â€However, Obama and the Democrats are not backing down from including same-sex couples in the [...]
-
[...] in immigration rights as too politicizing, and–according to Senator McCain–a “red flag.â€However, Obama and the Democrats are not backing down from including same-sex couples in the [...]
-
[...] in immigration rights as too politicizing, and–according to Senator McCain–a “red flag.â€However, Obama and the Democrats are not backing down from including same-sex couples in the [...]

view print edition
The old white guys who run the republican party have clearly decided that of the groups that they find distasteful — blacks, latinos, women and gays — that pandering for the latino vote is the fastest path to victory. They have always believed that Latino’s will embrace their family values rhetoric if it were not for the anti-immigration backlash. They secretly get giddy over how they won’t even have to change their macho views regarding women or hide their disgust for “puto.”
Think about it. What are the first four initiatives out of the GOP since the election? 1) Minimize the impact of democratic “urban” residents through electoral vote redistribution… Never gonna get the black vote, so let’s lessen the impact. 2) Increased funding for DOMA defense and trivialize UAFA… Hello? Have we not been clear gay voters? 3) Pledge to end abortion by end of the year… Still haven’t learned to keep their hands off women’s bodies. 4) Immigration reform with a path to citizenship… “Who’s your Papi?”
[Translate]