Connect with us

Congress

Equality Caucus report documents GOP’s anti-LGBTQ attacks in 2023

President Joe Biden has vowed to block homophobic, transphobic bills

Published

on

U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), U.S. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) (Graphic by the Congressional Equality Caucus)

The Congressional Equality Caucus on Monday released a 36-page report titled “Obsessed: House Republicans’ Relentless Attacks Against the LGBTQI+ Community in 2023,” which meticulously documents a year of anti-LGBTQ legislative activity in the lower chamber.

Trends detailed in the report map onto those seen in legislatures across the country. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, a total of 510 anti-LGBTQ bills were introduced last year, 84 of which were ultimately signed into law.

The caucus noted measures targeting the community that were proposed last year are likely to see movement in 2024. And just two days shy of six weeks into the new year, the ACLU is tracking 411 new anti-LGBTQ bills.

“When Republicans took control of the House of Representatives last year, we saw an
avalanche of attacks against the LGBTQI+ community,” U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), who chairs the caucus, said. “In one year, they forced more than 50 anti-LGBTQI+ votes on the House floor.”

“The cruelty is the point,” he said. “You expect bullies in school, but yet there are bullies walking around the halls of Congress. These elected officials target LGBTQI+ youth, especially
trans youth, because it helps increase their clout with a small slice of their base.”

The congressman highlighted efforts by his Republican colleagues to prohibit transgender women and girls from participating on women’s and girls’ sports teams and to ban medically necessary healthcare interventions for trans Americans.

Pocan added, “Not only have they passed numerous amendments to restrict access to medically necessary care, but 46 Republicans have signed on to a Marjorie Taylor Greene bill to throw doctors and parents in jail for providing evidence based care to transgender youth.”

Along with the more than 50 votes on anti-LGBTQ measures that House Republicans took to the floor of the chamber, the caucus’s report notes that GOP members filed more than 95 anti-LGBTQ amendments, introduced more than 55 anti-LGBTQ bills.

During more than 40 committee hearings, these lawmakers and the witnesses they brought made disparaging comments about LGBTQ people, according to the caucus.

Last year, House Republicans used their majority to pass legislation like House Resolution 5 and House Resolution 734 — which, respectively, “require schools that take steps to respect a student’s gender identity to forcibly out those transgender youth to their parents” and “ban all trans girls and trans women — as young as kindergarten — from participating on school sports teams.”

The bills were destined to fail in the Democratic-controlled U.S. Senate, and President Joe Biden vowed never to sign them. Still, advocacy groups warn the introduction of policies targeting LGBTQ people, along with the rhetoric in legislatures where they are debated, heightens the risk of depression, anxiety, self harm behaviors and suicide, particularly among queer youth.

With respect to gender affirming care — which is supported by every mainstream scientific and medical society in the U.S. — House Republicans were focused on restricting access for both youth and adults, the caucus’ report notes.

Additionally, nearly every appropriations bill introduced by Republican members in 2023 contained language permitting discrimination against LGBTQ people, the caucus said. “These provisions create a license for people and organizations, especially those receiving taxpayer funds, to discriminate against LGBTQI+ people by preventing the federal government from adequately responding.”

Among the other details contained in the caucus’s report are:

  • How GOP members hijacked funding bills that have traditionally passed with wide bipartisan margins to demand anti-LGBTQ provisions, despite the near certainty that they would be rejected by the Senate and by President Biden
  • How House Republicans stripped funding from three community-based projects because they supported LGBTQ centers
  • How GOP members are trying to exclude children’s hospitals that provided gender affirming care for patients younger than 18 from eligibility for funding under the Children’s Hospitals Graduate Medical Education program, which trains medical residents and fellows
  • The extreme anti-LGBTQ career of the Republican House Speaker U.S. Rep. Mike Johnson (La.)
  • A breakdown of bills targeting the LGBTQ community, those with anti-LGBTQ provisions, and votes on various amendments on matters including anti-discrimination protections, use of the “Holman rule to reduce the salary of federal employees due to their LGBTQI+ status or because of their support of LGBTQI+ rights,” and HIV/AIDS funding
  • Examples of hearings in which Republicans and their witnesses made anti-LGBTQI+ remarks or asked questions motivated by opposition to LGBTQI+ policies and equality

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Congress

Senate parliamentarian orders removal of gender-affirming care ban from GOP reconciliation bill

GOP Senate Leader John Thune (S.D.) hoped to pass the bill by end-of-week

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Restrictions on the use of federal funds for gender-affirming care will be stripped from the Republican-led Senate reconciliation bill, following a ruling by the Senate parliamentarian on Tuesday that struck down a number of health related provisions.

The legislation banned coverage for transgender medical care through Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program, language that was also included in the House version of the bill passed on May 22 with a vote of 215-214.

The parliamentarian’s decision also rejected Republican proposals for a Medicaid provider tax framework, which allows states to charge health care providers and use the funds to support their programs, along with broader cuts to Medicaid.

Amid calls to override Tuesday’s ruling from Republicans like U.S. Rep. Greg Steube (Fla.), GOP Senate Majority Leader John Thune (S.D.) told reporters “That would not be a good outcome for getting a bill done.”

He also acknowledged that the timing and schedule might have to be adjusted. Senate Republicans had hoped to pass the reconciliation bill by the end of this week, though this was not a legal or procedural deadline.

Dubbed the “one big, beautiful bill” by President Donald Trump, the legislation would extend tax breaks from 2017 that overwhelmingly benefit the wealthiest Americans and corporations. To cover the cost, which is estimated to exceed $4 trillion over 10 years, the bill would make drastic cuts to social welfare programs, particularly Medicaid.

Democrats are not in a position to negotiate across the aisle with Republicans holding majorities in both chambers of Congress, but for months they have been calling attention to the effort by their GOP colleagues to strip Americans of their health insurance to pay for the tax breaks.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 10.9 million people would lose their coverage, either through Medicaid or the Affordable Care Act marketplaces. Some Republicans like U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley (Mo.) are pushing back against the deep cuts to Medicaid, arguing they would be devastating for many of their constituents and also to hospitals, nursing homes, and community health care providers in rural areas.

In a statement emailed to the Washington Blade on Tuesday, U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.) said, “Anti-trans extremists are attempting to use the full power of the government to hurt kids, and recent Supreme Court decisions in Skrmetti and Medina are enabling their quest.”

While today’s ruling by the Senate parliamentarian is a temporary win, I will keep pushing back on these shameful attempts to harm trans kids and their families for trying to live authentically,” said the senator, who also serves as ranking member of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee.

U.S. Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.), who is gay and chairs the Congressional Equality Caucus, also shared a statement with the Washington Blade addressing the parliamentarian’s ruling:

“This ruling by the Senate Parliamentarian is a win for the transgender people who rely on Medicaid and CHIP to access the healthcare they need to live fuller, happier, and healthier lives—but the fight is not over yet,” the congressman said.

 “Republican Senators must abide by her ruling and remove the ban from the final version of Trump’s Big Ugly Bill,” he said. “Yet, even with this provision removed, this bill is terrible for the American people, including trans Americans. Every Equality Caucus member voted against it in the House and we’re ready to do so again if the Senate sends it back to the House.”

The Human Rights Campaign issued a press release with a statement from the organization’s vice president for government affairs, David Stacy:

“The fact remains that this bill belongs in the trash. It continues to include devastating cuts to health care programs — including Medicaid — that would disproportionately harm the LGBTQ+ community, all so the already rich can receive huge tax cuts,” Stacy said.

“While it comes as a relief that the Senate parliamentarian concluded that one provision in the nightmarish reconciliation bill that would have denied essential, best practice health care to transgender adults does not belong, we aren’t done fighting,” he said. “With attacks on our community coming from many directions, including the Supreme Court, we will work to defeat this bill with everything we’ve got.”


Continue Reading

Congress

Murkowski, Shaheen reintroduce Global Respect Act

Bill would sanction foreign nationals who commit anti-LGBTQ human rights abuses

Published

on

Then-U.S. Ambassador to Hungary David Pressman marches in the 2024 Budapest Pride parade that took place against the backdrop of the Hungarian government's continued anti-LGBTQ crackdown. The Global Respect Act would sanction foreign nationals who carry out human rights abuses against LGBTQ and intersex people. (Photo courtesy of Pressman's X account)

U.S. Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) on Wednesday once again introduced a bill that would sanction foreign nationals who carry out human rights abuses against LGBTQ and intersex people.

The two senators have previously introduced the Global Respect Act. Co-sponsors include U.S. Sens. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Edward Markey (D-Mass.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)

“Around the world, individuals who are part of the LGBTQ+ community are in danger for simply existing,” said Murkowski in a press release. “Hate and violence cannot and should not be tolerated. I’m hopeful that this legislation will establish actionable consequences for these inexcusable human rights violations, and create a safer world for all people — regardless of who they are or who they love.” 

Shaheen in the press release notes “the risk of personal harm for LGBTQI individuals for publicly identifying who they are or expressing who they love has tragically increased in recent years.”

“Human rights, as defined by the Universal Declaration of Human rights, recognizes that global freedom, justice, and peace depend on ‘the inherent dignity’ and ‘the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family,” said the New Hampshire Democrat. “LBGTQI human rights are universal human rights. We must ensure that we hold all violators of those rights accountable.” 

The promotion of LGBTQ and intersex rights abroad was a cornerstone of the Biden-Harris administration’s foreign policy.

The current White House has suspended most foreign aid. The elimination of these funds has left the global LGBTQ and intersex rights movement reeling.

Continue Reading

Congress

Garcia elected top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee

Gay Calif. lawmaker vows to hold Trump-Vance administration accountable

Published

on

U.S. Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

U.S. Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) on Tuesday was elected top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee in a vote that signaled the conference’s overwhelming support for a newer voice on Capitol Hill who will play a key role taking on President Donald Trump.

With a margin of 150-63, the 47-year-old openly gay congressman defeated U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), alongside U.S. Reps. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) and Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.) who exited the race after the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee backed Garcia.

Serving only since 2023, the congressman has had a remarkably quick ascent leading up to his election this week as ranking member of one of the most powerful House committees, awarded a leadership position serving under House Democratic Whip Katherine Clark (Mass.) and selected as a co-chair of former Vice President Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign.

Democratic members began jockeying for the top seat on the oversight committee this spring after the late-U.S. Rep. Gerry Connolly of Virginia stepped away amid news that his esophageal cancer had returned. He died in May.

Connolly last year fended off a challenge from one of the most well known House Democrats, U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), though with a narrower margin that signaled intra-party tensions over whether leadership roles should still be awarded based on seniority.

Garcia positioned himself as a bridge between the two camps — a consensus candidate with executive managerial experience as the former mayor of Long Beach, Calif. At the same time, particularly since the start of Trump’s second term, the congressman has emerged as one of the most outspoken critics of the new Republican regime.

In a statement on X Tuesday, Garcia thanked his colleagues and promised to “hold Donald Trump and his administration accountable.”

If Democrats win control of the House next year, the oversight committee will be able to exercise powers that are now available only to Republicans under the chair, U.S. Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), which include the authority to investigate virtually any matter across the federal government, to issue subpoenas, and to compel testimony.

In the meantime, Garcia on Monday promised that Democrats on the committee would “vigorously fight” Republican Speaker Mike Johnson’s (La.) plans “to dismantle the Government Accountability Office.”

Continue Reading

Popular