Connect with us

Local

Trial begins in Wone murder case

Judge blocks evidence on alleged paralytic drug, S&M restraints

Published

on

A long-awaited trial opened this week for three gay men implicated in the murder of attorney Robert Wone, who was found stabbed to death inside the menā€™s Dupont Circle area townhouse in August 2006.

Joseph Price, 39, his domestic partner, Victor Zaborsky, 44, and the coupleā€™s roommate, Dylan Ward, 39, have been charged with obstruction of justice, conspiracy and evidence tampering in connection with Woneā€™s murder. If convicted on all three charges, the men face a possible maximum sentence of 38 years in prison.

Authorities have yet to charge anyone with the murder itself, a development that has created an air of mystery and intrigue and has captured the interest of the gay community as well as local and national media.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys said they could present 80 or more witnesses and expect the trial to last as long as 10 weeks. Jury selection was scheduled to begin Wednesday at D.C. Superior Court, with opening arguments set for Monday.

Judge Lynn Leibovitz ruled Tuesday against the defense teamā€™s attempt to separate the joint case so that each defendant could be tried individually rather than together in a shared trial.

The defense argued that the men should be tried separately because it would be impossible for prosecutors to avoid violating constitutionally mandated rules of evidence that statements made by one defendant canā€™t be used against another defendant in a joint trial. But Leibovitz said the defendantsā€™ rights would be protected by strict limits she imposed on the prosecution concerning the introduction of the defendantsā€™ statements about each other.

Defense attorneys were especially concerned about prosecutorsā€™ plans to show jurors videotaped interviews of each of the defendants by homicide detectives conducted shortly after the murder. At Leibovitzā€™s instruction, prosecutors said they would edit the videos to remove any statements by the defendants that would incriminate a co-defendant.

After months of pre-trial wrangling over the admissibility of evidence, Leibovitz forced prosecutors in the days before the trial began to withdraw several key elements in their case, including allegations that the crime scene was cleaned of blood.

Under pressure that Leibovitz would rule against them and claims by the defense that the government lacked sufficient evidence, prosecutors also agreed not to introduce testimony that Wone may have been immobilized with a paralytic drug or restrained by S&M devices found in the menā€™s house before being stabbed three times in the chest.

Also excluded was any testimony by police regarding the collection of S&M devices they found in the house, including restraining harnesses, face masks, books about sadomasochism, and a device used to administer an electric shock to a person during sexual activity.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Glenn Kirschner, the lead prosecutor in the case, has said introduction of the S&M devices as evidence was intended to show that Wone might have been restrained at the time he was stabbed.

Kirschner has said the government nonetheless remains confident it has sufficient evidence to prove that the killer ā€œis someone known to the defendantsā€ and that the three men conspired to obstruct the police investigation into the crime.

Kirschner has said he also remains optimistic that the government will demonstrate to the jury that Wone was not murdered by some ā€œunknown, unseen, phantom intruder,ā€ as the defense has alleged.

In pleading not guilty to the charges, the three gay men have said through their attorneys that an intruder entered their house through a rear door while they were asleep and killed Wone.

Wone, a friend of Price since the two attended Virginiaā€™s College of William & Mary, spent the night at the menā€™s house on Swann Street, N.W., after working late at his nearby office. Woneā€™s wife, Kathy Wone, and family members have said Wone was straight.

The defendants have retained an experienced and highly regarded team of nearly one dozen defense attorneys, including former prosecutors such as the openly gay former D.C. Attorney General Robert Spagnoletti.

Since Price, Zaborsky and Ward were indicted in the case in 2008, the attorneys have methodically challenged nearly every piece of evidence and legal theory advanced by the government, accusing prosecutors of ā€œmanufacturingā€ a sensational case that isnā€™t supported by the facts.

In a final series of pre-trial hearings over the past month, Kirschner, chief of the homicide division at the U.S. Attorneyā€™s office, and his smaller team of prosecutors, have sought to defend a case built largely around the aspects of a stabbing death reportedly committed by an outside intruder that were conspicuously missing in the Wone murder.

Citing the autopsy and crime scene findings, prosecutors note that although Wone was stabbed three times in the chest area, including once in the heart, there was hardly any blood on the guest room bed where he was found or on the floor or walls. This prompted prosecutors to conclude in a lengthy arrest affidavit released in October 2008 that someone in the house had ā€œcleanedā€ the crime scene.

