Living
What does D.C.’s marijuana law mean for the community?
Local ordinances won’t protect businesses from federal prosecution
By JOHN J. MATTEO & LOGAN G. HAINE-ROBERTS
D.C. Code § 48-904.01 provides that persons over the age of 21 can possess relatively small amounts of marijuana for personal use, give some of that marijuana to others, and cultivate a few plants in their residence for personal use.
Washington, D.C., has legalized the recreational use of marijuana, allowing residents to smoke in their homes. Marijuana-smoking District residents may welcome this development, but their non-smoking neighbors and the residential communities where they live may have cause for concern. Non-smoking residents may have complaints about smoke entering their homes. Meanwhile, residential businesses catering to marijuana smoking residents may be concerned about their compliance with federal law.
While nearly half of the country has legalized marijuana use in some fashion, relatively few states have legalized recreational marijuana use. Among this small group of states, D.C.’s law is an anomaly. Unlike many of its counterparts, the District’s law does not allow the sale of marijuana. Instead, D.C. Code § 48-904.01 only provides that persons over the age of 21 can possess relatively small amounts of marijuana for personal use, give some of that marijuana to others, and cultivate a few plants in their residence for personal use. Moreover, smoking remains restricted to residences.
Longtime urban dwellers will recognize issues raised by a recent case as similar to past disagreements over cigarette smoke. Days after D.C.’s new law went into effect, a married couple filed a lawsuit in D.C. court alleging that their marijuana smoke wafting from the adjacent row house was harming their couple’s children. The judge hearing the case issued a temporary restraining order forbidding the neighbor from smoking anything in his home. The couple, both lawyers, has demanded $500,000 in damages in addition to the demand that the neighbor stop smoking.
In a past article for the Blade, we discussed the potential for conflicts such as these in the context of cigarette smoke, as well as their ramifications for condos and coop boards. Many of those steps apply to marijuana smoke as well. However, coops and condos may have more significant concerns with respect to marijuana smoke.
In short, the federal government still considers marijuana illegal. Marijuana is listed as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Schedule I controlled substances have a high potential for abuse, no accepted medical use, and no accepted protocol for medical use. In short, marijuana is among the most dangerous and least valued drugs according to the federal government. For reference, other Schedule I controlled substances include heroin, LSD and ecstasy.
The problem for coops and condo associations is that, while the District has legalized marijuana, the federal government has not. The law concerning conflicting state and federal law like this is fairly complicated, but federal courts have reached similar conclusions. Courts agree that businesses associated with marijuana use are subject to civil liability and possibly criminal prosecution by the federal government. Simply put, local laws legalizing marijuana will not protect businesses from contrary federal law.
The federal policy on marijuana implicates a number of laws applicable to coops, condo association, and even other businesses. For example, the Controlled Substances Act mentions real property owners and lenders specifically. The Act makes it illegal to knowingly lease or make available any place that is then used to produce or use a controlled substance. Therefore, landlords who are aware tenants residents are growing or using marijuana on the property may open themselves to criminal prosecution. As complaints arise between owners and renters, it may be harder for property owners and associations to ignore residents’ activities which are illegal under federal law.
The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention Act raises additional legal concerns for property owners. This law allows the federal government to seize drugs and associated items, including money and real property. In the event a tenant arouses the suspicion of federal law enforcement, property owners and lenders may find their property or collateral forfeited under the law. Notably, a property owner or lender does not even need to know about the illegal activity before the federal government seizes the property. While these repercussions may seem extreme, they are not unforeseeable.
The Bank Secrecy Act may be significant for local banks even though it would be more directly applicable to marijuana-based businesses, which remain largely illegal in D.C. Generally, the Act obligates banks to assist the federal government in policing criminal activity by watching for suspicious activity in clients’ transactions and filing reports as necessary. Banks need some understanding of their clients’ money to file these reports. Naturally, lending or holding money banks know to be associated with marijuana may expose them to liability and prosecution under the Act. If a bank somehow became aware that a significant portion of its’ clients money was associated with marijuana, it would have additional responsibilities and concerns under this Act.
