National
BREAKING: Senate may vote today on ‘Don’t Ask’ repeal
Legislation could come up if cloture fails on four other bills
UPDATE #1: Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn. )released a statement on Wednesday asserting that Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) is working “in good faith” to advance repeal of the military’s gay ban. He added, “It is now more clear than ever that we have 60 or more votes in support of repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,’ so it is vitally important to reach agreement on the right process to move forward.”
UPDATE: Statement from R. Clarke Cooper, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans: “FYI. I’ve communicated with twenty Republican Senate offices today. All were surprised about the announcement for a cloture vote this evening and all were understandably interested to see if the Majority Leader would make room for Republican amendments on the NDAA. Talk ranges from 7 to 12 up to 15 amendments for our side. Many offices, including Brown, noted the need to complete the tax relief legislation prior to work on the NDAA.”
_____________
Senate leadership may bring to the floor today major defense legislation containing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal if cloture isn’t invoked on four other bills scheduled for a vote, according to informed sources.
Fred Sainz, the Human Rights Campaign’s vice president of communications, said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) could make an attempt to bring to the floor early in the afternoon the fiscal year 2011 defense authorization bill.
“It’s completely situational depending on whether or not there is time available on the Senate floor — depending on whether or not those other motions pass their cloture votes,” Sainz said.
Cloture votes are scheduled today on four pieces of legislation: the DREAM Act, an immigration-related bill, legislation to provide compensation to 9-11 workers, a bill that would provide a one-time $250 payment to senior citizens and collective bargaining legislation for firefighters.
If cloture is invoked on any of those four items, Sainz said chances are the Senate wouldn’t move forward with the defense authorization until sometime later during the lame duck session.
According to Sainz, a simple majority would first be needed in the Senate to reconsider the defense authorization bill. When Reid offers the motion to proceed, 60 votes would be required to begin debate on the legislation.
It remains to be seen whether the necessary 60 votes are present to move forward with the bill. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has pledged to object to the motion to proceed.
Additionally, all 42 members of the Republican caucus last week signed a letter stating that they would oppose any attempt to move forward with other legislation before addressing a continuing resolution to fund the U.S. government and the extension of the Bush-era tax cuts. Both legislative items have yet to come to the Senate floor.
Also, many senators have said they would vote in favor of the motion to proceed on the defense authorization bill only under a more open amendment process than what was proposed in September when Senate leadership previously made an attempt to bring the legislation to the floor.
Sources have said Reid has been in negotiations with Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) to reach an agreement on the amendments that would attract Republican support to move forward.
“The U.S. Senate has a chance to make history with this cloture vote by including openly gay service in the defense bill and finally joining many of our NATO allies in Afghanistan who adopted inclusive policies years ago,” Aaron Belkin, director of the Palm Center, said in a statement.
State Department
Democracy Forward files FOIA request for State Department bathroom policy records
April 20 memo outlined anti-transgender rule
Democracy Forward on Tuesday filed a Freedom of Information Act request for records on the State Department’s new bathroom policy.
A memo titled “Updates Regarding Biological Sex and Intimate Spaces, Including Restrooms” that the State Department issued on April 20 notes employees can no longer use bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity.
“The administration affirms that there are two sexes — male and female — and that federal facilities should operate on this objective and longstanding basis to ensure consistency, privacy, and safety in shared spaces,” State Department spokesperson Tommy Piggot told the Daily Signal, a conservative news website that first reported on the memo. “In line with President Trump’s executive order this provides clear, uniform guidance to the department by grounding policy in biological sex as determined at birth.”
President Donald Trump shortly after he took office in January 2025 issued an executive order that directed the federal government to only recognize two genders: male and female. The sweeping directive also ordered federal government agencies to “effectuate this policy by taking appropriate action to ensure that intimate spaces designated for women, girls, or females (or for men, boys, or males) are designated by sex and not identity.”
Democracy Forward’s FOIA request that the Washington Blade exclusively obtained on Tuesday is specifically seeking a copy of the memo that details the State Department’s new bathroom policy. Democracy Forward has also requested “all” memo-specific communications between the State Department’s Bureau of Global Public Affairs and the Daily Signal from April 1-21.
Federal Government
House Republicans push nationwide ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill
Measures would restrict federal funding for LGBTQ-affirming schools
Republicans have been gaining ground in reshaping education policy to be less inclusive toward LGBTQ students at the state level, and now they are turning their focus to Capitol Hill.
Some GOP lawmakers are pushing for a nationwide “Don’t Say Gay” bill, doubling down on their commitment to being the party of “traditional family values” by excluding anyone who does not identify with their sex at birth.
The largest anti-LGBTQ education legislation to reach the House chamber is House Bill 2616 — the Parental Rights Over the Education and Care of Their Kids Act, or the PROTECT Kids Act. The PROTECT Kids Act, proposed by U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), and co-sponsored by U.S. Reps. Burgess Owens (R-Utah), Mary Miller (R-Ill.), Robert Onder (R-Mo.), and Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.), would require any public elementary and middle schools that receive federal funding to require parental consent to change a child’s gender expression in school.
The bill, which was discussed during Tuesday’s House Rules Committee hearing, would specifically require any schools that get federal money from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 — which was created to minimize financial discrepancies in education for low-income students — to get parental approval before identifying any child’s gender identity as anything other than what was provided to the school initially. This includes getting approval before allowing children to use their preferred locker room or bathroom.
It reads that any school receiving this funding “shall obtain parental consent before changing a covered student’s (1) gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on any school form; or (2) sex-based accommodations, including locker rooms or bathrooms.”
LGBTQ rights advocates have criticized both national and state efforts to require parental permission to use a child’s preferred gender identity, as it raises issues of at-home safety — especially if the home is not LGBTQ-affirming — and could lead to the outing of transgender or gender-curious students.
A follow-up bill, HB 2617, proposed by Owens, one of the bill’s co-sponsors, prevents the use of federal funding to “advance concepts related to gender ideology,” using the definition from President Donald Trump’s 2025 Executive Order 14168, making that an enshrined definition in law of sex rather than just by executive order. There is also a bill making its way through the senate with the same text— Senate Bill 2251.
Advocates have also criticized this follow-up legislation, as it would restrict school staff — including teachers and counselors — from acknowledging trans students’ identities or providing any support. They have said that this kind of isolation can worsen mental health outcomes for LGBTQ youth and allows for education to be politicized rather than being based in reality.
David Stacy, the Human Rights Campaign’s vice president of government affairs, called this legislation out for using LGBTQ children as political pawns in an ideology fight — one that could greatly harm the safety of these children if passed.
“Trans kids are not a political agenda — they are students who deserve safety and affirmation at school like anyone else,” Stacy said in a statement. “Despite the many pressing issues facing our nation, House Republicans continue their bizarre obsession with trans people. H.R. 2616 does not protect children. It targets them. This bill is cruel, and we’re prepared to fight it.”
This is similar to Florida House Bills 1557 and 1069, referred to as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill and “Don’t Say They” bill, respectively, restricting classroom discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity, prohibiting the use of pronouns consistent with one’s gender identity, expanding book banning procedures, and censoring health curriculum.
The American Civil Liberties Union is tracking 233 bills related to restricting student and educator rights in the U.S.
National
BREAKING NEWS: Shots fired at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner
Shooter reportedly opened fire inside hotel
Four loud bangs were heard in the International Ballroom of the Washington Hilton during the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner on Saturday.
According to the Associated Press, a shooter opened fire inside the hotel outside the ballroom.
Attendees could hear four loud bangs as people started to duck and take cover. During the chaos sounds of salad and glasses were dropped as hotel employees, and guests ducked for cover.
The head table — which included President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, first lady Melania Trump, and White House Correspondents Association President Weijia Jiang — were rushed off stage.
“The U.S. Secret Service, in coordination with the Metropolitan Police Department, is investigating a shooting incident near the main magnetometer screening area at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner,” the U.S. Secret Service said in a statement. “The president and the First Lady are safe along all protects. One individual is in custody. The condition of those involved is not yet known, and law enforcement is actively assessing the situation.”
Trump held a press conference at the White House after he left the hotel.
“A man charged a security checkpoint armed with multiple weapons and he was taken down by some very brave members of Secret Service,” said Trump.
Trump said the shooter is from California. He also said an officer was shot, but said his bullet proof vest “saved” him.
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, interim D.C. police chief Jeffrey Carroll, U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro, and other officials held their own press conference at the hotel.
Carroll said the gunman who has been identified as Cole Tomas Allen was armed with a shotgun, handgun, and “multiple” knives when he charged a Secret Service checkpoint in a hotel lobby. Carroll also told reporters that law enforcement “exchanged gunfire with that individual.”
Both he and Bowser said the gunman appeared to act alone.
“We are so very thankful to members of law enforcement who did their jobs tonight and made sure all guests were safe,” said Bowser. “Nobody else was involved.”
The Washington Blade will update this story as details become more available.
-
National4 days agoBREAKING NEWS: Shots fired at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner
-
District of Columbia4 days agoCommunity mourns passing of D.C. trans rights advocate SaVanna Wanzer
-
Movies4 days agoAn acting legend meets his match in ‘The Christophers’
-
Theater3 days agoWorld premiere of ‘Everything, Devoured’ oozes queer energy
