September 19, 2011 | by Chris Johnson
Court rules Prop 8 tapes should be public

A U.S. District Court in California has ruled that tape recordings should be made public of the trial for the federal lawsuit that led to the determination that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional.

In a 16-page ruling issued on Monday, U.S. District Judge John Ware determines “no compelling reasons exist” to keep the tapes of trial sealed away and orders the clerk of the court to place the recording in the publicly available record of the case.

“Foremost among the aspects of the federal judicial system that foster public confidence in the fairness and integrity of the process are public access to trials and public access to the record of  judicial proceedings,” Ware writes.

Ware issued a temporary stay on his order that will last until Sept. 30. Unless a further stay in granted by the district court, or a higher court, the tapes will be made public at that time.

U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker, who’s gay and now retired, determined last year that Prop 8 — a 2008 ballot initiative approved by California voters that ended same-sex marriage in the state — is unconstitutional. The case, known as Perry v. Brown, is now pending before the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The California State Supreme Court is considering whether or not defendants, the group known Protect Marriage, which was responsible for pushing Prop 8, have standing to appeal.

Plaintiffs contended the First Amendment establishes a strong presumption that the recordings should be open to the public. Defendants wanted the trial recording to remain under wraps because they argued they would in danger of reprisal supporters of same-sex marriage if the tapes were available.

But Ware in his ruling says defendants’ arguments aren’t enough of a reason to keep the recording away from the public.

“The Court finds that this contention is mere ‘unsupported hypothesis or conjecture,’ which may not be used by the Court as a basis for overcoming the strong presumptionin favor of access to court records,” Ware writes.

LGBT advocates praised Ware for the ruling that the tapes should be made publicly available.

Chad Griffin, board president for the American Foundation for Equal Rights, the organization behind the litigation, called the ruling “a significant victory for the American people, who will soon be able to see the evidence put forward by both sides in this historic federal trial.”

“Unlike political campaigns, in a court of law, the truth and facts are all that matter,” Griffin continued. “When witnesses take the stand, they are under oath and under penalty of perjury, and their statements are subjected to cross-examination and scrutiny. The public will soon see the extraordinarily weak case that the anti-marriage proponents presented in a desperate attempt to defend this discriminatory law.”

Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said the ruling “is a great victory for openness and transparency.”

“Our democracy depends on the public’s right to know what takes place inside our nation’s federal courts, especially in cases addressing fundamental constitutional rights that affect every person,” Minter said. “The proponents of Prop 8 should be ashamed for fighting to bar public access to this historic trial.”

Defendants are expected to appeal the ruling.

Chris Johnson is Chief Political & White House Reporter for the Washington Blade. Johnson attends the daily White House press briefings and is a member of the White House Correspondents' Association. Follow Chris

2 Comments
  • What are the prop 8 proponents trying to hide???

  • With the videos, on eg youtube, TV etc, people will see the lies and hateful inuendo of the “anything but Christians” Who hated blacks, Jews and Asians. And now gays are their latest victim.

    We as Americans should be ashamed of our human rights record. We were the next to last westernized nation to end slavery. Brazil was the last and its supreme court recently voted 10-0 that gays there must get equal legal rights. Same with Columbia’s supreme court

    We are rapidly headed for being the last or near so to give gays equal rights/benefits under civil law

    While virtually all of western Europe except Greece, and of course Italy, home of the church of the endless hidden molestation of children, have CUs or marriage for gays.

    Canada is doing just fine 6 years after gay marriage became nationwide. 6 countries in Latin America have CU’s or M for gays. 3 in E. Europe as the communist monstrosity is flushed away. Israel, RSA, Nepal, Israel, and about 10 others.

    But re the right wing churches Just Google (country name) – catholic church molestation. And be horrified.

    And more is coming to light about right wing evangelical churches. Its almost like being a conservative religious leader and hating gays go hand in hand with molesting children.

    http://www.religioustolerance.org/clergy_sex11.htm

    BTW the hate is simply another way to rile up the people and get more && in the collection plate.

    These “people” of the bible so conveniently forget that “the love of money is the root of all evil.”

    http://www.religioustolerance.org/clergy_sex11.htm

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.
Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin