July 16, 2010 | by Chris Johnson
UAFA gets renewed push as clock ticks

U.S. Rep. Jared Polis (center) (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Supporters of immigration and LGBT rights are renewing their calls on Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform legislation this year that includes protections for bi-national same-sex couples.

At a press conference Thursday on Capitol Hill, several U.S. House members emphasized the importance of passing legislation to make the nation’s immigration laws more fair and enable LGBT Americans to sponsor their foreign partners for residency in the United States.

The strengthened call for passing comprehensive immigration reform comes as limited time remains in the legislative calendar for this Congress, raising questions about whether lawmakers will be able to address major legislation such as immigration reform this year.

Same-sex partners currently have no recourse under any portion of family law in the U.S. immigration code. The policy threatens to keep an estimated 36,000 bi-national same-sex couples from remaining together in the United States.

Among those who spoke in favor of passing immigration reform inclusive of this language is Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), who sponsors the Uniting American Families Act, a standalone bill that would address the situation for LGBT families.

Nadler said passing immigration reform that includes protections for the LGBT community is “absolutely essential.”

“In particular, binational LGBT couples must be granted the right to sponsor their permanent partners for immigration, just as other committed and straight married couples can,” he said.

Rep. Mike Honda (D-Calif.), the sponsor of another UAFA-inclusive bill known as the Reuniting Familes Act, also addressed the importance of passing such legislation.

Honda said “ending discrimination” against bi-national same-sex couples is “in line with American values and is good for our economy.”

“We know that American workers who have family by their side are happier, healthier and more able to succeed with this essential social safety net,” he said.

Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.), a pro-immigrant lawmaker, said passing inclusive legislation is politically viable.

“On a more political note, I am confident that we can pass immigration reform that includes the provisions of UAFA this year,” Gutierrez said, according to his prepared remarks. “Including UAFA makes the tent that much bigger and makes the coalition that much stronger.”

Late last year, Gutierrez introduced immigration legislation that was seen as a more liberal alternative to the working bill expected for introduction in Congress. Although his legislation at the time didn’t include UAFA-like language, he recently revealed his support for including bi-national LGBT families as part of immigration reform.

Other lawmakers who appeared at Thursday’s event to show their support for such legislation were Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.), a gay lawmaker and proponent of immigration reform, as well as Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.).

Erwin de Leon, a gay D.C. resident and Blade contributor, also called for UAFA-inclusive legislation at the press conference.

He said passage of such a bill would help him obtain a green card to remain in the United States with his spouse, whom he married earlier this year in D.C.

“Thanks to vagaries of the U.S. immigration system, I still do not have my green card, even though I consider the United States my home, have lived here legally for several years and in my heart know that I am as American as my native-born cousins,” he said.

Along with lawmakers, a coalition of 37 organizations — including LGBT, immigration and faith-based groups — joined in the the chorus of voices calling on Congress to act on immigration reform.

Immigration Equality, one of the organizations working to pass UAFA, is a leading voice among these groups. Other LGBT groups in this coalition include the Family Equality Council, the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force and the Human Rights Campaign.

Rachel Tiven, Immigration Equality’s executive director, said current law is taking LGBT families “and sending them into exile.”

“Together we will fight for immigration reform that protects all families,” she said. “We will organize, we will protest, we will demand that the Uniting American Families Act and the Reuniting Families Act be part of a just, humane and comprehensive immigration reform bill.”

Still, challenges remain in passing UAFA-inclusive legislation. Patrick Egan, a gay political science professor at New York University, said the chances of Congress passing reform inclusive of LGBT families are “pretty low.”

“It’s going to be very difficult to get the 60 votes together in the Senate to move the bill forward and they’re going to be reluctant to put anything in there that jeopardizes its passage,” Egan said. “And this, unfortunately, is one of those issues that can cause you to shed a few votes on the Republican side. And I would be very surprised if that would be in any bill that gets passed by the Senate and the House.”

Sean Theriault, a gay government professor at the University of Texas, Austin, said “there is no chance” that an immigration bill immigration reform will pass this year whether or not it includes UAFA-like language.