The affidavit points to an autopsy finding that the three stab wounds on Woneā€™s chest area were surgical-like and undistorted rather than the jagged cuts usually found on a stabbing victim, who would be expected to recoil in pain and move around in an effort to defend himself ā€” even if he were sleeping in a bed, as the defendants say was the case with Wone.

Additionally, there were no defensive wounds on Woneā€™s hands or arms that are normally found on victims stabbed more than once, who traditionally position their arms to deflect the path of a knife-wielding attacker, prosecutors have said.

The arrest affidavit citing these findings pointed to a theory by the medical examiner that Wone appeared to have been immobilized by a paralytic drug, which likely prevented him from moving during a violent stabbing attack. The autopsy also found several needle marks on Woneā€™s body that were inflicted before he died, further pointing to the possible injection of a powerful drug before the stabbing.

Yet another autopsy finding of semen in and around Woneā€™s genital area and rectum prompted prosecutors to initially assert that Wone had been sexually assaulted at the time of the murder.

All of this, prosecutors said, made it clear that Wone could not have been murdered by a burglar or home intruder who entered the house, stabbed Wone and quickly fled.

The defense, however, has argued in pre-trial hearings that the paralytic drug theory should not be introduced as evidence because no such drug could be detected in Woneā€™s body from chemical tests. The defense also argued that semen is normally found to be secreted when men die and that the government failed to present any evidence that Wone had been sexually assaulted or restrained at the time of the murder.

Instead, defense attorneys announced they plan to call a controversial cardiologist as a witness who will testify that a stab wound to the heart can instantly stop the heart and immobilize the person stabbed. This development, defense attorneys have said, would explain why Wone didnā€™t move or recoil when stabbed two more times.

The defense said it would also present expert witnesses who will claim the bleeding in Woneā€™s case was mostly internal, explaining why the crime scene lacked large quantities of blood.

Agreeing with the defense that the government failed to produce sufficient evidence that a paralytic drug was administered, and that Wone was sexually assaulted or restrained by S&M sex devices, Leibovitz either ruled against admission of these theories or persuaded prosecutors not to bring them up at trial.

Kirschner has said the governmentā€™s case nevertheless remains strong.

With no evidence of a forced entry, no evidence that anything was taken from the house and no signs that anything was disturbed or disrupted, he has said prosecutors will call on the jury to conclude that an intruder or burglar could not have killed Wone and that the defendants had to know who was responsible for the murder ā€” even if the government doesnā€™t have sufficient evidence to charge anyone with Woneā€™s death.

But in a comment at one of the recent pre-trial hearings, lead defense attorney David Schertler called the reasoning ā€œridiculous,ā€ saying people are killed in the city ā€œall the timeā€ by home invaders and during botched burglaries.

ā€œAll you have to do is read the newspapers,ā€ he said.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

West Virginia

Appeals court strikes down W.Va. transgender athlete ban

Ruling finds law violates studentsā€™ constitutional rights, Title IX

Published

on

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on April 16, 2024, blocked West Virginiaā€™s ban on transgender athletes, finding the law violates trans studentsā€™ rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the constitution. The ban was challenged by Becky Pepper-Jackson (pictured) a 13-year-old trans student athlete from West Virginia. (Photo courtesy of Billy Wolfe/ACLU)

BY LORI KERSEYĀ | The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down West Virginiaā€™s ban on transgender athletes, finding the law violates trans studentsā€™ rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the constitution and Title IX, a federal civil rights law prohibiting discrimination based on sex in education programs.

The case, B.P.J. vs. the West Virginia Board of Education, was filed in May 2021 on behalf of Becky Pepper-Jackson, a 13-year-old trans middle school student and track athlete who would be barred from participating if the ban is upheld. Pepper-Jackson is represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia and Lambda Legal.

In April 2021, West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice signed into law a bill prohibiting trans women and girls in the state from participating in sports that align with their gender identity. The U.S. Court of Appeals in February 2023 blocked the state from removing Pepper-Jackson from her schoolā€™s track and field team as legal advocates appealed a lower courtā€™s ruling upholding the ban. 

In Tuesdayā€™s ruling, Judge Toby Heytens wrote that offering Pepper-Jackson the ā€œchoiceā€ between not participating in sports and participating only on boys teams is not a real choice.

ā€œThe defendants cannot expect that B.P.J. will countermand her social transition, her medical treatment, and all the work she has done with her schools, teachers and coaches for nearly half her life by introducing herself to teammates, coaches and even opponents as a boy,ā€ the judge wrote. 

ā€œBy participating on boys teams, B.P.J. would be sharing the field with boys who are larger, stronger, and faster than her because of the elevated levels of circulating testosterone she lacks,ā€ he wrote. ā€œThe Act thus exposes B.P.J. to the very harms Title IX is meant to prevent by effectively ā€˜exclud[ing]ā€™ her from ā€˜participation inā€™ all non-coed sports entirely.ā€

In a statement Tuesday, Joshua Block, senior staff attorney for the ACLUā€™s LGBTQ and HIV Project, called the courtā€™s ruling ā€œa tremendous victory for our client, transgender West Virginians and the freedom of all youth to play as who they are.ā€

ā€œIt also continues a string of federal courts ruling against bans on the participation of transgender athletes and in favor of their equal participation as the gender they know themselves to be,ā€ Block wrote. ā€œThis case is fundamentally about the equality of transgender youth in our schools and our communities and weā€™re thankful the 4th Circuit agreed.ā€ 

ā€œWe hope todayā€™s ruling sends a message of hope to the trans youth of West Virginia,ā€ Aubrey Sparks, legal director of the ACLU of West Virginia, said in the statement. ā€œAnd a message of warning to politicians who continue to dehumanize this vulnerable population.ā€

West Virginia is one of 21 states that have banned trans student-athletes over the last three years, according to the ACLU. 

In a statement Tuesday, West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey vowed to defend the ban and said he is ā€œdeeply disappointedā€ in the decision. 

ā€œThe Save Womenā€™s Sports Act is ā€˜constitutionally permissibleā€™ and the law complies with Title IX,ā€ Morrisey said. ā€œI will keep fighting to safeguard Title IX. We must keep working to protect womenā€™s sports so that womenā€™s safety is secured and girls have a truly fair playing field. We know the law is correct and will use every available tool to defend it.ā€

******************************************************************************************

Lori Kersey

Lori Kersey is a reporter with a decade of experience reporting in West Virginia. She covers state government for West Virginia Watch.

******************************************************************************************

The preceding article was previously published by the West Virginia Watch and is republished with permission.

Nonprofit, nonpartisan, independent journalism not hidden behind a paywall. Mountaineers are always free, and so is West Virginia Watch.

West Virginia Watch is part of States Newsroom, the nationā€™s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Reenactment of first gay rights picket at White House set for April 17

Event marks 59th anniversary of historic push for gay rights in nationā€™s capital

Published

on

Lilli Vincenz was among the original 1965 White House picketers. (Blade file photo by Michael Key)

D.C.ā€™s Rainbow History Project announced it will hold a reenactment on Wednesday, April 17, of the historic first protest for gay rights in the form of a picket line in front of the White House that took place on that same day in 1965.

In a statement released last week, Rainbow History Project says the reenactment will mark the 59th anniversary of an event that is credited with bringing attention for the first time to the federal governmentā€™s longstanding discrimination against a minority group referred to then as homosexuals or gays and lesbians.

The statement notes that the 1965 event was organized by the Mattachine Society of Washington, D.C., the first politically active LGBT organization in the nationā€™s capital founded by local gay rights pioneer Frank Kameny.

ā€œThe picket took place on the White House sidewalk, Lafayette Park, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., on April 17, 1965,ā€  the statement says. ā€œFor exactly one hour, from 4:20 p.m. to 5:20 p.m., members of the Mattachine Society of Washington walked in a circle, non-stop, in silence, carrying posters of their demands,ā€ the statement continues.

ā€œThe White House picket is the origin story for public demonstrations for gay rights in the U.S., and the origin story for Pride Marches and the annual LGBTQ Pride celebrations which occur across the globe,ā€ according to the statement.

It says those picketing in the April 1965 event, which included Kameny and longtime local D.C.-area lesbian activist Lilli Vincenz, both of whom held doctorate degrees, called on the government to adopt the Mattachine Society of Washingtonā€™s four major demands: an end to the exclusion of homosexuals from federal government employment; an end to the ban on gays and lesbians from serving in the U.S. military; an end to the ā€œblanket denialā€ of security clearances for gay people; and an end to the ā€œgovernment refusal to meet with the LGBTQ community.ā€™

Among those who chose not to respond to the request for a meeting was President Lyndon B. Johnson, who occupied the White House at the time of the 1965 picketing.

