Health
Pharmacies accuse D.C. of threatening AIDS drug program
Health director says HIV patients will get drugs on time

A decision by the D.C. Department of Health to terminate its contract with a local pharmacy chain that has administered the city’s AIDS Drug Assistance Program, or ADAP, could prevent patients who rely on the program from refilling their prescriptions after July 1. (Photo by Dvortygirl via Wikimedia)
A representative of at least 15 D.C. pharmacies dispensing prescription drugs for low income people with HIV and AIDS and the director of the city’s Department of Health gave conflicting views this week on whether patients’ ability to refill their prescriptions for life-saving AIDS drugs will be disrupted beginning July 1.
A decision by DOH to terminate its contract with the local pharmacy chain Care Pharmacies that has administered the city’s AIDS Drug Assistance Program, or ADAP, was expected to prompt an as yet undetermined number of pharmacies to discontinue serving ADAP patients, potentially preventing the patients from obtaining the drugs when their current prescriptions run out, according to pharmacist Michael Kim, owner of Grubbs Pharmacy.
“This is going to be an absolute disaster,” said pharmacist Tamara Foreman, a member of the D.C. Board of Pharmacies, an independent entity that advises the city on pharmacy related matters.
“The patients are not being notified,” said Foreman, who also serves on the board of a non-profit organization that advocates on behalf of pharmacy patients. “They are being told to anticipate a gap in service, but they’re not being told where to go if their pharmacy stops filling their prescription.”
Dr. Mohammad Akhter, director of the DOH, and Dr. Gregory Pappas, director of DOH’s HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Disease, and Tuberculosis Administration (HAHSTA), strongly dispute that assessment. Both told the Blade that no ADAP patients will be adversely impacted by the pharmacy related changes DOH is putting in place.
“We are providing the patients with a 60-day supply of drugs during the transition period,” Akhter told the Blade on Wednesday at a news conference on the release of the city’s 2011 Annual Report on its efforts to combat HIV/AIDS.
“I can tell you that no patients will be harmed in any way,” said Akhter.
He said DOH recently decided to postpone for one month the implementation of the revamped ADAP pharmacy program.
But he and Pappas declined to disclose how many pharmacies involved in the existing ADAP program operated by Care Pharmacies and how many others have opted to join the revised program to be operated directly by DOH.
Some AIDS activists, including Patricia Hawkins, a former Whitman-Walker Health official and member of the D.C.-area HIV Planning Council, have expressed concern that patients’ ability to refill their ADAP prescriptions could be jeopardized if too few pharmacies agree to be part of the new DOH pharmacy network.
Kim said Grubbs planned to stop serving ADAP patients beginning July 1, when the new city-administered program was originally scheduled to go into effect. Kim couldn’t be immediately reached to determine whether Grubbs would continue filling ADAP prescriptions for another month following DOH’s decision to postpone the new program.
Kim indicated in an earlier interview that DOH might postpone implementation of the new program, but said DOH had not informed Care Pharmacies that it planned to do so.
He and others familiar with the ADAP program said they were told by the city that a list of the participating pharmacies in the new program would be released on June 15.
The city didn’t release such a list on that date, prompting pharmacists and activists to fear that too few pharmacies would join the new system to adequately serve ADAP patients in need of prescriptions.
Kim said Grubbs, which is believed to have processed the largest number of ADAP prescriptions in D.C. over the past decade, isn’t signing up for the city’s revamped program because the DOH has cut in half its reimbursement payment for ADAP drug prescriptions and plans to keep the lower payment in place for the next five years.
He said the lower payment makes it too costly for Grubb and other pharmacies to process ADAP prescriptions. He acknowledged that Care Pharmacies currently collects the reimbursement for the prescriptions from the city, takes a cut to cover its own administrative costs and disburses the remaining amount of about $7 per prescription to the other pharmacies in the current program. The city was expected to dispense the reimbursement directly to each pharmacy under the new system.
ADAP, a joint federal-state program, was created under the Ryan White AIDS Care Act in the early 1990s as a means of providing life-saving AIDS drugs to low-income patients as well as symptom-free people with HIV who don’t have private health insurance coverage and can’t afford to pay for the drugs.
Many of the HIV medications, such as anti-retroviral drugs, cost between $1,000 to as much as $2,000 for a one-month prescription, AIDS advocacy groups familiar with ADAP have said.