“The reason that Democratic leaders and the White House have begun talking about immigration is because it divides Republicans from Hispanics,” he said. “On that score alone, the bill very well may contain [this] language. It is easy to be in favor of wholesale reform when the chances of it passing our zilch.”

Still, Theriault said if Democrats had to start making concessions to pass immigration reform, he couldn’t imagine “they would sacrifice the entire bill for inclusive language.”

Capitol Hill observers expect the U.S. Senate to debate and vote on comprehensive immigration reform legislation before a bill is taken up in the U.S. House. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), chair of the Senate Judiciary immigration subcommittee, is expected to introduce the legislation in the Senate.

While the Senate bill has yet to be introduced, framework for the legislation made public earlier this year shows support for passing a bill inclusive of LGBT families.

In a brief interview with the Blade on Capitol Hill late last month, Schumer noted the UAFA language was in the framework for immigration reform legislation. Asked whether the provision would be in the bill upon introduction, Schumer replied, “I believe so.”

“I believe in it and I want to see it stay in,” Schumer said.

Asked when he would introduce the legislation, Schumer replied, “We have the proposal and we’re still trying to get some Republican support.”

Schumer said he’s talking to several Republican senators who would be original co-sponsors for the legislation, but declined to identify any lawmakers.

Although no U.S. senator attended Thursday’s press conference, Tiven said advocates wanted to emphasize the support of U.S. House members for UAFA-inclusive legislation.

“We wanted to show what the House is doing to match the Senate’s leadership on inclusive comprehensive immigration reform,” she said.

Julie Kruse, policy director for Immigration Equality, said her organization is planning additional events throughout the country to draw attention to passing UAFA-inclusive comprehensive immigration legislation.

She said cities in Florida, California, Texas, New York and Minnesota are potential places where these events would take place.

Chris Johnson is Chief Political & White House Reporter for the Washington Blade. Johnson attends the daily White House press briefings and is a member of the White House Correspondents' Association. Follow Chris

5 Comments
  • The Uniting American Familes Act is long overdue, and the Democrats in Congress should have held hearings, passed it out of committee and brought it to the floor for a vote in both chambers of Congress by now, but so far nothing…no action, not unlike a host of other Pro-LGBT bills that are pending in this Congress. What happened to the Domestic Partnership Benefits & Obligations Act? That bill has already been passed out of committees in the House & Senate and has been waiting for a floor vote by the full senate & house for a long time now. The leadership of both chambers only have to call for a vote on it, but they haven’t done a damn thing. I know the Republicans will undoubtably try to filibuster our bills, but for God’s sake make them put their money where their mouth is and vote on the bill. I suspect the Dems are avoiding the votes on these bills because they are afraid the LGBT community will see how many anti-gay Democrats there are in the House & Senate who will vote with the Republicans against our interests, and they don’t want the LGBT community to close their wallets at their fundraisers for the DNC, DSSC and DCCC. I sincerely hope the UAFA passes, but lets face it, we can’t even get them to hold hearings or committee votes, and time is running out for this congress!

  • I don’t understand why this bill gets priority over ENDA. UAFA affects a relatively small number of people (36,000 couples), while ENDA provides workplace protection to all LGBT people. As usual, the Gay lobbying effort is focused on the wrong issue. ENDA has been around for 35 years and is supported by an overwhelming majority of Americans. It needs to become law NOW!

    • Why this bill gets priority? I’m a US citizen living in another country because I can’t sponsor my boyfriend to live in the US. 36,000 insignificant to you? So many tears have been shed because of the hard choice of having to leave the US. It might be the worong issue for you, not for many others. Do you belive that the gay community wasn’t a significantly low minority when comparing to the rest of each countries population in the 10 countries that allow same sex marriage???? They had no chance of marriage equaity if it was left up for a populr vote. The same thing happens with the UAFA.

  • @Mistr Knucklz
    Wrong issue? You need ENDA to live with the person you love? Why do people think just because an issue isn’t the most related to you, it’s wrong!
    BTW, gay lobbying (HRC) has not been supported UAFA since last month. Efforts have been given from grassroot! So don’t go around and spread wrong facts!

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.
Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin