Politics
National Council on Aging president calls out ageism in election discourse
Joe Biden is 81-years-old
National Council on Aging President Ramsey Alwin spoke with the Washington Blade on Tuesday, a few days after the group issued a statement calling out “pervasive ageist remarks [that] we have been hearing in the 2024 election.”
Discussion of President Joe Biden’s age reached a fever pitch last week after a prosecutor who was investigating his handling of classified documents called Biden a āwell-meaning, elderly man with a poor memoryā who had ādiminished faculties in advancing age” ā remarks that the administration roundly denounced as untrue and out-of-bounds.
“We’re always monitoring the public discourse as advocates for older adults,” Alwin said, “and we speak up and we speak out to reject ageism in all its forms when we feel necessary,” including in this instance.
Whether for partisan purposes or in the context of political punditry, talk about the president’s age has often come with speculation about the state of his mental faculties.
“We believe any questions related to person’s health are best discussed with their medical provider,” Alwin said. “Hard stop.”
In cases where Biden might mix up names or seem to forget details when delivering speeches, for instance, Alwin stressed “it’s crucial that we recognize age alone is not dictating speech abilities by any means.”
“The president has always acknowledged that he had a stutter since childhood,” she said. “And people can successfully overcome challenges such as that with therapy and practice regardless of their age.”
Asked whether, hypothetically, such speculation may be appropriate in cases where there is reason to suspect elected leaders may not be capable of executing their duties as a result of age-related conditions like memory loss, Alwin said “There are systems in place to assess the health and to explore these issues when necessary,” adding, “We believe in the current approach and the existing systems.”
Meanwhile, the presumptive Republican nominee challenging Biden for the White House, former President Donald Trump, is only three years younger ā and has, similarly, been accused of being or seeming too forgetful, too confused, and, of course, too old.
“Focusing only on age is a distraction,” Alwin said, “it shouldn’t be the sole determinant.”
Instead, she said, Americans “need to be able to assess candidates for elected office based on their skills, their knowledge, their experience” along with factors like “the individual’s ability and track record to do the job when it comes to doing the job.”
Ageism harms everyone
Alwin told the Blade that “ageism is the last -ism of many -isms that is still very socially acceptable,” but “it’s damaging in terms of preventing us from being able to make our best contributions and live our best lives.”
“With our first breath, we’re all aging,” she said ā and time and experience provide more “that we can bring to bear on all that we do: our work, our volunteerism, our contributions.”
So, at the National Council on Aging, “we really try to lift up the value of experience and wisdom and remind all of us that with the gift of longevity, with our first breath, we too are aging,” Alwin said.
“We are all living longer,” she added. “We should recognize the wisdom and experience that comes with those added years.”
Another unique feature about ageism, Alwin said, is that it works in both directions. For example, she said, one might be deemed either “too young to lead [or] too old to learn the new technology.”
Congress
House moves to block gender-affirming care for children of service members
Rules Committee approved NDAA on Monday
House Republicans added a provision to the annual must-pass military spending bill, filed over the weekend, that would prohibit the children of U.S. service members from accessing gender-affirming healthcare interventions.
President Joe Biden has promised to veto legislation that discriminates against the trans community, and the likelihood that the bill would pass through the U.S. Senate is uncertain with Democrats controlling the upper chamber until the 119th Congress is convened on Jan. 3.
Nevertheless, the GOP’s National Defense Authorization Act was passed along party lines by the U.S. House Rules Committee on Monday night, and a floor vote could come as early as Tuesday.
During the hearing yesterday, the committee’s top Democrat, U.S. Rep. Adam Smith (Wash.) said the NDAA negotiated by the chairs and ranking members of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees did not include this provision barring gender-affirming care and it was House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) who insisted that it be added after the fact.
Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is urging House Republicans to attach the Antisemitism Awareness Act, which is aimed at college campuses, to the NDAA, but Johnson reportedly wants the Democratic leader to put the bill to a floor vote on its own ā a move that would inhibit his party’s ability to confirm as many judicial nominees as possible before control of the upper chamber changes hands.
Smith’s office published a statement objecting to the anti-transgender language added by the Republican leader:
āFor the 64th consecutive year, House and Senate Armed Services Committee Democrats and Republicans worked across the aisle to craft a defense bill that invests in the greatest sources of Americaās strength: Service members and their families, science and technology, modernization, and a commitment to allies and partners.
Rooted in the work of the bipartisan Quality of Life Panel, the bill delivers a 14.5 percent pay raise for junior enlisted service members and 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It includes improvements for housing, health care, childcare, and spousal support.
House Armed Services Democrats were successful in blocking many harmful provisions that attacked DEI programs, the LGBTQ community, and womenās access to reproductive health care. It also included provisions that required bipartisan compromise. And had it remained as such, it would easily pass both chambers in a bipartisan vote.
However, the final text includes a provision prohibiting medical treatment for military dependents under the age of 18 who are diagnosed with gender dysphoria. Blanketly denying health care to people who clearly need it, just because of a biased notion against transgender people, is wrong. This provision injected a level of partisanship not traditionally seen in defense bills. Speaker Johnson is pandering to the most extreme elements of his party to ensure that he retains his speakership. In doing so, he has upended what had been a bipartisan process.
I urge the speaker to abandon this current effort and let the House bring forward a bill ā reflective of the traditional bipartisan process ā that supports our troops and their families, invests in innovation and modernization, and doesnāt attack the transgender community.ā
The Congressional Equality Caucus spoke out against the Republican NDAA with a statement by the chair, openly-gay U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), who said “In the last 72 hours, brave Americans who serve our nation in uniform woke up to the news that Republicans in Congress are trying to ban healthcare for their transgender children.”
Pocan continued, āFor a party whose members constantly decry ābig government,ā nothing is more hypocritical than hijacking the NDAA to override servicemembersā decisions, in consultation with medical professionals and their children, about what medical care is best for their transgender kids. The Congressional Equality Caucus opposes passage of this bill, and I encourage my colleagues to vote no on it.ā
Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson also issued a statement, arguing that āThis legislation has been hijacked by Speaker Mike Johnson and anti-LGBTQ+ lawmakers, who have chosen to put our national security and military readiness at risk for no other reason than to harm the transgender kids of military families.ā
āThe decisions that families and doctors make for the wellbeing of their transgender kids are important and complex, especially so for military families, and the last thing they need is politicians stepping in and taking away their right to make those decisions,” she said.
“When this comes up in the full House, lawmakers need to vote down this damaging and dehumanizing legislation,” Robinson added.
āThis is a dangerous affront to the dignity and well-being of young people whose parents have dedicated their lives to this countryās armed forces,ā said Mike Zamore, national director of policy and government affairs at the American Civil Liberties Union.
āMedical care should stay between families and their doctors but this provision would baselessly and recklessly inject politics into the health care military families receive,” he said. “Nobody should have to choose between serving the country and ensuring their child has the health care they need to live and thrive. Members of Congress must vote against the defense bill because of the inclusion of this deeply harmful, unconstitutional provision.ā
Congress
Protests against anti-trans bathroom policy lead to more than a dozen arrests
Demonstrations were staged outside House Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-La.) office
About 15 protestors affiliated with the Gender Liberation Movement were arrested on Thursday for protesting the anti-trans bathroom policy that was introduced by U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) and enacted last month by U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.).
Whistleblower Chelsea Manning and social justice advocates Raquel Willis and Renee Bracey Sherman were among those who were arrested in the women’s bathroom and the hallway outside Johnson’s office in the Cannon House Office Building.
Demonstrators held banners reading āFLUSH BATHROOM BIGOTRYā and āCONGRESS: STOP PISSING ON OUR RIGHTS!ā They chanted, āSPEAKER JOHNSON, NANCY MACE, OUR GENDERS ARE NO DEBATE!ā and “WHEN TRANS FOLKS ARE UNDER ATTACK WHAT DO WE DO? ACT UP, FIGHT BACK!”
Protests began around 12:10 p.m. ET. Within 30 minutes, Capitol Police arrived on the scene, began making arrests, and cleared the area. A spokesperson told Axios the demonstration was an illegal violation of the D.C. code against crowding, obstructing or incommoding.
Mace and her flame-throwing House GOP allies have said the bathroom policy was meant to target Sarah McBride, the Delaware state senator who will become the first transgender member of Congress after she is seated in January.
LGBTQ groups, elected Democrats, and others have denounced the move as a bigoted effort to bully and intimidate a new colleague, with many asking how the policy’s proponents would enforce the measure.
Outside her office in the Longworth House Office Building, the Washington Blade requested comment from Mace about the protests and arrests.
“Yeah, I went to the Capitol Police station where they were being processed, so I’ll be posting what I said shortly,” the congresswoman said.
Using an anti-trans slur, Mace posted a video to her X account in which she says, “alright, so some tranny protestors showed up at the Capitol today to protest my bathroom bill, but they got arrested ā poor things.”
“So I have a message for the protestors who got arrested,” the congresswoman continued, and then spoke into a megaphone as she read the Miranda warning. “If you cannot afford an attorney ā I doubt many of you can ā one will be provided to you at the government’s expense,” she said.
āEveryone deserves to use the restroom without fear of discrimination or violence. Trans folks are no different. We deserve dignity and respect and we will fight until we get it,ā Gender Liberation Movement co-founder Raquel Willis said in a press release.
āIn the 2024 election, trans folks were left to fend for ourselves after nearly $200 million of attack ads were disseminated across the United States,” she said. “Now, as Republican politicians, try to remove us from public life, Democratic leaders are silent as hell.”
Willis continued, “But we canāt transform bigotry and hate with inaction. We must confront it head on. Democrats must rise up, filibuster, and block this bill.ā
Politics
Trump nominates gay man for Treasury secretary
Hedge fund executive would be the second openly gay cabinet secretary
President-elect Donald Trump nominated openly gay hedge fund executive Scott Bessent as U.S. Treasury secretary on Friday.
Once a prolific donor to Democrats and a protege of liberal billionaire philanthropist George Soros, if confirmed Bessent would be the first LGBTQ official to lead the Treasury Department and the second gay cabinet secretary after Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.
“Trumpās selection of Bessent, who is also openly gay, married, and has two children with his partner, is also a reminder of President Trumpās love and respect for LGBT Americans,” the conservative LGBTQ group Log Cabin Republicans said in a statement.
āScott Bessent is a terrific choice to become the next Treasury Secretary and the Log Cabin Republicans applaud President Trump for his pick,” the organization wrote. “As one of the most brilliant minds in the financial space and a vocal supporter of President Trumpās economic agenda, Bessent will be a strong asset to help President Trump put America back on the path to financial security and economic prosperity.”
Equality Forum, a national LGBTQ civil rights organization, which oversees LGBT History Month, noted the nomination of Scott Bessent in a press release, writing that he “is highly regarded by the financial community and founder of a global macro investment firm.”
Equality Forum Executive Director Malcolm Lazin added, āIf confirmed, Bessent will be the highest ranking openly gay U.S. government official in American history.”
-
Rehoboth Beach1 day ago
Rehoboth Beachās iconic Purple Parrot is sold
-
Congress5 days ago
Protests against anti-trans bathroom policy lead to more than a dozen arrests
-
Opinions1 day ago
Navigating the holidays while estranged from ultra-religious, abusive parents
-
Books2 days ago
Mother wages fight for trans daughter in new book