Connect with us

National

GOP embraces anti-gay bias in platform

Party calls for federal marriage amendment, vexing Log Cabin

Published

on

Revelations this week that the Republican Party platform would include strong opposition to same-sex marriage and an endorsement of the Federal Marriage Amendment has renewed debate over whether Log Cabin Republicans should withhold its endorsement of presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney because of the anti-gay language.

This week, the 112 members of the Republican Party platform committee approved language that affirms marriage as between one man, one woman; criticizes judges for “court-ordered redefinition of marriage”; attacks the Obama administration for no longer defending the Defense of Marriage Act; and endorses a Federal Marriage Amendment. Buzzfeed revealed the draft language on marriage in a report on Monday and quoted Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, as taking credit for writing the marriage language.

“We reaffirm our support for a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman,” the draft language reportedly states. “We applaud the citizens of the majority of States which have enshrined in their constitutions the traditional concept of marriage, and we support the campaigns underway in several other states to do so.”

During deliberations over the platform, some members of the committee offered amendments to soften the language with respect to marriage — including delegate Barbara Ann Fenton of Rhode Island, who offered language saying the government should get out of marriage and endorse civil unions for gay and straight couples — but each of these measures was defeated by voice vote. Log Cabin Republicans had a four-member delegation credentialed to attend the proceedings.

Now that the platform language has been made public — and assailed by LGBT advocates across the board — calls are emerging for Log Cabin to decline to endorse Romney.

Log Cabin has precedent for declining to endorse presidential candidates in its own party. In 2004, the organization declined to endorse then-President George W. Bush in his bid for re-election largely over his support for a Federal Marriage Amendment. In an op-ed published Sept. 15, 2004, then-Log Cabin President Patrick Guerriero laid out the case for why his organization didn’t endorse its party’s presidential nominee — and referenced disappointment with the 2004 Republican Party platform.

“Even as we saw the GOP’s future highlighted with fair-minded prime-time convention speakers, we saw the passage of an extremist party platform that opposes any basic protections for gay and lesbian families,” Guerriero wrote at the time. “The incongruity between the party’s platform and its list of prime-time speakers symbolizes a wider battle for the GOP’s heart and soul.”

This year, the organization has yet to endorse the Republican presidential ticket, but is expected to announce its decision along with endorsements for congressional candidates prior to its national dinner, which will take place this year in D.C. at the Hyatt Regency on Sept. 20. Log Cabin didn’t respond to the Washington Blade’s request for comment on whether the platform will factor into the endorsement, but the organization has said before it would weigh many factors into the decision.

The co-founders of the “Mitt Gets Worse” LGBT campaign against Romney — Rick Jacobs, chair of the Courage Campaign, and David Brock, founder of American Bridge 21st Century — issued a joint statement on Wednesday decrying the platform language and calling on Log Cabin not to endorse the candidate.

“Surely, the Log Cabin Republicans, who exist to promote full equality in the Republican Party will now find it impossible to endorse Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, just as they had to pass on endorsing then-President Bush in 2004 when he and the Republican Party were then actively pushing an anti-marriage equality amendment to the Constitution while promoting anti-marriage equality state referenda,” Brock and Jacobs said. “The Republican Party and its nominees keep getting worse for LGBT Americans.”

The organization last week submitted a petition to Log Cabin — which is still available online — calling on the organization to decline to endorse Romney during the 2012 election based on the candidate’s anti-LGBT record. As of Wednesday, the petition had 35,000 signatures.

But the 2012 platform language is in line with Romney’s beliefs. He backs a U.S. constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage throughout the country even as he said he doubts Congress would have the political wherewithal to pass it. He also pledged to resume defending the Defense of Marriage Act in court.

Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan is similarly on the record with beliefs that are in accordance with the platform. As a U.S. House member, Ryan voted in favor of the Federal Marriage Amendment in 2004 and 2006. More recently, he voted for amendments to separate bills reaffirming the Defense of Marriage Act.

Gay Republicans had mixed views on whether the platform language should be a factor in the organization’s decision to endorse Romney.

Jim Driscoll, a a gay Nevada-based HIV/AIDS activist who’s backing Romney in the presidential election, has previously called on Log Cabin to endorse Romney and continued to say the organization should do so — with the caveat that the organization should express consternation over the party platform.

“They should endorse him despite the platform, but they should say it in spite of the platform and condemn those elements in the platform that are completely out of touch with the gay community and out of touch with America,” Driscoll said. “It should be an endorsement with that reservation — that they condemn that trend.”

Recalling Bush officially won Florida by a margin of 537 votes, Driscoll said gay Republicans were responsible for putting the candidate over the top. Driscoll said the Romney campaign should handle the issue of gay rights “more carefully, perceptively, sensitively, intelligently,” even though he acknowledged that the presidential campaign wasn’t responsible for writing the platform.

Log Cabin Republicans has responded to the platform. On Wednesday, Cooper issued a statement calling the inclusion of anti-gay language “a hollow and short-lived victory” for social conservatives who “know that public opinion is rapidly turning in favor of equality.” But the question of whether the organization will endorse Romney in spite of the language remains.

Robert Turner, president of the D.C. chapter of Log Cabin Republicans, said the platform language shouldn’t play a role in whether Log Cabin endorses because the platform document is unrelated to the candidate seeking the White House.

“The party platform is a document of the Republican Party not of the candidate,” Turner said.

Turner declined to opine on whether the national organization should endorse Romney, saying the decision is up to the national board.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Federal Government

RFK Jr.’s HHS report pushes therapy, not medical interventions, for trans youth

‘Discredited junk science’ — GLAAD

Published

on

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

A 409-page report released Thursday by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services challenges the ethics of medical interventions for youth experiencing gender dysphoria, the treatments that are often collectively called gender-affirming care, instead advocating for psychotherapy alone.

The document comes in response to President Donald Trump’s executive order barring the federal government from supporting gender transitions for anyone younger than 19.

“Our duty is to protect our nation’s children — not expose them to unproven and irreversible medical interventions,” National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya said in a statement. “We must follow the gold standard of science, not activist agendas.”

While the report does not constitute clinical guidance, its findings nevertheless conflict with not just the recommendations of LGBTQ advocacy groups but also those issued by organizations with relevant expertise in science and medicine.

The American Medical Association, for instance, notes that “empirical evidence has demonstrated that trans and non-binary gender identities are normal variations of human identity and expression.”

Gender-affirming care for transgender youth under standards widely used in the U.S. includes supportive talk therapy along with — in some but not all cases — puberty blockers or hormone treatment.

“The suggestion that someone’s authentic self and who they are can be ‘changed’ is discredited junk science,” GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said in a statement. “This so-called guidance is grossly misleading and in direct contrast to the recommendation of every leading health authority in the world. This report amounts to nothing more than forcing the same discredited idea of conversion therapy that ripped families apart and harmed gay, lesbian, and bisexual young people for decades.”

GLAAD further notes that the “government has not released the names of those involved in consulting or authoring this report.”

Janelle Perez, executive director of LPAC, said, “For decades, every major medical association–including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics–have affirmed that medical care is the only safe and effective treatment for transgender youth experiencing gender dysphoria.

“This report is simply promoting conversion therapy by a different name – and the American people know better. We know that conversion therapy isn’t actually therapy – it isolates and harms kids, scapegoats parents, and divides families through blame and rejection. These tactics have been used against gay kids for decades, and now the same people want to use them against transgender youth and their families.

“The end result here will be a devastating denial of essential health care for transgender youth, replaced by a dangerous practice that every major U.S. medical and mental health association agree promotes anxiety, depression, and increased risk of suicidal thoughts and attempts.

“Like being gay or lesbian, being transgender is not a choice, and no amount of pressure can force someone to change who they are. We also know that 98% of people who receive transition-related health care continue to receive that health care throughout their lifetime. Trans health care is health care.”

“Today’s report seeks to erase decades of research and learning, replacing it with propaganda. The claims in today’s report would rip health care away from kids and take decision-making out of the hands of parents,” said Shannon Minter, legal director of NCLR. “It promotes the same kind of conversion therapy long used to shame LGBTQ+ people into hating themselves for being unable to change something they can’t change.”

“Like being gay or lesbian, being transgender is not a choice—it’s rooted in biology and genetics,” Minter said. “No amount or talk or pressure will change that.” 

Human Rights Campaign Chief of Staff Jay Brown released a statement: “Trans people are who we are. We’re born this way. And we deserve to live our best lives and have a fair shot and equal opportunity at living a good life.

“This report misrepresents the science that has led all mainstream American medical and mental health professionals to declare healthcare for transgender youth to be best practice and instead follows a script predetermined not by experts but by Sec. Kennedy and anti-equality politicians.”




Continue Reading

The White House

Trump nominates Mike Waltz to become next UN ambassador

Former Fla. congressman had been national security advisor

Published

on

U.N. headquarters in New York (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

President Donald Trump on Thursday announced he will nominate Mike Waltz to become the next U.S. ambassador to the U.N.

Waltz, a former Florida congressman, had been the national security advisor.

Trump announced the nomination amid reports that Waltz and his deputy, Alex Wong, were going to leave the administration after Waltz in March added a journalist to a Signal chat in which he, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and other officials discussed plans to attack Houthi rebels in Yemen.

“I am pleased to announce that I will be nominating Mike Waltz to be the next United States ambassador to the United Nations,” said Trump in a Truth Social post that announced Waltz’s nomination. “From his time in uniform on the battlefield, in Congress and, as my National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz has worked hard to put our nation’s Interests first. I know he will do the same in his new role.”

Trump said Secretary of State Marco Rubio will serve as interim national security advisor, “while continuing his strong leadership at the State Department.”

“Together, we will continue to fight tirelessly to make America, and the world, safe again,” said Trump.

Trump shortly after his election nominated U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) to become the next U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Trump in March withdrew her nomination in order to ensure Republicans maintained their narrow majority in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Continue Reading

U.S. Federal Courts

Second federal lawsuit filed against White House passport policy

Two of seven plaintiffs live in Md.

Published

on

Lambda Legal on April 25 filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of seven transgender and nonbinary people who are challenging the Trump-Vance administration’s passport policy.

The lawsuit, which Lambda Legal filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in Baltimore, alleges the policy that bans the State Department from issuing passports with “X” gender markers “has caused and is causing grave and immediate harm to transgender people like plaintiffs, in violation of their constitutional rights to equal protection.”

Two of the seven plaintiffs — Jill Tran and Peter Poe — live in Maryland. The State Department, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and the federal government are defendants.

“The discriminatory passport policy exposes transgender U.S. citizens to harassment, abuse, and discrimination, in some cases endangering them abroad or preventing them from traveling, by forcing them to use identification documents that share private information against their wishes,” said Lambda Legal in a press release.

Zander Schlacter, a New York-based textile artist and designer, is the lead plaintiff.

The lawsuit notes he legally changed his name and gender in New York.

Schlacter less than a week before President Donald Trump’s inauguration “sent an expedited application to update his legal name on his passport, using form DS-5504.”

Trump once he took office signed an executive order that banned the State Department from issuing passports with “X” gender markers. The lawsuit notes Schlacter received his new passport in February.

“The passport has his correct legal name, but now has an incorrect sex marker of ‘F’ or ‘female,'” notes the lawsuit. “Mr. Schlacter also received a letter from the State Department notifying him that ‘the date of birth, place of birth, name, or sex was corrected on your passport application,’ with ‘sex’ circled in red. The stated reason was ‘to correct your information to show your biological sex at birth.'”

“I, like many transgender people, experience fear of harassment or violence when moving through public spaces, especially where a photo ID is required,” said Schlacter in the press release that announced the lawsuit. “My safety is further at risk because of my inaccurate passport. I am unwilling to subject myself and my family to the threat of harassment and discrimination at the hands of border officials or anyone who views my passport.”

Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken in June 2021 announced the State Department would begin to issue gender-neutral passports and documents for American citizens who were born overseas.

Dana Zzyym, an intersex U.S. Navy veteran who identifies as nonbinary, in 2015 filed a federal lawsuit against the State Department after it denied their application for a passport with an “X” gender marker. Zzyym in October 2021 received the first gender-neutral American passport.

Lambda Legal represented Zzyym.

The State Department policy took effect on April 11, 2022.

Trump signed his executive order shortly after he took office in January. Germany, Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlands are among the countries that have issued travel advisories for trans and nonbinary people who plan to visit the U.S.

A federal judge in Boston earlier this month issued a preliminary injunction against the executive order.  The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of seven trans and nonbinary people.

Continue Reading
Advertisement World Pride Guide
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular