- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
Marriage in Maryland?
The 2011 legislative session opened this week in Maryland with high hopes that one of the bluest of blue states will finally enact marriage equality.
The composition of the state Senate’s committees got a big shakeup and there are now enough supporters of the same-sex marriage bill to send it to the floor for a vote, where it should pass by a comfortable margin.
Senate minority leader Allan Kittleman, in an act of desperation, even made a public call for a civil unions bill, a last-ditch effort to avert a vote on full equality. When the Republicans are calling for civil unions, you know the marriage train has left the station.
I worked for Kittleman’s father, Robert, many years ago. He was a longtime Republican Maryland delegate and senator who also served as president of the Howard County NAACP chapter. He was active in the Civil Rights movement. Many leaders of that movement have come to see marriage equality as the civil rights cause of our time and I like to think Robert Kittleman would have been on the right side of the debate. His son should honor that record and not stand in the way of progress on marriage.
Gov. Martin O’Malley may finally have the chance to sign a marriage equality bill. I’ve been hard on O’Malley on these pages over the past four years, after endorsing him for governor and supporting him as Baltimore mayor. He disappointed LGBT Marylanders after backing the state’s high court ruling rejecting same-sex marriage in 2007. At the time, O’Malley invited me to Annapolis for an on-the-record interview, which felt more like a confrontation. But I extracted a pledge from him during the interview — that he would sign a marriage equality bill if the legislature could pass it. I knew he wouldn’t expend any political capital fighting for it, so it would be up to the legislature and its LGBT caucus to advance the bill.
That work is now paying off and Sen. Richard Madaleno (D-Mont. County) deserves much of the credit. Madaleno and Del. Maggie McIntosh, who are both gay, along with key allies gay and straight, have worked hard behind the scenes to advance the bill. Assuming Republicans can’t filibuster it or overturn it via Prop 8-style ballot measure, Maryland’s same-sex couples could soon be walking the aisle. As a lifelong Marylander, it’s a development I never thought possible while growing up and testament to the dramatic pace of change occurring within the larger LGBT rights movement.
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.

view print edition
As someone who worked for the current Sen. Kittleman, I can assure you that his heart is in the right place. He has the most pro gay rights record of anyone in his caucus. Before passing judgement I encourage you to contact him and hear him out for yourself.
[Translate]
Maryland political leaders love to tell us how liberal they are, despite what the state’s history has to say. Maryland voters should pressure those leaders to stop telling us and start showing us.
Then again, in fairness, you should go into detail on Kittleman’s reasons for calling for a civil-unions bill.
[Translate]
We need to pressure Sen. Kittleman to get out of the way of progress. We need to find out if he is taking money from NOM.
[Translate]
To think that Allan Kittleman would be against civil rights is to truly not know the man. I know Senator Kittleman personally, and I can assure you that the reasons he has for calling it “civil union” versus “marriage” are very real. It has nothing to do with being separate and unequal, it has to do with giving the same respect to people who hold the religious context of the word dear, as he gives respect to his goal of true and total equality for ALL people under the law.
To say anything less of Sen. Kittleman is to simply not understand what he’s trying to do. Please talk to him before passing judgment in this way.
[Translate]