Connect with us

Financial

LGBT press to advertisers: Don’t cut print

Experts warn companies not to show up at Pride, then disappear

Published

on

gay press, gay news, Washington Blade

Despite the paradigm shift declared by the Buggles during the debut moments of MTV, video didn’t kill the radio star—no more than the emergence of digital dealt a fatal blow to newsprint. But it did put another arrow in the quiver of advertisers, and gave readers a dizzying array of new destinations.

So with a world of news, information, and (we’ve heard) porn available on the phone you carry or the computer you use, why would the LGBT consumer choose to go the page-turning route?

“Well, I think the main thing is trust,” says Pride Source Media Group CFO Jan Stevenson. Along with her wife, Susan Horowitz, they publish Between The Lines, Michigan’s weekly LGBT newspaper.

“The LGBT print press,” says Stevenson, “has a certain level of quality and professionalism. We’re steeped in the ethics that center around publishing, that blogs and online sites just don’t have. It’s been vetted, and there are reputable people standing behind the work.”

Concurring on the matter of credibility is Scott Seitz, who says, “I absolutely believe in digital, but I do believe that digital often does not have the same integrity as print.”

Seitz, whose SPI Marketing LLC counts Absolut Vodka among its clients, notes, “When you have a team of people slapping together a meme or a statement, they’re just checking boxes.”

As a result, says Seitz, “It becomes less and less meaningful. It’s more about, ‘What can I do today to get attention?’ People are doing mechanical stuff, and those people are not necessarily from the [LGBTQ+] community… It’s not being done with a high level of integrity or seriousness.”

Like the connection forged at a mom-and-pop shop that can’t be bought by shopping online, Stevenson says the print format creates a unique bond.

“If someone is running a print ad, it’s an affirmative, on-paper commitment to the community, a message that they want to do business with us,” she notes. “It’s not as fleeting as an online ad, that could be coming from anywhere…. People remember what they see [in print], and have more faith that the advertiser intends for the ad to be there.” With digital ads, she says, “there’s not necessarily a connection between what you see and why it was put there.”

Stevenson says Pride Source Media has “very few clients who do digital only.” Almost all of them do a mix, “and we still have a fairly large contingent that do print only, because they want this market. They know this is where to go, to reach the community.”

Although Stevenson says her own publication is actually increasing its circulation, “The print sector continues to be in trouble, regardless of general or niche markets,” observes Mike Wilke, whose AdRespect.org archive of nearly 6,000 LGBT-themed ads date as far back as 1917. “In 2019,” Wilke says, “digital advertising revenues exceeded all traditional media ad revenues.”

“We have a digital world that is constantly wanting print to be dead, and I don’t know why,” says Todd Evans, president and CEO of Rivendell Media.

“The digital-only properties think that would be helpful, yet we estimate 90% of LGBTQ digital content comes directly from print products,” says Evans. “So I am not sure where digital would get its content. But print is maintaining its place in a world where there’s a new cog in the wheel.”

Evans and his team place advertisements for the National LGBT Media Association, whose 12 members, including the Washington Blade and Los Angeles Blade, have a combined estimated 500,000 weekly newspaper and online readers. Nationally, says Evans, there are about 130 LGBTQ-centric publications—most of them serving regional markets, and most of them distributed free of charge.

“Rivendell,” says Evans, “is 40 years old, and we’ve been tracking circulation since we started. We independently verify a publication’s printer’s receipts, so we know our clients are getting what they pay for and, thus have a real insight into circulation figures.”

Citing Rivendell’s 2019 Gay Press Report, Evans says, “Print circulation this year was up five percent [2,544,204]. It’s the only market I can think of where that is the case.”

But in order to create brand awareness that translates into brand loyalty, that market must be ministered to year-round, says Seitz. “We’re in a place where authenticity is over-communicated and under-realized,” he observes. “We have companies who do one quick thing at Pride every year, and then they do nothing else.”

Seitz’s SPI Marketing teamed up with BERA Brand Management to survey 5,000 LGBT attendees of last summer’s World Pride in New York City and LGBTQ Pride weekend in San Francisco.

They found that while Pride 2019 “provided a substantial lift to most of the sponsors,” the largest bumps in visibility and credibility “were among brands that didn’t just sponsor Pride, but that have history of directly supporting the LGBTQ community at large. Activations, advertising and promotions were strategically linked, and their history of support and engagement created trust in their messaging.”

“It all goes back to Marketing 101: Impact versus exposure,” says Evans, of the argument for maintaining a year-round presence in LGBT media and via brick and mortar events, rather than “spending it all on a one-shot wonder. Before there was digital, companies started to realize that Pride helped them [with LGBT community relations]. But if you only do that once a year, it’s out of sight, out of mind. One of the reasons Absolut Vodka always comes up, when you ask people about what companies really have our back, is that they stay in the game. The amount of [LGBT media] advertising they do will go up and down year to year, but they’ve always maintained a presence.”

That’s become even more important, says Seitz, “as we see Generation Z going back to being a little more physical, more likely to be out shopping and trying something on, as opposed to buying it online. So I thing we’re seeing the pendulum swing a little. They’ve never not been tactile, but it’s kind of shifting again, and that’s something to be studied and mindful of.”

Citing the strength of a regional publication whose hyperlocal content is a selling point to both the readership and advertisers, Stevenson says “circulation has actually gone up” over the last five years, “because more and more people are finding out about us, and want the papers.”

Many of those people, says Stevenson, are younger, and aren’t just accessing Between The Lines through digital means. One of the newspaper’s largest distribution sites, she notes, is the local LGBT youth center.

 “We can’t keep it in stock,” says Stevenson. “As soon as the new issue arrives, it’s gone.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Real Estate

New year, new housing landscape for D.C. landlords

Several developments expected to influence how rental housing operates

Published

on

Muriel Bowser has advocated for more affordable housing during her time as mayor. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

As 2026 begins, Washington, D.C.’s rental housing landscape continues to evolve in ways that matter to small landlords, tenants, and the communities they serve. At the center of many of these conversations is the Small Multifamily & Rental Owners Association (SMOA), a D.C.–based organization that advocates for small property owners and the preservation of the city’s naturally occurring affordable housing.

At their December “DC Housing Policy Summit,” city officials, housing researchers, lenders, attorneys, and housing providers gathered to discuss the policies and proposals shaping the future of rental housing in the District. The topics ranged from recent legislative changes to emerging ballot initiatives and understanding how today’s policy decisions will affect housing stability tomorrow.

Why Housing Policy Matters in 2026

If you are a landlord or a tenant, several developments now underway in D.C., are expected to influence how rental housing operates in the years ahead.

One of the most significant developments is the Rebalancing Expectations for Neighbors, Tenants and Landlords (RENTAL) Act of 2025, a sweeping piece of legislation passed last fall and effective December 31, 2025, which updates a range of housing laws. This broad housing reform law will modernize housing regulations and address long-standing court backlogs, and in a practical manner, assist landlords with shortened notice and filing requirements for lawsuits.  The Act introduces changes to eviction procedures, adjusts pre-filing notice timelines, and modifies certain tenant protections under previous legislation, the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act. 

At the same time, the District has expanded its Rent Registry, to have a better overview of licensed rental units in the city with updated technology that tracks rental units subject to and exempt from rent control and other related housing information. Designed to improve transparency and enforcement, Rent Registry makes it easier for all parties to verify rent control status and compliance.

Looking ahead to the 2026 election cycle, a proposed ballot initiative for a two-year rent freeze is generating significant conversation. If it qualifies for the ballot and is approved by voters, the measure would pause rent increases across the District for two years. While still in the proposal phase, it reflects the broader focus on tenant affordability that continues to shape housing policy debates.

What This Means for Rental Owners

Taken together, these changes underscore how closely policy and day-to-day operations are connected for small landlords. Staying informed about notice requirements, registration obligations, and evolving regulations isn’t just a legal necessity. It’s a key part of maintaining stable, compliant rental properties.

With discussions underway about rent stabilization, voucher policies, and potential rent freezes, long-term revenue projections will be influenced by regulatory shifts just as much as market conditions alone. Financial and strategic planning becomes even more important to protect your interests.

Preparing for the Changes

As the owner of a property management company here in the District, I’ve spent much of the past year thinking about how these changes translate from legislation into real-world operations.

The first priority has been updating our eviction and compliance workflows to align with the RENTAL Act of 2025. That means revising how delinquent rent cases are handled, adjusting notice procedures, and helping owners understand how revised timelines and court processes may affect the cost, timing, and strategy behind enforcement decisions.

Just as important, we’re shifting toward earlier, more proactive communication around compliance and regulatory risk. Rather than reacting after policies take effect, we’re working to flag potential exposure in advance, so owners can make informed decisions before small issues become costly problems.

A Bigger Picture for 2026

Housing policy in Washington, D.C., has always reflected the city’s values from protecting tenants to preserving affordability in rapidly changing neighborhoods. As those policies continue to evolve, the challenge will be finding the right balance between stability for renters and sustainability for the small property owners who provide much of the city’s housing.

The conversations happening now at policy summits, in Council chambers, and across neighborhood communities will shape how rental housing is regulated. For landlords, tenants, and legislators alike, 2026 represents an opportunity to engage thoughtfully, to ask hard questions, and to create a future where compliance, fairness, and long-term stability go hand-in-hand.

Continue Reading

Real Estate

Unconventional homes becoming more popular

HGTV show shines spotlight on alternatives to cookie cutter

Published

on

Shipping container homes have gained popularity in recent years. (Photo by Suchat Siriboot/Bigstock)

While stuck in the house surrounded by snow and ice, I developed a new guilty pleasure: watching “Ugliest House in America” on HGTV. For several hours a day, I looked at other people’s unfortunate houses. Some were victims of multiple additions, some took on the worst décor of the ‘70s, and one was even built in the shape of a boat.

In today’s world, the idea of what a house should look like has shifted dramatically. Gone are the days of cookie-cutter suburban homes with white picket fences. Instead, a new wave of architects, designers, and homeowners are pushing the boundaries of traditional housing to create unconventional and innovative spaces that challenge our perceptions of what a home can be.

One of the most popular forms of alternative housing is the tiny house. These pint-sized dwellings are typically fewer than 500 square feet and often are set on trailers to allow for mobility. Vans and buses can also be reconfigured as tiny homes for the vagabonds among us.

These small wonders offer an affordable and sustainable living option for those wishing to downsize and minimize their environmental footprint. With clever storage solutions, multipurpose furniture, and innovative design features, tiny homes have become a creative and functional housing solution for many, although my dogs draw the line at climbing Jacob’s Ladder-type steps.

Another unusual type of housing gaining popularity is the shipping container home. Made from repurposed shipping containers, these homes offer a cost-effective and environmentally friendly way to create modern and sleek living spaces. With their industrial aesthetic and modular design, shipping container homes are a versatile option for those contemplating building a unique and often multi-level home.

For those looking to connect with nature, treehouses are a whimsical and eccentric housing option. Nestled high up in the trees, these homes offer a sense of seclusion and tranquility that is hard to find in traditional housing. With their distinctive architecture and stunning views, treehouses can be a magical retreat for those seeking a closer connection to the natural world.

For a truly off-the-grid living experience, consider an Earthship home. These self-sustaining homes use recycled construction materials and rely on renewable energy sources like solar power and rainwater harvesting. With their passive solar design and natural ventilation systems, Earthship homes are a model of environmentally friendly living.

For those with a taste for the bizarre, consider a converted silo home. These cylindrical structures provide an atypical canvas for architects and designers to create modern and minimalist living spaces. With curved walls and soaring ceilings, silo homes offer a one-of-a-kind living experience that is sure to leave an impression.

Barn homes have gained popularity in recent years. These dwellings take the rustic charm of a traditional barn and transform it into a modern and stylish living space. With their open, flexible floor plans, lofty ceilings, and exposed wooden beams, barn homes offer a blend of traditional and contemporary design elements that create a warm and inviting atmosphere, while being tailored to the needs and preferences of the homeowner.

In addition to their unique character, barn homes also offer a sense of history and charm that is hard to find in traditional housing. Many of them have a rich and storied past, with some dating back decades or even centuries.

If you relish life on the high seas (or at a marina on the bay), consider a floating home. These aquatic abodes differ from houseboats in that they remain on the dock rather than traverse the waterways. While most popular on the West Coast (remember “Sleepless in Seattle”?), you sometimes see them in Florida, with a few rentals available in Baltimore’s Inner Harbor and infrequent sales at our own D.C. Wharf. Along with the sense of community found in marinas, floating homes offer a peaceful retreat from the hustle and bustle of city life.

From tiny homes on wheels to treehouses in the sky or homes that float, these distinctive dwellings offer a fresh perspective on how we live and modify traditional thoughts on what a house should be. Sadly, most of these homes rely on appropriate zoning for building and placement, which can limit their use in urban or suburban areas. 

Nonetheless, whether you’re looking for a sustainable and eco-friendly living option or a whimsical retreat, there is sure to be an unconventional housing option that speaks to your sense of adventure and creativity. So, why settle for a run-of-the-mill ranch or a typical townhouse when you can live in a unique and intriguing space that reflects your personality and lifestyle?


Valerie M. Blake is a licensed Associate Broker in D.C., Maryland, and Virginia with RLAH @properties. Call or text her at 202-246-8602, email her at [email protected] or follow her on Facebook at TheRealst8ofAffairs.

Continue Reading

Real Estate

Convert rent check into an automatic investment, Marjorie!

Basic math shows benefits of owning vs. renting

Published

on

Knowledgeable lenders can discuss useful down payment assistance programs to help a buyer ‘find the money.’ (

Suppose people go out for dinner and everyone is talking about how they are investing their money. Some are having fun with a few new apps they downloaded – where one can round up purchases and then bundle that money into a weekly or monthly investment that grows over time, which is a smart thing to do. The more automatic one can make the investments, the less is required to “think about it” and the more it just happens. It becomes a habit and a habit becomes a reward over time.  

Another habit one can get into is just making that rent check an investment. One must live somewhere, correct? And in many larger U.S. cities like New York, Chicago, D.C., Los Angeles, Miami, Charlotte, Atlanta, Dallas, Nashville, Austin, or even most mid-market cities, rents can creep up towards $2,000 a month (or more) with ease.  

Well, do the math. At $2,000 per month over one year, that’s $24,000. If someone stays in that apartment (with no rent increases) for even three years, that amount triples to $72,000.  According to Rentcafe.com, the average rent in the United States at the end of 2025 was around $1,700 a month. Even that amount of rent can total between $60,000 and $80,000 over 3-4 years.  

What if that money was going into an investment each month? Now, yes, the argument is that most mortgage payments, in the early years, are more toward the interest than the principal.  However, at least a portion of each payment is going toward the principal.  

What about closing costs and then selling costs? If a home is owned for three years, and then one pays out of pocket to close on that home (usually around 2-3% of the sales price), does owning it for even three years make it worth it? It could be argued that owning that home for only three years is not enough time to recoup the costs of mostly paying the interest plus paying the closing costs.

Let’s look at some math:

A $300,000 condo – at 3% is $9,000 for closing costs.

One can also put as little as 3 or 3.5% down on a home – so that is also around $9,000. 

If a buyer uses D.C. Opens Doors or a similar program – a down payment can be provided and paid back later when the property is sold so that takes care of some of the upfront costs. Knowledgeable lenders can often discuss other useful down payment assistance programs to help a buyer “find the money.”  

Another useful tactic many agents use is to ask for a credit from the seller. If a property has sat on the market for weeks, the seller may be willing to give a closing cost credit. That amount can vary. New construction sellers may also offer these closing cost credits as well.  

And that, Marjorie, just so you will know, and your children will someday know, is THE NIGHT THE RENT CHECK WENT INTO AN INVESTMENT ACCOUNT ON GEORGIA AVENUE!


Joseph Hudson is a referral agent with Metro Referrals. Reach him at 703-587-0597 or [email protected].

Continue Reading

Popular