Local
Senator backs off D.C. marriage amendment
In a little noticed development, Sen. Robert Bennett (R-Utah) filed an amendment with the Senate clerk March 11 that would prohibit D.C. from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples until the city allows voters to decide the issue through a referendum or initiative.
But Bennett did not formally introduce the amendment before Senate Democrats and Republicans agreed by unanimous consent to an approved list of amendments for a Federal Aviation Administration authorization bill ā the measure to which Bennett intended to attach his amendment.
The approved list does not include his amendment, preventing him from bringing it up at this time.
Bennettās office did not return calls seeking to determine why he didnāt offer the amendment before the list restricting new amendments was approved. It could not be immediately determined whether Bennettās GOP colleagues persuaded him to stop moving ahead with the amendment or whether he made the decision on his own.
āAmendments are often filed and not offered,ā said Max Gleischman, national press secretary for Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), the Senateās majority whip.
āSo Iām not sure why it wasnāt offered,ā Gleischman said. āBut it was not. And so therefore weāve locked in, through a consent agreement, a finite list of amendments. And thatās not one of the ones on the list.ā
Bennettās proposed amendment, which was published in the March 11 Congressional Record, is identical to a free-standing bill that he and seven other Republicans introduced Feb 2. The billās purpose is āto protect the democratic process and the right of the people of the District of Columbia to define marriage.ā
According to the Congressional Record, Sens. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) joined Bennett in filing the amendment as an attachment to the FAA authorization bill, which is being considered on the Senate floor.
The authorization measure is being pushed by Senate Democratic leaders and is considered essential for continued operation of U.S. aviation related programs, including the nationās air traffic control system.
Both the amendment and Bennettās free-standing bill say, āNotwithstanding any other provision of law, including the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, the government of the District of Columbia shall not issue a marriage license to any couple of the same sex until the people of the District of Columbia have the opportunity to hold a referendum or initiative on the question of whether the District of Columbia should issue same-sex marriage license.ā
Paul Strauss, who lobbies the U.S. Senate as an informal shadow senator on D.C. related issues, said unconfirmed reports that Bennett was planning to introduce an amendment to block the cityās same-sex marriage law surfaced last week on Capitol Hill.
āIt could potentially force an up or down vote on gay marriage,ā Strauss said. āThis is certainly something that Democrats and at least some Republicans want to avoid.ā
District of Columbia
D.C. Mayorās Office of LGBTQ Affairs moving to new location
LGBTQ community center also set to leave Reeves Center
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowserās Office of LGBTQ Affairs, which is currently located at the cityās Reeves Center municipal building at 14th and U Street, N.W., was scheduled to move during the week of Dec. 9 to a new location at 899 North Capitol St., N.E., according to Japer Bowles, the officeās director.
Bowles said the LGBTQ Affairs office will be located on the seventh floor of the privately owned office building in which the city has rented space for several other city agencies, including the D.C. Department of Health.
The move comes about amid longstanding plans to demolish the Reeves Center and replace it with a redevelopment project that will include a mix of housing, office space, a hotel, and retail stores along with a public plaza and a 200-seat amphitheater.
The D.C. LGBTQ+ Community Center, which has been located in the Reeves Center for about 10 years, also expects to be moving out of the building in the spring of 2025, said Kimberley Bush, the LGBTQ centerās executive director.
Bush said the LGBTQ center looks forward to moving into its new, larger space in a building at 1827 Wiltberger St., N.W. in the cityās Shaw neighborhood, which is located one block away from the Shaw-Howard University Metro station.
The LGBTQ center entered a joint lease to rent space in the Wiltberger Street building with the Capital Pride Alliance, the group that organizes most of D.C.ās LGBTQ Pride events, including the upcoming World Pride 2025 events set to take place in D.C. May 17-June 8.
In response to a request by Bowser, the D.C. Council earlier this year approved $1 million in funding for fiscal year 2025 to support the build-out and construction of the LGBTQ Centerās space in the Wiltberger Streetās converted warehouse building.
But shortly after the Council approved that funding, the D.C. Center and Capital Pride Alliance announced the launch of a fundraising campaign called āWelcome Home ā Building Together, Thriving Togetherā to raise an additional $1.5 million needed to complete the renovation of the new building.
āThis endeavor is more than just the construction of a building; it represents a commitment to carve out a generous 7,000 square feet of space devoted to nurturing unity, empowerment, and support across the LGBTQ+ spectrum,ā a statement announcing the fundraising campaign says.
District of Columbia
D.C. LGBTQ community to gather for post-election dialogue
Dec. 12 event to address federal workersā rights, immigration, more
Several leading LGBTQ organizations in D.C. are coming together to make sense of the recent election and to discuss the future of advocacy and resilience as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to take office.
With Republicans in firm control of the federal government after winning majorities in the House and Senate, many are concerned about attacks on the LGBTQ community, including Trumpās pledge to ban trans people from serving in the military. In addition, many LGBTQ federal workers have expressed concerns about being targeted for reassignment or termination, as outlined in Project 2025, a right-wing blueprint for Trumpās second term.
In response, D.C.ās LGBTQ community is coming together for an event on Thursday, Dec. 12, 6:30-8 p.m. at the Eaton Hotel (1201 K. St., N.W.) featuring an array of speakers who will address issues, including: anticipated policy shifts; community resilience strategies; legal rights; immigration advocacy; and federal workersā rights.
