News
Hearing set in anti-gay bias lawsuit against Exxon Mobil
Fact-finding conference to determine if oil-and-gas giant discriminated in job hiring

A hearing is set for Tuesday over a lawsuit contending anti-gay bias at Exxon Mobil. (Photo of Exxon sign by Ildar Sagdejev, photo of Mobil sign by Terence Ong; courtesy Wikimedia Commons).
An LGBT group that has sued oil-and-gas giant Exxon Mobil on the grounds of alleged anti-gay bias in hiring practices will get its hearing on Tuesday.
In the case of Freedom to Work v. Exxon Mobil, the Illinois agency charged with enforcing state civil rights law has set Oct. 21 at 10:30 am Central Time for a fact-finding conference at Vandalia City Hall, according to a redacted notice from the LGBT group obtained Sunday by the Washington Blade.
It’ll be the first time during the entire controversy that started in 1998 when Exxon merged with Mobil and deleted the company’s LGBT protections that the company has had to answer in a legal proceeding questions about its lack of explicit non-discrimination protections.
In May 2013, Freedom to Work filed a complaint with the Illinois Department of Human Rights alleging Exxon Mobil engaged in anti-gay discrimination in hiring practices for an Illinois job posting, which would be a violation of state law. As restitution, the lawsuit seeks enumerated protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the company’s equal employment opportunity policy.
Although the state initially threw out the lawsuit in January, the case was back on in July after the Illinois Human Rights Commission overturned that decision and remanded the case for additional review.
According to the notice, the fact-finding conference is an investigative forum “intended to define the issues, determine which facts are undisputed, obtain evidence and ascertain where there is a basis for a negotiated settlement of charge.” The investigator assigned to the case is Krista Sherrock, whose contact number information was redacted by Freedom to Work in the notice.
The investigator conducts the fact-finding conference, the notice states, and determines which persons should be present. During the conference, the investigator reads an opening statement as well as the charge and questions the participants.
Both Tico Almeida, president of Freedom to Work, as well representatives of Exxon Mobil — Kimberly Cunningham, who works in the company’s internal legal department, and Dona Steadman, a human resources adviser — are required to appear at the hearing, according to the notice.
As previously reported, the Chicago-based international law firm Seyfarth Shaw is designated as counsel for Exxon Mobil. The case is being handled for the law firm by attorney Gerald Maatman.
Representing Freedom to Work is Peter Romer-Friedman, an attorney with Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC.
“It is encouraging that the Illinois Department of Human Rights is now investigating the merits of Freedom to Work’s discrimination charge,” Romer-Friedman said. “We are confident the evidence will show Exxon broke the law and that Exxon must change its policies so that LGBT workers are no longer subject to harmful discrimination. After a one year delay due to an erroneous dismissal of the case on technical grounds, we look forward to working with the Department to finally hold Exxon accountable.”
Neither Exxon Mobil nor Seyfarth Shaw responded to the Blade’s request to comment on the hearing. A spokesperson for the Illinois Human Rights Department said she was unable to provide to comment on developments of the investigation.
In July, President Obama signed an executive order barring federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, but that directive isn’t expected to take effect until early next year. It remains to be seen whether the executive order or the lawsuit will be responsible for compelling Exxon Mobil to include LGBT protections in its non-discrimination policy.
District of Columbia
How Pepper the courthouse dog helps victims of abuse
Reshaping how the legal system balances compassion with procedure
Deborah Kelly’s blind husband, Alton, was dragged for blocks to his death by a hit-and-run driver who had already plowed into her on Alabama Ave., S.E., in June 2024.
But her trauma had only just begun. It took 10 months before the driver, Kenneth Trice, Jr., was arrested, and another six months before he was sentenced to just six months behind bars.
As she heaved and sobbed in the courtroom in November, Kelly had a steady four-legged presence by her side: Pepper the Courthouse Dog, as the black Labrador retriever is known in D.C. Superior Court.
Abby Stavitsky, a former federal prosecutor who now serves as a victims’ advocate, is the owner and handler of nine-year-old Pepper. She says that one of the things that has made Pepper such a great asset in the court in the past six years is the emotional support and comfort she provides to victims.
“She absorbs all of the feelings and the emotions around her, but she’s very good at handling it,” Stavitsky said.
Pepper and Stavitsky started working in Magistrate Judge Mary Grace Rook’s courtroom — and now works in Magistrate Judge Janet Albert’s — to provide support for youth who suffer trauma, especially young survivors of commercial sexual exploitation.
These specially trained dogs offer emotional support to trauma victims of all ages. Courthouse dogs can reduce victims’ and witnesses’ anxiety and stress, making it easier for them to provide clear statements in the courtroom, according to a 2019 report in the Criminal Justice Review.
“Having something to pet and interact with is a distraction that results in victims being calmer when testifying in court,” says Stavitsky. “This gives them an extra level of comfort.”
What brought Stavitsky and Pepper together
Stavitsky, who spent 25 years as an assistant U.S attorney, handled a lot of victim-based crimes, mostly domestic violence and sex offenses. She was also a dog lover, and once she learned about courthouse dogs and their use, she was inspired.
In 2019, Pepper was given to Stavitsky by a Massachusetts-based organization, NEADS, formerly known as the National Education for Assistance Dog Services. Although Pepper was originally trained to be a service dog, evaluators determined her character was best suited for a courthouse dog.
Pepper now works regularly in various treatment court cases involving juveniles, many of whom have experienced trauma or are involved in the child welfare system. She also sits with victims while they are testifying in a trial.
“She loves people, especially children,” Stavitsky said. “She loves that interaction.”
Courthouse dogs have a long history
In courthouses across the U.S. specially trained “facility dogs” are becoming an important part of how the justice system supports vulnerable victims and witnesses.
Since the late 1980s, these dogs were used to help trauma survivors and anxious children during testimonies and interviews. The first dog to make an appearance in a courtroom was Sheba, a German shepherd who assisted child sexual abuse victims in the Queens (N.Y.) District Attorney’s Office. Courthouse dogs help them communicate more clearly, especially in these settings that make them anxious and stressed.
Unlike service dogs, courthouse facility dogs are professionally trained through accredited assistance dog organizations and work daily alongside prosecutors, victim advocates, and forensic interviewers. For example, courthouse dogs can have more social interaction, unlike service dogs.
Courthouse dogs’ growing use has prompted state laws and professional guidelines to recognize the dogs as a trauma-informed tool that helps victims participate in the justice process without compromising courtroom fairness.
As more jurisdictions adopt these programs, courthouse dogs are reshaping how the legal system balances compassion with procedure, ensuring that victims’ voices can be heard in environments that might otherwise silence them.
Pepper makes it easy to see why.
“I really love people, especially kids, and can provide emotional support and comfort during all stages of the court process,” reads the business card Stavitsky hands out with Pepper’s picture. “I’m calm, quiet and can stay in place for several hours.”
(This article was written by a student in the journalism program at Bard High School Early College DC. This work is part of a partnership between the Washington Blade Foundation and Youthcast Media Group, funded through the FY26 Community Development Grant from the Office of D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser.)
Rehoboth Beach
Women’s FEST returns to Rehoboth Beach next week
Golf tournament, mini-concerts, meetups planned for silver anniversary festival
Women’s+ FEST 2026 will begin on Thursday, April 9 at CAMP Rehoboth Community Center.
The festival will celebrate a remarkable milestone in 2026: its silver anniversary. For 25 years, Women’s+ FEST has brought fun and entertainment for all those on the spectrum of the feminine spirit. There will be a variety of events including a golf tournament, mini-concerts and happy hour meetups.
For more information, visit Camp Rehoboth’s website.
Belarus
Belarusian lawmakers approve bill to crackdown on LGBTQ rights
Country’s president known as ‘Europe’s last dictator’
Lawmakers in Belarus on Thursday approved a bill that would allow the government to crack down on LGBTQ advocacy.
The Associated Press notes the bill would punish anyone found guilty of “propaganda of homosexual relations, gender change, refusal to have children, and pedophilia” with fines, community labor, and 15 days in jail.
The House of Representatives, the lower house of the Belarusian National Assembly, last month approved the bill. The Council of the Republic, which is the parliament’s upper chamber, passed it on Thursday.
President Alexander Lukashenko is expected to sign it.
Belarus borders Poland, Ukraine, Russia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Lukashenko — known as “Europe’s last dictator” is a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Kazakhstan is among the countries that have enacted Russian-style anti-LGBTQ propaganda laws in recent years.
Vika Biran, a Belarusian LGBTQ activist, is among those arrested during anti-Lukashenko protests that took place in 2020 after he declared victory in the country’s presidential election.
