National
HUD: Religious groups must abide by LGBT non-bias rule
Frank praises administration’s ‘important policy’
A Department of Housing & Urban Development official said Monday religious institutions receiving federal funds for housing programs will have to abide by a new HUD rule prohibiting discrimination against LGBT people.
John TrasviƱa, assistant secretary forĀ Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, confirmed the rule would impact religious institutions during a conference callĀ in response to a question from the Washington Blade, saying, “All HUD housing providers are covered under this rule.”
Asked to clarify whether these providers include religious institutions,Ā TrasviƱa replied, “Yes.”
Ian Thompson, the ACLU’s legislative representative, first wrote inĀ a blog postingĀ on the ACLU’s siteĀ last week that the rule will cover religious institutions that receive money for federal programs.
“[T]he rule will requireĀ allĀ organizations that operate HUD-assisted or HUD-insured housing facilities to serve LGBT Americans looking for shelter and housing ā including religious organizations,” Thompson said. “[O]nce a religious organization chooses to provide housing services or programs with the aid of federal funds and benefits from HUD, it cannot shield itself from traditional safeguards that protect civil rights in the provision of those services.”
Thompson added that religious organizations providing entirely private housing services are unaffected by the change.
“We are pleased that HUD said that all organizations must provide equal access to HUD housing programs and did not sanction the use of religion to discriminate,” Thompson concluded.
The rule,Ā first proposed in January, covers programs serving an estimated 5.5 million Americans, including those living in low-income subsidized housing.
The measure, which has four general components, requires owners and operators ofĀ HUD-assisted housing to make housing available to applicants and occupants regardless of their LGBT status.
The rule clarifies āfamiliesā otherwise eligible for HUD programs canāt be excluded because of one or more members of the family’s sexual orientation, gender identity or marital status.
Additionally, the rule prohibits owners and operators of HUD-assisted housing or housing whose financing is insured by HUD from inquiring about the sexual orientation or gender identity of an applicant or occupant of a dwelling, whether renter or owner-occupied.
TrasviƱa said HUD clarified this provision doesn’t prohibit voluntary and anonymous reporting of LGBT status in state, local or federal data collection requirements.
Additionally, the measure has a bearing onĀ mortgage insurance programs.Ā It prohibits lenders from using LGBT status as a basis to determine a borrowerās eligibility for Federal Housing Administration-insured mortgage financing.
“These days, when one-third of new homebuyers are served by FHA lenders, this last element to make sure that one’s sexual orientation or gender identity is not a basis for denying an FHA loan is critically important to America’s families,”Ā TrasviƱa said.
TrasviƱa added that rule is “governed as a HUD program rule,” so, unlike the Fair Housing Act provision, HUD offices throughout the country will enforce it and not just the Office of Fair Housing & Equal Opportunity.
HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan announced on Saturday during a speech at the 24th annual Creating Change conference that HUD would this week make final the rule by publishing it in the Federal Register. On Monday, the department published the text of the final regulation.
TrasviƱa confirmed that the Federal Register would publish the rule this week, but in response to another Blade question said he couldn’t give a more definitive time for when the rule will be published.
“That’s a little bit out of our control,”Ā TrasviƱa said. “Typically, the rules get printed within a week once they’re submitted, so the rule has been submitted, we’re just waiting for its publication.”
Trasviña noted that publication of the rule will start the 30-day period before the measure will go into effect and expects the measure to go into effect starting in March.
In a statement provided by HUD, gay Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) commended the department for implementing the change, saying āI am grateful to the Obama administration for instituting this important policy.”
Federal Government
Trump-appointed EEOC leadership rescinds LGBTQ worker guidance
The EEOC voted to rescind its 2024 guidance, minimizing formally expanded protections for LGBTQ workers.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission voted 2ā1 to repeal its 2024 guidance, rolling back formally expanded protections for LGBTQ workers.
The EEOC, which is composed of five commissioners, is tasked with enforcing federal laws that make workplace discrimination illegal. Since President Donald Trump appointed two Republican commissioners last year ā Andrea R. Lucas as chair in January and Brittany Panuccio in October ā the commissionās majority has increasingly aligned its work with conservative priorities.
