Connect with us

National

Federal appeals court declines to reconsider Prop 8 decision

Proposition 8 supporters petitioned a federal appeals court for an en banc review of a February ruling that struck it down

Published

on

Law gavel, gay news, Washington Blade

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has denied a request for an en banc rehearing of Perry v. Brown, setting the stage for a Supreme Court showdown. (Photo via Wikimedia)

A federal appeals court in San Francisco announced on Tuesday that it denied a request to reconsider a February ruling that struck down Californiaā€™s voter-approved ban on marriage for same-sex couples.

Proposition 8 supporters requested that the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals allow an 11-judge panel to review a decision made by a three-judge panel that found the Golden Stateā€™s ban on nuptials for gays and lesbians unconstitutional.

Now retired U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker in Aug. 2010 found Proposition 8 unconstitutional. Supporters of the voter-approved ban on marriage for gays and lesbians appealed the decision.

“This is a monumental day and our case has now entered its final chapter,” said Chad Griffin, board president of the American Foundation for Equal Rights during a conference call with reporters. “We began the final chapter of the Proposition 8 case today and the end is now in sight.”

Freedom to Marry President Evan Wolfson agreed.

ā€œTodayā€™s decision by the Ninth Circuit to deny a rehearing of Perry vs. Brown brings committed same-sex couples in California one step closer to being able to marry,ā€ he said.Ā ā€œIt’s now been three-and-a-half years since the freedom to marry was stripped from loving and committed same-sex couples.Ā It is long past time for this ‘gay exception’ to marriage in California to come to an end.ā€

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) described the Ninth Courtā€™s decision as another step towards bringing Prop 8 to ā€œits rightful place in the dustbin of history.ā€

ā€œBy declining to rehear this case, the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed a victory for civil rights for the LGBT community and for all Californians,ā€ she added.

The Ninth Circuitā€™s decision comes less than a week after three judges with the U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional. President Barack Obama last month announced his support of marriage rights for same-sex couples during a White House interview with ABC Newsā€™ Robin Roberts.

Judge Diarmuid Oā€™Scannlain referenced Obamaā€™s comments that marriage remains in the purview of the states in his dissenting opinion onto which Judges Jay Bybee and Carlos Bea signed. He further noted the presidentā€™s assertion during the interview that he would like to see the debate over marriage rights for same-sex couples ā€œcontinue in a respectful way.ā€

ā€œToday our court has silenced any such respectful conversation,ā€ wrote Oā€™Scannlain.

Prop 8 supporters announced moments after the Ninth Circuit announced its decision that they will petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Perry v. Brown.

ā€œMarriage is a universal good that has been honored by diverse cultures and faiths for the entire history of Western Civilization,ā€ said Brian Raum, senior counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. ā€œThe Protectmarriage.com legal team looks forward to standing before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the peopleā€™s right to preserve the fundamental building block of civilization, especially since the dissent accompanying todayā€™s decision strongly supports our arguments. The democratic process and the most important human institutionā€”marriageā€”shouldnā€™t be overthrown based on the demands of Hollywood activists.ā€

National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown echoed Raum.

“We are calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to preserve our democratic rights and overturn this action of judicial arrogance,ā€ he said.

Observers note that the case would go before the justices sometime next year if they agree to hear it.

ā€œThe Ninth Circuit has wisely declined to review the Prop 8 case,ā€ West Hollywood (Calif.) Mayor John Duran told the Blade. ā€œIf the U.S. Supreme Court also denies review, California will return to a freedom to marry.ā€

Meanwhile, Maryland voters face a likely referendum on the stateā€™s same-sex marriage law in November. A proposed constitutional amendment in Minnesota would ban nuptials for gays and lesbians. Maine voters will consider a ballot measure in November that would allow same-sex couples to tie the knot in their state.

“While the U.S. Supreme Court may ultimately decide the outcome of this case, we must all continue to walk that pathā€“in this case and other courtrooms, in legislatures, at ballot boxes and at kitchen tableā€“until all LGBT people are fully and equally part of the American community,ā€ said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

State Department

Transgender, nonbinary people file lawsuit against passport executive order

State Department banned from issuing passports with ‘X’ gender markers

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

Seven transgender and nonbinary people on Feb. 7 filed a federal lawsuit against President Donald Trump’s executive order that bans the State Department from issuing passports with “X” gender markers.

Ashton Orr, Zaya Perysian, Sawyer Soe, Chastain Anderson, Drew Hall, Bella Boe, and Reid Solomon-Lane are the plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Massachusetts, and the private law firm Covington & Burling LPP filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The lawsuit names Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio as defendants.

Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken in June 2021 announced the State Department would begin to issue gender-neutral passports and documents for American citizens who were born overseas.

Dana Zzyym, an intersex U.S. Navy veteran who identifies as nonbinary, in 2015 filed a federal lawsuit against the State Department after it denied their application for a passport with an ā€œXā€ gender marker. Zzyym in October 2021 received the first gender-neutral American passport.

The State Department policy took effect on April 11, 2022.

Trump signed the executive order that overturned it shortly after he took office on Jan. 20. Rubio later directed State Department personnel to ā€œsuspend any application requesting an ā€˜Xā€™ sex marker and do not take any further action pending additional guidance from the department.ā€  

ā€œThis guidance applies to all applications currently in progress and any future applications,” reads Rubio’s memo. “Guidance on existing passports containing an ā€˜Xā€™ sex marker will come via other channels.ā€

The lawsuit says Trump’s executive order is an “abrupt, discriminatory, and dangerous reversal of settled United States passport policy.” It also concludes the new policy is “unlawful and unconstitutional.”

“It discriminates against individuals based on their sex and, as to some, their transgender status,” reads the lawsuit. “It is motivated by impermissible animus. It cannot be justified under any level of judicial scrutiny, and it wrongly seeks to erase the reality that transgender, intersex, and nonbinary people exist today as they always have.”

Solomon-Lane, who lives in North Adams, Mass., with his spouse and their three children, in an ACLU press release says he has “lived virtually my entire adult life as a man” and “everyone in my personal and professional life knows me as a man, and any stranger on the street who encountered me would view me as a man.”

ā€œI thought that 18 years after transitioning, I would be able to live my life in safety and ease,” he said. “Now, as a married father of three, Trumpā€™s executive order and the ensuing passport policy have threatened that life of safety and ease.”

“If my passport were to reflect a sex designation that is inconsistent with who I am, I would be forcibly outed every time I used my passport for travel or identification, causing potential risk to my safety and my familyā€™s safety,ā€ added Solomon-Lane.

Continue Reading

Federal Government

Education Department moves to end support for trans students

Mental health services among programs that are in jeopardy

Published

on

The U.S. Department of Education headquarters in D.C. (Photo courtesy of the GSA/Education Department)

An email sent to employees at the U.S. Department of Education on Friday explains that “programs, contracts, policies, outward-facing media, regulations, and internal practices” will be reviewed and cut in cases where they ā€œfail to affirm the reality of biological sex.ā€

The move, which is of a piece with President Donald Trump’s executive orders restricting transgender rights, jeopardizes the future of initiatives at the agency like mental health services and support for students experiencing homelessness.

Along with external-facing work at the agency, the directive targets employee programs such as those administered by LGBTQ resource groups, in keeping with the Trump-Vance administration’s rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion within the federal government.

In recent weeks, federal agencies had begun changing their documents, policies, and websites for purposes of compliance with the new administration’s first executive action targeting the trans community, ā€œDefending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.ā€

For instance, the Education Department had removed a webpage offering tips for schools to better support homeless LGBTQ youth, noted ProPublica, which broke the news of the “sweeping” changes announced in the email to DOE staff.

According to the news service, the directive further explains the administration’s position that ā€œThe deliberate subjugation of women and girls by means of gender ideology ā€” whether in intimate spaces, weaponized language, or American classrooms ā€” negated the civil rights of biological females and fostered distrust of our federal institutions.”

A U.S. Senate committee hearing will be held Thursday for Linda McMahon, Trump’s nominee for education secretary, who has been criticized by LGBTQ advocacy groups. GLAAD, for instance, notes that she helped to launch and currently chairs the board of a conservative think tank that “has campaigned against policies that support transgender rights in education.”

NBC News reported on Tuesday that Trump planned to issue an executive order this week to abolish the Education Department altogether.

While the president and his conservative allies in and outside the administration have repeatedly expressed plans to disband the agency, doing so would require approval from Congress.

Continue Reading

State Department

Protesters demand US fully restore PEPFAR funding

Activists blocked intersection outside State Department on Thursday

Published

on

HIV/AIDS activists block an intersection outside the State Department on Feb. 6, 2025. They were demanding the Trump-Vance administration to fully restore PEPFAR funding. (Photo courtesy of Housing Works)

Dozens of HIV/AIDS activists on Thursday protested outside the State Department and demanded U.S. officials fully restore President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief funding.

The activists ā€” members of Housing Works, Health GAP, and the Treatment Action Group ā€” blocked an intersection for an hour. Health GAP Executive Director Asia Russell told the Washington Blade that police did not make any arrests.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Jan. 24 directed State Department personnel to stop nearly all U.S. foreign aid spending for 90 days in response to an executive order that President Donald Trump signed after his inauguration. Rubio later issued a waiver that allows PEPFAR and other ā€œlife-saving humanitarian assistanceā€ programs to continue to operate during the freeze.

The Blade on Wednesday reported PEPFAR-funded programs in Kenya and other African countries have been forced to suspend services and even shut down because of a lack of U.S. funding.

ā€œPEPFAR is a program that has saved 26 million lives and changed the trajectory of the global HIV/AIDS epidemic,” said Housing Works CEO Charles King in a press release. “The recent freeze on its funding is not just a bureaucratic decision; it is a death sentence for millions who rely on these life-saving treatments. We cannot allow decades of progress to be undone. The U.S. must immediately reaffirm its commitment to global health and human dignity by restoring PEPFAR funding.” 

ā€œWe demand Secretary Rubio immediately reverse his deadly, illegal stop-work order, which has already disrupted life-saving HIV services worldwide,” added Russell. “Any waiver process is too little, too late.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular