January 19, 2012 at 8:00 pm EST | by Lou Chibbaro Jr.
Activists skeptical about Hunter’s marriage views

Gay activists in Ward 5 have expressed skepticism over a candidate for the ward’s Council seat who says he no longer opposes the city’s same-sex marriage law.

Council candidate Delano Hunter, a Democrat, told the Blade last week that he no longer believes the marriage equality law should be subjected to a voter referendum, reversing his position from 2010 when he unsuccessfully ran for the Ward 5 seat against incumbent Harry Thomas (D).

The D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics officially declared the Ward 5 seat vacant on Tuesday, nearly two weeks after Thomas resigned shortly before pleading guilty to embezzling more than $300,000 in city funds. The board scheduled a special election on May 15 to fill the seat.

Meanwhile, since Hunter told the Blade he’s changed his position on the marriage bill, rival Ward 5 candidate Kenyan McDuffie, also a Democrat, joined gay activists in the ward to question Hunter’s sincerity, noting that Hunter stressed strong support for “traditional marriage” during his campaign for the Council seat in 2010.

McDuffie sent a statement to the Blade pointing out that he declared his full support for same-sex marriage when he, too, ran for the Ward 5 Council seat against Hunter and Thomas in the September 2010 Democratic primary.

“Undeniably, Mr. Hunter’s position on gay marriage today runs counter to the views he espoused on the campaign trail merely 15 months ago,” McDuffie said in his statement. “This is a classic case of a candidate analyzing voter returns and making a calculated decision to appeal to a constituency that he previously had written off.”

McDuffie added, “On the other hand, my record demonstrates my unwavering support for the LGBT community as well as my firm belief that tolerance and open-mindedness must pervade even where differing opinions collide.”

Political observers say both candidates have impressive credentials that could make them attractive to Ward 5 voters. Hunter, a native D.C. resident, worked as a company diversity specialist with the Nike Corporation in Oregon before returning to D.C. to become a Ward 5 community organizer. McDuffie, an attorney, worked in the Justice Department’s civil rights division as a trial lawyer.

In its candidate ratings for the 2010 Democratic primary, the Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance gave Hunter a score of -2 on a scale of +10 to -10. GLAA gave McDuffie a score of “0.” The group said the two were given low ratings because neither of them returned a GLAA questionnaire that asks candidates about their positions on a wide range of LGBT-related issues.

Failure to return the questionnaire results in an automatic “0” rating unless the group has information about a candidate’s record on LGBT issues, GLAA officials have said. In this case, the group only knew of Hunter’s call for a referendum to overturn the marriage bill and of support he received from anti-gay groups, information considered hostile to LGBT rights.

Hunter told the Blade his campaign’s failure to return the GLAA questionnaire was an “oversight.” A McDuffie campaign spokesperson noted that McDuffie returned a questionnaire to the Gertrude Stein Democratic Club, the city’s largest LGBT political group, and expressed strong support for LGBT rights in his answers. He sent a copy of his answers to the Blade.

In an interview with the Blade last week, Hunter disputed claims by critics that his call for a referendum on the gay marriage bill was the focus of his 2010 campaign. He acknowledged that anti-gay groups opposed to the marriage equality bill endorsed him and spent large sums of money attacking incumbent Thomas, who voted for the same-sex marriage bill.

But Hunter noted that the anti-gay groups released ads attacking Thomas through an independent expenditure campaign over which he had no control.

He declined to say whether he would have voted for or against the marriage equality bill if he had been on the Council in 2009 when the Council approved the measure.

“I would like him to not only say he won’t overturn it but to say he supports it,” said gay Democratic activist Peter Rosenstein. “He should also state that he will not seek or take support from homophobic groups like the National Organization for Marriage if we are truly to believe this conversion in his beliefs.”

Ward 5 gay Democratic activist Barrie Daneker said Hunter would have to put forward specific proposals for supporting and advancing LGBT rights in the city before he can count on support from the LGBT community.

“Taking a new position at the 11th hour in order to appeal to a wider base of Ward 5 voters will do nothing for his campaign,” Daneker said. “We need concrete accomplishments and plans prior to giving support to a so-called ‘reformed anti-gay’ candidate,” he said.

Ward 5 political observers have said as many as seven or eight other candidates were considering entering the Ward 5 special election contest. Among them are Anita Bonds, the LGBT supportive chair of the D.C. Democratic State Committee, and Tim Day, the gay Republican who ran and lost against Thomas in the November 2010 general election.

According to Washington Post political analyst Mike DeBonis, Day made a comment likely to startle the city’s gay Republican leaders when responding to DeBonis’s question of whether he planned to run for the Ward 5 seat as a Republican in the May special election. “That’s an interesting question,” DeBonis quoted him as saying.

Many political observers have praised Day, an accountant, as a highly qualified candidate who would have little or no chance of winning election as a Republican in a Ward with an overwhelming majority of Democratic voters. Day lost to Thomas by a lopsided margin in 2010. But should Day change party affiliation to become a Democrat or an independent, his chances of becoming the Council’s third out gay member would increase in the eyes of some political observers.

Lou Chibbaro Jr. has reported on the LGBT civil rights movement and the LGBT community for more than 30 years, beginning as a freelance writer and later as a staff reporter and currently as Senior News Reporter for the Washington Blade. He has chronicled LGBT-related developments as they have touched on a wide range of social, religious, and governmental institutions, including the White House, Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court, the military, local and national law enforcement agencies and the Catholic Church. Chibbaro has reported on LGBT issues and LGBT participation in local and national elections since 1976. He has covered the AIDS epidemic since it first surfaced in the early 1980s. Follow Lou

  • Just like Conservatives being skeptical about Romney’s views – Fully Justified.

  • Identifying Friends and Foes
    (Delano Hunter’s Stealth 2012 Candidacy)…
    “I believe in traditional marriage, point blank. That’s not something I’m going to waffle on.”
    — Delano Hunter
    (‘The Politics Hour’ w/ Kojo Nnamdi, September 10, 2010)

    See NOM’s outrageous direct mail to Ward 5 residents on behalf of Delano Hunter in 2010 here:
    “But Hunter noted that the anti-gay groups released ads attacking Thomas through an independent expenditure campaign over which he had no control.

    He declined to say whether he would have voted for or against the marriage equality bill if he had been on the Council in 2009 when the Council approved the measure.”
    That really says it all, doesn’t it? It is a matter of indisputable public record. Delano Hunter opposed marriage equality just over 16 months ago. Also in that recent campaign, without protest or apology– before or after the fact– Delano Hunter tacitly accepted the support of NOM and their virulent anti-gay, direct mail campaign to Ward 5 residents.

    So why is Hunter trying to deny, soft-soap and/or dodge those facts now? Why is Hunter continuing to pander to the same Marriage Equality opponents in Ward 5 now? In a recent posting Ward 5’s Kathryn Pearson-West, a sometime Delano Hunter booster, apparently doesn’t believe Hunter’s taking money and/or virulent anti-gay support from NOM was a bad thing.

    THE real issue questions Ward 5 and LGBT residents citywide are asking of Delano Hunter are as basic as they come.

    Given Delano Hunter’s recent anti-gay stances and demonizing, anti-gay support from NOM, can DC’s LGBT residents trust him to be one of the 15 highest elected officials in DC? Is Delano Hunter more likely to be a FRIEND or FOE of LGBT civil rights interests?

    Unlike Vincent Orange and Kenyan McDuffie, Hunter apparently can not point to any personal or professional effort in his history on behalf of LGBT civil rights at all.

    Hunter’s stealth candidacy is not about successfully fooling LGBT voters in Ward 5, as much as it is about fooling our straight friends and neighbors in Ward 5– many of whom were appalled at the anti-gay mailings of NOM on Hunter’s behalf.

    Respectfully differing from Peter and Barrie, Ward 5 voters, and our allies across the city need to set a significantly higher bar in support LGBT issues and civil rights. And those candidates who have fallen so far short of that mark– and so very recently– should be quickly rejected by voters.

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2021. All rights reserved.