The event, titled, āCharting Our Future: LGBTQ+ Advocacy & Resilience in a Changing Landscapeā is free; visit washingtonblade.com/future to RSVP.
The event is being hosted by the Washington Blade and includes community partners: the DC LGBTQ+ Budget Coalition, HME Consulting & Advocacy, Eaton DC, DC LGBTQ+ Community Center, Capital Pride Alliance, and the Mayor’s Office of LGBTQ+ Affairs. Heidi Ellis of the DC LGBTQ+ Budget Coalition will moderate. A list of speakers will be released later this week.
District of Columbia
Casa Ruby receiver files for bankruptcy
Jan. 21 deadline set for creditors, former employees to apply for reimbursement
In a little-noticed development, the Wanda Alston Foundation, which assumed control over the operations of the D.C. LGBTQ community services group Casa Ruby in August 2022 under a court-appointed receivership role, filed a petition on Aug. 27 of this year to place Casa Ruby in bankruptcy.
The petition, filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia, says Casa Ruby has estimated liabilities to at least 50 creditors of more than $1 million and estimated assets of between $0 and $50,000.
Nick Harrison, an attorney representing the Wanda Alston Foundation, which provides housing services to homeless LGBTQ youth, said Casa Ruby currently has no known financial assets, including cash.
He said the bankruptcy petitionās estimated assets of up to $50,000 are based on a pending lawsuit that the Alston Foundation filed against eight former Casa Ruby board members and Casa Rubyās founder and former executive director Ruby Corado in December 2022. The lawsuit accuses the board of violating D.C.ās nonprofit corporation law by failing to exercise oversight over Casa Rubyās operations that led to its financial collapse and shutdown in 2022.
The lawsuit calls on the court to require Corado and the former board members to pay ārestitution, compensatory damages, punitive damages, receivership fees and expenses, court costs, attorneysā fees, and expenses, and any other relief the court deems necessary and proper.ā
A D.C. Superior Court judge on May 1, 2023, dismissed the lawsuit filed by the Alston Foundation against all but one of the former Casa Ruby board members but did not dismiss the case against Corado.
The Alston Foundation has appealed the ruling dismissing the lawsuit, and the case is now pending before the D.C. Court of Appeals.
The lawsuit also alleges that the board failed to adequately oversee the actions of Corado, who pleaded guilty in July of this year to a charge of wire fraud as part of a plea bargain deal offered by prosecutors.
The charge to which Corado pleaded guilty in the U.S. District Court for D.C. says she allegedly diverted at least $150,000 āin taxpayer-backed emergency COVID relief fundsā awarded to Casa Ruby to āprivate offshore bank accounts for her personal use,ā according to a statement released by the U.S. Attorneyās office.
Corado, who initially denied the allegations against her, is currently staying with a family member in Rockville, Md., in a home detention arrangement following her arrest by the FBI on March 5 of this year. She is scheduled to be sentenced on Jan. 10.
D.C. Superior Court Judge Danya A. Dayson stated that her decision to dismiss the lawsuit against seven of the eight former board members was based on her interpretation of D.C. law. She said she believes the law holds that members of an organizationās board of directors can only be held liable for harming an organization like Casa Ruby if they āintentionally, rather than negligently, inflicted harm on Casa Ruby.ā
The judge said she did not dismiss the case against one of the board members because the lawsuit presents evidence that the board member received some financial benefits from Corado.
In a legal brief filed with the appeals court, the Alston Foundation attorneys state that evidence shows the Casa Ruby board members āwere deliberately indifferent or āwillfully blindā to the alleged wrongful conduct of the nonprofitās executive director amounting to actual knowledge on their part that inaction would harm the nonprofit, ultimately and forcibly leading to its financial inability to continue operation.ā
The former board members have declined requests for comment on the lawsuit.
Harrison, the attorney representing the Alston Foundation in the bankruptcy filing, said anyone who is owed money by Casa Ruby has until Jan. 21 to file a āproof of claimā form with the bankruptcy court to be eligible to be compensated if funds become available.
At the time of Casa Rubyās shutdown, the organizationās employees were among those who said they were not paid in the months or weeks prior to the shutdown.
Asked what prompted the Alston Foundation to file the bankruptcy petition on behalf of Casa Ruby, Harris said, “Filing the bankruptcy petition ensures that a trustee with the appropriate expertise can wrap up the remaining issues while allowing the Wanda Alston Foundation to stay focused on its core mission.”
U.S. Bankruptcy Court records show that one of the officials in charge of collecting proof of claim forms for those owed money is Mark E. Albert, a court appointed Trustee for the bankruptcy filing. Court records show he can be reached at 202-728-3020.
-
U.S. Supreme Court4 days ago
Supreme Court hears oral arguments in pivotal gender affirming care case
-
U.S. Supreme Court4 days ago
Trans rights supporters, opponents rally outside Supreme Court as justices consider Tenn. law
-
District of Columbia4 days ago
Casa Ruby receiver files for bankruptcy
-
Rehoboth Beach5 days ago
Adult suspect pleads guilty to Rehoboth Beach hate crime