The commission updated its guidance in 2024 under then-President Joe Biden to expand protections to LGBTQ workers, particularly transgender workers ā the most significant change to the agencyās harassment guidance in 25 years.
The directive, which spanned nearly 200 pages, outlined how employers may not discriminate against workers based on protected characteristics, including race, sex, religion, age, and disability as defined under federal law.
One issue of particular focus for Republicans was the guidanceās new section on gender identity and sexual orientation. Citing the 2020 U.S. Supreme Court’s Bostock v. Clayton County decision and other cases, the guidance included examples of prohibited conduct, such as the repeated and intentional use of a name or pronoun an individual no longer uses, and the denial of access to bathrooms consistent with a personās gender identity.
Last year a federal judge in Texas had blocked that portion of the guidance, saying that finding was novel and was beyond the scope of the EEOC’s powers in issuing guidance.
The dissenting vote came from the commissionās sole Democratic member, Commissioner Kalpana Kotagal.
āThereās no reason to rescind the harassment guidance in its entirety,ā Kotagal said Thursday. āInstead of adopting a thoughtful and surgical approach to excise the sections the majority disagrees with or suggest an alternative, the commission is throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Worse, it is doing so without public input.ā
While this now rescinded EEOC guidance is not legally binding, it is widely considered a blueprint for how the commission will enforce anti-discrimination laws and is often cited by judges deciding novel legal issues.
Multiple members of Congress released a joint statement condemning the agencyās decision to minimize worker protections, including U.S. Reps. Teresa Leger FernĆ”ndez (D-N.M.), Grace Meng (D-N.Y.), Mark Takano (D-Calif.), Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), and Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) The rescission follows the EEOCās failure to respond to or engage with a November letter from Democratic Caucus leaders urging the agency to retain the guidance and protect women and vulnerable workers.
āThe Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is supposed to protect vulnerable workers, including women, people of color, and LGBTQI+ workers, from discrimination on the job. Yet, since the start of her tenure, the EEOC chair has consistently undermined protections for women, people of color, and LGBTQI+ workers. Now, she is taking away guidance intended to protect workers from harassment on the job, including instructions on anti-harassment policies, training, and complaint processes ā and doing so outside of the established rule-making process. When workers are sexually harassed, called racist slurs, or discriminated against at work, it harms our workforce and ultimately our economy. Workers canāt afford this ā especially at a time of high costs, chaotic tariffs, and economic uncertainty. Women and vulnerable workers deserve so much better.ā
Minnesota
Lawyer representing Renee Good’s family speaks out
Antonio Romanucci condemned White House comments over Jan. 7 shooting
A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot and killed Renee Good in Minneapolis on Jan. 7 as she attempted to drive away from law enforcement during a protest.
Since Goodās killing, ICE has faced national backlash over the excessive use of deadly force, prompting the Trump-Vance administration to double down on escalating enforcement measures in cities across the country.
The Washington Blade spoke with Antonio Romanucci, the attorney representing Goodās family following her death.
Romanucci said that Jonathan Ross ā the ICE agent seen on video shooting Good ā acted in an antagonizing manner, escalated the encounter in violation of ICE directives, and has not been held accountable as ICE and other federal agents continue to āramp upā operations in Minnesota.
A day before the fatal shooting, the Department of Homeland Security began what it described as the largest immigration enforcement operation ever carried out by the agency, according to DHSās own X post.
That escalation, Romanucci said, is critical context in understanding how Good was shot and why, so far, the agent who killed her has faced no consequences for killing a queer mother as she attempted to disengage from a confrontation.
āYou have to look at this in the totality of the circumstances … One of the first things we need to look at is what was the mission here to begin with ā with ICE coming into Minneapolis,ā Romanucci told the Blade. āWe knew the mission was to get the worst of the worst, and that was defined as finding illegal immigrants who had felony convictions. When you look at what happened on Jan. 7 with Renee and Rebecca [Good, Reneeās wife], certainly that was far from their mission, wasnāt it? What they really did was they killed a good woman ā someone who was a mother, a daughter, a sister, a committed companion, an animal lover.ā
Romanucci said finding and charging those responsible for Goodās death is now the focus of his work with her family.
āWhat our mission is now is to ensure that we achieve transparency, accountability, and justice … We aim to get it in front of, hopefully, a judge or a jury one day to make that determination.ā
Those are three things Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and DHS has outright rejected while smearing Good in the official record ā including accusing her of being a ādomestic terroristā without evidence and standing by Ross, who Noem said acted in self-defense.
The version of events advanced by Noem and ICE has been widely contradicted by the volume of video footage of the shooting circulating online. Multiple angles show Goodās Honda Pilot parked diagonally in the street alongside other protesters attempting to block ICE agents from entering Richard E. Green Central Park Elementary School.
The videos show ICE officers approaching Goodās vehicle and ordering her to āget out of the car.ā She then puts the car in reverse, backs up briefly, shifts into drive, and steers to the right ā away from the officers.
The abundance of video evidence directly contradicts statements made by President Donald Trump, Noem, and other administration officials in interviews following Goodās death.
āThe video shows that Renee told Jonathan Ross that āIām not mad at you,ā so we know that her state of mind was one of peace,ā Romanucci said. āShe steered the car away from where he was standing, and we know that he was standing in front of the car. Reasonable police practices say that you do not stand in front of the car when thereās a driver behind the wheel. When you leave yourself with only the ability to use deadly force as an option to escape, that is not a reasonable police practice.ā
An autopsy commissioned by Goodās family further supports that account, finding that her injuries were consistent with being shot from the direction of someone driving away.
The autopsy found three gunshot wounds: one to Goodās left forearm, one that struck her right breast without piercing major organs, and a third that entered the left side of her head near the temple and exited on the right side.
Romanucci said Ross not only placed himself directly in harmās way, but then used deadly force after creating the conditions he claimed justified it ā a move that violates DHS and ICE policy, according to former Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Juliette Kayyem.
āAs a general rule, police officers and law enforcement do not shoot into moving cars, do not put themselves in front of cars, because those are things that are easily de-escalated,ā Kayyem told PBS in a Jan. 8 interview.
āWhen he put himself in a situation of danger, the only way that he could get out of danger is by shooting her, because he felt himself in peril,ā Romanucci said. āThat is not a reasonable police practice when you leave yourself with only the ability to use deadly force as an option. Thatās what happened here. Thatās why we believe, based on what weāve seen, that this case is unlawful and unconstitutional.ā
Romanucci said he was appalled by how Trump and Noem described Good following her death.
āI will never use those words in describing our client and a loved one,ā he said. āThose words, in my opinion, certainly do not apply to her, and they never should apply to her. I think the words, when they were used to describe her, were nearly slanderous … Renee Good driving her SUV at two miles per hour away from an ICE agent to move down the street is not an act of domestic terrorism at all.ā
He added that his office has taken steps to preserve evidence in anticipation of potential civil litigation, even as the Justice Department has declined to open an investigation.
āWe did issue a letter of preservation to the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies to ensure that any evidence thatās in their possession be not destroyed or altered or modified,ā Romanucci said. āWeāve heard Todd Blanche say just in the last couple of days that they donāt believe that they need to investigate at all. So weāre going to be demanding that the car be returned to its rightful owner, because if thereās no investigation, then we want our property back.ā
The lack of accountability for Ross ā and the continued expansion of ICE operations ā has fueled nationwide protests against federal law enforcement under the Trump-Vance administration.
āThe response weāve seen since Reneeās killing has been that ICE has ramped up its efforts even more,ā Romanucci said. āThere are now over 3,000 ICE agents in a city where there are only 600 police officers, which, in my opinion, is defined as an invasion of federal law enforcement officers into a city … When you see the government ramping up its efforts in the face of constitutional assembly, I think we need to be concerned.ā
As of now, Romanucci said, there appears to be no meaningful accountability mechanism preventing ICE agents from continuing to patrol ā and, in some cases, terrorize ā the Minneapolis community.
āWhat we know is that none of these officers are getting disciplined for any of their wrongdoings,ā he said. āThe government is saying that none of their officers have acted in a wrongful manner, but thatās not what the courts are saying … Until they get disciplined for their wrongdoings, they will continue to act with impunity.ā
When asked what the public should remember about Good, Romanucci emphasized that she was a real person ā a mother, a wife, and a community member whose life was cut short. Her wife lost her partner, and three children lost a parent.
āIād like the public to remember Renee about is the stories that Rebecca has to tell ā how the two of them would share road trips together, how they loved to share home-cooked meals together, what a good mother she was, and what a community member she was trying to make herself into,ā Romanucci said. āThey were new to Minneapolis and were really trying to make themselves a home there because they thought they could have a better life. Given all of that, along with her personality of being one of peace and one of love and care, I think thatās what needs to be remembered about Renee.ā
The White House
Trump-Vance administration ‘has dismantled’ US foreign policy infrastructure
Current White House took office on Jan. 20, 2025
Jessica Stern, the former special U.S. envoy for the promotion of LGBTQ and intersex rights, on the eve of the first anniversary of the Trump-Vance administration said its foreign policy has “hurt people” around the world.
“The changes that they are making will take a long time to overturn and recover from,” she said on Jan. 14 during a virtual press conference the Alliance for Diplomacy and Justice, a group she co-founded, co-organized.
Amnesty International USA National Director of Government Relations and Advocacy Amanda Klasing, Human Rights Watch Deputy Washington Director Nicole Widdersheim, Human Rights First President Uzra Zeya, PEN America’s Jonathan Friedman, and Center for Reproductive Rights Senior Federal Policy Council Liz McCaman Taylor also participated in the press conference.
The Trump-Vance administration took office on Jan. 20, 2025.
The White House proceeded to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development, which funded LGBTQ and intersex rights organizations around the world.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio last March announced the State Department would administer the 17 percent of USAID contracts that had not been cancelled. Rubio issued a waiver that allowed PEPFAR and other “life-saving humanitarian assistance” programs to continue to operate during the U.S. foreign aid freeze the White House announced shortly after it took office.
The global LGBTQ and intersex rights movement has lost more than an estimated $50 million in funding because of the cuts. The Washington Blade has previouslyĀ reportedĀ PEPFAR-funded programs in Kenya and other African countries have been forced to suspend services and even shut down.
Stern noted the State Department “has dismantled key parts of foreign policy infrastructure that enabled the United States to support democracy and human rights abroad” and its Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor “has effectively been dismantled.” She also pointed out her former position and others ā the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice, the Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues, and the Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice ā “have all been eliminated.”
President Donald Trump on Jan. 7 issued a memorandum that said the U.S. will withdraw from the U.N. Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and more than 60 other U.N. and international entities.
Rubio in a Jan. 10 Substack post said UN Women failed “to define what a woman is.”
“At a time when we desperately need to support women ā all women ā this is yet another example of the weaponization of transgender people by the Trump administration,” said Stern.
US ‘conducting enforced disappearances’
The Jan. 14 press conference took place a week after a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent killed Renee Good, a 37-year-old woman who left behind her wife and three children, in Minneapolis. American forces on Jan. 3 seized now former Venezuelan President NicolƔs Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, at their home in Caracas, the Venezuelan capital, during an overnight operation. Trump also continues to insist the U.S. needs to gain control of Greenland.

Widdersheim during the press conference noted the Trump-Vance administration last March sent 252 Venezuelans to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, a maximum-security prison known by the Spanish acronym CECOT.
One of them, Andry HernĆ”ndez Romero, is a gay asylum seeker who the White House claimed was a member of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang the Trump-Vance administration has designated as an “international terrorist organization.” HernĆ”ndez upon his return to Venezuela last July said he suffered physical, sexual, and psychological abuse while at CECOT.
“In 2025 … the United States is conducting enforced disappearances,” said Widdersheim.
Zeya, who was Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights from 2021-2025, in response to the Blade’s question during the press conference said her group and other advocacy organizations have “got to keep doubling down in defense of the rule of law, to hold this administration to account.”
-
The White House4 days agoA full year of Trump and LGBTQ rights: all that’s been lost
-
Health4 days agoCVS Health agrees to cover new HIV prevention drug
-
District of Columbia4 days agoSold-out crowd turns out for 10th annual Caps Pride night
-
LGBTQ Non-Profit Organizations4 days agoHRC warns LGBTQ progress faltering as Trump enters second year