Vincent Slatt, the Rainbow History Projectā€™s director of archiving and one of the lead organizers of the April 17 reenactment event, said the event is aimed, among other things, at drawing attention to how far the LGBTQ community has come since 1965. He said the event is not in any way a protest of the administration of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, who Slatt called staunch supporters of the LGBTQ community.

ā€œWe are just reenacting this historical event and pointing out how far weā€™ve come,ā€ Slatt told the Washington Blade. ā€œIf you think about what it means in 1965 when these people were protesting and LBJ would not even respond to them. And now, we are at a place where Vice President Harris speaks on a stage at Capital Pride.ā€

The Rainbow History Project statement notes that the reenactment event will also be held in honor of Kameny, who died in 2011, and Vincenz, who passed away in 2023, both of whom participated in a similar reenactment event in 2008.

Among those who will be participating in this weekā€™s reenactment on April 17 will be longtime local LGBTQ rights activist Paul Kuntzler, who is the only known surviving person who was among the White House picketers at the April 1965 event. Kuntzler will be carrying a replica of his own picket sign he held at the 1965 event, the statement says.

It says Rainbow History Project volunteers will also carry replicas of the original protest signs and hand out literature explaining the picket to passersby and tourists.

Similar to the 1965 event, the reenactment picketing at the White House will begin on April 17 at about 4:15 p.m., according to Slatt of the Rainbow History Project.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Four LGBTQ candidates running for delegate to Democratic National Convention from D.C.

Thirty-two candidates competing for 13 elected delegate positions in April 20 party caucus

Published

on

From left, candidates include John Fanning, Jimmie Williams, Monika Nemeth and David Meadows. (Photos courtesy of the D.C. Democratic Party)

Four LGBTQ Democratic Party activists are running for election as delegates from D.C. to the Democratic National Convention at an April 20 local Democratic Party caucus election in which all D.C. voters who are registered as Democrats will be eligible to vote.

The four LGBTQ candidates are among 32 candidates competing for just 13 elected delegate positions. D.C. will have a total of 51 delegates to the Democratic Convention, but the other 38 include elected officials and party leaders who are considered ā€œautomaticā€ or appointed delegates. The convention will be held in Chicago Aug. 19-23,

Under the delegate selection process put in place by the D.C. Democratic Party, six of the thirteen elected delegate positions will be elected by voters in a section of the city designated as District 1, which includes Wards 1,2, 6, and 8. The other seven elected delegates will be chosen by voters in District 2, which includes Wards 3, 4, 5, and 7.

The LGBTQ candidates include longtime gay Democratic activists David Meadows of Ward 6 and John Fanning of Ward 2 who are running in District 1. Transgender rights advocate and Democratic Party activist Monika Nemeth of Ward 3 and gay Democratic activist Jimmie Williams of Ward 7 are running in DistrictĀ  2.

All four of the LGBTQ candidates have been active members of the Capital Stonewall Democrats, one of D.C.ā€™s largest LGBTQ political organizations. Nemeth and Meadows are past presidents of the organization. Williams has served as chair of the Ward 7 Democratic Committee and is a current member of the committee. Fanning has served as an elected member of the D.C. Democratic State Committee from Ward 2 and served as a delegate to the 2016 Democratic National Convention.

A total of 12 candidates are running in each of the two districts. Under party rules the highest six vote getters in District 1 and the highest 7 vote getters in District 2 will be declared the winners.

The Saturday, April 20 caucus election for the delegate candidates will take place at the Walter E. Washington D.C. Convention Center. An announcement by party officials says two voting sessions will take place, one from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and the other from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Aside from the elected delegates, two prominent D.C. LGBTQ Democratic leaders will be appointed as delegates to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in their role as members of the Democratic National Committee from D.C.

They are Claire Lucas, a highly acclaimed Democratic Party and LGBTQ rights advocate and party fundraiser; and Earl Fowlkes, one of the lead organizers of D.C.ā€™s annual Black LGBTQ Pride celebration and former president of Capital Stonewall Democrats.

Lucas and Fowlkes and the four LGBTQ candidates running in the April 20 caucus election are committed to backing President Joe Biden as the Democratic nominee for re-election.

Statements from each of the candidates running for delegate in the April 20 caucus election, including the four LGBTQ candidates, can be accessed here: Candidates for Delegate | DC Democratic Party

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular