- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-

Black Pride opening reception
-

White House Pride reception set for June 13
-

Puerto Rico House approves non-discrimination bill
-

Lesbian EEOC commissioner re-nominated for 2nd term
-

Obama praises Boy Scouts, but hopes for more change
-

Boy Scouts of America vote to partially end gay ban
-

Lesbian elected to AAPA board
Md. marriage referendum supporters submit 113,000 signatures
Same-sex marriage opponents claimed on Tuesday that they have collected enough signatures to place the issue before Maryland voters in November.
Derek McCoy, executive director of the Maryland Marriage Alliance, said during a Tuesday afternoon press conference outside the Maryland Secretary of State’s office in Annapolis that his organization submitted 113,000 signatures. They have yet to be certified, but the group submitted more than double the 55,736 signatures necessary to place the referendum on the ballot.
The Maryland Marriage Alliance hopes to collect 150,000 signatures by the June 30 deadline.
The group did not immediately return the Blade’s request for comment, but a Public Policy Polling survey last week found that 57 percent of Marylanders would vote for the same-sex marriage law that Gov. Martin O’Malley signed in March. The same PPP poll found that 55 percent of the state’s black voters back marriage rights for same-sex couples.
The Baltimore-based National Association for the Advancement of Colored People announced its support of nuptials for gays and lesbians during their National Board of Director’s quarterly meeting in Miami on May 19.
“Given the low bar for petitioning a law to the ballot in Maryland, we’ve always expected same-sex marriage opponents to meet that threshold and then some—up to their stated target of 150,000,” said Josh Levin, campaign director for Marylanders for Marriage Equality. “But don’t confuse meeting the legal requirement with intensity or measure of support. It’s clear those opposed to marriage equality are losing ground.”
Maryland Del. Heather Mizeur (D-Montgomery County) echoed Levin.
“We’ve always been planning to fight a referendum fight,” she told the Blade as she discussed the likely referendum. “We know when this comes to referendum we’re going to win. Public opinion is continuing to evolve rapidly and support is on our side.”
Tagged with Derek McCoy, Heather Mizeur, Homepage Headlines, Martin O'Malley, Maryland, Maryland Marriage Alliance, NAACP
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.
-
[...] supporters submit 113,000 signatures Washington Blade Tue, May 29, 2012 8:15 PM UTC Washington Blade Rate Loading … Share (function() { var po = document.createElement('script'); [...]
-
[...] a role to preserve marriage equality in Maryland. Opponents of same-sex marriage in Maryland have already submitted 113,000 signatures to put marriage equality on the ballot, which far exceeds the necesary 55,736 names, so the initiative will likely be on the [...]
-
[...] a role to preserve marriage equality in Maryland. Opponents of same-sex marriage in Maryland have already submitted 113,000 signatures to put marriage equality on the ballot, which far exceeds the necesary 55,736 names, so the initiative will likely be on the [...]
-
[...] a role to preserve marriage equality in Maryland. Opponents of same-sex marriage in Maryland have already submitted 113,000 signatures to put marriage equality on the ballot, which far exceeds the necesary 55,736 names, so the initiative will likely be on the [...]
-
[...] on the State Board of Elections’ website late Thursday shows that officials have validated 70,039 of the roughly 113,000 signatures that the Maryland Marriage Alliance submitted on May 29. Referendum supporters needed to collect 55,736 signatures by the end of this month to put the [...]


view print edition
I know it looks like the [EXPLETIVE REMOVED] anti-gay forces will get the ballot measure on the ballot for this election, but I still hold out some hope it won’t get that far and they will fail to get the signatures they need. If they do get it on the ballot, I am encouraged by the poll results that we can keep mariage equality with a public vote.
[Translate]
Well the [EXPLETIVE REMOVED] anti-gay bigts appear to have the signatures to put our civil rights up for a public vote; now lets make sure these rotten [EXPLETIVE REMOVED] rue the day they did it by beating them on Election Day and retaining marriage equality in Maryland.
[Translate]
Can someone please explain to me why no one has launched a pre-emptive legal strike against Bishop Harry Jackson and other religious opponents of marriage equality for gay and lesbian couples by suing them under the federal RICO Act for conspiracy to deprive gay and lesbian Americans of their constitutuiona right to equal protection of the laws under the 14th Amendment?
Can someone explain to me why they are not being sued for conspiring to violate the constitutioal separation of church and stateby imposing their homophobic religious doctrine into the laws of the state?
WHY ARE THESE HOMOPHOBIC THEOCRATS BEING ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH THIS?
[Translate]
Seems to me that all of the hating that is going around is caused by gay people, who are the true haters in this debate.
[Translate]