A staffer with the city’s AIDS administration, who isn’t authorized to speak to the media, said DOH chose to set up its own network of local pharmacies to process ADAP drug prescriptions rather than renew Care Pharmacies’ contract to “expand the options” for patients.
The staffer said DOH wanted to bring in more pharmacies and different types of pharmacies, including those providing mail order services, into the ADAP network beyond the 24 that have been participating under the Care Pharmacies network.
Kim, who serves on the Care Pharmacies board of directors, said that in addition to about 24 pharmacies that are part of the Care Pharmacies franchise, several unaffiliated pharmacies were part of Care’s ADAP network. Among them was Whitman-Walker Health, the city’s largest private AIDS services provider, which has its own in-house pharmacy. Others included the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, a worldwide AIDS care provider that has an in-house pharmacy in its D.C. office; and Safeway supermarket stores, which also have in-house pharmacies.
Foreman said the non-profit group CMS Health Initiative, with which she is affiliated, has provided quality control training and supervision under a city contract to ensure that D.C. pharmacies dispensing ADAP drugs meet the city’s requirements under the ADAP program operated by Care Pharmacies.
She said that in order to be approved by the city to dispense ADAP drugs, a pharmacy is required to provide patient counseling and a series of other patient-related services, including checks to make sure patients remain compliant with their drug regimen and don’t drop out of the program, placing their health at risk. She said all pharmacies in the program must provide free delivery service to patients.
Foreman and Kim also noted that under rules established by the D.C. DOH, pharmacies participating in the city’s ADAP program are reimbursed under a drug “replenishment” system. The system, which saved money for the city, requires the pharmacies to pay wholesale pharmaceutical supplies the first month’s prescription for all new patients. The city then replenishes the pharmacies with supplies of drugs for all subsequent prescriptions.
Kim said the system requires a pharmacy to pay out of pocket for the first prescription, which could come to between $1,000 and $2,000. He said he now fears that the expected fewer number of pharmacies that join the city’s in-house network will be hit by dozens of patients dropped from the pharmacies like Grubb’s, that choose not to join the new network.
“They could be facing an initial payment of $40,000 in a single month,” Kim said. “Many of them just can’t absorb that. They are small, independent pharmacies.”
One city government source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Care Pharmacy and its representatives were exaggerating the potential harm the changes will have on patients because the city has ended what the source called a “sweetheart deal” for Care Pharmacies.
Kim disputes claims by sources from the DOH that the new city-operated network will include improved services and options over and above the Care Pharmacies contract.
“Basically, in my opinion, it’s all about money,” he said. “They feel that they are paying too much for the ADAP program. If you look at their program, they just took the current program that’s being run by Care Pharmacies and then they put it out and stamped it with their name and they cut the reimbursement in half. And that’s it,” he said.
“So if they say they’ve improved the program somewhat that’s a flat out lie because they haven’t done anything to the program except cut the reimbursement in half.
He said the current per-prescription reimbursement to Care Pharmacies is $20.50. DOH has invited pharmacies to apply to be accepted into the new program for a reimbursement of $10.50, he said.
“I can tell you that $10.50 was the rate that was given to us about 10 years ago,” Kim said. “It just doesn’t cover the costs.”
Whitman-Walker and AIDS Healthcare Foundation are among the local pharmacy providers that have signed up to be part of the new city ADAP network, representatives of the two organizations said.
Jerame Zelner, regional director of AIDS Healthcare Foundation’s pharmacies, said AHF is “very concerned” that many ADAP patients in D.C. will be unable to refill their prescriptions if a large number of local pharmacies that once participated in the program don’t join the new city network.
“We are taking steps to step in and help,” he said, noting that AHF, with a multi-million dollar budget, has the financial cushion to absorb the cost of a first month’s supply of drugs that other smaller pharmacies may not have.
AIDS Healthcare Foundation’s offices and pharmacy are located at 2141 K St., N.W., Suite 606. Zelner said that AHA, like all pharmacies participating in the current and soon-to-be started ADAP pharmacy network, provides fill delivery services for prescription drugs.
Hawkins of the HIV Planning Council said the Council is also concerned about patients not being able to fill prescriptions during the transition into the new program.
“No one from the city has told us how many pharmacies are dropping out and how many will be joining the new system,” she said. She said the Planning Council would be taking up the issue at an executive committee meeting on June 21.
Don Blanchon, Whitman-Walker’s executive director, said he doesn’t believe patients will suffer under the new system and said Whitman-Walker looks forward to its participation in the new program.
According to Blanchon, a decision during the past few years by the city to transfer many of its ADAP patients to the city’s Medicaid program has significantly decreased the number of remaining ADAP patients.
“There are currently around 500 ADAP patients and Whitman-Walker has 400 of them,” he said.
He said he doesn’t think city pharmacies should have a problem dispensing prescription drugs to the remaining 100.
District of Columbia
Trans activists arrested outside HHS headquarters in D.C.
Protesters demonstrated directive against gender-affirming care
Authorities on Tuesday arrested 24 activists outside the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services headquarters in D.C.
The Gender Liberation Movement, a national organization that uses direct action, media engagement, and policy advocacy to defend bodily autonomy and self-determination, organized the protest in which more than 50 activists participated. Organizers said the action was a response to changes in federal policy mandated by Executive Order 14187, titled “Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation.”
The order directs federal agencies and programs to work toward “significantly limiting youth access to gender-affirming care nationwide,” according to KFF, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that provides independent, fact-based information on national health issues. The executive order also includes claims about gender-affirming care and transgender youth that critics have described as misinformation.
Members of ACT UP NY and ACT UP Pittsburgh also participated in the demonstration, which took place on the final day of the public comment period for proposed federal rules that would restrict access to gender-affirming care.
Demonstrators blocked the building’s main entrance, holding a banner reading “HANDS OFF OUR ‘MONES,” while chanting, “HHS—RFK—TRANS YOUTH ARE NO DEBATE” and “NO HATE—NO FEAR—TRANS YOUTH ARE WELCOME HERE.”
“We want trans youth and their loving families to know that we see them, we cherish them, and we won’t let these attacks go on without a fight,” said GLM co-founder Raquel Willis. “We also want all Americans to understand that Trump, RFK, and their HHS won’t stop at trying to block care for trans youth — they’re coming for trans adults, for those who need treatment from insulin to SSRIs, and all those already failed by a broken health insurance system.”
“It is shameful and intentional that this administration is pitting communities against one another by weaponizing Medicaid funding to strip care from trans youth. This has nothing to do with protecting health and everything to do with political distraction,” added GLM co-founder Eliel Cruz. “They are targeting young people to deflect from their failure to deliver for working families across the country. Instead of restricting care, we should be expanding it. Healthcare is a human right, and it must be accessible to every person — without cost or exception.”

Despite HHS’s efforts to restrict gender-affirming care for trans youth, major medical associations — including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Endocrine Society — continue to regard such care as evidence-based treatment. Gender-affirming care can include psychotherapy, social support, and, when clinically appropriate, puberty blockers and hormone therapy.
The protest comes amid broader shifts in access to care nationwide.
NYU Langone Health recently announced it will stop providing transition-related medical care to minors and will no longer accept new patients into its Transgender Youth Health Program following President Donald Trump’s January 2025 executive order targeting trans healthcare.
Health
CMS moves to expand HIV-positive organ transplants
HIV/AIDS activists welcome potential development
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is pushing forward a proposed rule that would make it not only easier for people with HIV in need to get organ transplants from HIV-positive donors, but also make it a priority where there was often a barrier.
The Washington Blade sat down with people familiar with this topic — from former heads of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to HIV activists and to the first HIV-positive person to donate an organ — about what this proposed change could mean.
HIV is a virus that attacks the body’s immune system, particularly targeting the body’s T-cells, which makes it harder to fight off infection and disease. If left untreated, HIV can become AIDS. Without treatment, AIDS can lead to death within a few months or years. The virus is spread through direct contact with bodily fluids — often through sex, unclean needles, or from mother to baby during pregnancy.
According to HIV.gov, a website managed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, approximately 1.2 million people in the U.S. were living with HIV in 2022. Of those 1.2 million, 13 percent don’t know they have it.
The virus disproportionately impacts men who have sex with men and people of color.
The CDC’s statistics show men are most affected, making up almost 80 percent of diagnoses, with gay and bisexual men accounting for the majority. Racial disparities also are present — Black people make up 38 percent of diagnoses. The World Health Organization estimates that around 44.1 million people have died from AIDS-related illnesses globally as of 2024.
Since the virus was first detected 45 years ago, scientists have been working on ways to treat and prevent its spread. In 1987, the first breakthrough in fighting HIV came as the U.S. approved the first HIV medication, AZT — marking the beginning of antiretroviral therapy. This medicine — and later descendants of it, like today’s widely prescribed Biktarvy — stop the HIV virus from reproducing and allow the body to keep its T-cells.
Then in 2012, another big step toward minimizing the scope of the potentially fatal disease came as the CDC approved the first HIV prevention medication, Truvada, more commonly known as PrEP. As of 2024, nearly 600,000 people in the U.S. are using PrEP, according to AIDSVu, which uses data from Gilead Sciences (manufacturers of Truvada and Biktarvy) and is compiled by researchers at the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University.
The following year, in 2013, the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act was signed into law, enabling the use of organs from HIV-positive donors for transplants into HIV-positive recipients, overturning a 1988 ban.
There are an estimated 123,000 people waiting for organ transplants in the U.S. The number of HIV-positive people on that list is estimated to be smaller, harder to precisely quantify, but they are still in dire need.
A study from the New England Journal of Medicine, published in 2024, analyzed the outcomes of 198 kidney transplantations to people with HIV at 26 medical centers across the U.S. from 2018 to 2021.
Results from the study showed that for kidney transplants performed using organs from 99 donors with HIV and 99 without HIV, one-year survival rates for HIV-positive recipients were nearly identical (94 percent and 95 percent, respectively). Three-year survival rates were also similar (85 percent and 87 percent). Organ rejection rates were also numerically on par after three years (21 percent and 24 percent). Other measures for surgical outcomes, including the number of side effects that occurred, were also roughly the same for both groups.
This shows that, overall, HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive transplants are nearly identical in outcome to transplants between HIV-negative donors and recipients.
Where we are now
Now in 2026, CMS is pushing past the clinical trial testing phase it has been in, making HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive organ transplants more widespread and more accessible.
Adrian Shanker, the former deputy assistant secretary for health policy and senior advisor on LGBTQ health equity at HHS, explained to the Blade that the HOPE Act was a step in the right direction, but this policy change from CMS will expand the ability to help HIV-positive patients in need.
“The original HOPE Act asked for scientific research,” Shanker explained. “There were 10 years of clinical trials. The Biden administration promulgated a rule that removed clinical trial requirements for kidney and liver transplants between people living with HIV. This proposed rule is further implementation on the CMS side with the organ procurement organizations to ensure they’re carrying out the stated intent of the HOPE Act law. It’s building on consensus that has existed through multiple administrations.”
The proposed change would go into effect on July 1, and, according to Shanker, would help everyone in need of an organ — not just HIV-positive people.
“People living with HIV, their ability to receive organs from other people living with HIV in a more streamlined way means that the overall organ waitlist is sped up as well,” he added. “So it benefits everyone on the waitlist.”
Shanker, who was also a member of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS, spoke about how this is a rare moment of bipartisanship.
“There’s no secret that the Trump administration has been quite adversarial to LGBTQI plus health, and to the health of people living with HIV/HIV prevention resources as well … From destabilizing PEPFAR to shutting down one of the primary implementation partners, which is USAID, to firing almost the entire staff of the Office of Infectious Disease and HIV Policy at HHS … But what this is is a glimmer of hope that we can have bipartisan solutions that improve quality of life for people living with HIV.”
Harold Phillips, the CEO of NMAC, a national HIV/AIDS organization that pushes policy education and public engagement to end the HIV epidemic, and an HIV-positive American, sees this as a huge gain for the HIV-positive community.
“For a number of years, we were excluded from that pool of potential donors,” Phillips said. “Many people living with HIV were excluded from being able to get organ transplants. So this opens up that door. This is a positive step forward that will help save lives.”
That “open door,” Phillips said, does more than just provide life-saving organs to people in the most need. It provides a sense of being able to support their community.
“I remember when I was no longer able to check that box on my driver’s license,” Phillips recalled during his interview with the Blade. “I remember what that meant — that my organs might not be able to save a life. The potential that now they could is really exciting for me.”
“To think about people living with HIV donating their organs to other people living with HIV and helping extend their health and well-being — that’s an exciting moment in our history. It reinforces that HIV is not a death sentence anymore.”
Human Rights Campaign Senior Public Policy Advocate Matt Rose also sat down with the Blade to explain the realities of HIV-positive people in the U.S. right now who are looking for a transplant.
“If you’re HIV positive and on the waitlist for an organ right now, your chance of getting one is slim to nil,” Rose said. “This at least gives you a real shot.”
He went on to explain that while the HOPE Act started to move in the right direction, it hasn’t done enough for HIV-positive people in dire need.
“This bill [HOPE] was supposed to fix that — and it never really has. But every administration, we keep chipping away at the next hurdle,” he said. “This latest move will drastically expand the ability for someone who is HIV positive to donate an organ.”
That slow chipping away, in addition to the non-stop trials being done to prove the efficacy and ability for HIV-positive people’s bodies to accept organ donation, is part of the broader push to normalize this practice and remove outdated restrictions.
Shanker elaborated, explaining all that time was necessary to figure out the efficacy of HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive organ transplants but now that the data has been collected — its time to expand the availability.
“There were over a decade of clinical trials between the original HOPE Act law being signed by President Obama and our rule being promulgated at the end of the Biden administration. It was to allow those clinical trials to run their course,” Shanker said.
Nina Martinez is the first HIV-positive person to donate an organ to another person with HIV.
She explained that the stigma and lack of understanding from the general public is another hurdle that those working to improve the quality of life for people living with HIV have to deal with.
“People don’t generally understand that treatment works,” Martinez said, who became the first person to undergo HIV-positive organ donation in 2019. “When you have access to antiretroviral therapy, it lowers the virus in your bloodstream to levels so low that lab tests can’t detect it. Clinically, that correlates to good health and an inability to transmit HIV sexually. I was healthy enough to pass the same evaluation as any other living donor without HIV.”
She continued explaining:
“Just by having a diagnosis of HIV, they’re labeling donors as medically complex, and that’s not accurate. Every donor with HIV has to pass the same evaluation as donors without HIV,” she said. “If someone passes that evaluation and still isn’t allowed to donate, that’s discrimination. If a patient is willing to accept that organ and you block it because of preconceived notions, you’re denying someone care based on disability. That runs counter to basic fairness.”
When asked about her decision to become a donor and what message she hopes it sends, Martinez emphasized that the choice should remain personal.
“I didn’t undertake this endeavor to say that people with HIV should donate. This is a community that’s been through a lot and has contributed to science — we have served. But for people who wanted a way to leave a legacy, and that is what I wanted, they should be supported in that. There shouldn’t be arcane scientific perceptions and myths getting in the way of that.”
National Donor Day, which raises awareness of organ donation, is on Feb. 14. To become an organ donor, visit registerme.org.
Health
CVS Health agrees to cover new HIV prevention drug
‘Groundbreaking’ PrEP medication taken by injection once every six months
CVS Health, the nation’s second largest pharmacy benefit manager company that plays a key role in deciding which drugs are covered by health insurance policies, has belatedly agreed to cover the new highly acclaimed HIV prevention drug yeztugo.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of yeztugo as an HIV prevention or “PrEP” medication in June 2025 as the first such drug to be taken by injection just once every six months. AIDS activists hailed the drug as a major breakthrough in the longstanding effort to end the HIV epidemic.
“We are pleased that CVS Health has finally decided to cover this groundbreaking new PrEP mediation,” said Carl Schmid, executive director of the HIV+ Hepatitis Policy Institute.
“Four months ago, 63 HIV organizations joined us in sending a letter to CVS’s president urging them to reconsider their refusal to cover Yeztugo and reminding them of their legal obligation to cover PrEP and describe the important benefits the drug would bring to preventing HIV in the U.S.,” Schmid said in a statement.
He noted that CVS Health now joins other leading pharmacy benefit manager companies and insurers in covering yeztugo. Gilead Sciences, the pharmaceutical company that developed and manufactures yeztugo, has said 85 percent of all people with health insurance in the U.S. now have coverage for the drug, according to Schmid.
“However, coverage does not automatically translate into access and usage,” Schmid said in his statement. “Too many people are being forced to pay copays while other payers, including employers, are failing to cover all forms of PrEP,” he said.
According to Schmid, the HIV+ Hepatitis Policy Institute is joining other HIV advocacy organizations in urging federal and state government officials to engage in “aggressive enforcement of PrEP insurance coverage requirements and sustained funding of state, local, and community HIV prevention programs.”
