Connect with us

Commentary

Silence is indeed not an option

Israel has effectively declared war on all of Gaza and its civilians

Published

on

Jewish Voice for Peace members protest in the U.S. Capitol on Oct. 18, 2023. (Screen capture via CBS News YouTube)

BY ELLE FLANDERS | As a Jewish member of the LGBTQ+ community, I agree with Ethan Felson: “Silence is not an option.” I have never been silent, mind you, and while it’s not easy to raise your voice, especially with views that are counter to the mainstream, I have been taught all my life in one form or another, that Silence = Death. I do think, however, that it is crucial to fill in some of the gaping silences Mr. Felson’s article leaves out, because it is in these holes that we can find the necessary empathy that could allow us to get past the binary that only results in ongoing conflict and mass killing. Empathy, by its very definition, is not a one-way street. We cannot have true empathy for one and not another and as queers, if we know one thing it is that embracing difference is key to overcoming oppression. 

I myself am a child of Zionists who immigrated to Israel. I grew up in Jerusalem. I came out in Israel at a time when there was no visible LGBTQ community to speak of. The hostility we felt as members of the tiny queer community necessitated a collectivity of outcasts. It brought me into contact with people from other oppressed minorities; I joined the peace movement instead of the army; I studied Arabic and became a photographer instead of becoming an archaeologist; I fell in love with women instead of men. In that time, I learned about Israel’s ongoing occupation of Palestine, about the proliferation of illegal settlements that violated international law and became an ongoing obstacle to any potential peace process. Most significantly, I learned to listen to another narrative about the day-to-day hardship of Palestinian lives.

After marching in Tel Aviv Pride with a queer Israeli group called Black Laundry carrying signs that said, “there is no Pride in the occupation,” I made a film called “Zero Degrees of Separation” at the height of the second Intifada. The film was about the occupation as seen through the lens of LGBTQ Israelis Palestinian couples. The people I met in my everyday life in the occupied territories were my Palestinian landlady who became like a mother to my partner and me, the queer Palestinian friends we would meet at a cafe in Ramallah, the professors and colleagues I met while filming in Nablus and the lesbian from Khan Younis in Gaza. The conversations we need to have as LGBTQ+ individuals are about solidarity across borders. It is only when we choose a stance of denial or hostility to the other that we are forced to “choose between our identities” as Mr. Felson suggests. Rather, I would argue, we must embrace the lessons of being queer and confirm our commitment to justice and equal rights for all.

After Hamas’ brutal massacre of more than 1,400 people on Oct. 7, Israel declared war on Hamas. Defense Minister Yoav Gallant declared: “I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we act accordingly.” Effectively Israel has declared war on all of Gaza and its civilians, it is punishing and killing indiscriminately, just like Hamas, citizens of Gaza: Families, children, the old and the sick. Thus far Israel has killed over 5,000 people. Over 1/3 of those killed have been children. That bears repeating: 2,000 children who are no less significant than the children killed in Hamas’ recent attack. And thus we cannot take seriously Mr. Felson’s argument that Israel is a place that needs our unconditional support. These injustices are the silences that Mr. Felson did not fill. When he says: “Your voice matters — on social media, in articles and op-eds and in your everyday conversations,” we agree again. But what we say and learn in these times perhaps needs to be spelled out a little more. Implicit in Mr. Felson’s unconditional support is the suggestion that there be no criticism of Israel. For years the Israeli government has been pushing foreign governments to equate criticism with antisemitism. When I joined Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA), we supported peaceful boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS). We were immediately branded antisemites. Except many of us were Jewish. BDS movements sprung-up across the world, urging legitimate debate across college campuses and yet becoming a lightning rod for attacks declaring them antisemitic. While Mr. Felson calls for our voices, he is quite clear that they only be pro-Israel Jewish voices. This is unhelpful and will only perpetuate the violence that has been going on for decades. We do not need voices for some but silence for others. We do not need justifications for more murderous activity. We do, however, need to affirm that the only viable means to end all violence is to take action to end the root cause of the violence: Oppression and that oppression is the occupation. The world must demand that Israel end its brutal 75 year-long apartheid regime that denies millions their equal rights. We must end our silence about a violent occupation in which the lives of millions of people are at stake who have no voice and much understandable resentment. Let me be clear, nothing “justifies” the murdering of innocent civilians, not an occupation and not a murderous, racist revenge attack sending millions fleeing from their homes. What we do know however is that violence only breeds violence and we must demand better.

We must demand that the U.S. government cease its “full support” of Israel in its bombardment of civilians and its displacement of millions. That is not “the right to defend,” that is an intentional war crime. We must demand, in full voice, that these crimes, the endless cycle of violence, the ongoing occupation not be conducted in our names, not Jewish, not queer, not American or Canadian or otherwise. That is the silence we must overcome. 

Elle Flanders is a queer filmmaker, artist and activist with publicstudio.ca. Her award-winning documentary “Zero Degrees of Separation” was produced and distributed by the National Film Board of Canada. https://www.nfb.ca/film/zero_degrees_of_separation/

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Commentary

Protecting the trans community is not optional for elected allies and candidates

One of oldest political tactics is blaming vulnerable group for societal woes

Published

on

rotester stands outside Children's National Hospital in Northwest D.C. on Feb. 2, 2025. (Washington Blade photo by Linus Berggren)

Being an ally to the trans community is not a conditional position for me, nor should it be for any candidate. My allyship doesn’t hinge on polling, focus groups, or whether courage feels politically convenient. At a time when trans people, especially trans youth of color, are under coordinated attack, elected officials and candidates must do more than offer quiet support. We must take a public and solid stand.

History shows us how these moments begin. One of the oldest political tactics is to single out the most vulnerable and blame them for society’s anxieties — not because they are responsible, but because they are easier to blame than those with power and protection. In Nazi Germany, Jewish people were primarily targeted, but they were not the only demographic who suffered elimination. LGBTQ people, disabled people, Romani communities, political dissidents, and others were also rounded up, imprisoned, and killed. Among the earliest acts of fascistic repression was the destruction of Berlin’s Institute for Sexual Science, a pioneering center for gender-affirming care and LGBTQ research. These books and medical records were among the first to be confiscated and burned. It is not a coincidence that these same communities are now the first to suffer under this regime, they are our canaries in the coal mine signaling what’s to come. 

Congress, emboldened by the rhetoric of the Donald Trump campaign, recently passed HR 3492 to criminalize healthcare workers who provide gender-affirming healthcare with fines and imprisonment. This bill, sponsored by celebrity politicians like Marjorie Taylor Greene, puts politics and headlines over people and health outcomes. Healthcare that a number of cis-gendered people also benefit from byway of hair regeneration and surgery, male and female breast augmentation, hormone replacement therapy etc. Even when these bills targeting this care do not pass, they do real damage. They create fear among patients, legal uncertainty for providers, and instability for clinics that serve the most marginalized people in our communities.

Here in D.C., organizations like Planned Parenthood and Whitman-Walker Health are lifelines for many communities. They provide gender-affirming care alongside primary care, mental health services, HIV treatment, and preventative medicine. When healthcare is politicized or criminalized, people don’t wait for court rulings — they delay care, ration medication, or disappear from the system entirely.

As a pharmacist, I know exactly what that means. These are life-saving medications. Continuity of care matters. Criminalizing and politicizing healthcare does not protect children or families — it puts lives at risk.

Instead of centering these realities, political discourse has been deliberately diverted toward a manufactured panic about trans women in sports. Let me be clear: trans women deserve to be protected and allowed to compete just like anyone else. Athletics have always included people with different bodies, strengths, and abilities. Girls and women will always encounter competitors who are stronger or faster — that is not a gender or sports crisis, it is the nature of competition.

Sports are meant to teach fairness, mutual respect, and the shared spirit of competition — not suspicion or exclusion. We should not police young people’s bodies, and we should reject attempts to single out trans youth as a political distraction. Families and doctors should be the authority on sex and gender identity.

This narrative has been cynically amplified by the right, but too often Democrats have allowed it to take hold rather than forcefully rejecting it. It is imperative to pay attention to what is happening — and to push back against every attempt to dehumanize anyone for political gain.

Trans people have always been part of our communities and our democracy. Protecting the most vulnerable is not radical — it is the foundation of a just society. My work is grounded in that commitment, and I will not waver from it. I’m proud to have hired trans political team Down Ballot to lead my campaign for DC Council At Large. We need more ally leaders of all stages to stand up for the LGBTQ+ community. We must let elected detractors know that when they come for them, then they come for all of us. We cannot allow Fox News and social media trolls to create a narrative that scares us away from protecting marginalized populations. We must stand up and do what’s right.

Anything less is not leadership.

Rep. Oye Owolewa is running for an at-large seat on the D.C. Council.

Continue Reading

Commentary

America is going in the wrong direction for intersex children

Lawmakers are criminalizing care for trans youth, while permitting irreversible harm to intersex babies

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

I live with the consequences of what America is willing to condone in the name of “protecting children.”

When I was young, doctors and adults made irreversible decisions about my body without my informed consent. They weren’t responding to an emergency. They were responding to discomfort with innate physical differences and the social and medical pressure to make a child’s body conform to a rigid female-male binary. That’s the part people like to skip over when they talk about “child welfare”: the harm didn’t begin with my identity. It started with adults deciding my healthy body needed fixing.

That’s why the hypocrisy unfolding right now from statehouses to Capitol Hill feels so familiar, and so dangerous. 

While harmful medical practices on intersex children, the nearly 2 percent born with differences in one or more of their physical sex characteristics, have been ongoing in the U.S. for decades, until recently, there was no law specifically condoning it. 

This month, House Republicans passed one of the most extreme anti-trans bills in modern American history, advancing legislation that would criminalize gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth and threaten doctors with severe penalties for providing evidence-based treatment. The bill is framed as a measure to “protect children,” but in reality, it weaponizes the criminal legal system against families and providers who are trying to support young people in surviving adolescence.

At the same time, the administration has proposed hospital and insurance policies designed to choke off access to affirming care for trans youth nationwide by making providers fear loss of federal funding, regulatory retaliation, or prosecution. This is a familiar strategy: don’t just ban care outright; instead, make it so risky that hospitals stop providing it altogether. The result is the same everywhere. Young people lose access to care that major medical associations agree can be lifesaving.

All of this is happening under the banner of preventing “irreversible harm.”

But if America were genuinely concerned about irreversible harm to minors, the first thing lawmakers would address is the medically unnecessary, nonconsensual surgeries still performed on intersex infants and young children, procedures that permanently alter healthy tissue, often without urgent medical need, and long before a child can meaningfully participate in the decision. Human rights organizations have documented for years how these interventions are justified not by medical necessity, but by social pressure to make bodies appear more typically “female” or “male.” 

Here is the uncomfortable truth: all of the state laws now banning gender-affirming care for transgender youth explicitly include exceptions that allow nonconsensual and harmful intersex surgeries to continue.

A recent JAMA Health Forum analysis found that 28 states have enacted bans on gender-affirming care for minors that carve out intersex exceptions, preserving doctors’ ability to perform irreversible “normalizing” procedures on intersex children even while prohibiting affirming care for trans adolescents.

This contradiction is not accidental. It reveals the real priority behind these laws.

If the goal were truly to protect children from irreversible medical interventions, intersex kids would be protected first. Instead, these policies target one group of children, transgender youth, while continuing to permit permanent interventions on another group whose bodies challenge the same rigid sex and gender binary that lawmakers are trying to enforce.

Intersex people are routinely erased from American policy debates, except when our bodies are invoked to justify harmful laws, warning that intersex children are being used as legal loopholes rather than protected as human beings. This “protect the children” rhetoric is routinely deployed to justify state control over bodies, while preserving medical practices that stripped intersex children like me of autonomy, good health, and choice. Those harms are not theoretical. They are lifelong.

What makes this moment even more jarring is that the federal government had finally begun to recognize intersex people and attempt to address the harms suffered.

In 2024, at the very end of his term, the Biden administration released the first-ever intersex health equity report — a landmark admission that intersex people have been harmed by the U.S. health care system. Issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, the report documents medically unnecessary interventions, lack of informed consent, and systemic erasure and recommends delaying irreversible procedures until individuals can meaningfully participate in decisions about their own bodies.

This should have been a turning point. Instead, America is moving in the opposite direction.

On day one, President Trump issued an executive order defining “sex” in a way attempting to delegitimize the existence of transgender Americans that also erased the existence of many intersex people. 

When medicine is used to erase difference, it is called protection, while care that supports self-understanding is treated as a threat. This is not about medicine. It is about control.

You cannot claim to oppose irreversible harm to children while legally permitting surgeries that intersex adults and human rights experts have condemned for decades. You cannot claim to respect bodily autonomy while denying it selectively, based on whose bodies make lawmakers uncomfortable.

Protecting children means protecting all children, transgender, intersex, and cisgender alike. It means delaying irreversible interventions when they are not medically necessary. It means trusting and supporting young people and families over politicians chasing culture-war victories.

America can continue down the path of criminalizing care for some children while sanctioning harm to others, or it can finally listen to the people who have lived the consequences.

Intersex children deserve laws that protect their bodies, not politics that hurt and erase them.

Kimberly Zieselman is a human rights advocate and the author of “XOXY: A Memoir”. The author is a co-author of the JAMA Health Forum article cited, which examined state laws restricting gender-affirming care.

Continue Reading

Commentary

Stand with displaced queer people living with HIV

Dec. 1 is World AIDS Day

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

Today, on World AIDS Day, we honor the resilience, courage, and dignity of people living with HIV everywhere especially refugees, asylum seekers, and queer displaced communities across East Africa and the world.

For many, living with HIV is not just a health journey it is a journey of navigating stigma, borders, laws, discrimination, and survival.

Yet even in the face of displacement, uncertainty, and exclusion, queer people living with HIV continue to rise, thrive, advocate, and build community against all odds.

To every displaced person living with HIV:

• Your strength inspires us.

• Your story matters.

• You are worthy of safety, compassion, and the full right to health.

• You deserve a world where borders do not determine access to treatment, where identity does not determine dignity, and where your existence is celebrated not criminalized.

Let today be a reminder that:

• HIV is not a crime.

• Queer identity is not a crime.

• Seeking safety is not a crime.

• Stigma has no place in our communities.

• Access to treatment, care, and protection is a human right.

As we reflect, we must recommit ourselves to building systems that protect not punish displaced queer people living with HIV. We must amplify their voices, invest in inclusive healthcare, and fight the inequalities that fuel vulnerability.

Hope is stronger when we build it together.

Let’s continue to uplift, empower, and walk alongside those whose journeys are too often unheard.

Today we remember.

Today we stand together.

Today we renew hope.

Abraham Junior lives in the Gorom Refugee Settlement in South Sudan.

Continue Reading

Popular