Local
Bill would create ‘temporary’ marriage officiants
Wells and five other members want to allow couples to choose any adult to perform wedding


D.C. Council member Tommy Wells (D-Ward 6) (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)
D.C. Council member Tommy Wells (D-Ward 6) has scheduled a public hearing on March 14 for a bill that would allow couples engaged to be married in the city to choose any adult to perform their wedding ceremony.
The Marriage Officiant Amendment Act of 2013 would authorize same-sex or opposite-sex couples applying for a marriage license to designate a friend, parent, sibling or any other adult as a one-time, “temporary officiant” empowered to perform the marriage.
“‘Temporary Officiant’ means an individual authorized to solemnize only the marriage registered with the Clerk of the said Court, and shall receive proof of that authority,” the bill states. “The individual’s authority to solemnize that marriage shall expire upon completion of such solemnization,” the bill says.
Under the city’s marriage law, couples must identify the person they plan to perform their marriage ceremony on the application for their marriage license, which is obtained at the marriage bureau of the D.C. Superior Court. The current law limits the selection of the person who can perform a marriage ceremony to licensed clergy members, judges and court personnel designated as officiants.
Five Council members co-introduced the bill with Wells – Jack Evans (D-Ward 2), David Catania (I-At-Large), Marion Barry (D-Ward 8), Jim Graham (D-Ward 1), and David Grosso (I-At-Large).
A separate bill introduced three years ago that would have allowed licensed notary publics to perform marriages died in committee.
District of Columbia
Norton reintroduces bill to ban discrimination against LGBTQ jurors in D.C. Superior Court
Congresswoman notes Congress controls local court system

D.C. Congressional Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) on Friday, June 20, reintroduced her bill to ban discrimination against LGBTQ D.C. residents in the process for selecting people to serve as jurors in D.C. Superior Court.
“The bill would clarify that D.C. residents may not be excluded or disqualified from jury service in the local D.C. trial court, the D.C. Superior Court, based on sexual orientation or gender identity,” Norton said in a statement.
“Specifically, this bill would clarify that the term ‘sex,’ which is a protected class under the nondiscrimination law that applies to jurors in the D.C. Superior Court includes sexual orientation and gender identity,” Norton said.
She points out in her statement that under the D.C. Home Rule Act approved by Congress that created D.C.’s local government, including an elected mayor and City Council, the federal government retained control over the local court system.
“Therefore, until D.C. is given authority to amend Title 11 of the D.C. Code, which one of my bills would do, an act of Congress is required to clarify that LGBTQ+ jurors in the D.C. Superior Court are protected from discrimination,” according to her statement.
A spokesperson for Norton couldn’t immediately be reached to determine whether Norton is aware of specific instances where residents were denied jury service because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Online records of congressional action on Norton’s juror nondiscrimination bill show she had introduced it in 2019, 2021, and 2023, when it died in committee each year, except for the 117th Congress in 2022, when it was approved by a committee but died in the full House.
“During Pride month we are reminded of the many contributions of the LGBTQ+ community,” Norton said in her June 20 statement. “Nobody, including D.C. jurors, should be discriminated against based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, and D.C. juries should not be deprived of the service of LGBTQ residents,” she added.

The Washington Blade’s second day of Pride on the Pier at The Wharf DC ended with a fireworks show on Saturday, June 7. The fireworks show was presented by the Leonard-Litz LGBTQ Foundation.
(Washington Blade photos by Michael Key)

















State Sen. Ghazala Hashmi (D-Chesterfield) will face John Reid in the race to become Virginia’s next lieutenant governor.
Hashmi won the Democratic primary with 27.49 percent of the vote. She defeated former Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney, state Sen. Aaron Rouse (D-Virginia Beach), Babur Lateef, Victor Salgado and Alexander Bastani.
“Tonight, Virginians made history,” said Hashmi in a statement. “We didn’t just win a primary, we sent a clear message that we won’t be bullied, broken, or dragged backward by the chaos in Washington.”
Reid, a gay conservative talk show host, in April won the Republican nomination to succeed Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, who is running to succeed Gov. Glenn Youngkin.
The incumbent governor days after Reid secured the nomination called for him to withdraw his candidacy amid reports that a social media account with his username included “pornographic content.” Reid, who would become the first openly gay person elected to statewide office in Virginia if he wins in November, has strongly denied the reports.
Former state Del. Jay Jones defeated Henrico County Commonwealth’s Attorney Shannon Taylor in Democratic attorney general primary. Jones will face Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares in November.
Youngkin cannot run for a second, consecutive term.
Former Congresswoman Abigail Spanberger will face off against Earle-Sears in November. The winner will make history as the first woman elected governor in the state’s history.
-
U.S. Supreme Court4 days ago
Supreme Court upholds ban on transgender care for minors
-
District of Columbia5 days ago
Juvenile arrested for anti-gay assault in D.C.
-
Out & About3 days ago
‘Lou’s Legacy’ to make TV debut next week
-
World4 days ago
These eight autistic LGBTQ people are making a difference