Federal agencies have tried to placate businesses concerned about compliance with these laws. The Department of Justice has issued two memos discussing legalized marijuana. The memos suggest that enforcement by federal authorities may be less vigorous in these states, but the memos also reiterate that marijuana is illegal and exposes users and businesses to prosecution. The Treasury has acted similarly to address banks concerns about making loans to marijuana based-businesses. Specifically, Treasury policy now requires banks to file an additional form under the Bank Secrecy Act to address these issues. However, despite these and other steps by federal agencies, the general consensus is that the federal government has done little to clarify the operation of local and federal laws and even less to address business concerns. Consequently, local coops, banks, and businesses now face the unenviable task of trying to remain compliant with federal law while their clients make use of D.C.’s new law.
If a cooperative apartment or condominium community is experiencing an increasing number of complaints regarding marijuana smells, smoke, or perhaps related criminal activity and if remediation efforts have been unsuccessful, the Board should consider a building-wide smoking ban, and perhaps a ban on odiferous plants. Smoking marijuana is legal under state law, but as has been seen in the case of the D.C. temporary-restraining order, it does not make it less of a nuisance. Owners and boards should begin preparing for these conflicts now by seeking legal advice early. Bear in mind also, that Congress has a significant level of control over District issues, but has not, as of yet, intervened directly on this. Consequently, the situation could change rapidly.
These are just a few of the potential issues that are on the horizon given D.C.’s new law. Others include the effect of the law on records and drug testing in the workplace. These and other issues are certain to find their way to the courts as potential plaintiffs use the law as a defense to adverse actions from their communities and employers.
This is part of a series of articles by Jackson & Campbell on legal issues of interest to the LBGT community. Jackson & Campbell is a full-service law firm based in Washington with offices in Maryland and Virginia. If you have any questions, contact John J. Matteo at 202-457-1600 or [email protected]. If you have any questions regarding our firm, contact Don Uttrich, who chairs our Diversity Committee, at 202-457-4266 or [email protected].
The contents of this article are intended for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.
Real Estate
Under-the-radar Delaware beach towns smart buyers are targeting
There are other options if Rehoboth prices are scaring you off
Look, we love Rehoboth. We will always love Rehoboth. Queer folks have been flocking there since the 1940s, and with scores of LGBTQ-owned businesses and a Pride calendar packed tighter than the boardwalk in July, “Rehomo” earned its crown fair and square.
But let’s be honest with each other: trying to buy property there right now feels a lot like trying to get a reservation at the one good restaurant in town on a Saturday in August. Everyone wants in, inventory is tighter than your swim trunks after Labor Day brunch, and the prices have officially entered “are you kidding me” territory.
So here’s a thought: What if you didn’t fight the crowd? What if, instead, you let Rehoboth keep doing its glorious, chaotic, glitter-bomb thing and you quietly built your beach life 15 minutes away for considerably less drama and considerably more square footage? Here are four towns ready for their close-up.
Lewes: The Charming Overachiever
Lewes is what happens when a beach town actually has its life together. Historic charm, walkability, proximity to Cape Henlopen State Park, less crowding, and a strong year-round community. Unlike towns that turn into ghost towns after Labor Day, Lewes maintains a real community all year long, which is more than we can say for some situationships.
And right now, the market is practically begging you to make a move. It’s one of the most desirable and stable markets in the county — built for buyers thinking long-term, not flippers, and Sussex County overall has flipped into genuine buyer’s market territory for the first time in years. Translation: you finally get to be the one with leverage.
Bethany Beach: My Personal Pick
Full disclosure: I own in Bethany. So consider this section a little biased — and also the most honest thing I’ll tell you in this whole article.
When I drive down from D.C., I’m not looking for more of D.C. I love this city, but I also love leaving it — and yes, some of the people in it too (you know who you are, and so do I). Bethany gives me that full exhale. It’s quiet in the way that actually means something: fewer crowds, slower mornings, a soundtrack that’s mostly waves instead of nightlife. It leans hard into its “quiet resort” reputation, with low property taxes and a limited geographic footprint, and it is not the least bit sorry about it.
But quiet doesn’t mean isolated. I’ve got a genuinely excellent food scene nearby, real shopping, and a string of charming neighboring beach towns — and when I do want a taste of Rehoboth’s energy, it’s a short, easy drive away. I get to choose my dose of chaos instead of living inside it.
And here’s the part that matters most for this article: the price. If you’ve looked at Rehoboth listings and quietly closed the tab in despair, I need you to hear this — you can absolutely afford a beach house. It just doesn’t have to be in Rehoboth. Bethany’s average home value sits around $848,592, which is still real money, no question — but it buys you more house, more land, and more peace than the same budget gets you closer to the boardwalk. Bethany is welcoming too, just without Rehoboth’s decades of built-in queer institutional history — and for plenty of us, that trade-off is more than worth it.
Fenwick Island: Small Town, Big Flex
Fenwick rarely gets mentioned and, frankly, it should be insulted. It’s tiny, it’s quiet, and it has beach access without the carnival energy. The market data tends to lump it in with Bethany, where single-family oceanfront homes clear $1 million while entry-level condos start in the $600s — proof that “under-the-radar” doesn’t mean “bargain bin,” it means “fewer people fighting you for it.”
South Bethany: For the Boat Gays
Some of us want sand between our toes. Others want a private dock and a boat named something deeply unserious. South Bethany’s canal communities are built for the latter — water access on both sides, fewer crowds, and a lifestyle that says, “I have a captain’s hat and I am not afraid to wear it.”
The Math Works in Your Favor Now
Here’s the part that should really get your attention: Sussex County’s median sold price has dropped to $440,000, down 3.3% year-over-year, and buyers are routinely closing around 88 cents on the dollar compared to asking price. That’s a far cry from the unhinged bidding wars of 2021 and 2022, when overpaying was basically a competitive sport. Inventory across the county sits at nearly 2,500 active listings — the most of any county in Delaware, meaning you actually get to be picky for once. Revolutionary, we know.
And no, choosing one of these towns doesn’t mean leaving your people behind. Sussex Pride serves the entire county, not just Rehoboth proper, and CAMP Rehoboth’s resources extend well beyond town limits too. You’re not exiling yourself to the suburbs of queerness — you’re just getting a bigger kitchen, a quieter porch, and a much shorter line for the bathroom.
Add in the fact that Delaware has no estate tax and some of the lowest property taxes around, savings that genuinely add up over a retirement horizon, and the case writes itself. Rehoboth will always be the beating, sequined heart of queer beach culture in Delaware. But if you’ve been telling yourself a beach house isn’t in the cards — I’m here to tell you it absolutely is. It just might be 15 minutes south, with your own quiet porch, your own salt air, and considerably more room to breathe.
Have a real estate question or Rehoboth market tip? Reach out to [email protected] for LGBTQ-friendly real estate resources in the Rehoboth area.
Justin Noble is a Realtor licensed in D.C., Maryland, and Delaware with Monument Sotheby’s International Realty. Reach him at [email protected] or 302-897-7499.
Real Estate
‘Culture eats strategy for breakfast’
Real estate agents must adapt, learn how to manage from within
“Culture Eats Strategy for Breakfast” was a phrase often repeated in many of my management courses from the University of Illinois. The concept was discussed at length – how the best laid plans can sometimes be supported or derailed by the culture of the people involved in whichever project to be implemented. Whether it be a project to implement new software, roll out a new product or service, or just reaching a sales target, the way the team involved works together can indeed affect the outcome.
Perhaps this is just another way to say, “teamwork makes the dream work!” Most teams usually have someone who is designated as a leader. The leader can try to lead through authority and control or can alternatively try to lead through influence and encouraging a more collective framework for solving problems.
Why does this matter when picking the right real estate agent or team to work with? Besides having a job as a salesperson for the brokerage, the real estate agent is contractually bound to act on their client’s behalf. The buyer broker agreement is in place so that the agent and the client can work together as a team in communications regarding offer strategy, during negotiations, implementing marketing plans, as well as selecting which renovations or upgrades to choose before selling a property. After the property goes under contract, the job isn’t “done”. There is still work to do.
At this point, the agents then turn into a project manager of sorts – coordinating communications between the lending team, the title attorneys, the other client’s agents, any governmental agencies that could be involved in down payment assistance or helping to clear a property for a sale, and often times groups like a condo board, a home inspector, or contractors when arranging repairs and estimates before a final walk through.
In short, the agent takes on somewhat of a “leadership role” in the transaction and ensures that all the ducks stay in a row until the project is complete. That agent will hopefully be very fluid and forthcoming with their information, copying the required parties on all communications and creating a “paper trail” of who said what or didn’t offer to fix A, B, or C, so that all the minutiae of the contract can be addressed and fulfilled before the settlement date. The agent often must wear many hats and quickly learn the communication styles of an entire new set of people in a short period. One person may not return calls for a week after being contacted. Another person may go on vacation at the beginning of the process and not return emails for two weeks. Another person may wish to have daily updates of the progress of the process.
In this way – an agent quickly learns in each transaction that “culture can eat strategy for breakfast.” Because the agent must adapt to a wide variety of communication styles, learn how to “manage from within”, build support for closing the project by the due date, and somehow keep all the interested parties invested, engaged, and responsive.
Who you work with matters when picking the right person to represent you in your next transaction – so, just remember that “teamwork makes the dream work!”
Joseph Hudson is a referral agent with RLAH. Reach him at 703-587-0597 or [email protected].
Dear Michael,
I’ve been dating Mark for three years, living together for two, and I’m not sure he’s for me. We get along great but I’m questioning how attracted I am to him.
I was never crazy about him physically but he was such a sweet and smart guy that I wanted to date him.
Sex was never mind-blowing and the longer we’ve been together the more this is bothering me. I wonder if I could find someone who appeals to me more, physically.
On the plus side, I like him a lot. He has good values, shares my religious faith, which is hard to find in another gay guy, is responsible and has a good work ethic. Also, I just have fun with him and he’s always interested to hear what’s on my mind. He’s an all-around decent guy.
As I’m writing this, I’m thinking that he seems great and that I’m a fool for even questioning our relationship. But all my friends are always talking about the amazing sex they are having, and then I think I’m missing out on a key part of life because my sex life is comparatively lackluster.
I don’t want to settle. But how likely am I to find another guy who is as all-around a good catch as Mark, but with more sexual chemistry?
Michael replies:
I don’t think the right approach is to wonder about your chances for of finding someone better. Anyone you find will have things you aren’t crazy about.
For example, you might find someone whom you’re wildly attracted to sexually, but they’ll bore you or annoy you, or have values you don’t respect.
I understand that you aren’t wildly sexually attracted to Mark. The truth is that it’s extremely unlikely that you would remain wildly sexually attracted to anyone for that long. People tend to get used to each other over time. Sex can remain great, but more from closeness and love than heat and sizzle.
I work with people all the time who wonder if there is someone “better” out there. And I tell them, they’re never going to get through all the possibilities before they die. Instead, how about thinking if the guy you are with is someone you’d like to go with on this journey through life?
Mark’s attributes that you mention sound wonderful to me. After more than 30 years working with folks on relationships, and being in my own 30+ year relationship, I have learned a thing or two about what creates a relationship that is satisfying and good. A decent, kind guy with admirable values is an excellent start.
The question is, can you live with your sex life not being on an orgasmically hot mind-blowing level? I hope the answer is yes, because sex with anyone you pick is not likely to stay in that sort of realm for long.
Another point to consider: I don’t think you should get too caught up in what your friends are telling you. They may be having amazing sex, but are they all having it with the same long-term partner? As I mentioned, long-term sex can be great, but the excitement tends to be replaced by caring connection over time.
I’ll generalize here for a moment: Because so many gay men have many sexual partners, the kind of sex you have with someone new, whom you’re tremendously attracted to, tends to be glorified among gay men as the gold standard of sex. But it’s not realistic for sex with a long-term partner.
This glorification is a big problem: It leaves gay men who are not having torrid sex with lots of guys feeling like there is something wrong with the sex they are having, that they are missing out on something super fantastic. Just like you are feeling.
If you want a lifetime of ongoing hot sex, I don’t think you should be looking for a relationship. If you are willing to accept sex being a not-always fantastic, but perhaps consistently loving, often good, and occasionally great part of life with a kind decent guy, then Mark might just be the right partner for you after all.
(Michael Radkowsky, Psy.D. is a licensed psychologist who works with couples and individuals in D.C., Maryland, Virginia, New York, and all PSYPACT states. He can be found at michaelradkowsky.com. All identifying information has been changed for reasons of confidentiality. Have a question? Send it to [email protected].)
As Washington shifts right, Democratic Socialists gain ground
Susan Stewart could make history as Rehoboth’s first openly gay mayor
Silky Nutmeg Ganache talks sex and dating, gender, politics, weight loss journey
Madonna roundup: Reviews, sales, and love for ‘Danceteria’
Three overlooked court rulings limited White House anti-trans policies
‘Transcendent’ a tough but important read
Under-the-radar Delaware beach towns smart buyers are targeting
‘My Favorite Sociopath’ debuts at Shepherdstown’s CATF
In Trump’s divided America, Michael Weinstein’s AHF responds
